Precautionary measures for roadside properties before purchase

[email protected] (Vivekananda Paniyala)
April 19, 2013
Cities are undoubtedly becoming cauldrons of development, demanding fast paced upgrade in the quality of existing roads. May it be the National highways or the State Highways or even Major District Roads, they have seen massive development, fuelling a sudden rise in the prices of the properties abutting them. There is a rush of the investors wanting to invest on these roadside properties which hold immense potential for development to yield higher returns.

propertiesHowever, extreme care and caution should be exercised before acquiring such properties given the kind of pitfalls that these properties pose and in some cases the investment may prove to be disastrous. Hence, it is advised that professional advice is sought while finalising such a deal. Factor that needs to be looked at while contemplating to purchase a roadside property is the vulnerability of the land for compulsory acquisition in case of widening of road.

This vulnerability is also coupled with several other factors like the affect of drainage, rain water storm construction, service lines like electricity underground cables, water pipelines, gas pipelines etc.

The common concerns are listed in a question format and answered as hereunder:

1. What are the general precautions to be taken while purchasing roadside properties?

In the case of vacant sites, make sure that the land is privately owned having clear marketable and valid legal title thereto. Many a times, the owners of small strip of road side properties encroach the road margin lands which is owned by the government left as “road margin” for future development. Over a long period of time, the adjacent private land owners have enclosed these lands by constructing compound wall and pose as if the same is in their possession. From the eyes of law, they are called as unauthorised encroachment and any length of time cannot legalise the same. It being a public property can be evicted summarily by the governmental authorities by invoking special laws and powers without paying any compensation. So, make sure that the property is excluded from road margin and for this purpose get the property measured by the well experienced and competent official surveyor having regard to the government survey documents like FMB etc. This will make sure that you are paying only for what is legally sold to you and not for road margin government land.

Secondly, in the case of buildings abutting to the road, even if they are built long back, still the land and the building remain unauthorised construction and they are liable to be demolished and no one can claim any kind of compensation even if the building has got door number, electricity supply and water connection. So, one has to make sure that the property being purchased does not include road margin lands, the ownership whereof is vested with the government.

2. How do I ascertain that the road side land under purchase does not belong to the government?

Carefully examine the title deed under which the seller claims right over the property and make sure that the boundaries mentioned therein tally with the physical condition and the same shall be read in conjunction with the survey sketch annexed to the title deed, if any. Also get the property measured by the official surveyors as provided under the survey laws and regulations. Make sure that the authorities who maintain the roads like the National Highway Authority, State Highway Authority or the PWD etc are consulted in writing about the same.

3. Is it sufficient if I take their opinion and verify the sketch available in these public authorities?

It is advised to take written opinion and seek their consent or no objection letter before acquiring such lands.

4. Do the authorities have an obligation to give the opinion in writing? How can I obtain the same?

Yes. They have an obligation to give correct reply. For this purpose invoke the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005 and the Rules framed there under by submitting an application along with the sketch depicting the actual condition of the site and seek specific answers for your queries.

5. Apart from road margin issue, are there any other aspects to bother about?

Yes. The issue of road widening is something that all investors have to look at critically. Almost all National and State Highway are getting upgraded , redeveloped under different models like PPP, BOP, BOOP etc. and these roads are being transformed from two lanes to four lanes and in some cases even six lanes. Hence, most of the roads are already in the process of land acquisition and some are under widening proposal. In the case of land acquisition being conducted, lands cannot be alienated and any such alienation will be null and void. Hence, make proper enquires with the special land acquisition officers who are in charge of the land acquisition for highway [Both N.H and S.H] and also the other officials concerned.

6. Where can I contact the Special Land Acquisition Officers?

It depends. However, the easiest way of finding such officers are by approaching the office of revenue authorities like Deputy Commissioners [ District Collectors ], Assistant Commissioners [ Sub Collectors ] and Tahsildars. Also, the National, State High Way authorities and specifically PWD’s. Local government surveyors can also throw some light on the same. So, never hesitate to approach all the authorities concerned. Unfortunately, there is no single office or nodal agency wherein you get complete information.

