Australia in good hands under proactive Smith

December 16, 2014

Australia smithDec 16: Australia can be confident about seeing the national cricket team in Steven Smith's hands. It is a great shame that Michael Clarke's body has not held up well this summer, and ideally it would have been nice to see Steven have another 12 months or so before taking on the job. But as the next long-term captain in the selectors' eyes, these next three Tests against India will do him a world of good.

I could understand Michael's strong desire to push through his back trouble and make a hundred in Adelaide, and I felt for him as he spoke fearfully about whether he might play again. We don't yet know how long he will be out for, but I do know that if the experts can get his body right, he may end up benefiting from time away, much as Mitchell Johnson and Brad Haddin have done in recent times. For now, though, the captaincy rests with Steven, completing a journey to leadership that began when I handed him his baggy green cap at Lord's against Pakistan five years ago.

Steven then made 77 in his second Test match, at Headingley. We had been bowled out for 88 on the first day and were well behind in the game. Pakistan eventually scrambled home in the fourth innings, but Steven's knock gave us a chance. Batting with the tail, he played all the shots, taking on Danish Kaneria in particular with a pair of sixes down the ground. We were sitting there in the team viewing area hoping he would go on to a hundred, and while Steven fell short, I never forgot how much poise he showed that day.

I think we all thought he was eventually going to be a batsman, but the view from the selectors when they first picked Steven was that he could be the next really bright, shining light as far as spin bowling was concerned. A bit like Cameron White when he came in for his first few games as a teenager bowling legspin. Everyone hopes they're going to turn into the next Shane Warne, and it very rarely turns out that way. Legspinners probably don't reach their peak until their late 20s, and we saw Steven in Shield cricket at 18, and White at 17.

Leggie or not, you could just see there was something unique about his batting. Like Phillip Hughes, Steven had the ability to score a lot of runs but did so in an unorthodox manner. They both looked a little different, Phillip being very strong on the off side and Steven, if anything, a little stronger as a leg-side player. When we first saw him we hoped he could potentially turn into a very good allrounder.

Since then, Steven has been treading a very similar path to David Warner. When I saw them both as young blokes, I knew that they had a lot of talent, because they could do the things that senior Test players deemed as difficult. They had all the shots, Warner could hit big sixes and Steven could play some unorthodox shots and make the hard things look easy. But when you looked at their techniques and how they were going to survive in the longer forms of the game, you had some question marks over how they were going to fare.

They both needed that technical base most players of my generation had, because we grew up playing longer-form cricket. They grew up playing short-form cricket, so had a game based more on those formats than we had. Both Steven and Warner have been able to build defensive games and plans that now allow them to bat for long periods of time and therefore score good Test match runs. With a little more comfort around their positions and 20 to 30 Test matches under their belt, they are getting to the point where they understand themselves and their own games and understand what it takes to be very good Test match players.

Something else I have liked about Steven's batting is how he has taken on responsibility for winning games in recent times. He has shown that particularly in the past two ODI series. When he got a chance to bat at No. 3 against Pakistan he made a fine hundred, and then against South Africa he was the man who got Australia over the line when they had looked down and out. He has got all the qualities to be a long-term leader and he's already developing a reputation as the man who can rescue Australia when all seems lost.

I learned a good deal about the way Steven thinks about the game by commentating on the BBL last summer. I watched him lead Sydney Sixers as I sat alongside Adam Gilchrist, Mark Waugh and Damien Fleming in the commentary box. We would talk about what the captain or bowlers might be thinking an over or two ahead. More than once, we mentioned a possible tactical move, and sure enough, Steven addressed it even as we spoke.

T20 provides a useful test of a young captain, because it is easy to get lost in the speed of the game and become overly reactive rather than staying ahead of it. Steven was very proactive in his thinking, and to see him do that gave me a lot of confidence about his leadership.

Brad Haddin has already served as Steven's deputy in the BBL, and will be an ideal vice-captain in Brisbane. The way he led the team in the final session of the Adelaide Test after Clarke's hamstring injury gave us a glimpse of how sharp Brad can be, both in terms of setting the right fields but also ensuring that the players stuck to their task at a time when India looked more than capable of winning the match. You could see from a distance that if Australia broke the stand between Virat Kohli and M Vijay it was always going to be difficult for new batsmen to start, and Brad should take a lot of credit for the way the team hung in.

