Adani gives final approval for coal mine project in Australia

June 6, 2017

Melbourne, Jun 6: Indian conglomerate Adani Group todaygave the final investment approval for its controversy- hit 21.7billion dollars Carmichael coal mine project in Australia which had hit several roadblocks over environmental concerns due to its proximity to the Great Barrier Reef.adani

"I am proud to announcethe project has Final Investment Decision (FID) approvalwhich marksthe official start of one of the largest singleinfrastructure-- and job creating -- developments in Australia's recent history," Adani Group Chairman Gautam Adani said.

This is a historic day for Adani, a historic day for regional Queensland, andahistoric day for the Indian investment in Australia, he said.

The announcement comes just days after the Adani Group agreed to pay royalties on coal produced from its project after it struck an agreement with the Queensland government to help the controversy-hit project move forward.

"Thisisthe largest single investment by an Indian corporation in Australia, andI believeotherswill followwithinvestments and trade deals," the Adani Group Chairman said.

"We have been challengedby activists in the courts, ininner citystreets,and even outside banks thathave noteven been approachedto financetheproject. We are still facingactivists. But we are committed to this project," Adani said, adding that the group is committed to Queenslandand to addressing energy poverty in India.

Adani said the Carmichael projects will generate 10,000 direct and indirect jobs,with pre-construction works starting in the September Quarter 2017.

Queensland Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk today officially opened Adani's Regional Headquarters (RHQ) in Townsville fromwhere the companywill oversee theconstruction and operations of theproject.

The regional headquarters will also accommodate Adani's Remote Operations Centre, the first time that such a centre has been set up in an Australian regional city.

PrimeMinister Malcolm Turnbullwas represented at the ceremony bythe Federal Minister for Northern Australia and Resources, Senator Matt Canavan.

Adani Australia Head of Country and Chief Executive Jeyakumar Janakaraj saidthe companyhasalready invested 3.3 billion dollars in the project, including buying the bulk coal handling port ofAbbot Point.

Adani today also signed letters of awardfordesign, construction, operations, the supply ofmaterialsandprofessional services.

The biggestdealis withDownerMiningfor the construction and operation of the Carmichael mine.

The company hasalso announced in the past few weeks contracts totalling more than 150 million dollars for the railway tracks and concrete sleepers for the planned388- kmstandard gaugerail link between the mine and Abbot Point.

Importantly, these contracts had gone to regional cities to generate jobs -- 74 million dollars for railway tracks (Arrium Steel, Whyalla) and 82 million dollars for sleepers (Austrak, Rockhampton).

Janakaraj also announcedanother contract for the CarmichaelRail Network linkingGalilee Basinmines, including the Adani mine,tothe port ofAbbot Point.

This contract iswith AECOM,who are regionally based in Townsville.

The AECOM deal coverssurveying anddesignfor the rail linkwith the company basing 70 people in Townsville.

"But we are building more than a rail line," Janakaraj said.

"We are building a line that will open the Galilee Basin, linking that massive coal reserve to markets around the world, generating power, and -- importantly -- generating many thousands of direct and indirect jobs in regional Queensland," Janakaraj said.

In Adani's case, it will linkitsCarmichael coal mine to its bulk loading facility atthe port ofAbbot Point from where it will be shipped to Adani's power stations in India. While some may be looking for ways to leave regional Queensland, Adani is looking to the future, he said.

"We are looking to ensure regional Queensland remains a great place to live, work and to raise a family. To achieve that, Adani is delivering onitspromise to address power poverty for hundreds of millions in India and unacceptably high unemployment in regional Queensland," he added.

"To those activists who sit in creature comfort and criticise us, I ask a simple question -- what are you doing for those people?" Janakaraj said.

Meanwhile, a group of religious leaders camped out today at the Sydney-based Commonwealth Bank's headquarters to protest against the proposed Adani mega coal mine project.

Local media reported that ten Buddhist and Christian leaders rallied outside the Darling Harbour office, holding signs with messages including 'People of faith say rule out Adani' and 'Grandpa what did you do about global warming?'

Uniting Church Minister Rex Graham said the group was opposed to the expansion of coal mines in Australia.

"The other banks have heard the message, particularly National Australian Bank and Westpac, and that's what we're looking for the Commonwealth Bank to also do so," he was quoted as saying.

The Carmichael coal project, Australia's largest, has been delayed since first being proposed in 2010 due to protests by green groups over its environmental impact.

The Indian energy giant has for more than five years battled the opposition to any expansion of the Abbot Point port, saying it will cut into the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area.

The project involves dredging 1.1 million cubic metres of soil near the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, which will then be disposed of on land.

