Anger managed, job done: A new Virat Kohli emerges

February 18, 2015

Feb 18: There was something different about Virat Kohli at the Adelaide Oval on February 15. Actually, there were several things different about him at a venue that he can now claim to have made his own with a third international ton in three innings this Australian summer.

For one thing, the lynchpin of the Indian batting wasn't at his very best. He has called his 22nd One-Day International hundred, the first by an Indian against Pakistan in World Cup cricket, 'perhaps one of the biggest in my career', but this was no dominant, eye-catching Kohli masterpiece.

Virat KohliFor another, Kohli didn't get angry. He didn't snarl and gripe and thirst for a fight. He actually smiled. A lot. More than he has ever smiled on a cricket field, probably.

He didn't leap up in the air and let loose a string of expletives when he reached a memorable, milestone hundred. He merely took his helmet off, sank into the arms of Suresh Raina, and acknowledged the cheers from every section of a packed stadium dotted extensively by colourful Indian fans.

When a throw from Shahid Afridi pinged him on his backside as he completed a sharp single, Kohli again smiled. He didnt break stride, his face didn't contort into a mask of rage and indignation. He recognised a cricketing accident for what it was. Unlike earlier on this tour, when he took offence to a Mitchell Johnson throw on his follow through during the Melbourne Boxing Day Test.

Then, with the match won and lost, he engaged Sohail Khan in the first verbal battle of a long, tense but surprisingly uneventful evening. Again, while the tall Pakistani paceman was close to losing his shirt, Kohli was beaming. Broadly. And, finally, with Umesh Yadav settling under the catch that sealed Indias sixth successive win over Pakistan in World Cup history, Kohli was a picture of composure, delighted at the result but keeping his oftentimes volatile emotions well in check.

Kohli is one of those figures on the cricket field that magnetically draws attention. Sometimes by accident, but sometimes by design too, and especially when he gets into oral confrontations that he invariably seems to be a part of. But whether you love him, like all Indian fans do at most times, or whether you hate him, like most Australian fans appear to at all times, you simply can't ignore him.

On Sunday, Kohli faced one of the bigger tests of a career that has just gone up and up since his second coming as a Test cricketer. As the vice-captain of the team and one of only four surviving members from the 2011 World Cup-winning team, he had to set the tone. This was no Sunday backyard game; this was India v Pakistan, the first match each for both sides in a brand new World Cup, a game where victory and only victory was acceptable to fans from both sides of the border.

Normally, this is precisely the kind of stage on which you would expect Kohli to revel. But the last month hasn't exactly been normal so far as Kohli was concerned. After a fourth hundred of the series in the Sydney Test a little under five weeks back, the runs had dried up. In four games during the tri-series with Australia and England, he had scores of 9, 4, 3* and 8. In the two warm-up games against Australia and Afghanistan respectively, he was dismissed for 18 and 5. His place in the batting order was discussed threadbare. Should he bat at No. 3 where he has had great success? Or should he come in at No. 4 where, despite having even better numbers, he isn't entirely at home? Should he be exposed early to the swinging ball in the event of one opener falling cheaply? Or, being the best batsman in the side, should he be given the responsibility of seeing off that little period and then doing what he does best?

Mahendra Singh Dhoni repeatedly emphasised during the tri-series that it wasn't about the number in the batting order, it was about the state of the match. Overs bowled. Nature of surface. Behaviour of the ball. No matter. Most of what he said fell on deaf ears. Only one thing registered: "I know individuals love to bat at a certain slot. If you dont have people who can float around in the batting order, it becomes very difficult." It was construed as a direct barb at the man who has succeeded him as Test skipper, and will do so not too far from now in the limited-overs game too. More grist to the team mein daraar (rift in the team) rumour mills. 'Ha!', Dhoni must have said, and Kohli must have replied, 'Ha indeed', MS.

His success on Sunday can and perhaps will be attributed to his batting position, but if cricket were just a matter of No. 3 or No. 4, how simple it would be. Kohli walked out in the eighth over with the ball not quite swinging around, but with the bounce a little variable, with stroke-making not a very prudent option. Then again, seeing Shikhar Dhawan bat, you wouldn't have guessed that. Himself out of sorts for the last couple of months, Dhawan was striking the ball beautifully. Kohli, by contrast, had to battle his way through a tough early part, and even as he built his innings brick by careful brick, you never ever sensed that he had the bowling at his mercy.

