House panel summons defence chiefs

April 10, 2012

New Delhi, April 10: The three defence service chiefs have been summoned by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Defence, which asked them to appear before it and apprise on the level of the armed forces’ preparedness in case of an enemy attack.

The three chiefs may appear before the panel on April 20, though the date may be changed to ensure their presence.

The committee took this unprecedented step after Army Chief Gen V K Singh's letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, depicting the sorry state of affairs in the Army, found its way to the media.

tank

New Delhi, April 10: The House panel on Monday took the decision of calling the chiefs after it heard Defence Secretary Shashi Kant Sharma, who clarified the government's stand on a newspaper report on the movement of two Army units towards the national capital on the same day when Gen Singh moved the Supreme Court challenging the government's stand on his date of birth controversy.

The Army does not need the government's permission to move units, Sharma reportedly informed the committee headed by Congress member Satpal Maharaj. The defence secretary said that the inference drawn in the report – an attempt to stage a coup or muscle flexing by the Army – was completely wrong. Sharma underlined that no standard operating procedures were violated by the Army.

The media report was “misleading” and drew “wrong inferences,” she added. While a some MPs wanted more details, many wanted a closure of the controversy as it dealt with the Army.

Quizzed by the Parliamentarians on the involvement of retired officers in arms deals, Sharma suggested a moratorium of five years for service officers before they were allowed to take up a job in the private sector, BJP MP Uday Singh, who attended the meeting, told Deccan Herald. The MPs wondered why the Defence ministry lowered the cool-off period for service officers from two years previously to one year, which is in vogue at the moment. The Army Chief claimed recently that a retired Lt Gen offered him a bribe of Rs 14 crore to clear a tranche of sub-standard vehicles.

Besides the defence secretary, the House panel also heard Vice-Chief of the Army Lt Gen S K Singh and officials from the Indian Air Force, Defence Research and Development Organisation and Bharat Earth Movers Ltd, to understand the status of preparedness of the armed forces as the committee was discussing the budgetary proposals for defence. Last month the Centre increased the military budget by 17.63 per cent aiming to improve border infrastructure, purchase new equipment and raise new forces. The rise is possibly the highest since Kargil conflicts.

Munition shortage

Deposing before the panel, the Army vice-chief said the force was facing a shortage of certain anti-tank munitions - an issue flagged by the Army chief in his letter. Though there were reports that tank ammunition might be exhausted in 20 days due to poor reserve rather than the buffer period of 40 days, there was no official confirmation on the extent of shortage.

Following the vice-chief's deposition, the committee decided to call all three service chiefs for an ‘interaction’ which may lead to a separate report on defence preparedness, a member said.

This is an extraordinary step as in the recent past, the three service chiefs have appeared before a House panel only once. In January, 2011, the Army and IAF chiefs and the Navy vice-chief appeared before the Public Accounts Committee when it was examining a CAG report on ration supply to soldiers. BEML chief V R S Natarajan informed the panel that the company dealt with the original manufacturer of Tatra trucks and not an agent. All standard processes were followed.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
June 12,2020

New Delhi, Jun 12: The Supreme Court on Friday slammed the Delhi government on news reports showing deplorable condition of medical wards in Delhi, where dead bodies were not only in wards, but were also found in lobby and waiting areas.

The apex court termed the situation in Delhi "horrendous, horrific and pathetic". It slammed the Arvind Kejriwal-led Delhi government for its handling of dead bodies, terming it "very sorry state of affairs".

A bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan, SK Kaul and MR Shah took suo moto cognizance of the ill-treatment being meted out to Covid patients in hospitals and also the undignified way in which dead bodies of Covid patients were being handled.

Solicitor general Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, said there was a case in Delhi where dead bodies were found alongside patients, who were undergoing treatment.

Justice Shah questioned Mehta, "So what have you done?"

The bench termed the situation in Delhi "horrendous, horrific and pathetic", and reproached the government for patients being placed alongside stacks of dead bodies in the hospitals. The bench noted that patients' families aren't even informed about deaths and in some cases, families haven't been able to attend the last rites, too.