The Adani Group entered Australia in 2010 with the purchase of the greenfield Carmichael coal mine in the Galilee Basin in central Queensland, and the Abbot Point port near Bowen in the north.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 1,2020

Washington, May 1: The United States on Thursday recorded 29,625 new coronavirus cases, and 2,035 deaths in the last 24 hours, according to Johns Hopkins University.

The total number of coronavirus cases has reached 1,069,534 and the death toll stands at 63,001, CNN reported.

The novel coronavirus has infected more than 3.2 million people and killed at least 233,000 globally, according to Johns Hopkins University.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
August 3,2020

New York, Aug 3: The number of coronavirus cases confirmed all over the world has surpassed 18 million, while the global COVID-19 death toll stands at over 687,000 according to data from the Johns Hopkins University's Coronavirus Resource Center.

As of 06:00 Moscow time on Monday (03:00 GMT), there are 18,017,556 confirmed coronavirus cases in the world. The global death toll from COVID-19 stands at 687,930. The number of recovered individuals stands at 10,649,108.

The United States remains the country with the largest number of cases (4,665,932) and the highest COVID-19 death toll (154,841), according to the latest data from the Johns Hopkins University.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 3,2020

Mar 3: Just hours after the ending of a week-long “reduction” in violence that was crucial for Donald Trump’s peace deal in Afghanistan, the Taliban struck again: On Monday, they killed three people and injured about a dozen at a football match in Khost province. This resumption of violence will not surprise anyone actually invested in peace for that troubled country. The point of the U.S.-Taliban deal was never peace. It was to try and cover up an ignominious exit for the U.S., driven by an election-bound president who feels no responsibility toward that country or to the broader region.

Seen from South Asia, every point we know about in the agreement is a concession by Trump to the Taliban. Most importantly, it completes a long-term effort by the U.S. to delegitimize the elected government in Kabul — and, by extension, Afghanistan’s constitution. Afghanistan’s president is already balking at releasing 5,000 Taliban prisoners before intra-Afghan talks can begin — a provision that his government did not approve.

One particularly cringe-worthy aspect: The agreement refers to the Taliban throughout  as “the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan that is not recognized by the United States as a state and is known as the Taliban.” This unwieldy nomenclature validates the Taliban’s claim to be a government equivalent to the one in Kabul, just not the one recognised at the moment by the U.S. When read together with the second part of the agreement, which binds the U.S. to not “intervene in [Afghanistan’s] domestic affairs,” the point is obvious: The Taliban is not interested in peace, but in ensuring that support for its rivals is forbidden, and its path to Kabul is cleared.

All that the U.S. has effectively gotten in return is the Taliban’s assurance that it will not allow the soil of Afghanistan to be used against the “U.S. and its allies.” True, the U.S. under Trump has shown a disturbing willingness to trust solemn assurances from autocrats; but its apparent belief in promises made by a murderous theocratic movement is even more ridiculous. Especially as the Taliban made much the same promise to an Assistant Secretary of State about Osama bin Laden while he was in the country plotting 9/11.

Nobody in the region is pleased with this agreement except for the Taliban and their backers in the Pakistani military. India has consistently held that the legitimate government in Kabul must be the basic anchor of any peace plan. Ordinary Afghans, unsurprisingly, long for peace — but they are, by all accounts, deeply skeptical about how this deal will get them there. The brave activists of the Afghan Women’s Network are worried that intra-Afghan talks will take place without adequate representation of the country’s women — who have, after all, the most to lose from a return to Taliban rule.

But the Pakistani military establishment is not hiding its glee. One retired general tweeted: “Big victory for Afghan Taliban as historic accord signed… Forced Americans to negotiate an accord from the position of parity. Setback for India.” Pakistan’s army, the Taliban’s biggest backer, longs to re-install a friendly Islamist regime in Kabul — and it has correctly estimated that, after being abandoned by Trump, the Afghan government will have sharply reduced bargaining power in any intra-Afghan peace talks. A deal with the Taliban that fails also to include its backers in the Pakistani military is meaningless.

India, meanwhile, will not see this deal as a positive for regional peace or its relationship with the U.S. It comes barely a week after Trump’s India visit, which made it painfully clear that shared strategic concerns are the only thing keeping the countries together. New Delhi remembers that India is not, on paper, a U.S. “ally.” In that respect, an intensification of terrorism targeting India, as happened the last time the U.S. withdrew from the region, would not even be a violation of Trump’s agreement. One possible outcome: Over time the government in New Delhi, which has resolutely sought to keep its ties with Kabul primarily political, may have to step up security cooperation. Nobody knows where that would lead.

The irresponsible concessions made by the U.S. in this agreement will likely disrupt South Asia for years to come, and endanger its own relationship with India going forward. But worst of all, this deal abandons those in Afghanistan who, under the shadow of war, tried to develop, for the first time, institutions that work for all Afghans. No amount of sanctimony about “ending America’s longest war” should obscure the danger and immorality of this sort of exit.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.