93,000 calls intercepted in Gujarat in seven months: Cong

November 25, 2013
New Delhi, Nov 25: Congress today upped the ante against Narendra Modi over the snooping issue alleging a "reign of terror" in Gujarat where it claimed that 93000 unauthorised interceptions were made in just seven months.

naren

On a day social activists joined in by representatives of four political parties including Congress petitioned President Pranab Mukherjee over the issue, party spokesperson P C Chacko questioned the silence of Modi and went hammer and tongs against Leader of Opposition Arun Jaitley over his remarks that Congress was using disgruntled officers of Gujarat to mount attack on Modi.

"By attacking our leaders, I do not think Jaitley or anybody else can escape. What happened in Gujarat was a reign of terror. 93,000 unauthorised interceptions were made in Gujarat in seven months. BJP's prime ministerial candidate will have to answer. BJP cannot escape from it," he told reporters at the AICC briefing.

Slamming Jaitley for his "audacity" to accuse Congress of using disgruntled officers to attack Modi, Chacko said it appears that the tweets and taunts have really disturbed the BJP and wondered "how many disgruntled officers are there in Gujarat?"

Jaitely had yesterday said that while Congress' top leaders remain in background, others attack Modi through their tweets and taunts, which was interpreted as the BJP leader's jibe at Congress general secretary Digvijay Singh.

Alleging that this time something has happened in which "Modi is directly involved...Modi has been caught," Chacko said that the person who has been made the PM candidate of the party should not be allowed to escape without giving answers.

Mahila Congress chief Shobha Oza, who was part of the delegation that went to the President to demand an independent judicial probe into the matter, said, "Modi like a spider has been caught in the net woven by himself" and questioned "does he have moral right to continue as chief minister after this".

Giving clear signals that Congress will seek to build momentum, Oza said the party will show black flags to Modi when he comes out of Gujarat after the assembly elections.

"We have thrown the issue in public domain and now the public will decide... a public opinion is naturally being built. We will keep fighting for justice," she said.

Oza also said Congress will have "zero tolerance" on the issue of women's exploitation and sought to reject the criticism that her party was politicising the issue and treating it differently from other cases of women's exploitation in Congress-ruled states.

Chacko said if social organisations and activists are also supporting a cause taken by Congress, it means that his party was standing up for a right cause.

Former UPCC chief Rita Bahuguna Joshi said, "Who said is not important. What was said is important. It is not important who is charging whom but the facts that have come out are not frivolous.

"Jaitley cannot say it was frivolous. A person like Jaitely, who himself is a lawyer and had raised the issue of telephone tapping on himself so assertively has dubbed this incident as absurd... Congress will not allow it to be covered up. We are very angry the way, BJP is dealing with the issue."

Chacko said that whether is the snoopgate involving Modi or the rape case against Tehelka journalist Tarun Tejpal, Congress applies the same yardstick. "Whether it is Tejpal or Modi, we see it the same way. We will raise our voice against all such cases," he said.

The Congress spokesperson alleged that the Modi government "put in dustbin" a code of conduct prepared by senior officers in the state for phone tapping.

Oza said in the Tejpal case, the Goa government has already taken action and Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde had also spoken to the Governor to ensure that justice is done in the case.

"BJP says that they can treat the issue (snoopgate) lightly. Modi has maintained complete silence on it. Does he want to endorse with his silence all that has happened and the facts that have come out before the country? But people of the country are not going to remain silent," she said.

Oza said the difference between Congress and BJP is that her party treated such issues seriously and those who committed the "sin" were jailed, when asked why Congress fielded Bhanwari Devi murder accused Haryana Mahipal Maderna's wife in elections.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
August 6,2020

New Delhi Aug 6: In a new twist in the Vijay Mallya case, a certain document connected with the case in the Supreme Court has gone missing from the apex court files. 

A bench comprising Justices U.U. Lalit and Ashok Bhushan adjourned the hearing to August 20.

It was hearing the review plea filed by Mallya against a July 14, 2017 judgment wherein he was found guilty of contempt for not paying Rs 9,000 crore dues to banks despite repeated directions, although he had transferred $40 million to his children.

The bench was looking for a reply on an intervention application, which it seemed has gone missing from the case papers.Parties involved in the case sought more time to file fresh copies.

On June 19, the Supreme Court sought explanation from its registry regarding Mallya's appeal against the May 2017 conviction in the contempt case for not repaying Rs 9,000 crore dues to banks not listed for the last 3 years.

A bench comprising Justices Lalit and Bhushan had asked the Registry to furnish all the details including names of the officials who had dealt with the file concerning the Review Petition for last three years.

The bench said according to the record, placed before it, the review petition was not listed before the court for last three years. "Before we deal with the submissions raised in the Review Petition, we direct the Registry to explain why the Review Petition was not listed before the concerned Court for last three years," said the bench.In May 2017, the apex court held him guilty of contempt of court for transferring $40 million to his children, and ordered him to appear on July 10 to argue on the quantum of punishment.

The bench said let the explanation be furnished within two weeks. "The Review Petition shall, thereafter, be considered on merits," it added.In 2017, the apex court passed the order on a contempt petition against Mallya by a consortium of banks led by the SBI. 

The banks claimed Mallya transferred $40 million from Daigeo to his children's accounts, and did not use this money to clear his debt. Banks cited this as violation of judicial orders.

stm88 info live rtp slot

slot auto scatter hitam

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
January 21,2020

Kochi, Jan 21: A special court here on Tuesday sent two students, who were arrested under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) case in Kozhikode last November, to the custody of National Investigation Agency (NIA) for a day.

The NIA court ordered that the duo, who were in judicial custody till now, to be produced before it tomorrow.

In its application, the NIA had said that the accused must be interrogated on the basis of digital records and sought custody of the duo for a week.

However, the defendant argued that no new evidence had been found against the accused and therefore no custody should be granted.

During an earlier hearing, the two had told the court, "We are not Maoists. We are CPI (M) activists. The Chief Minister, who says we are Maoists, should bring proof of whom we killed and where we bombed. In the last election, we have served as CPI (M), booth agents. We are the ones who went out to vote and pasted posters for the party."

The two were charged under Sections 20 (punishment for being a member of terrorist gang or organisation), 38 (offence relating to membership of a terrorist organisation) and 39 (offence relating to support given to a terrorist organisation) of the UAPA.

Allen and Thaha, students of law and journalism respectively of Kannur University, were taken into custody by the police from Pantheerankavu in Kozhikode on November 1 last year.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 12,2020

Kolkata, Jan 12: Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Sunday said a section of the youth is being misguided about the Citizenship Amendment Act and asserted that it will not take away anybody's citizenship.

Modi also said whoever has faith in India and believes in its Constitution can become an Indian citizen.

“There are a lot of questions among the youth about the new citizenship law, and some are being misled by rumours around it... it is our duty to clear their doubts,” the PM said during an address at Belur Math in Howrah district.

“I want to make this clear again that the CAA is not about taking away anybody's citizenship, but about granting citizenship,” he added.

Modi said that some people with political interests are deliberately spreading rumours about the new citizenship law.

Lauding the youth for speaking against religious persecution of minorities, the prime minister said the energy of the country's young will form the basis of change in the 21st century. The PM is on a two-day visit to the city.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.