House panel summons defence chiefs

April 10, 2012

New Delhi, April 10: The three defence service chiefs have been summoned by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Defence, which asked them to appear before it and apprise on the level of the armed forces’ preparedness in case of an enemy attack.

The three chiefs may appear before the panel on April 20, though the date may be changed to ensure their presence.

The committee took this unprecedented step after Army Chief Gen V K Singh's letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, depicting the sorry state of affairs in the Army, found its way to the media.

tank

New Delhi, April 10: The House panel on Monday took the decision of calling the chiefs after it heard Defence Secretary Shashi Kant Sharma, who clarified the government's stand on a newspaper report on the movement of two Army units towards the national capital on the same day when Gen Singh moved the Supreme Court challenging the government's stand on his date of birth controversy.

The Army does not need the government's permission to move units, Sharma reportedly informed the committee headed by Congress member Satpal Maharaj. The defence secretary said that the inference drawn in the report – an attempt to stage a coup or muscle flexing by the Army – was completely wrong. Sharma underlined that no standard operating procedures were violated by the Army.

The media report was “misleading” and drew “wrong inferences,” she added. While a some MPs wanted more details, many wanted a closure of the controversy as it dealt with the Army.

Quizzed by the Parliamentarians on the involvement of retired officers in arms deals, Sharma suggested a moratorium of five years for service officers before they were allowed to take up a job in the private sector, BJP MP Uday Singh, who attended the meeting, told Deccan Herald. The MPs wondered why the Defence ministry lowered the cool-off period for service officers from two years previously to one year, which is in vogue at the moment. The Army Chief claimed recently that a retired Lt Gen offered him a bribe of Rs 14 crore to clear a tranche of sub-standard vehicles.

Besides the defence secretary, the House panel also heard Vice-Chief of the Army Lt Gen S K Singh and officials from the Indian Air Force, Defence Research and Development Organisation and Bharat Earth Movers Ltd, to understand the status of preparedness of the armed forces as the committee was discussing the budgetary proposals for defence. Last month the Centre increased the military budget by 17.63 per cent aiming to improve border infrastructure, purchase new equipment and raise new forces. The rise is possibly the highest since Kargil conflicts.

Munition shortage

Deposing before the panel, the Army vice-chief said the force was facing a shortage of certain anti-tank munitions - an issue flagged by the Army chief in his letter. Though there were reports that tank ammunition might be exhausted in 20 days due to poor reserve rather than the buffer period of 40 days, there was no official confirmation on the extent of shortage.

Following the vice-chief's deposition, the committee decided to call all three service chiefs for an ‘interaction’ which may lead to a separate report on defence preparedness, a member said.

This is an extraordinary step as in the recent past, the three service chiefs have appeared before a House panel only once. In January, 2011, the Army and IAF chiefs and the Navy vice-chief appeared before the Public Accounts Committee when it was examining a CAG report on ration supply to soldiers. BEML chief V R S Natarajan informed the panel that the company dealt with the original manufacturer of Tatra trucks and not an agent. All standard processes were followed.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
February 26,2020

Hyderabad, Feb 26: Hyderabad Police on Tuesday registered a case against well-known poet Imran Pratapgarhi for his statement asking why there was "no Shaheen Bagh in Hyderabad".

According to Charminar Police, the complaint was registered by Sub-Inspector S Guruswamy, who was on duty at the QQ Stadium on February 24 where an Ehtaji Mishaira (Poetry Program) against the Citizenship Amendment Act, National Register Commission and National Population Register was held.

Permission for the said event was granted by Hyderabad Additional Commissioner of Police to the program organisers with certain guidelines including that poetry program should be held on February 24 from 6 pm to 9 pm, and no speaker should give provocative speeches in the program.

However, police said that the program was started by the organisers at 6 pm and continued till 9:48 pm even after police officers asked them to end the event by 9 pm. The program was attended by around 3,000 members at QQ stadium.

