Drama galore in India's doubles tennis teams

August 5, 2016

Ravi Ubha, Aug 5: India loves Bollywood, and its Olympic tennis team has inadvertently provided a sequel suitable for the country’s renowned film industry.

olyAs at the London Games four years ago, personality clashes and animosity are threatening to overshadow Indian players’ reputation for strong doubles play.

Since the 2012 Games, Sania Mirza has risen to No. 1 in the women’s doubles rankings, and Leander Paes, who at 43 is headed to a record seventh Olympics, has collected five more Grand Slam titles in doubles or mixed doubles to raise his career total to 18.

But instead of celebrating Paes’ longevity and the team’s medal chances, Indian players have been rehashing public feuds.

“It doesn’t look good, but it happens in various other countries,” said Bharat Oza, the secretary-general of India’s national tennis governing body, the All India Tennis Association. Oza, however, was not immediately able to give examples.

Four years ago, the tennis association’s preference was for Mahesh Bhupathi to partner in London with Paes, recreating the so-called Indian Express team that won three Grand Slams and in 1999 became the first men’s pair in the Open era to reach all four Grand Slam finals in one season. But Bhupathi, whose doubles partner at the time was Rohan Bopanna, refused to play with Paes.

Bhupathi, who used stinging language like “we don’t speak and have no camaraderie” and said Paes “privately and publicly stabbed me in the back,” could not be convinced.

Disappointing show

Ultimately, Bhupathi and Bopanna formed one team, with Paes forced to play with the unheralded Vishnu Vardhan.

Paes, though, was chosen to play mixed doubles alongside Mirza, even though she had won two mixed doubles Grand Slam titles with Bhupathi, including one at the French Open just weeks earlier.

Mirza, feeling like a pawn, released a lengthy, no-holds-barred statement denouncing the decision.

“As an Indian woman belonging to the 21st century, what I find disillusioning is the humiliating manner in which I was put up as a bait to try and pacify one of the disgruntled stalwarts of Indian tennis,” she said.

None of India’s four doubles teams won more than one Olympic match on the grass of the All England Club.

Any thoughts of a seamless process this year fizzled when Bopanna told the Indian association that he wanted to play in Rio de Janeiro with Saketh Myneni, who has yet to appear in the top 100 in singles or doubles but has regularly played with Bopanna in the Davis Cup.

As a top-10 doubles player at the ranking cutoff for the Olympics in June, Bopanna earned an automatic spot in the Rio tournament and could line up with any country-

man he chose, but his governing body had to approve.

“I have much admiration for Leander Paes and his many achievements, but unfortunately we have not been able to put together a good combination despite our best efforts, and I do not believe our styles of play are either compatible or complementary,” Bopanna said in a statement.

“Considering that this is a team event where two individuals need to jell together

to do well, regardless of individual achievements, it is the team and the combination that matters.”

The Indian tennis association, to no one’s surprise, turned down Bopanna’s request, and he was named Paes’ partner. This time, though, there was no fight.

“The moment we declared this is what the combinations are, immediately, within five minutes, Rohan sent me an email saying that I agree to play because he knew if he refuses, then he knows we don’t send a team,” Oza said.

If Bopanna had prevented Paes from making a record-extending seventh appearance in the Olympic tennis event and deprived the country of men’s participants, he would have been cast as a villain by many in India.

“The best bet would be to field Leander and Rohan, so that’s why we told Rohan,

‘We appreciate what you say, but ultimately we have to think about the country and the medal prospect,’” Oza said. “Naturally Leander is an iconic figure in the Davis Cup and world tennis.”

Measured moves

Mirza avoided being placed in an awkward position again. A team of Bopanna and Mirza was the only one that had a rankings combination that guaranteed India a spot in the 16-team mixed doubles draw.

At Wimbledon, Mirza said she did not “have a take” on the latest turbulent chapter in Indian tennis. “I’m there to represent my country, and I’m looking forward to it,” she added.

Bopanna, in an email, said: “What’s done in the past, there is nothing to dwell on that. It’s time where you look into the future and move on.” Paes did not respond to questions emailed to him.

For Mirza, chemistry in doubles is pivotal. “I think it’s good if you get along on and off the court, but history has said people who don’t get along well on the court can still win,” she said. “It just depends person to person. For me, it’s important.”

Paes and Bopanna won together in a lower-tier Davis Cup series against South Korea in July. Paes would not normally have played in such an event, but he was urged to participate by the Indian tennis association, Oza said.

“Leander has said he would only play at the World Group level, not below that, but we told him that because the government, the public, population of India and people abroad are looking at what you people are doing, you at least better make an appearance saying that we can play good doubles, so that at least will satisfy some of the murmurs that are going around,” Oza said.

“We called him because it was an important tie, and it was before Rio, so at least you can have some exercise together, playing in match conditions.”

Bopanna said, “We had a few strong practice sessions prior to the start of the tie.”

Paes’s lone Olympic medal came not in doubles but in singles, in Atlanta in 1996, when he took home the bronze. If he and Bopanna stand side by side on the podium in Brazil, this Bollywood-style drama would come to a pleasing conclusion for Indian tennis fans.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
July 12,2020

New Delhi, Jul 12: Former India batsman Sachin Tendulkar has urged the International Cricket Council (ICC) to do away with 'umpire's call' whenever a team opts for a review regarding a leg-before wicket (LBW) decision.

