Seizure of fake voter IDs: BJP, JDS demand postponement of polls in RR Nagar; Cong suspects BJP’s hand

News Network
May 9, 2018

Bengaluru, May 9: After the seizure of nearly 10,000 fake voters IDs from a private apartment at Jalahalli ward in Rajarajeshwarinagar constituency in Bengaluru, the Bharatiya Janata Party and the Janata Dal(S) have demanded postponement of election in the segment.

Chief Electoral Officer Sanjiv Kumar, at a specially convened press meet around 11.30 pm on Tuesday, said 9,746 voter IDs were found at a flat at the SLV Park View apartment and owned by one Manjula Nanjamuri that was rented out to one Rakesh.

The CEO, who visited the flat, also found five laptops and one printer. There were two large steel trunks with about one lakh counterfoil strips resembling acknowledgement slips used for addition of new names on to the electoral rolls.

Referring to the demand for countermanding or postponement of polls, Kumar said the decision will have to be taken by the Election Commission and added that a move on this would be known in the next 24 hours.

Among the contestants from the seat are: Muniratna of the Congress, P M Muniraju of BJP and G H Ramachandra of JD(S).

The BJP first made a complaint to the Election Commission as a team of party workers found the ID cards at the apartment in the Jalahalli ward of the Rajarajeshwarinagar constituency. The BJP workers found this when they searched the Park View flat. JD(S) national president H D Deve Gowda visited the area and urged the Election Commission to intervene in the matter.

Gowda, who paid a visit to RR Nagar at around 9 pm, is said to have later made calls to Election Commissioner of India O P Rawat, CEO Sanjiv Kumar and Bengaluru Police Commissioner T Suneel Kumar, and sought to know what action has been taken.

Joining the issue, BJP leaders Ananth Kumar and Prakash Javadekar too demanded that the ECI countermand the elections in the segment. They duo convened a press conference at party chief Amit Shah’s temporary residence in the city.

“In light of revelation of tens of thousands of fake voter ID cards and empty packets of hard currency, the BJP demands countermanding of the elections. This is a Congress’s conspiracy to rig the elections, in face of their imminent defeat,” they said.

Sanjiv Kumar said, "this is certainly a serious matter. More than a lakh counter fouls found in this apartment. We ensure that free and fair poll will be conducted.’’

Ananth Kumar also said that illegalities were found in Chamundeshwari and Badami constituencies where Chief Minister Siddaramaiah is contesting. "By deciding to contest from Badami, Siddaramaiah has already admitted defeat in Chamundeshwari. He is doing everything in his capacity to rig the elections. The BJP has demanded that the Election Commission deploy paramilitary forces in every booth in Chamundeshwari," he said, adding that wads of cash, in addition to a diary was seized in Badami.

Kumar also demanded that Munirathna be arrested immediately. "Munirathna has set up a factory to print fake voter ID cards. He is a close aide of Siddaramaiah. He should be arrested immediately. His candidature should also be cancelled," he added.

Terming it a "classic case of a pot calling the kettle black in a midnight drama", the Congress turned tables by pointing fingers at the BJP.

‘BJP is the actor, director and perpetrator’

Addressing the media at 12.30 am, Congress spokesperson Randeep Surjewala charged that the BJP leaders were "actors, directors and perpetrators", of the entire episode.

He said that the party, fearing defeat, was trying to divert the attention of the Karnataka voters. He said that top BJP leaders were involved in this "conspiracy".

Questioning who the 9,476 cards belonged to, Surjewala demanded a high-level enquiry against the top BJP leadership, including Narendra Modi, Amit Shah, BS Yeddyurappa and Prakash Javadekar.

He said that the apartment belonged to a BJP leader and ex-corporator Manjula Najamari. She had rented it to her adopted son, who had contested the BBMP elections in 2015 and lost, he added.

"BJP has lost the elections. Hence it is indulging in this blame game. It's attempt influence the election is an insult to the wisdom of the Karnataka electorate. It is reprehensible. The ECI should not jump to any conclusions. Instead, it should lodge an FIR against those who held a press conference at the same time the CEO was holding a presser, aside from the people who own the apartment," he added.