According to police, while addressing the meeting Pratapgarhi said: "Mujhe hairath hai us Hyderabad mein koi Shaheen Bagh kyu nahi hai (I am surprised why there is no Shaheen Bagh in Hyderabad)", which is "provocative" and may cause fear to any section of the public.

In this regard, a case has been registered against organisers for disobeying public servants' orders and the poet has been booked for delivering provocative statements under the relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code.

Further investigation is underway.

Meanwhile, Congress leader Mohammed Ali Shabbir took to Twitter to condemn the police action.

"Hyderabad Police booked a case against poet Imran Pratapgarhi for expressing surprise on why there is no Shaheen Bagh in Hyderabad. For police, this sentence is provocative. Is Shaheen Bagh not a part of India?," Shabbir tweeted.

"Shame on TRS Government and Hyderabad Police for targeting a poet for no-fault," he added.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 25,2020

New Delhi, May 25: India witnessed the highest ever spike of 6,977 positive cases in the last 24 hours, taking the total number of COVID-19 to 1,38,845, according to the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.

India is now among the top 10 countries in the world regarding the total number of COVID-19 cases.

With 154 deaths reported in the last 24 hours, the total number of deaths due to COVID-19 now stands at 4,021 in the country.

Out of the total number of cases, 77,103 are active cases and 57,721 have been cured/discharged/migrated.

Maharashtra continues to remain the worst affected state with 50,231 COVID-19 cases, followed by Tamil Nadu (16,277), Gujarat (14,056) and Delhi (13,418).

The fourth phase of the nationwide lockdown imposed as a precautionary measure to contain the spread of COVID-19 is scheduled to end on May 31.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 19,2020

Hyderabad, May 19: Telangana Chief Minister K Chandrashekar Rao has hit out at the Narendra Modi-led NDA government over the fiscal stimulus package, accusing it of treating states like "beggars" and imposing "laughable" conditions for increasing borrowing limits under the FRBM Act.

"This is 'pure cheating. Betrayal. Jugglery of numbers. All gas. The Centre has reduced its own prestige," he said while referring to conditions linked to the increased borrowing limits for states under the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) Act.

Rao cited international journals that had commented on whether the Union Finance Minister's aim was to revive the GDP or to reach the Rs 20 lakh crore number (the stimulus package announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi).

"This is a very cruel package. It is fully in a feudal policy and dictatorial attitude. We fully condemn this. This is not what we asked for," Rao, who had supported several measures taken by the Centre so far in the fight against coronavirus, said.

At a time when the finances of states were paralysed due to COVID-19 global pandemic, the state governments wanted funds to reach them so that they can help people in different forms, he said. "When we asked for it, you treat states like beggars, what did the Centre do? Is this the way reforms are implemented in India?" he asked during an interaction with media on Monday after a cabinet meeting.

For example, two per cent increase under the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) Act (about Rs 20,000 crore in Telangana) has been given.

But, the conditions put are "laughable" and "very nasty" though the loan was to be fully repaid by the state, he said.

Explaining the situation, Rao said Rs 2,500 crore would be given if reforms were implemented in power sector and Rs 2,500 crore would be allowed if reforms in market committees as suggested by the central government are accepted.

"Is this a package? What is this? This cannot be called a package. Very sorry.. This is not the policy to be followed in a federal system... Then what are the state governments for?" the Telangana Rashtra Samithi supremo asked and said they were also constitutional governments and not subordinates.

The CM said he felt anguished and the way the Centre was wielding control over states was against the spirit of federalism.

"Prime Minister ji said cooperative federalism. This has proved that it is totally hollow and bogus," he added.

The state, however, has already fulfilled certain conditions, he added.

On the occasion, Rao also outlined his government's certain policy guidelines for regulatory farming proposed to be implemented.

On the additional water proposed to be drawn by the neighbouring Andhra Pradesh from Srisailam project, he said there was no question of compromising on the states interests.

Flaying Opposition criticism against his government for allegedly failing to protect the state's interests, Rao said he had sought peaceful co-existence with all the neighbouring states.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.