7. Does it hold good for roads inside the municipal limits also or only the National and State High ways?

Even the roads running inside the corporation and municipal limits are in the process of being widened and one can find the same in the city master plans being approved by the urban development bodies like BDA in Bangalore, MUDA in Mangalore in addition to Corporation and Municipal councils.

8. What are the other potential threats of which one should take note of before purchasing these road side properties?

Most of the investors are not aware of the fact that before constructing any building on the road side, even though in the private property, certain set back has to be left which varies from National Highway, State Highway and major District or Panchayath roads. It varies from 40 metres to 22 metres. The local planning Engineers will be in a better position to guide the buyers to take note of the Master Plans or CDP’s etc.

9. Is there any data bank or official publication available in this regard to study?

Unfortunately, most of the times, these publications [even official] are not readily available for citizens’ scrutiny. As the buyers go by the advice of real estate brokers than subject matter expert professionals like Advocates,  Planning Engineers, there is very little awareness on these aspects. Hence, every time, it is advisable to file an application under R.T.I specifically showing the details of the properties which are under consideration for acquisition by specifically mentioning the survey number, village, extent etc duly supported by approved survey plans. This forms important part of Due Diligence. What is important to note here is that only authentic and competent legislation and government orders having the force of law shall be looked into. Advocates are better professionals to be consulted in this connection.

10. Are there any other thing that we should be really worried about?

Yes. One should also take note of the service or civic amenities lines like water supply, underground electricity cables, drainage lines, storm water or rain water drains [ open or closed] as they will also have impact on the value and utilisation of the lands. On this, the local engineers will be in a better position to advice. So, it is just not enough to consult an Advocate on the legal and valid marketable title, but also involve the engineers and planners as the importance of taking opinion of multi level professionals is increasing.

The FAR or FSI issue can also be a major problem. This is determined by the developmental or municipal or regulatory bodies.  Though these are developmental aspects they do have direct bearing on the commercial and real estate value when the land is going to be resold or offered as security to banks or financial institutions at a later point of time. The local practising architects will be in a better position to guide as the same varies from location to location and street to street based on certain parameters like width of the road, nature or classification or zoning of the land etc.

11. What if the land is acquired for widening of road? Will I get compensation?

Yes. You will get compensation. It is a matter of legal and constitutional right. But, the compensation is determined on the basis of guideline value as fixed by the authorities. The real transaction value is hardly reflected in the deed of sale or title deeds. It is heavily undervalued to save stamp duty and in case of compulsory acquisition. In some cases, compensation is paid in Transferable Developmental Rights [TDRs], which is in the form of a certificate and one can realised the value only by selling the same in the open market. Mostly the builders are interested to buy. This is again in the clutches of real estate cartel and certain vested interests. Hence, compensation may not be adequate and commensurate to the loss of land.

12. What are the measures to be taken after purchasing the lands abutting to the public roads?

Firstly, enclose the property by constructing compound wall after obtaining license from the local authorities. Most of the people are under the impression that no license is required to build compound wall. This is important for protecting the property from encroachment and to also ensure that no one puts up any hutment or petty shops in front of your land blocking the road margin. It is better to put temporary fencing in-between your land and road margin to prevent unauthorised occupation of the government road margin land. Even though you will have absolute right to gain access to the public road from any point of your property, the enforcement thereof becomes extremely difficult once vested elements encroach the road margin land blocking your frontage. It is advisable to put up a small shed in the land and obtain door number for the same as that can give some practical benefits during land disputes and to establish your exclusive physical possession over the same in case of litigations or disputes or rival claims. It is not mandatory or absolutely essential but, highly advisable.

13. Who are the professionals who should be consulted in this regard?

Advocates, Chartered Accountants, Planning Engineers / Architects, Surveyors will be able to guide from different perspective.