The bench noted that there is a problem with the way the pandemic was being fought in the national capital.

"The number of tests conducted are low in Delhi compared to Chennai and Mumbaia...Why are tests so less in Delhi?" the bench said.

"Nobody should be denied testing onn technical reasons...simplify procedure so more and more can test for Covid," said the bench.

The top court pointed out that it is the duty of the state to conduct testing so that more people know about their health status.

The top court also noted that the situation is grim even in Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 22,2020

New Delhi, June 22: Former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on Monday asked Prime Minister Narendra Modi to be “mindful of the implication of his words” as a controversy raged over his “no intrusion” remark about the violent face-off with Chinese troops in the Galwan Valley.

“The Prime Minister must always be mindful of the implications of his words and declarations on our Nation’s security as also strategic and territorial interests,” Singh said in a statement here as Chinese media welcomed Modi’s ‘no intrusion’  remarks contending that it may lead to a de-escalation of tensions between China and India.

Congress has been maintaining that Modi’s assertions at Friday’s all-party meeting that neither was there any intrusion nor was any Indian post captured ran counter to the statements made by the Indian Army and the External Affairs Ministry.

Singh said the prime minister cannot allow his words to be used by China as a vindication of its position and all organs of the government should work together to tackle this crisis and prevent it from escalating further.

“We remind the Government that disinformation is no substitute for diplomacy or decisive leadership. The truth cannot be suppressed by having pliant allies spout comforting but false statements,” the former prime minister said.

Singh said the prime minister and the government should rise to the occasion to ensure justice for Colonel B Santosh and the army jawans who made the supreme sacrifice and resolutely defended the nation’s territorial integrity.

“To do any less would be a historic betrayal of the people’s faith,” the former prime minister said.

“At this moment, we stand at historic crossroads. Our Government’s decisions and actions will have serious bearings on how the future generations perceive us,” Singh said.

Singh said China was brazenly and illegally seeking to claim parts of Indian territory such as the Galwan Valley and the Pangong Tso Lake by committing multiple incursions between April 2020 till date.  

“We cannot and will not be cowed down by threats and intimidation nor permit a compromise with our territorial integrity,” said Singh. 

The former prime minister said this was a moment where “we must stand together as a nation and be united in our response to this brazen threat.”

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 19,2020

New Delhi, May 19: In a fresh blow to saffronite journalist Arnab Goswami, the Supreme Court of India today rejected his plea seeking transfer of the investigation of a case, filed against him for defaming Congress interim president Sonia Gandhi, to the CBI. The court also refused to quash the FIRs filed against him.

Goswami, editor-in-chief of Republic TV, has been booked in connection with a TV show on the gathering of migrants outside Bandra railway station on April 14. This apart, multiple FIRs have been filed against him for his show on Palghar lynching. In that show, he had posed certain questions on the incident to Congress President Sonia Gandhi, following which Congress workers lodged complaints against him in various states.

Extending Goswami’s interim protection from arrest by three weeks, the Supreme Court said, “Right of a journalist under 19 1 (a) higher…Free citizens can’t exist if news media can’t speak.”

During the earlier hearing, Senior Advocate Harish Salve, appearing for Goswami, had urged the court to transfer the probe to an agency like CBI. He said the “nature of the” second FIR against Goswami over a show on the migrant gathering outside Bandra station on April 14 “shows that it’s arm-twisting tactic”. 

“They are trying to stifle an unpleasant voice. This is a political party targeting a journalist. All complainants are members of one political party. They have a problem with the government. They want to teach this journalist a lesson,” he added.

Objecting to Salve’s plea to transfer the case to the CBI, Maharashtra government counsel, Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, had said, “CBI investigation will go into your hands”. 

Sibal denied that Goswami was being harassed and said he was only asked relevant questions. He said Goswami should “stop this communal violence and communal mongering”.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.