The Master Blaster has also said that a batsman should be given out if the ball is hitting the stumps.

Whether more than 50 per cent of the ball is hitting the stumps or not should not be matter, he further stated.

"What per cent of the ball hits the stumps doesn't matter, if DRS shows us that the ball is hitting the stumps, it should be given out, regardless of the on-field call," Tendulkar tweeted.

With this tweet, the former India batsman also shared a video, in which he has a discussion with Brian Lara regarding the working of DRS.
"One thing I don't agree with, with the ICC, is the DRS they have been using for quite some time. It is the LBW decision where more than 50 per cent of the ball must be hitting the stumps for the on-field decision to be overturned," Tendulkar said in the video.

"The only reason they (the batsman or the bowler) have gone upstairs is that they are unhappy with the on-field decision, so when the decision goes to the third umpire, let the technology take over, just like in tennis, it's either in or out, there's nothing in between," he added.

This call for doing away with umpire's call has been recommended by many former players.
Whenever a verdict pops up as 'umpire's call, the decision of the on-field umpire is not changed, but the teams do not lose their review as well.

ICC recently introduced some changes to the game of cricket, and they gave all teams liberty of extra review as non-neutral umpires will be employed in Test matches due to the coronavirus pandemic.

As a result, all teams will now have three reviews in every innings of a Test match. 

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 9,2020

Bengaluru, Jun 9: Former India skipper Rahul Dravid has said that Virat Kohli understands that the real respect for him as a cricketer will come through success in the longest format of the game.

Dravid, popularly known as 'The Wall', also said that Test batsmanship has become exciting to watch now as batters play aggressive shots more often.

"I actually believe Test batsmanship has become more exciting than before, the aggressive element of Test batsmanship is going forward, players are playing shots and it is good to see, a good thing for India is Virat Kohli really values Test cricket, he understands that the real respect for him as a cricketer will come from his success in Test cricket," Dravid told Sanjay Manjrekar in a videocast hosted by ESPNCricinfo.

He also said that defensive batting in cricket is not irrelevant, but added that players can have successful careers without having a good defensive technique.

"I don't think it is becoming irrelevant, maybe the value of defensive batting is not the same as it was a generation ago, it can never become irrelevant, I think you still need to defend your wicket if you want to score suns, I feel now you can survive without a good defensive technique in cricket," Dravid said.

"Today, you do not need to have a good Test career to have a successful career, look at the best players in the world today, a lot of them have a good defensive technique and they can play out difficult periods of the game," he added.

The 47-year-old Dravid also said that all young players want to represent their country in all three formats during their initial days, but eventually, they become realistic as time passes by.

"I would say in my interaction with the younger players, everyone's hero is someone who has succeeded in all formats of the game. I think all players start off wanting to play all formats, but then guys get a little realistic about their careers, superstars of the game will still want to play to all formats of the game," Dravid said.

Dravid is the only player in the history of cricket to be involved in two 300-plus ODI partnerships.

He played 164 Tests, 344 ODIs and one T20I for India. Dravid had announced his retirement from international cricket in March 2012.

He finished his career with 48 international centuries.

He has also coached the Indian junior sides (India U-19 and India A) and he is now the head of the National Cricket Academy (NCA).

Dravid has also led the side during his playing days and under his leadership, the side had managed to register their first Test series win in England.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 25,2020

Jun 25: After asserting that the 2011 World Cup final was "sold" by "certain parties" in Sri Lanka to India, the island nation's former sports minister Mahindananda Aluthgamage has now called his claim a "suspicion" that he wants investigated.

The Lankan government has ordered an enquiry into the matter and a special Police investigation unit recorded Aluthgamage's statement on Wednesday. He told the team that he was only suspicious of fixing.

"I want my suspicion investigated," Aluthgamage told reporters.

"I gave to the Police, a copy of the complaint I lodged with the International Cricket Council (ICC) on 30 October 2011 regarding the said allegation as then Sports Minister," he said.

Aluthgamage has alleged that his country "sold" the game to India, a claim that was ridiculed by former captains Kumar Sangakkara and Mahela Jayawardene who demanded evidence from him.

Set a target of 275, India clinched the trophy thanks to the brilliance of Gautam Gambhir (97) and then skipper Mahendra Singh Dhoni (91).

"Today I am telling you that we sold the 2011 world cup, I said this when I was the sports minister," Aluthgamage, who was the sports minister at the time, had stated.

Sangakkara, the captain of Sri Lanka at that time, asked him to produce evidence for an anti-corruption probe.

"He needs to take his 'evidence' to the ICC and the Anti corruption and Security Unit so the claims can be investigated thoroughly," he tweeted.

Jayawardene, also a former captain who scored a hundred in that game, ridiculed the charge.

"Is the elections around the corner...like the circus has started...names and evidence?" he asked in a tweet.

Aluthgamage said that in his opinion no players were involved in fixing the result, "but certain parties were."

Both Aluthgamage and the then President Mahinda Rajapaksa were among the invitees at the final played at the Wankhede Stadium in Mumbai.

Following his allegations, Aravinda de Silva, the former great who was the then chairman of selectors, has urged the BCCI to conduct its own investigation.

De Silva has said he is willing to travel to India to take part in such an investigation despite the current COVID-19 threat.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.