Karkala: NRI's wife found hanging at in-laws' house; murder suspected

[email protected] (CD Network)
February 20, 2016

Udupi, Feb 20: In a shocking incident, a Muslim woman was found hanging under suspicious circumstances in her in-laws' house at Bailoor near Karkala in Udupi district last night.

rubinaThe victim has been identified as Rubeena(27), mother of a two-and-a-half-year-old son. Her husband Mohammed Asif works in United Arab Emirates. Mr Asif has arrived from Dubai.

Even though Rubeena's in-laws have claimed that she committed suicide by hanging herself from the ceiling of her room, her family members have accused her in-laws of murdering her and then trying to depict it as a case of suicide.

After Rubeena's body was sent for post-mortem, her mother-in-law Bi Fathima and husband's sister Haseena Banu were taken into custody by the police for questioning.

According to Rubeena's brother Abdul Rahman, who rushed to her in-laws' house after an emergency call from her husband's brother, told police that the body was found hanging in a suspicious manner.

“Rubeena endured torture from her husband's mother and sister for a long time. We knew the fact that Haseena, a divorcee, often used to fight with my sister and verbally abuse her. Now they silenced her forever,” Abdul Rahman told police.

Rubeena's uncle and other family members also refused to buy the version of her in-laws and accused the latter of harassing and ultimately killing her for dowry.

Originally hailing from Mukkah, Rubeena's parents had recently shifted to Katipalla and she had lost her father nearly four months ago.

A case has been registered at Karkala town police station and investigations are on.

rubina3

rubina2

 rubina4 copy

Comments

saif
 - 
Sunday, 21 Feb 2016

Inna lillahi vahinna hillalhi rajivoon

Haris
 - 
Saturday, 20 Feb 2016

\Inna Lillahi Wa Inna Elaihi Rajiwoon\"
My deepest sympathies go out to her family,may ALLAH give her family comfort,peace,strength & \"sabr\" to bear the loss."

abusali fahad
 - 
Saturday, 20 Feb 2016

Inna lillahi wa Inna ilahi raijoon. Give sabar to their family members. ..

abusali fahad
 - 
Saturday, 20 Feb 2016

Inna lillahi wa Inna ilahi raijoon. .give sabar to family members.

abusali fahad
 - 
Saturday, 20 Feb 2016

Inna lillahi wa Inna ilahi raijoon. .give sabar to family members. .

Haroon shiek
 - 
Saturday, 20 Feb 2016

Inna lillahi vahinna hillalhi rajivoon.....

Haroon shiek
 - 
Saturday, 20 Feb 2016

Inna lillahi vahinna hillalhi rajivoon.....

Poornima
 - 
Saturday, 20 Feb 2016

now a days its common everywhere, india govt should implement new law to stop this crime, for example lifetime Imprisonment should be claimed to the accused,

saleem mohammed
 - 
Saturday, 20 Feb 2016

arrest and give maximum punishment to in laws

Faizuddin
 - 
Saturday, 20 Feb 2016

sorry sis, we are helpless that we couldnt help u at the right time.

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 4,2020

Vijayapura, Mar 4: Despite strict measures to prevent any kind of embarrassing incidents during II PU board exams, the first three pages of Physics question paper was doing rounds on social media within an hour of commencement.

According to sources, “after removing the question papers from the sealed paper envelope, one of the supervisors is suspected to have taken photographs of it and circulated to the various social networking sites and Whatsapp. In an hour it spread across the district and the incident is said to be happened at Shanteshwar Pre-University College at Indi town.”

As many as 27,359 students were enrolled for the PU Board exams and among them 7,984 students have registered for Science. On the first-day, Physics for Science and History for Arts examinations were held in 41 centres of the district.

Confirming the question papers are being circulated over social networking applications, Deputy Commissioner YS Patil told TNIE that: “According to the Karnataka Education Act 24 (a) it cannot be considered as the question paper leak.”

“Even we have contacted the head office of the PU Board they also collecting the primary details denied to claim it as question paper leak. However, a committee will investigate and will also visit the college in the earliest. If any of the supervisors found guilty an action will be initiated against them. It is not a question paper leak instead it might be lapse of duty from the supervisors and investigation will be made,” stated DC Patil.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 11,2020

Bengaluru, Feb 11: A 36-year-old woman who fought back after being stabbed eight times by a helmet-clad intruder succumbed to injuries at a hospital.