He's a very determined, fighting character, and as the wicketkeeper, gets an excellent overview of the game. Brad's strong relationship with Steven will also come in handy, because as I discovered, leading Australia in a Test match is far more consuming than doing so for any other team or in any other format. This is less to do with the intensity of the match but more the amount of other tasks you find yourself saddled with in the days leading into the match. There are press conferences, numerous pitch inspections, interactions with players, discussions with selectors, and more -all the things that Steven would never have had to worry about before. Brad will be helpful there.

The way Australia have played over the past 18 months won't change much under Steven, because he doesn't know any other way. The time he has been back in the team is the time that Michael and Darren Lehmann have generated a shift towards greater acceptance of the way the team needs to play.

It was summed up best by the way Warner attacked the game on the first morning in Adelaide, not allowing India to settle. This was something special, because it took the pressure off the whole dressing room. He may only have been doing it to free his own mind and get himself back into another contest, but I have no doubt that had a big positive effect on everybody who batted after him.

It helped him that Mohammed Shami and Varun Aaron both started by bowling round the wicket. It was almost as though India were thinking about containing Warner, rather than trying to take the early wickets that are so critical in Adelaide, given how the pitch settles down on days one and two. You've got to try to make inroads with the new ball, and it doesn't matter how good the batsman is, your first thoughts must be about how you are trying to get him out.

There was never much doubt that was how Nathan Lyon was thinking on the last day, and what he did in the second innings, bowling Australia to victory, will be great for him. A lot of people seem to forget how good Nathan's record is. Every series there seem to be questions about why he is being persevered with, but his record is already outstanding for an Australian spinner, and he is getting better all the time.

India's batsmen have seen more spin than anyone in the world, and Nathan was able to bowl deliveries that baffled even their best. Balls that drift away and spin back with bounce are of the kind that Indian spinners have unleashed upon Australia, so to see one of our spinners doing that was terrific - it couldn't happen to a nicer bloke.

One of cricket's modern greats, Ricky Ponting captained Australia in 324 matches and scored over 27,000 runs

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 18,2020

New Delhi, Jan 18: There was not much rustiness but just the initial nervousness, which a “pleasantly surprised” Sania Mirza shook off to win a title in her first tournament in 27 months, capping off her comeback from a maternity leave in style.

Partnering Ukraine's Nadiia Kichenov, the trailblazing Indian tennis player annexed the Hobart International trophy with a straight sets win over second seed Chinese pair of Shuai Peng and Shuai Zhang.

She worked hard to get into shape but the way she moved, it seemed Sania was never away from the courts.

“It's something I did not expect totally, so to say, but I am excited to be able to do this in my first tournament on comeback," Sania told PTI in an exclusive interview from Melbourne.

“I honestly thought I would be a bit more rustier than I was. I was pleasantly surprised that I was not. But there are things I can improve and that is what makes a champion. You always want to get better in what you are doing, no matter how well you do."

The 33-year-old winner of six Grand Slam titles said she played without pressure, and insisted there was no secret to the swift success on comeback.

“There is no key, I wish I knew, there was one key to winning. I just enjoyed my game. You have to work hard, play your game. I was playing with a new partner, new gear after two-and-a-half years. There was no pressure and no expectations.

"The first match was the only one when I felt a bit nervous because I did not know how my body would react and how I would play. That match was difficult but it set the tone and momentum. I was happy to come though that one and after that things kept getting better and better," she said.

Sania said her body has certainly changed after giving birth to son Izhaan but she did not have to tweak her post-match recovery process much.

“It does change. I was dealing with a calf injury, from last month and I aggravated a bit today. I am still icing it as we speak but it should not be serious.

“The body is a lot different now. It recovers different. But recovery (process) has not changed so much, it's similar."

Asked if she could go for her shots as she was doing before the break, she said, “I was able to do enough, I can improve, no matter how I play."

"My serve was decent but I can improve. I the first match I was not serving that well and was not returning well on important points but by the time I was playing the final, I was doing both of those little better. It is a process, it does not happen overnight. It's something will keep working on."

