New Delhi, May 27: If performance is the only benchmark and age just a number, then there is no reason to ignore what Ashish Nehra did in IPL 2015 to deserve a place in India's tour of Bangladesh.
Harbhajan Singh, 34, was rewarded with a Test comeback for his 18 wickets but the 36-year-old Ashish Nehra's 22 wickets for Chennai Super Kings were neither considered for Tests nor ODIs. If anything, the contrasting approach points at (a) different standards for different players and (b) quality bench strength of pace bowlers but not spinners. And in case of (b), it's a slightly worrying admittance for a country that is regarded as a traditional nursery of spinners.
While the rise in international-standard pacers in India's domestic circuit is a welcome news, national selection still depends on current form and performance. If that holds true for Harbhajan, it so does for others - and Nehra fits that block to perfection on the back of his IPL-8 heroics.
The selectors didn't need to buy an excuse to recall Nehra. Mohammad Shami is injured and Nehra is consistently back among the wickets. It was a straight pick, still the selectors favoured Ishant Sharma for Tests and Dhawal Kulkarni for ODIs on the Bangladesh tour.
Ishant is coming back from injury since being ruled out for the World Cup. In IPL 2015, the lanky pacer played just four matches for Sunrisers Hyderabad picking only one wicket. Kulkarni, on the other hand, took 13 wickets in 11 matches for Rajasthan Royals.
In comparison to Nehra's 22 sticks at a strike rate of 16.9, only Kulkarni's strike rate of 16.1 makes it to the merit list. But then Nehra bowled 62 overs and Kulkarni only 35. The thing that goes against Nehra is that he's a slow mover and at times a liability in the field. But then Harbhajan isn’t getting younger and has never been a stand-out fielder.
"I have got three or four Man of the Match awards this season and that says it all," Nehra said after his match-winning performance in Qualifier 2.
"When you pick wickets, people remember you more."
People surely do, perhaps selectors don't.
Comments
Add new comment