For $200,000, Tesla Will Sell You The 'World's Fastest' Consumer Car

Agencies
November 18, 2017

Nov 18: Tesla's very first car is back. It's red. It's fast. And it will cost you upward of $200,000.

The Roadster, the electric sports car that put the automaker on the map, made a surprising appearance at Tesla's semi-truck event late Thursday. The next-generation Roadster is Tesla's first new sports car since it discontinued the original in 2012, and marks the company's bid to remain competitive across several categories in the world of electric vehicles that it helped reshape.

The updated Roadster will achieve world record speeds, Tesla chief executive Elon Musk said during the event in Los Angeles. The base model can travel from a dead stop to 60 miles per hour in less than two seconds, making it the fastest consumer car on the planet, and the first to break the two-second mark, Musk said. He declined to give the Roadster's top speed but said it would surpass 250 mph.

But while Musk and his audience were characteristically gleeful, investors and some auto analysts were skeptical about the company's prospects. Tesla's stock fell nearly four percent in midday trading Friday. Some industry observers pointed to the company's production delays in its mass-market Model 3. Ed Hellwig, a senior editor at auto research website Edmunds.com, described the Roadster as a "very unnecessary distraction" whose reintroduction was likely designed to divert attention from Tesla's business struggles.

The company reported a net loss of $619 million, or about $2.92 per share,in its most recent earnings report, compared with a net income of $21 million and a gain of 71 cents per share, during the same period last year. Tesla also said recently that it had fired hundreds of employees after annual performance reviews. And it's unclear, even as the company faces production bottlenecks, where the new Roadster will be manufactured.

Analysts said that it's too early to tell if the Roadster will help lift Tesla to profitability, but the sports car gives the company's image a boost. "You can say a lot of things about Tesla, but one thing it's done is built a brilliant brand," said Michelle Krebs, executive analyst at Autotrader.

The original Roadster, released nearly a decade ago, was Tesla's the first step in a multistage process to entice the public with its promising technology and eventually offer all-electric vehicles to the masses. The company showed that electric vehicles could preform just as well, and perhaps even better, than cars powered by fossil fuel. Its limited run, in Tesla's view, was part of the plan.

"We started Tesla with a sports car, the Tesla Roadster. That baby got us going. It was the foundation of the whole company," said Musk said. "People have asked us for a long time, 'When are you going to make a new roadster?' We are making it now."

The successor, like the original, was designed to make a splash. The unveiling itself was a surprise, coming after Musk showed off Tesla's long-anticipated semitruck. But beyond Musk's flair for showmanship, experts said the new Roadster gives Tesla a prestige product to showcase and compete with.

"It's got a lot of sizzle. It worked before, and why not," said Krebs. "If they get it on the roads it will be something that will go head-to-head with Porsches and Ferraris and all the exotic vehicles."

Toni Sacconaghi, an analyst at Bernstein Research, described the Roadster as a "brand enhancing," car, in a note to investors Friday. But he also said he sees it as a low-volume product. He cautioned that Tesla should focus on building and selling the economy-class Model 3, rather than broadening its initiatives with new vehicles and energy projects.

While experts did not go so far as to describe the Roadster as a game changer, they said it will allow Tesla to challenge automakers of high-end sports cars who have been nudged, largely by Tesla, to make high-powered electric vehicles of their own. Musk made that argument in more colorful language. "The point of doing this is to just give a hardcore smackdown to gasoline cars," he said. "Driving a gasoline sports car is going to feel like a steam engine with a side of quiche."

Tesla says the car will come with a 200-kilowatt-hour battery, giving it a range of 620 miles at highway speeds without the need to recharge. In comparison, the current 75-kilowatt-hour battery in the Model S gives the sedan a 250-mile range. To put the Roadster's battery endurance into perspective, Musk said a driver would be able to travel from Los Angeles to San Francisco, and back again, on a single charge.

Up to four people can fit in the Roadster with "plenty of storage," Musk said. But he was quick to add that you can't put "giant" people in the back seat. The car will feature all-wheel drive and will have three motors.

The first customers of the new Roadster will have to wait a few years before they can climb in and let the top down, however. Musk said the car will not be available until 2020. The "Founders Series" will go for $250,000, but its specifications won't be shared until as early as next year, Musk said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
March 8,2020

Consumer watchdog Which? has claimed that more than one billion Android phones and tablets are vulnerable to hackers as they no longer supported by security updates.

According to the research report, the most at-risk phones are any that run Android 4 or older and those smartphones running Android 7.0 which can not be updated are also at risk.

Based on data from Google analysed by Which?, two in five android device users around the world are no longer receiving the important updates. Currently, those devices are unlikely to have issues, but the lack of security leaves them open to attack.

