Australia in good hands under proactive Smith

December 16, 2014

Australia smithDec 16: Australia can be confident about seeing the national cricket team in Steven Smith's hands. It is a great shame that Michael Clarke's body has not held up well this summer, and ideally it would have been nice to see Steven have another 12 months or so before taking on the job. But as the next long-term captain in the selectors' eyes, these next three Tests against India will do him a world of good.

I could understand Michael's strong desire to push through his back trouble and make a hundred in Adelaide, and I felt for him as he spoke fearfully about whether he might play again. We don't yet know how long he will be out for, but I do know that if the experts can get his body right, he may end up benefiting from time away, much as Mitchell Johnson and Brad Haddin have done in recent times. For now, though, the captaincy rests with Steven, completing a journey to leadership that began when I handed him his baggy green cap at Lord's against Pakistan five years ago.

Steven then made 77 in his second Test match, at Headingley. We had been bowled out for 88 on the first day and were well behind in the game. Pakistan eventually scrambled home in the fourth innings, but Steven's knock gave us a chance. Batting with the tail, he played all the shots, taking on Danish Kaneria in particular with a pair of sixes down the ground. We were sitting there in the team viewing area hoping he would go on to a hundred, and while Steven fell short, I never forgot how much poise he showed that day.

I think we all thought he was eventually going to be a batsman, but the view from the selectors when they first picked Steven was that he could be the next really bright, shining light as far as spin bowling was concerned. A bit like Cameron White when he came in for his first few games as a teenager bowling legspin. Everyone hopes they're going to turn into the next Shane Warne, and it very rarely turns out that way. Legspinners probably don't reach their peak until their late 20s, and we saw Steven in Shield cricket at 18, and White at 17.

Leggie or not, you could just see there was something unique about his batting. Like Phillip Hughes, Steven had the ability to score a lot of runs but did so in an unorthodox manner. They both looked a little different, Phillip being very strong on the off side and Steven, if anything, a little stronger as a leg-side player. When we first saw him we hoped he could potentially turn into a very good allrounder.

Since then, Steven has been treading a very similar path to David Warner. When I saw them both as young blokes, I knew that they had a lot of talent, because they could do the things that senior Test players deemed as difficult. They had all the shots, Warner could hit big sixes and Steven could play some unorthodox shots and make the hard things look easy. But when you looked at their techniques and how they were going to survive in the longer forms of the game, you had some question marks over how they were going to fare.

They both needed that technical base most players of my generation had, because we grew up playing longer-form cricket. They grew up playing short-form cricket, so had a game based more on those formats than we had. Both Steven and Warner have been able to build defensive games and plans that now allow them to bat for long periods of time and therefore score good Test match runs. With a little more comfort around their positions and 20 to 30 Test matches under their belt, they are getting to the point where they understand themselves and their own games and understand what it takes to be very good Test match players.

Something else I have liked about Steven's batting is how he has taken on responsibility for winning games in recent times. He has shown that particularly in the past two ODI series. When he got a chance to bat at No. 3 against Pakistan he made a fine hundred, and then against South Africa he was the man who got Australia over the line when they had looked down and out. He has got all the qualities to be a long-term leader and he's already developing a reputation as the man who can rescue Australia when all seems lost.

I learned a good deal about the way Steven thinks about the game by commentating on the BBL last summer. I watched him lead Sydney Sixers as I sat alongside Adam Gilchrist, Mark Waugh and Damien Fleming in the commentary box. We would talk about what the captain or bowlers might be thinking an over or two ahead. More than once, we mentioned a possible tactical move, and sure enough, Steven addressed it even as we spoke.

T20 provides a useful test of a young captain, because it is easy to get lost in the speed of the game and become overly reactive rather than staying ahead of it. Steven was very proactive in his thinking, and to see him do that gave me a lot of confidence about his leadership.

Brad Haddin has already served as Steven's deputy in the BBL, and will be an ideal vice-captain in Brisbane. The way he led the team in the final session of the Adelaide Test after Clarke's hamstring injury gave us a glimpse of how sharp Brad can be, both in terms of setting the right fields but also ensuring that the players stuck to their task at a time when India looked more than capable of winning the match. You could see from a distance that if Australia broke the stand between Virat Kohli and M Vijay it was always going to be difficult for new batsmen to start, and Brad should take a lot of credit for the way the team hung in.

He's a very determined, fighting character, and as the wicketkeeper, gets an excellent overview of the game. Brad's strong relationship with Steven will also come in handy, because as I discovered, leading Australia in a Test match is far more consuming than doing so for any other team or in any other format. This is less to do with the intensity of the match but more the amount of other tasks you find yourself saddled with in the days leading into the match. There are press conferences, numerous pitch inspections, interactions with players, discussions with selectors, and more -all the things that Steven would never have had to worry about before. Brad will be helpful there.

The way Australia have played over the past 18 months won't change much under Steven, because he doesn't know any other way. The time he has been back in the team is the time that Michael and Darren Lehmann have generated a shift towards greater acceptance of the way the team needs to play.