Susheela was in shock after she pulled off the attacker’s helmet as it was her own brother-in-law. Before breathing her last, she explained the sequence of events to the police.

She said her brother-in-law attacked her because he was eyeing their ancestral property worth over Rs 10 crore. “Susheela put up a stiff resistance and identified her assailant. But the stab injuries proved to be fatal,” said a police officer. Based on her statement, Ananth Kumar, 42, was arrested on murder charges.

The attack occurred on February 7 at Honaganahatti village in Tavarekere, off Magadi Road. Susheela, whose husband Gangaraju died in a road accident 12 years ago, was living with her 14-year-old daughter and 75-year-old mother, Rudramma.

On Friday, her daughter had gone to school and Rudramma was sitting outside the house when a man walked in wearing a full-faced helmet and attacked Susheela with a knife. She defended herself with a stick used for making ragi balls and by throwing chilli powder at his face. But the attacker stabbed her on the hand, neck and head. He fled when Susheela identified him and raised an alarm. Neighbours rushed her to a hospital.

During questioning, Kumar reportedly confessed to the crime, saying he wanted to get rid of her as she was not agreeing to sell five acres of their ancestral property.

Susheela’s nephew Kiran G said: “The family owned six acres. Kumar sold one acre for Rs 50 lakh a few years ago after convincing Susheela. He, however, paid her only Rs 5 lakh. Lately, he was pestering Susheela to sell the remaining land as buyers were ready to pay Rs 2.5 crore per acre. But she was hesitating as she had been cheated by him earlier.”

Police are now examining the circumstances under which Gangaraju was killed. “We learnt the driver who had been arrested in connection with Gangaraju’s accident is currently working with Kumar,” said an officer.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 21,2020

Mangaluru, May 21: The Supreme Court has awarded Rs 7.64 crore compensation to the next of kin of a man who was killed in a crash-landing of Air India Express Flight 812 from Dubai in Mangalore on May 22, 2010. The accident killed 158 out of 166 passengers on board.

The family of the 45-year-old Mahendra Kodkany, which include his wife, daughter and son, were earlier granted Rs 7.35 crore as compensation by National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC). This compensation will now get enhanced after adding 9 per cent interest per annum (on the amount yet to be paid), to be paid by Air India.

Kodkany was the regional director for the Middle East for a UAE-based company. The aircraft overshot the runway and went down a hillside and burst into flames.

A bench comprising Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and Ajay Rastogi said: "The total amount payable on account of the aforesaid heads works out to Rs 7,64,29,437. Interest at the rate of nine per cent per annum shall be paid on the same basis as has been awarded by the NCDRC. The balance, if any, that remains due and payable to the complainants, after giving due credit for the amount which has already been paid, shall be paid within a period of two months."

The apex court noted that in a claim for compensation arising out of the death of an employee, the income has to be assessed on the basis of the entitlement of the employee. The top court said: "We are unable to accept the reasons which weighed with the NCDRC in making a deduction of AED (UAE currency) 30,000 from the total CTC. Similarly, and for the same reason, we are unable to accept the submission of Air India that the transport allowance should be excluded. The bifurcation of the salary into diverse heads may be made by the employer for a variety of reasons."

The top court observed that the deceased was evidently, a confirmed employee of his employer. "We have come to the conclusion that thirty per cent should be allowed on account of future prospects", added the court.

The top court noted that if the amount which has been paid by Air India is in excess of the payable under the present judgement, "we direct under Article 142 of the Constitution (discretionary powers) that the excess shall not be recoverable from the claimants," said the court.

Comments

A.Rahman
 - 
Friday, 22 May 2020

First of all  A Salute To Lawyer One Who Handled This Case Against Carriers Mismanagement Wrong Action.

 

Sure this is the second victory for the lawyer against arriers mismanagement.

 

Over all it is the sign  of a profesional ; qualified  eligble  lawyers efforts and right decision from a capable knowlegable judge. Suit case operating lawyers cannot handle such specilized cases.

They lawyer may handled rest of the vicitms cases or he not. But for his siincere efforts for the past ten years delcares whatn he  is. Am personally met him and  witnessed his court appearance  hope and wish him all the best and success .

 

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.