"It is very concerning that expensive Android devices have such a short shelf life before they lose security support, leaving millions of users at risk of serious consequences if they fall victim to hackers," Kate Bevan editor Which? said in a statement.

"Google and phone manufacturers need to be upfront about security updates with clear information about how long they will last and what customers should do when they run out. The government must also push ahead with planned legislation to ensure manufacturers are far more transparent about security updates for smart devices and their impact on consumers," Kate added.

Android phone released around 2012 or earlier, including popular models like the Samsung Galaxy S3 and Sony Xperia S, are particularly at risk to hackers.

Which? has made suggestions to Android users on what to consider if they have an older phone that may be at risk.

Any Android device which is more than two years old, check whether it can be updated to a newer version of the operating system. If it is on an earlier version than Android 7.0 Nougat, try to update via Settings> System>Advanced System update.

In case a user is not able tto update the phone, the device could be at risk of being hacked if it is running a version of Android 4 or lower.

A user also need to be careful about downloading apps outside the Google Play store and should also install a mobile anti-virus via an app.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
June 12,2020

New Delhi, Jun 12: The Supreme Court on Friday asked Solicitor General Tushar Mehta to convene a meeting of the Finance Ministry and RBI officials over the weekend to decide whether interest incurred on EMIs during the moratorium period can be charged by banks.

A bench comprising Justices Ashok Bhushan, Sanjay Kishan Kaul and M.R. Shah queried Mehta as the court was concerned since the Centre has deferred loan for three months.

"Then how can interest of these 3 months be added?" the apex bench asked. Mehta replied: "I need to sit down with the RBI officials and have a meeting."

SBI's counsel, senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, intervened during the proceedings and said "all banks are of the view that interest cannot be waived for a six month EMI moratorium period".

"We need to discuss it with the RBI," insisted Rohatgi.

Justice Bhushan then asked Mehta to convene a meeting of the RBI and Finance Ministry officials over the weekend, and listed the matter for further hearing on June 17.

The top court, during the hearing, indicated that it was not considering a complete waiver of interest but was only concerned that postponement of interest shouldn't accrue further interest on it.

After the RBI said the waiver of interest charges on EMIs during moratorium will lead to loss of 1 per cent of the nation's GDP, the top court had earlier asked the Finance Ministry to reply, whether the interest could be waived or it would continue during the moratorium period.

The top court said these are not normal times, and it is a serious issue, as on one hand moratorium is granted and then, the interest is charged on loans during this period.

"There are two issues in this (matter). No interest during the moratorium period and no interest on interest," said Justice Bhushan. The observation from the bench came on a petition by Gajendra Sharma, in which he sought a direction to declare portion of the RBI's March 27 notification as ultra vires to the extent it charged interest on the loan amount during the moratorium period.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
June 19,2020

Denser places, assumed by many to be more conducive to the spread of the coronavirus that causes COVID-19, are not linked to higher infection rates, say researchers.

The study, led by Johns Hopkins University, published in the Journal of the American Planning Association, also found that dense areas were associated with lower COVID-19 death rates.

"These findings suggest that urban planners should continue to practice and advocate for compact places rather than sprawling ones, due to the myriad well-established benefits of the former, including health benefits," says study lead author Shima Hamidi from Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in the US.

For their analysis, the researchers examined SARS-CoV-2 infection rates and COVID-19 death rates in 913 metropolitan counties in the US.

When other factors such as race and education were taken into account, the authors found that county density was not significantly associated with county infection rate.

The findings also showed that denser counties, as compared to more sprawling ones, tended to have lower death rates--possibly because they enjoyed a higher level of development including better health care systems.

On the other hand, the research found that higher coronavirus infection and COVID-19 mortality rates in counties are more related to the larger context of metropolitan size in which counties are located.

Large metropolitan areas with a higher number of counties tightly linked together through economic, social, and commuting relationships are the most vulnerable to the pandemic outbreaks.

According to the researchers, recent polls suggest that many US citizens now consider an exodus from big cities likely, possibly due to the belief that more density equals more infection risk.

Some government officials have posited that urban density is linked to the transmissibility of the virus.

"The fact that density is unrelated to confirmed virus infection rates and inversely related to confirmed COVID-19 death rates is important, unexpected, and profound," said Hamidi.

"It counters a narrative that, absent data and analysis, would challenge the foundation of modern cities and could lead to a population shift from urban centres to suburban and exurban areas," Hamidi added.

The analysis found that after controlling for factors such as metropolitan size, education, race, and age, doubling the activity density was associated with an 11.3 per cent lower death rate.

The authors said that this is possibly due to faster and more widespread adoption of social distancing practices and better quality of health care in areas of denser population.

The researchers concluded that a higher county population, a higher proportion of people age 60 and up, a lower proportion of college-educated people, and a higher proportion of African Americans were all associated with a greater infection rate and mortality rate.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.