Anger managed, job done: A new Virat Kohli emerges

February 18, 2015

Feb 18: There was something different about Virat Kohli at the Adelaide Oval on February 15. Actually, there were several things different about him at a venue that he can now claim to have made his own with a third international ton in three innings this Australian summer.

For one thing, the lynchpin of the Indian batting wasn't at his very best. He has called his 22nd One-Day International hundred, the first by an Indian against Pakistan in World Cup cricket, 'perhaps one of the biggest in my career', but this was no dominant, eye-catching Kohli masterpiece.

Virat KohliFor another, Kohli didn't get angry. He didn't snarl and gripe and thirst for a fight. He actually smiled. A lot. More than he has ever smiled on a cricket field, probably.

He didn't leap up in the air and let loose a string of expletives when he reached a memorable, milestone hundred. He merely took his helmet off, sank into the arms of Suresh Raina, and acknowledged the cheers from every section of a packed stadium dotted extensively by colourful Indian fans.

When a throw from Shahid Afridi pinged him on his backside as he completed a sharp single, Kohli again smiled. He didnt break stride, his face didn't contort into a mask of rage and indignation. He recognised a cricketing accident for what it was. Unlike earlier on this tour, when he took offence to a Mitchell Johnson throw on his follow through during the Melbourne Boxing Day Test.

Then, with the match won and lost, he engaged Sohail Khan in the first verbal battle of a long, tense but surprisingly uneventful evening. Again, while the tall Pakistani paceman was close to losing his shirt, Kohli was beaming. Broadly. And, finally, with Umesh Yadav settling under the catch that sealed Indias sixth successive win over Pakistan in World Cup history, Kohli was a picture of composure, delighted at the result but keeping his oftentimes volatile emotions well in check.

Kohli is one of those figures on the cricket field that magnetically draws attention. Sometimes by accident, but sometimes by design too, and especially when he gets into oral confrontations that he invariably seems to be a part of. But whether you love him, like all Indian fans do at most times, or whether you hate him, like most Australian fans appear to at all times, you simply can't ignore him.

On Sunday, Kohli faced one of the bigger tests of a career that has just gone up and up since his second coming as a Test cricketer. As the vice-captain of the team and one of only four surviving members from the 2011 World Cup-winning team, he had to set the tone. This was no Sunday backyard game; this was India v Pakistan, the first match each for both sides in a brand new World Cup, a game where victory and only victory was acceptable to fans from both sides of the border.

Normally, this is precisely the kind of stage on which you would expect Kohli to revel. But the last month hasn't exactly been normal so far as Kohli was concerned. After a fourth hundred of the series in the Sydney Test a little under five weeks back, the runs had dried up. In four games during the tri-series with Australia and England, he had scores of 9, 4, 3* and 8. In the two warm-up games against Australia and Afghanistan respectively, he was dismissed for 18 and 5. His place in the batting order was discussed threadbare. Should he bat at No. 3 where he has had great success? Or should he come in at No. 4 where, despite having even better numbers, he isn't entirely at home? Should he be exposed early to the swinging ball in the event of one opener falling cheaply? Or, being the best batsman in the side, should he be given the responsibility of seeing off that little period and then doing what he does best?

Mahendra Singh Dhoni repeatedly emphasised during the tri-series that it wasn't about the number in the batting order, it was about the state of the match. Overs bowled. Nature of surface. Behaviour of the ball. No matter. Most of what he said fell on deaf ears. Only one thing registered: "I know individuals love to bat at a certain slot. If you dont have people who can float around in the batting order, it becomes very difficult." It was construed as a direct barb at the man who has succeeded him as Test skipper, and will do so not too far from now in the limited-overs game too. More grist to the team mein daraar (rift in the team) rumour mills. 'Ha!', Dhoni must have said, and Kohli must have replied, 'Ha indeed', MS.

