Kundapur woman dies of A (H1N1) influenza in Mangaluru hospital

[email protected] (CD Network)
March 3, 2015

h1n1Mangaluru, Mar 3: A woman, who was said to have tested positive for A (H1N1) virus, popularly known as swine flu, died at a private hospital in the city.

Medical sources said that the 33-year-old woman from Shiroor in Kundapura taluk, Udupi district breathed her last during treatment on Monday morning.

Dakshina Kannada District Health Surveillance Officer Rajesh said that the woman was admitted to the hospital on February 24. However, she did not respond to the treatment and passed away.

Rohini, Udupi District Health Surveillance Officer, said that of the 22 cases reported in the district so far, in 18 cases, the patients had recovered and had been discharged.

The remaining four are being treated at Kasturba Hospital in Manipal.

Comments

Mikki
 - 
Saturday, 18 Jun 2016

Shady stock brokers will try to sell speculative stocks to
clients who hve expressed preference inn investing in low-risk, steady
growth stockos that have less risk of sustaining capital loss.
The creation died a sudden death, its principles by no means realized, and through all
those time individuals reproduced docments manually using
longhand. You can save resources when you only have to
log in to tthe internet to buy your needs.

Heere is mmy webpage su kacagi tespit cihazi: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToednXFnemk

Melvina
 - 
Monday, 6 Jun 2016

Yet another substantial result associated with the ressearch
indicated that the label applied too the product packaging or caftridges marke
as 'Comprising No Nicotine' in reality has nicotine.

Technological advancements today have led tto the creation of the new electtronic cigarette, a device tht aims to
hewlp evven the most seemingly hopeless smoker too
quit. It is ridiculous that I have never been to law school and do noot make it
a habit of studying thhe law, yet I had to tell them what their own law was.

my web page; elektronik sigara tütünü: http://gzomh42-1011523553.pen.io/

Ernesto
 - 
Wednesday, 25 May 2016

Yet another substantial result associated with the research indicated that
the labe applied tto the product packaging orr cartridgess marked as 'Comprising No Nicotine' in reality has nicotine.
Secondly, when dscussing health aand safety, you have to take
into account the health and safety of people who smoke
traditional tobacco cigarettes. After advertising on Craigslist,
he soon had a huge customer bse in Cerritos and the surrounding areas.

Visit my web-site elektronik sigara gen: http://re.vu/summeroffice98

Louis
 - 
Tuesday, 12 Apr 2016

Don't make assumptions based on names that imply savings such as Budget, Dollar and Thrifty.
This not only requires creative thinking, but the intestinal fortitude to pursue new ideas and deal with
periodic setbacks. That is why our incentive program are made to be an unique one where you will experience something new something unique every time.

My web page ... antalya
araç Kiralama Havalimani: http://www.cognoschina.net/home/link.php?url=http://www.xa999.com/hi/li…

Maryann
 - 
Wednesday, 10 Feb 2016

????????????? ?? ?????.
?????? ???????????? ???????.
??? ????????, ??? ????????? ? ???? ???? ????? ??????
????????? ???????.

My blog :: ?????? ??????: http://ludovodka.ru

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 3,2020

Bengaluru, Jan 3: Three advocates were appointed additional judges of the Karnataka High Court.

A Law Ministry notification, issued here on Friday said Maralur Indrakumar Arun, Engalaguppe Seetharamaiah Indiresh and Ravi Venkappa Hosmani have been appointed as additional judges of the high court on Thursday. The newly appointed Judges will continue in their post for a period of two years from the date they assume charge.

While the names of advocates Arun and Indiresh were recommended by the Collegium on March 25 last year the name of Advocate Hosmani was recommended by the Collegium on October 4.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 5,2020

Chennai, Feb 5: In order to ensure housing for all, the Madras High Court has proposed ban on non-resident Indians from purchasing houses in India, prohibit speculative sale, and impose 100 per cent extra stamp duty on purchase of second house.

The court on its own impleaded the Union housing and finance ministries as party respondents.