It was summed up best by the way Warner attacked the game on the first morning in Adelaide, not allowing India to settle. This was something special, because it took the pressure off the whole dressing room. He may only have been doing it to free his own mind and get himself back into another contest, but I have no doubt that had a big positive effect on everybody who batted after him.

It helped him that Mohammed Shami and Varun Aaron both started by bowling round the wicket. It was almost as though India were thinking about containing Warner, rather than trying to take the early wickets that are so critical in Adelaide, given how the pitch settles down on days one and two. You've got to try to make inroads with the new ball, and it doesn't matter how good the batsman is, your first thoughts must be about how you are trying to get him out.

There was never much doubt that was how Nathan Lyon was thinking on the last day, and what he did in the second innings, bowling Australia to victory, will be great for him. A lot of people seem to forget how good Nathan's record is. Every series there seem to be questions about why he is being persevered with, but his record is already outstanding for an Australian spinner, and he is getting better all the time.

India's batsmen have seen more spin than anyone in the world, and Nathan was able to bowl deliveries that baffled even their best. Balls that drift away and spin back with bounce are of the kind that Indian spinners have unleashed upon Australia, so to see one of our spinners doing that was terrific - it couldn't happen to a nicer bloke.

One of cricket's modern greats, Ricky Ponting captained Australia in 324 matches and scored over 27,000 runs

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 26,2020

New Delhi, Apr 26: The idea of having a full-fledged women's IPL is in a "progression stage" and a World Cup title for India can actually help in turning that into a reality sooner than later, says former captain Anjum Chopra.

Under the leadership of Harmanpreet Kaur, the Indian team sailed into the final of the last women's T20 World Cup, but was thrashed by home favourites and defending champions Australia when it mattered the most.

Chopra, one of the country's most decorated women cricketers, said a World Cup title triumph would have brought about a generational shift to the women's game in cricket-mad India.

"Women's IPL in the progression stages. From one game at the start we had four last year in the Women's T20 Challenge, and this time it was supposed to be seven. It has progressed," Chopra said.

"If the women's team had won the World Cup this year, the number of matches would have been more. There is a big difference between winners and runners up."

Chopra had a successful career spanning over 17 years during which she represented India in six World Cups while becoming the first woman cricket to appear in 100 One-day Internationals.

She added, "A victory (in final of last T20 World Cup) would have been a complete generational shift in a much more progressional manner."

Referring to the rapid strides the women's game has made the world over, she praised the International Cricket Council (ICC) for "consciously building it up".

"ICC has bifurcated viewership numbers also very well for Indian audience."

The icing on the cake was a near-packed Melbourne Cricket Ground (MCG) for the World Cup final between India and Australia, and that was not lost on Chopra, who is now a respected analyst and sportscaster.

"To have 80,000 people watching the final that's commendable. That definitely a boost," said Chopra, who holds the distinction of leading India to their first ever Test series win.

A World Cup triumph and the "mind set would have gone to different level altogether", she believed.

Asked about the chatter around pay disparity in Indian cricket, her simple message was win more to earn more.

"There is already pay parity in Australia. Because both teams have won the World Cups more than any other nations.

"If you start winning, then I am sure things will be different. It's also about how much you are able to generate as a team.

"I would say sky is the limit for them."

With the COVID-19 pandemic bringing sporting activities to a standstill, a cloud of uncertainty hangs over the fate of many big events lined up in the near future.

While the IPL has been put on hold indefinitely, the pandemic has thrown the men's T20 World Cup, scheduled for October-November in Australia, into doubt.

"There has been a suggestion that if we are hosting the World Cup in October, then play the IPL as preparation ground for World Cup."

That is only if the situation improves in the coming times.

"It's difficult to see, to gauge where sport will be after this. For sure it is not going to be where it was before. Even if it opens up tomorrow it couldn't be the same.

"Can sports people can get back to work without worry? We don't know when this is going to be under control."

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 22,2020

New Delhi, Jun 22: Claiming to be saddled with faulty equipment from China, the Indian Weightlifting Federation (IWLF) on Monday called for a boycott of sports apparatus made in that country after the violent face-off in eastern Ladakh killed 20 Army personnel last week.

The IWLF ordered four weightlifting sets, comprising barbells and weight plates, from Chinese company 'ZKC' last year. The body said that the equipment turned out to be faulty and the weightlifters are no longer using them.

"We should boycott all Chinese equipment. The Indian Weightlifting Federation has taken the decision that it will not use any equipment made in China," IWLF secretary general Sahdev Yadav said.

The IWLF, in a letter, has informed the Sports Authority of India (SAI) about its decision to stop using any equipment made in China.

"In a letter to SAI we have written that IWLF won't be using the Chinese equipment," he said.

"In future also we will not use made in china sets. We will use sets made by Indian origin companies or any other company but not from China," Yadav added.

National coach Vijay Sharma revealed that the plates were found to be sub-standard when the lifters started training again earlier this month following the easing of the COVID-19 lockdown restrictions.