Comments

A Kannadiga
 - 
Wednesday, 9 May 2018

This is from a flat (RR Nagar, Apt No 115) owned by BJP leader Manjula Nanjamari and rented to another BJP leader (& her son), Rakesh, who is managing elections for the party.

Rakesh is close to the senior BJP leaders in Karnataka and he has been assigned the task to 'manage' elections for the BJP in Karnataka.

This is what the BJP is doing, looking at the defeat on its face.. Completely exposed.

ahmed ali k
 - 
Wednesday, 9 May 2018

 No need to mention the party here. Most of the peace loving kannadigas knows who is behind this issue as you  can see now a days how they are fooling public by giving false statements, giving provocative speaches, communal bias etc.. etc.

They will never hesitate to do anything to gain the power. Ready to make issue of circumcision.

Peacelover
 - 
Wednesday, 9 May 2018

The criminal will go to any extend for the power they will not spare their own family. So all should care full with these non sense.Stand together and eliminate all social criminals and their entire groos from our loving state.

 

Jai Hind Jai Karnataka

 

Kumar
 - 
Wednesday, 9 May 2018

There is no doubt that bjp is behind this issue.  They are expert in doing illegal things like issuance of fake voter id, hampering is EVM machines, bribing voters, looting banks, running away with money, threatening people to face dare sequence if not voted for bjp, supporting rapists etc etc.   EC should do thorough investigatin in this false voted id issue and ban the responsible party from voting elecion.

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 27,2020

New Delhi, Jan 27: Non-Muslim refugees from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan will have to provide proofs of their religious beliefs while applying for Indian citizenship under the controversial Citizenship Amendment Bill (CAA), officials said on Monday.

The applicants belonging to Hindu, Sikh, Christian, Buddhist, Jain or Parsi faiths will also have to furnish documents to prove that they entered India on or before December 31, 2014.

Those who will seek Indian citizenship under the CAA will have to provide proofs of their religious beliefs and this will be mentioned in the rules to be issued under the CAA, a government official said.

According to the CAA, members of Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi and Christian communities who have come from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan till December 31, 2014, due to religious persecution there will not be treated as illegal immigrants and will be given Indian citizenship.

The central government is also likely to give a relatively smaller window of just three months to those who want to apply for Indian citizenship in Assam under the CAA, another official said.

Some Assam-specific provisions are expected to be incorporated in the rules to be issued for the implementation of the CAA.

Assam chief minister Sarbananda Sonowal and his finance minister Himanta Biswa Sarma had made a request about a fortnight ago to keep a limited period window for applying under the CAA and also incorporate some other Assam-specific provisions in the CAA rules.

The move comes in view of continuing protests against the CAA in Assam that have been going on since the legislation was passed by Parliament in December last year.

There has been a growing feeling among the indigenous people of Assam that the newly enacted legislation will hurt their interests politically, culturally as well as socially.

The Assam Accord provides for detection and deportation of all illegal immigrants who have entered the country after 1971 and are living in the state, irrespective of their religion.

The protesters in Assam say that the CAA violates the provisions of the Assam Accord.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
coastaldigest.com news network
August 2,2020

Bengaluru, Aug 2: All the seven Airports in Karnataka have seen poor traffic even after the restoration of domestic flight services post covid-19 lockdown. Interestingly, Mangaluru International Airport, the second biggest in the state, has slipped to third position in number of number of passengers and flights. 

Of all the seven airports in State-- Bengaluru, Mangaluru, Hubballi, Belagavi, Mysuru, Kalaburagi and Vijaynagara (Hosapete)-- it was the Sambra (Belagavi) airport which saw the highest number of passengers and flights after Bengaluru. 

According to Airports Authority of India report released on their website recently, the Sambra airport outperformed the Managluru international airport in June. 