His success on Sunday can and perhaps will be attributed to his batting position, but if cricket were just a matter of No. 3 or No. 4, how simple it would be. Kohli walked out in the eighth over with the ball not quite swinging around, but with the bounce a little variable, with stroke-making not a very prudent option. Then again, seeing Shikhar Dhawan bat, you wouldn't have guessed that. Himself out of sorts for the last couple of months, Dhawan was striking the ball beautifully. Kohli, by contrast, had to battle his way through a tough early part, and even as he built his innings brick by careful brick, you never ever sensed that he had the bowling at his mercy.

And yet, he scored at a perfectly acceptable clip. This wasn't a free-flowing, boundary-ridden hundred. Only seven fours in the 100, but made off only 119 deliveries. Dropped on 3, dropped again on 76 a little after having played his part in Dhawan's run out for a fluent 73, but never losing sight of the larger goal. The constant in consecutive stands of 129 and 110 with Dhawan and Raina respectively, content to play second fiddle as the two left-hand batsmen took the fight to the opposition. No ego, no competition with his mates. Mature Kohli. Team man Kohli. Magnificent Kohli. Not so much for the quality of stroke production as his approach. There were some stunning strokes alright, primarily off the legpsin of Yasir Shah, but the entire package was even more stunning.

"Virat batted really well. Every game, according to demands and the behaviour of the wicket, you have to alter your game. Virat did that," gushed Dhoni later. Not just lip service there. But hang on, listen to Kohli too. "My role in the team is to bat through (the innings), and the power-hitters can play around knowing that one end is secure." Don't bet against him batting through the innings, one end secure, and himself turning on the class and the power and the booming boundaries in the near future.

For Kohli and India, Sunday was just about the perfect day. So much had been riding on the result, apart from the fact that this was a match against them India were winless since arriving in Australia in late November. So much had been riding for Kohli — he is the kind of player who, if he begins a tournament or series well, just gets on a roll and becomes impossible to stop. Both boxes ticked. "I hate to lose, I play passionately," Kohli told us — ah, we didn't know that, did we? "I like the expectations. The last couple of days have been too tough, too many people in the hotel getting worked up. You just have to stay in your little space."

Kohli did that brilliantly. Gradually, his little space expanded, and it gobbled up Pakistan.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 27,2020

Bengaluru, May 27: Pakistan pacer Shoaib Akhtar has revealed that he was never able to dismiss Inzamam-ul-Haq in the nets.

The Rawalpindi Express praised the former Pakistan skipper and said Inzamam could see the ball one second earlier than the rest of the batsmen could.

"Honestly, I don't think I could ever get him (Inzamam) out, he had the time and I always felt he saw the ball a second earlier than the rest of the batsmen because I had a complicated action unlike Brett Lee, I felt I could never dismiss Inzamam-ul-Haq," Akhtar told Sanjay Manjrekar in a videocast hosted by ESPNCricinfo.

"I couldn't get him out in the nets, I think he could see the ball a second before anyone else," he added.

Inzamam played 120 Tests and 378 ODIs for Pakistan.

He finished his career with 20,569 runs across all formats.

The right-handed batsman called time on his career in 2007 and he played his last Test against South Africa in Lahore.

On the other hand, Akhtar played 224 matches for Pakistan in international cricket and took 444 wickets across all formats.

The Rawalpindi Express last played an ODI in 2011 as he played against New Zealand in the 50-over World Cup.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 26,2020

Mumbai, May 26: Former Pakistan pacer Shoaib Akhtar said that if he was playing currently he and Virat Kohli would have been the best of friends off the field, but real enemies whenever they stepped on the field.

Akhtar also said that he would have liked to challenge Kohli to drive the ball.

"Virat Kohli and I would have been the best of friends as both of us are Punjabi, but on the field, we would have been the best of the enemies. I would have loved to get inside the head of Kohli. I would have told him that you cannot play a cut or pull shot against me," Akhtar told Sanjay Manjrekar in a videocast hosted by ESPNCricinfo.