And yet, he scored at a perfectly acceptable clip. This wasn't a free-flowing, boundary-ridden hundred. Only seven fours in the 100, but made off only 119 deliveries. Dropped on 3, dropped again on 76 a little after having played his part in Dhawan's run out for a fluent 73, but never losing sight of the larger goal. The constant in consecutive stands of 129 and 110 with Dhawan and Raina respectively, content to play second fiddle as the two left-hand batsmen took the fight to the opposition. No ego, no competition with his mates. Mature Kohli. Team man Kohli. Magnificent Kohli. Not so much for the quality of stroke production as his approach. There were some stunning strokes alright, primarily off the legpsin of Yasir Shah, but the entire package was even more stunning.

"Virat batted really well. Every game, according to demands and the behaviour of the wicket, you have to alter your game. Virat did that," gushed Dhoni later. Not just lip service there. But hang on, listen to Kohli too. "My role in the team is to bat through (the innings), and the power-hitters can play around knowing that one end is secure." Don't bet against him batting through the innings, one end secure, and himself turning on the class and the power and the booming boundaries in the near future.

For Kohli and India, Sunday was just about the perfect day. So much had been riding on the result, apart from the fact that this was a match against them India were winless since arriving in Australia in late November. So much had been riding for Kohli — he is the kind of player who, if he begins a tournament or series well, just gets on a roll and becomes impossible to stop. Both boxes ticked. "I hate to lose, I play passionately," Kohli told us — ah, we didn't know that, did we? "I like the expectations. The last couple of days have been too tough, too many people in the hotel getting worked up. You just have to stay in your little space."

Kohli did that brilliantly. Gradually, his little space expanded, and it gobbled up Pakistan.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
July 12,2020

New Delhi, Jul 12: Former India batsman Sachin Tendulkar has urged the International Cricket Council (ICC) to do away with 'umpire's call' whenever a team opts for a review regarding a leg-before wicket (LBW) decision.

The Master Blaster has also said that a batsman should be given out if the ball is hitting the stumps.

Whether more than 50 per cent of the ball is hitting the stumps or not should not be matter, he further stated.

"What per cent of the ball hits the stumps doesn't matter, if DRS shows us that the ball is hitting the stumps, it should be given out, regardless of the on-field call," Tendulkar tweeted.

With this tweet, the former India batsman also shared a video, in which he has a discussion with Brian Lara regarding the working of DRS.
"One thing I don't agree with, with the ICC, is the DRS they have been using for quite some time. It is the LBW decision where more than 50 per cent of the ball must be hitting the stumps for the on-field decision to be overturned," Tendulkar said in the video.

"The only reason they (the batsman or the bowler) have gone upstairs is that they are unhappy with the on-field decision, so when the decision goes to the third umpire, let the technology take over, just like in tennis, it's either in or out, there's nothing in between," he added.

This call for doing away with umpire's call has been recommended by many former players.
Whenever a verdict pops up as 'umpire's call, the decision of the on-field umpire is not changed, but the teams do not lose their review as well.

ICC recently introduced some changes to the game of cricket, and they gave all teams liberty of extra review as non-neutral umpires will be employed in Test matches due to the coronavirus pandemic.

As a result, all teams will now have three reviews in every innings of a Test match. 

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
July 3,2020

Karachi, Jul 3: There was a sense of insecurity among Pakistan players during the 2019 World Cup, claims former chief selector Inzamam-ul-Haq, who also reckons that the PCB should have given Sarfaraz Ahmed more time as captain instead of removing him abruptly.

Inzamam said captains need to be backed since they get better with time.

"Even in the last World Cup I felt the captain and players were under pressure because they were thinking if we don't do well in the tournament we will be out. That environment was created and this is not good for cricket," Inzamam said.

"Sarfaraz achieved some notable victories for Pakistan and was learning to be a good captain but unfortunately when he had learnt from experience and mistakes he was removed as captain," the former captain told a TV channel.