"The sets were spoilt. We can't use them now," Sharma said.

"All the weightlifters in the camp are against China. They have stopped using Chinese apps like Tik Tok. Even while ordering things online, they check where the product has been manufactured," he added.

Asked why the sets were even ordered, Sharma said they had no option as the equipment from China is to be used in the Tokyo Olympics and lifters needed to be familiar with it.

"We had ordered four sets from China for Olympic training a year ago. Now, since we have resumed training post the lockdown we haven't used them. All the lifters are against the use of Chinese equipment," he said.

He said equipment was ordered from China for the first time.

"We don't order equipment from China as the quality is very bad. This was the first time we got it."

The weightlifters are currently training with equipment made in Sweden.

"Post the lockdown we started training on sets from Swedish company 'ELICKO'. SAI has issued 10 sets for us. The main training takes place with those. Maximum international competitions have sets from ELICKO," Sharma said.

Yadav also said that there are ready alternatives to Chinese equipment.

"We have a lot of alternatives. We already have good Indian sets and we also have equipment from Sweden. We will use that, why should we use Chinese?" Yadav said.

Calls to boycott China-made goods erupted across India after the Galwan valley clash last Monday. It was the most violent face-off between the troops from the two countries in more than four decades.

The Indian Olympic Association (IOA) has said it is open to boycotting Chinese products in the wake of the incident.

The BCCI will also review IPL's sponsorship deals, including the title deal with Chinese mobile manufacturing company Vivo later this week.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
July 19,2020

Dubai, Jul 19: On hold for the past two months, the fate of this year's T20 World Cup will be up for a decisive round of deliberation when the ICC board meets virtually on Monday with the BCCI hoping for a postponement to ensure that the IPL can go ahead.

The global event is supposed to be held from October 18 to November 15 in Australia but the country's cricket board had, in May itself, expressed its inability to host amid a second surge of Covid-19 cases in the state of Victoria.

With India's case load also exceeding the 10 lakh mark, including more than 26,000 deaths, the IPL, if it is held, is likely to move to the UAE once the central government gives its go ahead.

"The first step was postponement of Asia Cup, which has happened. We can only start to move ahead with our plans after the ICC announces the postponement. They have been sitting on the decision even after Cricket Australia said that they are not too keen on hosting the event," a BCCI Apex Council member told PTI on conditions of anonymity.

This year's T20 World Cup will likely be held in Australia in 2022 as India doesn't want to swap its 2021 hosting rights with Cricket Australia as of now.

That Australia won't be hosting the mega event was clear after the cricket board told its players to prepare for a white-ball series against England scheduled for late September.

CA has even announced a 26-strong preliminary squad for that tour.

The ICC, on its part, has maintained that it wants to explore all possible "contingency" options before taking a call of such immense magnitude. And it is not unusual for the governing body to wait this long.

"Pakistan was supposed to host the Champions Trophy in 2009. After the terrorist attacks on the Sri Lankan team bus, everyone in their proper senses knew that PCB will never host a big event in distant future," said a source familiar with the functioning of the ICC.

"Yet, ICC deputed its employees in Pakistan for months when South Africa was already preparing to host the event. Everyone knew but a formal announcement of shift took months as threat assessment was part of protocol.

"The ICC couldn't have just postponed 9the T20 World Cup) immediately as initially, the top ministers of the Australian government expressed keenness to host," he added.

The Pakistan Cricket Board has also resigned itself to this outcome after vehemently opposing the Indian board.

The postponement of Asia Cup, which was supposed to be hosted by the PCB, to 2021 was a big blow to Ehsan Mani and his team.

"We have had a lot of discussions and the feeling is it (T20 World Cup) would not be possible this year. ICC has World Cups lined up in 2021 and 2023 so we have a gap year where we can adjust this event," Mani had recently said while talking to reporters in his country.

It has been learnt that PCB is contacting other boards in the hope of finalising some bilateral engagements as the national team has nothing lined up after its England tour.

Nomination process for Chairman's election:

The other issue that is likely to come up for discussion in Monday's meeting is the nomination process for the next independent chairman of the ICC after Shashank Manohar's resignation earlier this month.

It is learnt that there is no consensus on what should be the criteria in case multiple candidates join the fray.

"The board is not united on whether the usual 2/3rd majority to decide will be used (as its in case of policy decision) or the case of simple majority among the 17 board members," an ICC Board member said.

England and Wales Cricket Board's Colin Graves was considered the top contender with BCCI president Sourav Ganguly's name also being floated.

Ganguly's candidature will certainly depend on whether the Supreme Court waives off the cooling off period and allows him to continue as BCCI president beyond July 27 when he completes six years as an office-bearer in the Indian Board's state and national units.

When asked about the possibility of taking up the ICC job in a recent interview, the 48-year-old said he is young and and in no hurry for the position.

New Zealand's Gregor Barclay, Hong Kong's Imran Khawaja, who is currently the interim chairman, are also being talked about as potential candidates.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.