It has directed them to answer a series of questions including as to how many families have basic amenity of housing in India as well as in Tamil Nadu, population and housing ratio in the country and in the state, when 'Housing for All' mission of the central government would be achieved.

"Why the government does not consider imposing such restrictions to control escalation of house prices and to provide a house to every family in the country, a division bench of Justice N Kirubakaran and Justice Abdul Quddhose wondered.

Directing the authorities to inform as to whether the central and state have got special schemes to provide housing for the marginalized and economically weaker sections including SC/ST communities, the bench has also sought the details of the number of families that possess more than one house.

"Why the governments do not restrict families/individuals from purchasing/possessing more than one housing unit/flat/plot till "Housing for all" is achieved?

Why not the government charge 100 per cent more or extra stamp duty to discourage buying more than one house by a family while purchasing second house?

Why not the government conditionally allow the families to purchase more than one house provided the said family pays 100 per cent extra statutory dues like property tax, electricity charges, water and sewerage charges on the second property?" the bench said.

This apart, the court also wanted the authorities to know as to why it should not prohibit the NRIs from purchasing houses in India to bring down the cost of housing.

Justifying its directions, the court said "Lakhs and lakhs of people are living on platforms, roads, and cement pipes, slums, under the trees and on banks of water bodies without proper shelter and basic amenities and safety."

It is true that the Centre had taken a policy decision to provide housing unit to every family.

It should be achieved at the earliest, the court said, adding it could become fruitful when restrictions are put on persons who hold more than one housing units.

The court passed the order while hearing an appeal moved by the Tamil Nadu Housing Board challenging a single judge order against acquisition of about 369 acres of private land in Thudiyalur and Vellakinar areas of Coimbatore for a housing scheme.

Comments

Suresh SS
 - 
Wednesday, 5 Feb 2020

We believed that only Indian Govt. ministers, MP and MLAs has this disease, now it is spreading everywhere even Indian High courts. it is certainly very harmful virus  

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 9,2020

New Delhi, May 9: The Finance Ministry on Friday announced relief to those who have been facing difficulty with their residency status in India under section 6 of the Income-tax Act due to lockdown and suspension of international flights owing to COIVD-19 outbreak, as they have had to prolong their stay in India.

According to a Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) release, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman today allowed discounting of prolonged stay period in India for the purpose of determining residency status after considering various representations received from people who had to prolong their stay in India due to lockdown and suspension of international flights.

They expressed concern that they will be required to file tax returns as Indian residents and not as NRIs after 120 days of stay.

The Finance Ministry stated that the lockdown continues during the financial year 2020-21 and it is not yet clear when international flight operations would resume, a circular excluding the period of stay of these individuals up to the date of resumption of international flight operations shall be issued for determination of the residential status for the financial year 2020-21.

A circular also said that in order to avoid genuine hardship in such cases, the CBDT has decided that for the purposes of determining the residential status under section 6 of the Act during the previous year 2019-20 in respect of an individual who has come to India on a visit before March 22, 2020 and:

(a) has been unable to leave India on or before March 31, 2020, his period of stay in India from March 22, 2020 to March 31, 2020 shall not be taken into account; or

(b) has been quarantined in India on account of novel coronavirus (Covid-19) on or after March 1, 2020 and has departed on an evacuation flight on or before March 31, 2020 or has been unable to leave India on or before March 31, 2020, his period of stay from the beginning of his quarantine to his date of departure or March 31, 2020, as the case may be, shall not be taken into account; or

(c) has departed on an evacuation flight on or before March 31, 2020, his period of stay in India from March 22, 2020 to his date of departure shall not be taken into account."

The release said there are number of individuals who had come on a visit to India during the previous year 2019-20 for a particular duration and intended to leave India before the end of the previous year for maintaining their status as non-resident or not ordinary resident in India.

"However, due to declaration of the lockdown and suspension of international flights owing to outbreak of COVID-19, they are required to prolong their stay in India. The status of an individual whether he is resident in India or a non-resident or not ordinarily resident, is dependent, inter-alia, on the period for which the person is in India during a year," it said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.