14. Which are the departments one has to deal with generally?

National and State Highway Departments, P.W.D, local self governments life Municipal Corporations, Town Municipalities, Village Panchayaths and developmental authorities like Urban Development Bodies, Electricity Corporations, Water Supply, Drainage boards / departments etc.

Therefore, it is advised that  special care is taken while looking for properties abutting to the public roads. It is better to take the professionals to the site and closely examine the proposal from all angles and do not confine the importance to just pricing and legal documentation. This will save an investor from many future risks.

Paniyala

The writer is a Corporate Lawyer based in Mangalore. He can be reached at [email protected]

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
January 14,2020

In the beginning of January 2020 two very disturbing events were reported from Pakistan. One was the attack on Nankana Sahib, the holy shrine where Sant Guru Nanak was born. While one report said that the place has been desecrated, the other stated that it was a fight between two Muslim groups. Prime Minister of Pakistan Imran Khan condemned the incident and the main accused Imran Chisti was arrested. The matter related to abduction and conversion of a Sikh girl Jagjit Kaur, daughter of Pathi (One who reads Holy Guru Granth Sahib in Gurudwara) of the Gurudwara. In another incident one Sikh youth Ravinder Singh, who was out on shopping for his marriage, was shot dead in Peshawar.

While these condemnable attacks took place on the Sikh minority in Pakistan, BJP was quick enough to jump to state that it is events like this which justify the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). Incidentally CAA is the Act which is discriminatory and relates to citizenship with Religion, which is not as per the norms of Indian constitution. There are constant debates and propaganda that population of Hindus has come down drastically in Pakistan and Bangla Desh. Amit Shah, the Home minister stated that in Pakistan the population of Hindus has come down from 23% at the time of partition to 3.7% at present. And in Bangla Desh it has come down from 22% to present 8%.

While not denying the fact that the religious minorities are getting a rough deal in both these countries, the figures which are presented are totally off the mark. These figures don’t take into consideration the painful migrations, which took place at the time of partition and formation of Bangla Desh later. Pakistan census figures tell a different tale. Their first census was held in 1951. As per this census the overall percentage of Non Muslim in Pakistan (East and West together) was 14.2%, of this in West Pakistan (Now Pakistan) it was 3.44 and in Eat Pakistan it was 23.2. In the census held in Pakistan 1998 it became 3.72%. As far as Bangla Desh is concerned the share of Non Muslims has gone down from 23.2 (1951) to 9.6% in 2011.

The largest minority of Pakistan is Ahmadis, (https://minorityrights.org/country/pakistan/) who are close to 4 Million and are not recognised as Muslims in Pakistan. In Bangla Desh the major migrations of Hindus from Bangla Desh took place in the backdrop of Pakistan army’s atrocities in the then East Pakistan.

As far as UN data on refugees in India it went up by 17% between 2016-2019 and largest numbers were from Tibet and Sri Lanka.  (https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/publication…)

The state of minorities is in a way the index of strength of democracy. Most South Asian Countries have not been able to sustain democratic values properly. In Pakistan, the Republic began with Jinnah’s classic speech where secularism was to be central credo of Pakistan. This 11th August speech was in a way what the state policy should be, as per which people of all faiths are free to practice their religion. Soon enough the logic of ‘Two Nation theory” and formation of Pakistan, a separate state for Muslim took over. Army stepped in and dictatorship was to reign there intermittently. Democratic elements were suppressed and the worst came when Zia Ul Haq Islamized the state in collusion with Maulanas. The army was already a strong presence in Pakistan. The popular formulation for Pakistan was that it is ruled by three A’s, Army, America and Allah (Mullah).

Bangla Desh had a different trajectory. Its very formation was a nail in the coffin of ‘two nation theory’; that religion can be the basis of a state. Bangla Desh did begin as a secular republic but communal forces and secular forces kept struggling for their dominance and in 1988 it also became Islamic republic. At another level Myanmar, in the grip of military dictatorship, with democratic elements trying to retain their presence is also seeing a hard battle. Democracy or not, the army and Sanghas (Buddhist Sang has) are strong, in Myanmar as well. The most visible result is persecution of Rohingya Muslims.

