Fin sector jobs to be lost to mergers, tech & cost pressures

February 24, 2017

Feb 24: A permanent job with a nationalised bank. Until a few months ago, being employed with a public sector bank was a matter of pride and drew the choicest wedding proposals. Unfortunately, that position is losing its lustre as it may no longer be a job for life.

jobsAfter its associate banks are merged into the State Bank of India (SBI), about 200,000 jobs could be cut, said CH Venkatachalam, General Secretary, All India Bank Employees Association (AIBEA).

Human resource officials said that this is still a conservative number. With automation, the numbers could double. Voluntary retirement offers are expected to climb steeply not only in SBI associate banks but also in other public sector banks.

This is not a problem restricted to only SBI and associates. The number of senior executives being asked to take voluntary retirement in PSU banks has seen a 25 percent jump over the last two years.

“The competition between public sector and private sector banks has intensified in the last one to two years. PSU banks, which were shy of going digital, are getting into this game in a big way. Naturally, we would want more niche talent for such roles and they don"t come cheap,” said the general manager of a mid-size public sector bank.

Many skill sets of cash managers and those in branches have become redundant, making their positions vulnerable.

Aditya Narayan Mishra, CEO, CIEL HR Services, said that the opportunities for reskilling are also limited in banks. This means that a large portion of the clerical staff which were once the core strength of banks are no longer required.

“Rather than reskilling existing operations staff, banks are choosing to hire more younger job-ready talent,” he said. As per estimates, almost 500,000 clerical jobs will be replaced by automated processes.

Customers have also opted to keep branch visits to the bare minimum. Hence, branch banking, which had 60-65 percent of total bank staff, will soon have 15-20 percent fewer people in the next three years. Approximately, 100,000 jobs in branch banking will go missing in the next three to four years.

Banks setting up robots may not lead to jobs getting cut immediately, but over 12-24 months, recruiters said, cuts are bound to happen.

Mishra said that compared to earlier times, automation has led to private banks cutting down branch banking costs. This translates to job cuts across their branch networks.

As younger talent is becoming the need of the hour, many banks want older staff, who are often not tech-savvy, to leave. The younger staff also come cheaper, resulting in useful savings.

“Employees who have crossed 45 and are being asked to quit have fewer options since banks only want 23-25 year-olds,” said a senior HR head.

The situation is no better in other segments like insurance where regulatory whip on managing expenses has forced companies to trim down teams across roles. Positions in teams like investment and top management are now also being reviewed on a quarterly basis and those who are off targets are constantly put under watch.

The big foreign investment numbers are no longer coming in. Insurers have opted for cost-cutting through letting go of people and having smaller teams.

Company executives said that with even the debt market getting volatile, churn in investment teams in insurers and mutual funds has been high. This, they said, is expected to continue even this year.

Rather than having big investment teams, numbers are being gradually cut to 4-5 people to look into daily trading. Smaller insurers are the worst hit since the new norms on expenses of management mean that salary costs would have to be drastically reduced.

Further, with mergers of insurance companies also on the anvil, consequent job losses are certain, though they would come with a lag.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
June 10,2020

US dictionary Merriam-Webster will update the meaning of the word "racism" after being contacted by a Missouri black woman, who claimed the current definition fell short of including the systematic oppression of people of colour, according to media reports.

"A revision to the entry for racism is now being drafted to be added to the dictionary soon, and we are also planning to revise the entries of other words that are related to racism or have racial connotations," according to a statement of the 189-year-old dictionary shared by Kennedy Mitchum, a recent graduate of Drake University in Iowa, on her Facebook.

Mitchum, 22, emailed the dictionary last month, following the death of African American George Floyd in the custody of four Minneapolis police officers, Xinhua news agency reported.

"I kept having to tell them that definition is not representative of what is actually happening in the world," Mitchum told CNN. "The way that racism occurs in real life is not just prejudice, it's the systemic racism that is happening for a lot of black Americans."

Merriam-Webster's first definition of racism is "a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race."

"It's not just disliking someone because of their race," Mitchum wrote in a Facebook post on Friday. "This current fight we are in is evidence of that, lives are at stake because of the systems of oppression that go hand-in-hand with racism."

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
March 8,2020

Consumer watchdog Which? has claimed that more than one billion Android phones and tablets are vulnerable to hackers as they no longer supported by security updates.

According to the research report, the most at-risk phones are any that run Android 4 or older and those smartphones running Android 7.0 which can not be updated are also at risk.

Based on data from Google analysed by Which?, two in five android device users around the world are no longer receiving the important updates. Currently, those devices are unlikely to have issues, but the lack of security leaves them open to attack.

"It is very concerning that expensive Android devices have such a short shelf life before they lose security support, leaving millions of users at risk of serious consequences if they fall victim to hackers," Kate Bevan editor Which? said in a statement.

"Google and phone manufacturers need to be upfront about security updates with clear information about how long they will last and what customers should do when they run out. The government must also push ahead with planned legislation to ensure manufacturers are far more transparent about security updates for smart devices and their impact on consumers," Kate added.

Android phone released around 2012 or earlier, including popular models like the Samsung Galaxy S3 and Sony Xperia S, are particularly at risk to hackers.

Which? has made suggestions to Android users on what to consider if they have an older phone that may be at risk.

Any Android device which is more than two years old, check whether it can be updated to a newer version of the operating system. If it is on an earlier version than Android 7.0 Nougat, try to update via Settings> System>Advanced System update.

In case a user is not able tto update the phone, the device could be at risk of being hacked if it is running a version of Android 4 or lower.

A user also need to be careful about downloading apps outside the Google Play store and should also install a mobile anti-virus via an app.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
June 5,2020

With the scrapping of Mitron and Remove China Apps from its Play Store gaining a lot of attention in India, Google on Thursday said that it removed a video app "for a number of technical policy violations", while adding that it also does not allow an app that "encourages or incentivizes users into removing or disabling third-party apps".

Both the apps became immensely popular in India within a short span of time due to the prevailing anti-China sentiment amid border tensions between India and China in Ladakh and calls by Indian activists to boycott Chinese products.

Reports suggested that the Mitron app is a repackaged version of TicTic, which is a TikTok clone.

The Remove China Apps was designed to help users identify applications of Chinese origin.

Without naming the apps, Google hinted that the Mitron app may make a comeback on the Play Store once it fixes some technical issues, but the chances of the Remove China Apps are thin.

"We have an established process of working with developers to help them fix issues and resubmit their apps. We've given this developer (of the video app) some guidance and once they've addressed the issue the app can go back up on Play," Sameer Samat, Vice President, Android and Google Play, said in a statement.

Google said that its Android app store was designed to provide a safe and secure experience for the consumers while also giving developers the platform and tools they need to build sustainable businesses.

Samat said that Google Play recently suspended a number of apps for violating the policy that it does not allow an app that "encourages or incentivizes users into removing or disabling third-party apps or modifying device settings or features unless it is part of a verifiable security service".

"This is a longstanding rule designed to ensure a healthy, competitive environment where developers can succeed based upon design and innovation. When apps are allowed to specifically target other apps, it can lead to behaviour that we believe is not in the best interest of our community of developers and consumers," Samat said.

"We've enforced this policy against other apps in many countries consistently in the past - just as we did here," he added.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.