"I would have gone wide of the crease and bowled a ball that would go away from him, I would have forced him to drive the ball as it is his favourite shot. So I would keep forcing him to play the drive shot at my pace," he added.

Akhtar also said that he wishes that Kohli could have played against some of the top bowlers in the game.

The Rawalpindi Express said that Kohli would have enjoyed the challenge of facing bowlers like Wasim Akram, Shane Warne, and Waqar Younis.

"I would also keep talking to him, because if I get him to lose his focus then that would have been great. The great thing about Kohli is that he gets more focused when he is challenged. But I believe Virat Kohli would have still scored the same amount of runs if I was playing," Akhtar said.

"I really wish that he had played against Wasim Akram, Waqar Younis, Shane Warne, and then Virat would have also enjoyed the challenge," he added.

Akhtar played 224 matches for Pakistan in international cricket and took 444 wickets across all formats.

Over the years, comparisons between Kohli and Sachin Tendulkar have been growing and many have picked the current Indian skipper to break the records set by Tendulkar.

Tendulkar called time on his career after registering 100 international centuries, while Kohli has 70 centuries across all formats.

Currently, Kohli is ranked at the top spot in the ICC ODI rankings while he is in second place in the Tests rankings.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 29,2020

Kolkata, May 29: Former skipper Kumar Sangakkara believes missing Angelo Mathews due to an injury hurt Sri Lanka badly in the summit clash of the 2011 World Cup, which hosts India won after a gap of 28 years.

Having played a key role in their thrilling semifinal win against New Zealand, Mathews was forced out of the final against India at Mumbai's Wankhede Stadium by a quadriceps muscle injury.

Reflecting on the six-wicket loss to India, the former Sri Lankan captain said Mathews' injury forced him to opt for a 6-5 combination and was also the reason behind his decision to bat first after winning the toss.

"In that WC final, that's the biggest thing I look back and think...You can talk about drop catches and all of that happens. But the composition of the side and the fact that we were forced to make the change was to me the turning point," Sangakkara said in the latest episode of Instagram series 'Reminisce with Ash' hosted by India off-spinner Ravichandran Ashwin.

Mahela Jayawardene's unbeaten 103 went in vain as India hunted down 275 with Gautam Gambhir setting up the chase with a 97-run knock before skipper Mahendra Singh Dhoni finished off in style, smashing Nuwan Kulasekara for the winning six in his unbeaten 91.

"But for 100 per cent, if Angelo (Mathews) had been fit, I know for sure we would have gone for chase... I'm not sure whether the result would have changed. That balance of team that Mathews would give at seven really was a bonus," the former wicketkeeper batsman said

"If you take our entire campaign, whatever we did Mathews' overs and his ability to bat with the tail and read situations was an incredible bonus to us. He was a young chap who came into the side and from day one he could read situations. It's just instinct, how to up the rate, how to control the bowler, when to accelerate."

During the conversation, Ashwin also asked him about the controversial toss when the coin was flipped twice amid the cacophony of the Wankhede and eventually Sangakkara elected to bat.

"The was crowd was huge. It never happens in Sri Lanka. Once I had this at Eden Gardens when I could not talk to the first slip and then of course at the Wankhede. I remember calling on the toss then Mahi wasn't sure and said did you call tail and I said no I called head.

"The match referee actually said I won the toss, Mahi said he did not. There was a little bit of confusion there and Mahi said let's have another toss of the coin and heads went up again," he said.

"I am not sure whether it was luck that I won. I believe probably India might have batted if I had lost."

The loss prolonged Sri Lanka's wait for another world title as yet again the 1996 champions failed in the final hurdle.

"Whether we win or lose, we have this equilibrium on how to take a win or loss. The smile hides a huge amount of sadness, of disappointment, of thinking of 20 million people back in Sri Lanka who had been waiting for this for so long, since 1996.

"We had an opportunity in 2011, opportunity in 2007, then T20 opportunities in 2009 and 2012," Sangakkara said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.