Similar phenomenon is dominating in Sri Lanka also where Budhhist Sanghas and army have strong say in the political affairs, irrespective of which Government is ruling. Muslim and Christian minorities are a big victim there, while Tamils (Hindus, Christians etc.) suffered the biggest damage as ethnic and religious minorities. India had the best prospect of democracy, pluralism and secularism flourishing here. The secular constitution, the outcome of India’s freedom struggle, the leadership of Gandhi and Nehru did ensure the rooting of democracy and secularism in a strong way.

India so far had best democratic credentials amongst all the south Asian countries. Despite that though the population of minorities rose mainly due to poverty and illiteracy, their overall marginalisation was order of the day, it went on worsening with the rise of communal forces, with communal forces resorting to identity issues, and indulging in propaganda against minorities.

While other South Asian countries should had followed India to focus more on infrastructure and political culture of liberalism, today India is following the footsteps of Pakistan. The retrograde march of India is most visible in the issues which have dominated the political space during last few years. Issues like Ram Temple, Ghar Wapasi, Love Jihad, Beef-Cow are now finding their peak in CAA.

India’s reversal towards a polity with religion’s identity dominating the political scene was nicely presented by the late Pakistani poetess Fahmida Riaz in her poem, Tum bhi Hum Jaise Nikle (You also turned out to be like us). While trying to resist communal forces has been an arduous task, it is becoming more difficult by the day. This phenomenon has been variously called, Fundamentalism, Communalism or religious nationalism among others. Surely it has nothing to do with the religion as practiced by the great Saint and Sufi traditions of India; it resorts mainly to political mobilization by using religion as a tool.

Comments

Ashi
 - 
Tuesday, 14 Jan 2020

If Malaysia implement similar NRC/CAA, India and China are the loser.

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
July 20,2020

As Covid 19 has created havoc all rounds, the rulers of certain countries are using it to further intensify their set agendas. The democratic freedoms are being curtailed in certain forms, the reaction to which has come in America in the form of a campaign, which is opposing “stifling” cultural climate that is imposing “ideological conformity” and weakening “norms of open debate and toleration of differences”. In India similar intimidations have been intensified. In addition the occasion has been used by the sectarian forces first to link the spread of Corona to Muslim community and now in the name of reducing the burden of curriculum certain chapters on core concepts related to Indian nationalism are being deleted from the text books.

It has been reported that chapters on federalism, citizenship, nationalism, secularism, Human Rights, Legal Aid and Local Self Government and the like are being dropped. Education has been an important area for communal forces and they constantly keep saying that leftists have dominated the curriculum content, it suffers from the impact of Macaulay, Marx and Mohammad and so needs to be Indianized. The first such attempt was done when BJP came to power in 1998 as NDA and had Murli Manohar Joshi as the MHRD minister. He brought the changes which were termed as ‘saffronization of education’. Their focus is more on social science. Some of the highlights of this were introduction of subjects like Astrology and Paurohitya, and chapters defending caste system, nationalism of the type of Hitler was praised.

With defeat of NDA in 2004, the UPA did try to rectify some of these distortions. Again after 2014 the RSS affiliates working in the area of education have been active, interacting with MHRD officials to impress upon them the need to change the curriculum matching with their Hindu nationalist agenda. Its ‘Shiksha Sanskriti Utthan Nyas’ has been asking for removal of English, Urdu words in the texts. It has asked for removal of thoughts of Rabindranath Tagore on Nationalism, extracts of autobiography of M F Husain, references to benevolence of Muslim rulers, references to BJP being Hindu party, apology of Dr. Manmohan Singh for anti Sikh pogrom of 1984, the reference to killings of Gujarat carnage in 2002 among others. This they call as Bhartiykaran of syllabus.

