Anant Kumar Hegde’s shocker: Rahul born to a Muslim and Christian! How did he become a Brahmin?

coastaldigest.com web desk
March 11, 2019

Newsroom, Mar 11: Union Minister and BJP’s controversy specialist Anant Kumar Hegde has dropped an obnoxious bombshell by claiming that Congress supremo Rahul Gandhi was born to a Muslim.

Addressing a public rally in his Uttara Kannada constituency recently, Hegde attacked Congress president Rahul Gandhi after Congress leaders raised questions on the Balakot air strikes conducted in February post the Pulwama terror attack.

Hegde questioned whether Gandhi would be willing to provide a DNA proof to establish that he is of the Brahmin caste.

Hegde said, “The entire world is talking about our might and valour. They want proof of our IAF’s air strikes against Pakistan.”

"...But how did the son of a Muslim become a Brahmin named Gandhi? What proof do they have? He was born to a Muslim father and Christian mother. How does he become a Brahmin?" the Minister of State for Skill Development questioned. Calling Rahul Gandhi a ‘pardesi’, a foreigner”

Hegde is no stranger to making such comments on Gandhi and others. Less than two months ago, Hegde had called Gandhi a ‘hybrid specimen’ who was ‘born to a Christian and a Muslim’.

Earlier, Hegde had also targeted the Muslim wife of a politician and made derogatory comments.

Comments

A Kannadiga
 - 
Tuesday, 12 Mar 2019

Ananth Kumar uncultured, absolutely unfit as a politician.

FAIRMAN
 - 
Tuesday, 12 Mar 2019

This man is the worst crazy type of  person as peoples rep.

You can imagine if a MP is behaving like this, what could be the credentials of his party and those who elected him.

 

He is so stupid, he does not have brain to think, that

To follow any religion, is required who is his father or mother.

Our constitution fully empowers every citizen to follow the religion of their choice, propagate it

 also.

No religion refuses anyone from following their choice of religion.

 

 

Is Rajeev Gandhi Muslim.

This so called MP does not know also, Rajeev Gandhi’s father Firoz Gandhi was a Farsi man.

I hope Rajeev Gandhi is Muslim, but we know he is not.

Becoming Muslim is it sin. Muslim means person who submits to the will of his creator the God.

 

I can prove that Hege’s ancestor Father was Muslim. Our first father Adam was Muslim, biologically all were  Muslims.  Again Muslim means person who obeys or submits to his creator.

 

But later as they grow, they inherited their parents or chose to remain their parents religion.

Is it sin. This is what requ

This man is the worst crazy type of  person as peoples rep.

You can imagine if a MP is behaving like this, what could be the credentials of his party and those who elected him.

 

He is so stupid, he does not have brain to think, that

To follow any religion, is required who is his father or mother.

Our constitution fully empowers every citizen to follow the religion of their choice, propagate it

 also.

No religion refuses anyone from following their choice of religion.

 

Is Rajeev Gandhi Muslim.

This so called MP does not know also, Rajeev Gandhi’s father Firoz Gandhi was a Farsi man.

I hope Rajeev Gandhi is Muslim, but we know he is not.

Becoming Muslim is it sin. Muslim means person who submits to the will of his creator the God.

 

I can prove that Hege’s ancestor Father was Muslim. Our first father Adam was Muslim, biologically all were  Muslims.  Again Muslim means person who obeys or submits to his creator.

 

But later as they grow, they inherited their parents or chose to remain their parents religion.

Is it sin. This is what required a person to be loyal to his creator and obey his creator.

 

May God give wisdom to this man and save his followers.

 

 

 

ired a person to be loyal to his creator and obey his creator.

 

May God give wisdom to this man and save his followers.

 

 

 

shaji
 - 
Tuesday, 12 Mar 2019

This person is mentally sick and does not know about parents of Rahul Gandhi.   He thinks everyone like him who has no trace of his own parents.   This Gowda has no trace from where he came.   He should be kicked out to andaman to live with monkeys, apes etc.  

Madan
 - 
Tuesday, 12 Mar 2019

this man have more more hatrate to mulsim community..

 

after 2019 they will make you to count your sin did in past..

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 16,2020

Madikeri, Mar 16: Three suspected cases of COVID-19, who returned from a foreign country recently have been admitted to the isolation ward of the district hospital here, the district administration said on Monday.

The samples of the suspected cases have been sent for lab tests and the reports are being awaited, sources said.