As many 10,224 passengers travelled to or from Belagavi airport in June, whereas Mangaluru airport saw a footfall of only 8,608 passengers including 3,726 international and 4,882 domestic passengers. Belagavi airport handled 391 flights whereas Mangaluru airport handled 190 flights.

Even the Bengaluru international airport saw a decline in the number of passengers and flights in June. Only 3.69 lakh domestic and 10,654 international passengers arrived or departed from Kempegowda International Airport, Bengaluru in June as against 27.59 lakh total passengers in June 2019. 

Between April-June 2020 the Bengaluru airport saw only 4.54 lakh total passengers (domestic and international) as against 84.11 lakh total passenger during the same period last year. The number of flights to and from Bengaluru also saw a huge dip in June with only 731 international (2,582 in June 2019) and 4290 domestic (16,216 in June 2019) flights.

Though the Mysuru domestic airport handled a higher number of flights compared to last June, the number of passengers either arriving or departing saw a decline. Last year June 4,775 passengers travelled in 96 flights, whereas in June 2020 the airport handled 3,158 passengers and 330 flights.

Hubballi airport saw the least number of passengers or flights among the seven airports in Karnataka in June. It saw only 55 passengers either arriving or departing from the city's airport in 14 flights in the month of June. In the same month last year, Hubballi airport, which was third busiest before the pandemic, had facilitated 45,973 passengers and handled 604 flights.

Since April 2020 to June, the Hubballi airport has handled only 18 flights (as against 1,958 during the same period last year) and 122 passengers (1,50,416 between April-June 2019).

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
July 29,2020

Bengaluru, Jul 29: The Karnataka High Court’s division bench of Chief Justice Abhay Oka and Justice H P Sandesh today rejected an application that wanted Amulya Leona’s case to be transferred from Karnataka Police to the National Investigation Agency (NIA).

The bench, while observing that extraordinary jurisdiction can’t be exercised for transferring the case to the NIA, asked “What is so special that investigation should be transferred to NIA?”

The court, in its previous hearing, had questioned the maintainability of the petition seeking transfer of the sedition case against Leona to the NIA.

According to the petitioner, advocate Pavana Chandra Shetty, the case is a serious matter against national integration and unity and has not been investigated properly by the police. The state police also failed to file the chargesheet within 90 days, he said, and also asked for cancellation of her bail.

The bench asked the petitioner as to how a bail, already granted to a person, can be cancelled. “Is it not the indefeasible right of the accused to be released on bail if chargesheet is not filed within stipulated time? How can you make a prayer for cancellation of bail?”  the Court asked.

The counsel for the petitioner also stated that in cases of a cognizable offence, when the chargesheet is purposely not filed within the stipulated time, the matter will have to transferred to the appropriate authority.

The court responded to his contention by asking him how could the court override law and cancel the bail. “Where is the question of cancellation of bail? Can we override the law and say that bail should be cancelled?” said the bench.

Advocate Vishal Raghu had filed the petition for transfer of Leona’s case, who was accused of raising pro-Pakistan slogans at an anti-CAA rally on February 20 at Freedom Park. The advocate had blamed the probe team for not filing a chargesheet on time and has asked the state government to approach the higher court against bail granted to Leona.

Bengaluru student Amulya Leona was charged with sedition for her actions in the presence of All India Majlis-e-Ittehad-ul-Muslimeen chief Asaduddin Owaisi. She was arrested by the Bengaluru police for allegedly shouting ‘Pakistan Zindabad’ slogans at an anti- CAA Protest in Bengaluru in February this year. On June 11, she was granted conditional bail by the Bengaluru civil court.

Her bail plea was earlier rejected by a Bengaluru court, after she had spent a three-month period in jail, stating that she may abscond if she is released. The sessions judge Vidhyadhar Shirahatti had also stated that if the petitioner is granted bail, she may abscond and may involve in similar offence which affects peace at large and hence her petition is liable to be rejected. The court had also noted that Amulya Leona is an influential person who may threaten and influence the witness and hamper the case in case of the prosecution and will abscond if released on bail.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.