As RSS is a multithreaded hydra one of its pracharak Dinanath Batra has set up ‘Shiksha Bachao Abhiyan Samiti’ which has been pressurizing various publishers to drop the books which are not conforming to their ideology. One recalls their pressuring withdrawal of Wendy Doniger’s ‘The Hindus’, as it does present the ancient India through the concerns of dalits and women. Mr. Batra has already come out with a set of nine books for school curriculum, giving the RSS view of the past and RSS understanding of social sciences. These have already been translated into Gujarati and thousands of the sets of these books are being used in Gujarat Schools.

The present step of deleting parts of curriculum which gives the basics of Indian Nationalism, secularism and human rights is a further step in the same direction. These are the topics which have made the Hindu nationalists uncomfortable during last few years. They have been defaming secularism. They removed it from the preamble of Indian constitution, when they put out an ad on the eve of Republic day in 2015. From last few decades since the Ram Temple movement was brought up, simultaneously the secular ethos of India’s freedom movement and secular values of Indian constitution have been constantly criticized. Many an RSS ideologues and BJP leaders have been asking for change of Indian Constitution for this very reason.

Secularism is part of the concept of Indian nationalism. In the name of religious nationalism, sectarian divisive nationalism they have been attacking various student leaders in particular. When we study Nationalism, the very genesis of Indian nationalism tells us the plurality of our freedom movement with its anti colonial roots. The struggle was for Indian nationalism and so the Muslims and Hindu communalists kept aloof from this great struggle against colonial masters, it was this struggle which built the Indian nation with all its diversity.

Similarly as we have equal rights as citizens the chapters on citizenship are being dropped. Federalism has been the core part of India’s administrative and political structure. As the dictatorial tendencies are becoming stronger, federalism is bound to suffer and that explains the dropping of this subject. Democracy is decentralization of power. Power reaching the lowermost part of the system, the villages and average citizens. This got reflected in Local self Government. The power is distributed among villages, cities, state and center. By removing chapters on federalism and local self government, the indications of the ideology of ruling party are on display.

While we are not dealing with all the portents of the planned omissions, one more aspect that related to dropping of chapter on Human rights needs our attention. The concept of Human rights and dignity are interlinked. This concept of Human rights also has international ramifications. India is signatory to many an UN covenants related to Human rights. The indications are clear that now rights will be for the few elite and ‘duties’ for the large deprived sections will be put on the forefront.

In a way this incidental ‘Corona gifted opportunity’ to the ruling Government is being fully used to enhance the agenda of ruling party in the arena of Educational Curriculum. The part of curriculum with which the ruling party is uncomfortable is being removed. This act of omission does supplement their other acts of commission in changing the shape of educational curriculum, which are reflected in RSS affiliates’ suggestions to MHRD regarding Bhartiyakaran of contents of syllabus. As per this the things like regarding the great epics like Ramayana and Mahabharata as History, the things like India having all the stem cell technology, plastic surgery, aviation science etc. will have a place in the changes planned by communal forces!

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
August 9,2020

Contrary to present impression that Muslims are separatists due to whom the partition of India took place, the truth is that Muslims contributed to freedom movement and upheld India’s composite culture in equal measure. The partition process, mainly due to British policy of ‘divide and rule’ well assisted by Hindu and Muslim communalists is being hidden from the popular vision in India and Muslims in general are held responsible for the same. Not only that the communal historiography introduced by British to pursue their policies has become the bedrock of communal politics and worsening of the perceptions about Muslims is in progress in India.

Yet another example of this has been a series of tweets by the bureaucrat, who is close to retirement, K. Nageshwar Rao. Contrary to the service rules he has made statements, through his tweets which are appreciative of RSS-BJP and demonise the stalwarts Muslim leaders who not only contributed to the freedom movement but also later gave valuable service in laying the foundation of Independent India. As per Rao, his tweets he accuses Maulana Azad and the other Muslim Education ministers of “deracination of Hindus”. After naming “Maulana Abul Kalam Azad — 11 years (1947-58)”; “Humayun Kabir, M C Chagla & Fakruddin Ali Ahmed — 4 years (1963-67)”; and, “Nurul Hassan — 5 years (1972-77)”, he posts: “Remaining 10 years other Leftists like VKRV Rao.”