As many as 74 people have been placed under home quarantine in Kodagu (also known as Coorg) as a precautionary measure following their return from abroad, a press note from the Deputy Commissioner Annies Kanmani Joy said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 2,2020

Udupi, May 2: During the lockdown period the Department of Public Library digitised more books to the Karnataka Digital Public Library (KDPL).

According to the data released by the KDPL issued here on Saturday , as on April 29, 89,239 people from the State have already registered for the digital library.  From these 1,807 are from Dakshina Kannada district and 605 from the Udupi district.

The digital library already has a repository of 35,500 e-books, 4,800 videos, 59,980 e-journals and 1,112 items for children.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
coastaldigest.com web desk
June 16,2020

New Delhi, Jun 16: Despite Prime Minister Narendra Modi led government’s attempt to downplay the border dispute with China, matters have heated up unprecedentedly along the Line of Actual Control (LAC)- the effective Sino-India border in Eastern Ladakh. 

The country has lost three precious lives – an army officer and two soldiers. The last time blood was spilled on the LAC, before the latest episode, was 45 years ago when the Chinese ambushed an Assam Rifles patrol in Tulung La.

India had lost four soldiers on October 20, 1975 in Tulung La, the last time bullets were fired on the India-China border though both the countries witnessed bitter stand-offs later at Sumdorong Chu valley in 1987, Depsang in 2013, Chumar in 2014 and Doklam in 2017.

Between 1962 and 1975, the biggest clash between India and China took place in Nathu La pass in 1967 when reports suggest that around 80 Indian soldiers were killed and many more Chinese personnel.

While three soldiers, including a Commanding Officer, were killed in the latest episode in Galwan Valley, the government describes it as a "violent clash" and does not mention opening fire.

New Delhi described the locality where the 1975 incident took place as "well within" its territory only to be rebuffed by Beijing as "sheer reversal of black and white and confusion of right and wrong".

The Ministry of External Affairs had then said that the Chinese had crossed the LAC and ambushed the soldiers while Beijing claimed the Indians entered their territory and did not return despite warnings.

The Indian government maintained that the ambush on the Assam Rifles' patrol in 1975 took place "500 metres south of Tulung" on the border between India and Tibet and "therefore in Indian territory". It said Chinese soldiers "penetrating" Indian territory implied a "change in China's position" on the border question but the Chinese denied this and blamed India for the incident.

The US diplomatic cables quoted an Indian military intelligence officer saying that the Chinese had erected stone walls on the Indian side of Tulung La and from these positions fired several hundred rounds at the Indian patrol.

"Four of the Indians had gone into a leading position while two (the ones who escaped) remained behind. The senior military intelligence officer emphasised that the soldiers on the Indian patrol were from the area and had patrolled that same region many times before," the cable said.

One of the US cables showed that former US Secretary of State and National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger sought details of the October 1975 clash "without approaching the host governments on actual location of October 20 incident". He also wanted to know what ground rules were followed regarding the proximity of LAC by border patrols.

A cable sent from the US mission in India on November 4, 1975 appeared to have doubts about the Chinese account saying it was "highly defensive".

"Given the unsettled situation on the sub-continent, particularly in Bangladesh, both Chinese and Indian authorities have authorised stepped up patrols along the disputed border. The clash may well have ensued when two such patrols unexpectedly encountered each other," it said.

Another cable from China on the same day quoted another October 1974 cable, which spoke about Chinese officials being concerned for long that "some hotheaded person on the PRC (People's Republic of China) might provoke an incident that could lead to renewed Sino-Indian hostilities. It went on to say that this clash suggested that "such concerns and apprehensions are not unwarranted".

According to the United States diplomatic cables, Chinese Foreign Ministry on November 3, 1975 disputed the statement of the MEA spokesperson, who said the incident took place inside Indian territory.

The Chinese had said "sheer reversal of black and white and confusion of right and wrong". In its version of the 1975 incident, they said Indian troops crossed the LAC at 1:30 PM at Tulung Pass on the Eastern Sector and "intruded" into their territory when personnel at the Civilian Checkpost at Chuna in Tibet warned them to withdraw.

Ignoring this, they claimed, Indian soldiers made "continual provocation and even opened fire at the Chinese civilian checkpost personnel, posing a grave threat to the life of the latter. The Chinese civilian checkpost personnel were obliged to fire back in self defence."

The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson had also said they told the Indian side that they could collect the bodies "anytime" and on October 28, collected the bodies, weapons and ammunition and "signed a receipt".

The US cables from the then USSR suggested that the official media carried reports from Delhi on the October 1975 incident and they cited only Indian accounts of the incident "ridiculing alleged Chinese claims that the Indians crossed the line and opened fire first".

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.