Serena Williams set an example in 2018 when she came out playing highly competitive tennis after giving birth to her daughter Olympia. There are other tennis moms like Victoria Azrenka and Evgeniya Rodina.

Sania said she did not seek any input from tennis moms but their presence on the Tour is inspiring enough.

“I did not speak to anyone but it is inspiring to see so many moms around, playing well in different sports."

Sania will play the Australian Open mixed doubles with compatriot Rohan Bopnna after her original first-choice Rajeev Ram opted out due to health reasons.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 30,2020

New York, May 30: Cricket superstar Virat Kohli remains the only Indian in the Forbes' list of world's highest-paid athletes with total earnings of USD 26 million, jumping to the 66th spot from 100 in the 2020 standings.

Kohli's earnings from endorsement stand at USD 24 million and USD 2 million from salary/winnings. The 31-year-old is also the only cricketer in the top-100 list.

With earnings of USD 25 million, Kohli was ranked 100th in 2019 and 83rd in 2018 with USD 24 million.

Tennis legend Roger Federer has toped the list for the first time with earnings of USD 106.3 million, rising from fifth place last year.

Football icons Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi are second and third respectively with earnings of USD 105 and USD 104 million.

The others in the top-10 are Neymar (football), LeBron James (basketball), Stephen Curry (basketball), Kevin Durrant (basketball), Tigers Woods (golf), Kirk Cousins (American football) and Carson Wentz (American football).

The athletes' earnings have been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic which led to suspension of sporting activities all around the world.

Comments

Ismail
 - 
Sunday, 31 May 2020

Saina Nehwal is the only Indian to feature in the world’s 20 most charitable athletes, as per a list compiled by the US based website in Athletes Gone Good. 

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
August 6,2020

New Delhi, Aug 6: The BCCI on Thursday suspended the IPL title sponsorship deal with Chinese mobile phone company Vivo for the event's upcoming edition amid heightened tensions in Sino-India diplomatic ties.

The BCCI sent out a one-line statement, without giving details, saying that Vivo would not be associated with the IPL this year. "The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and vivo Mobile India Pvt Ltd have decided to suspend their partnership for Indian Premier League in 2020," the statement said.

Meanwhile, Vivo released its own statement saying that the two entities "have mutually decided to pause their partnership for the 2020 season".

Vivo won the IPL title sponsorship rights for five years from 2018 to 2022 for a reported sum of Rs 2,190 crore, approximately Rs 440 crore per annum.

The two parties are now working out a plan in which Vivo might come back for a fresh three-year period starting 2021 on revised terms.

However, a top BCCI official offered a different view. "Here we are talking about diplomatic tensions and you expect that after November, when IPL ends and before the next IPL starts in April 2021, there would be no anti-China sentiment? Are we serious?" a veteran BCCI official said on conditions of anonymity.

The anti-China sentiment in the country peaked after the violent face-off between the Indian and Chinese troops in eastern Ladakh. India lost 20 soldiers in the clash, while China also acknowledged unspecified casualties.

The stand-off at the Line of Actual Control (LAC) caused outrage across India with several calls for boycotts of Chinese companies and products.

The BCCI is now likely to float a tender for new IPL title sponsors as mandated by its constitution. The glitzy T20 league starts on Sept. 19 in the UAE, forced out of India due to the rising COVID-19 cases.

The new development is in stark contrast to what came out of Sunday's IPL's Governing Council meeting, where it was decided that Vivo, along with all the other sponsors, will remain on board.

This was after the BCCI had announced in June that all sponsorship deals pertaining to IPL will be reviewed in the aftermath of the clash in the Galwan Valley.

However, after Sunday's meeting, there was a huge backlash on social media about the BCCI holding on to Vivo.

Both parties then began thrashing out an amicable separation plan, at least for this season.

However, the end of this deal could spell losses for the franchises as they get a substantial share from the sponsorship pool. Half of the annual Vivo sponsorship money is distributed equally among eight franchises, which comes to Rs 27.5 crore.

"As of now, it will be very difficult for the BCCI to match the sponsorship amount at such short notice. Therefore, both BCCI and the franchises should be prepared to lose out on some money -- BCCI more but each franchise from Vivo's exit will potentially lose 15 crore," the official said.

"This year will be difficult for everyone but the show must go on," the official said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.