He points out that their policies were meant to “1. Deny Hindus their knowledge, 2. Vilify Hinduism as collection of superstitions, 3. Abrahamise Education, 4. Abrahamise Media & Entertainment, 5. Shame Hindus about their identity!  and 6. Bereft of the glue of Hinduism Hindu society dies.”

Then he goes on to praise RSS-BJP for bringing the glory back to Hindus. These statements of his on one hand promote the Hate and on the other tantamount to political statement, which civil servants should not by making. CPM politburo member Brinda Karat has written a letter to Home Minister Amit Shah to take suitable action against the erring bureaucrat.

Rao begins with Maulana Abul kalam Azad. Surely Azad was one of the major leaders of freedom movement, who was also the youngest President of INC, in 1923 and later between 1940 to 1945. He opposed the partition process tooth and nail till the very last. As the Congress President in 1923 he wrote a remarkable Para, symbolizing the urge for Hindu Muslim unity, “If an angel descends from heaven and offers me Swaraj in 24 hours on condition that I give up Hindu Muslim Unity, I will refuse. Swaraj we will get sooner or later; its delay will be a loss for India, but loss of Hindu Muslim unity will be a loss for human kind”. His biographer Syeda Hamid points out “He spoke without an iota of doubt about how debacle of Indian Muslims has been the result of the colossal mistakes committed by Muslim League’s misguided leadership. He exhorted Muslims to make common cause with their Hindu, Sikh, Christian fellow countrymen.” He was the one who promoted the translation of Hindu scriptures Ramayan and Mahabharat in to Persian.

Surely Mr. Rao, neither has read Azad or read about him nor knows his contributions to making of Modern India. While today, the ideological formation to which Mr. Rao seems to be pledging his commitment is critical of all that happened during Nehru era, it was during this period when as education minister Azad was shepherding the formations of IITs, Academies of Science, Lalit kala Academies. It was during this period that the efforts to promote Indian composite culture were undertaken through various steps.

The other stalwarts who are under the hammer have been outstanding scholars and giants in their own field of education. Humayun Kabir, Nurul Hasan, Dr.Zakir Husssain gave matchless ideas and practical contributions in different fields of education. One can say that contrary to the accusations, India could match up to the Computer era, software and associate things, due to creation of large manpower in these areas mainly due to these foundations which were laid down particularly in the field of education during this period.

The charge that these ‘Muslim’ education ministers white washed the bloody Islamic rule is a blind repetition of the offshoot of communal historiography introduced by British. While Kings were ruling for power and wealth, their courts had Hindus and Muslim both officers. The jaundiced vision sees this as a bloody Islamic rule but as a matter of fact the syncretic culture and traditions developed precisely this period. It was during this period that Bhakti Traidtion with Kabir, Tukaram, Namdeo, Tulsidas flourished. It was during this period that humane values of Sufi saints reached far and wide. It was during this period that poets like Rahim and Raskhan produced their classic literature n praise of Hindu Gods.

We also need to remind ourselves that large number of Muslims participated in the freedom Movement. Two scholars Shamsul Islam and Nasir Ahmad have come out with books on the myriad such freedom fighters, to recall just a few names. Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan, Zakir Hussain, Syed Mohammad Sharfuddin Kadri, Bakht Khan, Muzzafar Ahmad, Mohammad Abdir Rahman,, Abbas Ali, Asaf Ali, Yusuf Mehrali, Maulana Mazahrul Hague.

These are just a few of the names. The movement, led by Gandhi, definitely laid the foundations where composite Indian culture and respect for all religions, others’ religion was paramount and this is what created Indian fraternity, one of the values which finds its place in the preamble of Indian Constitution.

This blaming of Education ministers who were Muslims is an add-on to the process of Islamophobia in India. So for there have been many actions of Muslim kings which are selectively presented as being bloody, now the post Independent History, where glorious contributions have been made by Muslim leaders are being used to further deepen the divisive process. We need to pay respects to builders of modern India, irrespective of their religion.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.