Inzamam remained chief selector from 2016 till the 2019 World Cup. During his tenure, most of the time Sarfaraz remained captain.

Soon after Inzamam was replaced by head coach Misbah-ul-Haq, the Pakistan Cricket Board removed Sarfaraz as a player and captain from all three formats.

"Sarfaraz won us the Champions Trophy and also made the team number one in T20 cricket. He got us some good wins. He should have been given more time as captain by the board but it acted in haste and didn't give him confidence or patience."

The PCB has now given the Test captaincy to senior batsman, Azhar Ali while young batsman Babar Azam leads the side in the white ball formats.

Inzamam, the most capped player for Pakistan, also said that the captain's own performance can dip as he had to focus a lot on other players.

"But a captain learns all this with time. There is no shortcut to it."

He pointed out that people praise Imran Khan’s leadership qualities and captaincy but he also won the World Cup on his third attempt as captain.

"He won the 1992 World Cup because by that time he had become a seasoned captain and learnt to motivate his players and get them to fight in every match."

Inzamam said giving confidence to new players and youngsters is very important for the selectors. He gave the example of Babar Azam.

"Babar struggled initially in Test cricket but we never had any doubt about his ability so we persisted with him and see today where he is standing in all formats."

He also described Babar and pacer, Shaheen Shah Afridi as and future stars.

"Babar is always compared to Virat Kohli but the latter has played a lot more cricket and if you look at their stats and performances at the stage Babar is now, he has not done badly at all."

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 26,2020

New Delhi, Apr 26: The idea of having a full-fledged women's IPL is in a "progression stage" and a World Cup title for India can actually help in turning that into a reality sooner than later, says former captain Anjum Chopra.

Under the leadership of Harmanpreet Kaur, the Indian team sailed into the final of the last women's T20 World Cup, but was thrashed by home favourites and defending champions Australia when it mattered the most.

Chopra, one of the country's most decorated women cricketers, said a World Cup title triumph would have brought about a generational shift to the women's game in cricket-mad India.

"Women's IPL in the progression stages. From one game at the start we had four last year in the Women's T20 Challenge, and this time it was supposed to be seven. It has progressed," Chopra said.

"If the women's team had won the World Cup this year, the number of matches would have been more. There is a big difference between winners and runners up."

Chopra had a successful career spanning over 17 years during which she represented India in six World Cups while becoming the first woman cricket to appear in 100 One-day Internationals.

She added, "A victory (in final of last T20 World Cup) would have been a complete generational shift in a much more progressional manner."

Referring to the rapid strides the women's game has made the world over, she praised the International Cricket Council (ICC) for "consciously building it up".

"ICC has bifurcated viewership numbers also very well for Indian audience."

The icing on the cake was a near-packed Melbourne Cricket Ground (MCG) for the World Cup final between India and Australia, and that was not lost on Chopra, who is now a respected analyst and sportscaster.

"To have 80,000 people watching the final that's commendable. That definitely a boost," said Chopra, who holds the distinction of leading India to their first ever Test series win.

A World Cup triumph and the "mind set would have gone to different level altogether", she believed.

Asked about the chatter around pay disparity in Indian cricket, her simple message was win more to earn more.

"There is already pay parity in Australia. Because both teams have won the World Cups more than any other nations.

"If you start winning, then I am sure things will be different. It's also about how much you are able to generate as a team.

"I would say sky is the limit for them."

With the COVID-19 pandemic bringing sporting activities to a standstill, a cloud of uncertainty hangs over the fate of many big events lined up in the near future.

While the IPL has been put on hold indefinitely, the pandemic has thrown the men's T20 World Cup, scheduled for October-November in Australia, into doubt.

"There has been a suggestion that if we are hosting the World Cup in October, then play the IPL as preparation ground for World Cup."

That is only if the situation improves in the coming times.

"It's difficult to see, to gauge where sport will be after this. For sure it is not going to be where it was before. Even if it opens up tomorrow it couldn't be the same.

"Can sports people can get back to work without worry? We don't know when this is going to be under control."

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.