Manmarziyaan: When Anurag Kashyap jockeys around ‘post-love era’

Samvartha ‘Sahil’ | coastaldigest.com
September 18, 2018

Anurag Kashyap who just a decade ago reinterpreted the story of Devdas drowning in his agony of lost love, understanding very well the pulse of the new generation of the new millennium, now has ended up making Manmarziyaan while trying to underline the new shade of love in what can be called the post-love era, seems a decade behind of Dev D in its final vision.

Inability to commit to a relationship, unwillingness to bracket the relationship into an institutional form, having no strings attached- these seem to be a new phase of romantic relationships among the new generation. All of this indicates the dawning of a post-love era, which the Bombay cinema has caught not just by making its eternally favourite subject of romance take a back seat in most of its recent films (dominated by biopics) but also by handling it directly in films like Befikre, Love You Zindagi, Aye Dil Hai Mushkil etc. The films which attempt to speak about this new post-love phenomenon, one can see the writers and directors not knowing how to resolve after the impossibility of love is established in the story, in the film. If in Befikre the director forces the couple to marry each other, Love You Zindagi introduces a fresh character and Aye Dil Hai Mushkil kills its protagonist. All of this shows how the Bombay cinema is struggling to give a closure to such a love.

In such a scenario when Anurag Kashyap attempts to touch on this new shade of love, of course one expects him to understand its pulse differently. But sadly the film disappoints.

An adventurous but indecisive girl (Rumi played by Taapsee Pannu ) & an equally adventurous but irresponsible boy (Vicky played by Vicky Kaushal) both impulsive and immature being in an inconsistent relationship is at the heart of Manmarziyaan. The decision to marry each other suffers in the first half due to the irresponsible behaviour of Vicky, the marriage of Rumi and Robbie (Abhishek Bachchan) suffers in the second half because of the indecisive behaviour of the girl, not able to get past Vicky or get involved with Robbie.

Manmarziyaan though reflects the love of a post-love era, falls flat on its nose because of its repetitiveness and heavy similarities to films of earlier days like Woh Saat Din and Hum Dil Dey Chuke Sanam. Like some of its predecessors exploring post-love phenomenon, Manmarziyaan loses its plot after exploring the post-love era love and collapses not knowing how to resolve it. It gets extremely disappointing when the film chooses the conventionally safe and convenient option for love defeating the quintessential nature of its characters and the director.

The first half of the film is relatively more enjoyable than the second half as it mostly dedicates its time to beautifully unfold the characters Rumi and Vicky and the complications of their relationship through intense moments packaged light heartedly. The scene where Rumi discovers that Vicky has no solid plan for the two while running away and also has forgotten his wallet while eloping, is priceless. But both the characters repeating the same mistakes repeatedly and the story not going forward, does gets to nerves of the audience. At the intermission point suddenly and surprisingly the film gives a hope by breaking the repetitiveness. Greater expectations are set for the second half by concluding the first half of the film with the poem ‘main tenu phir milaangi’ (I shall meet you again) by Amrita Pritam, the Punjabi poet to whom the film is dedicated.

The second half begins with great promise too when Rumi tells her uncle, “pyaar khatam nahi hua, shaadi shuru nahi hui” highlighting complications quite intense. But in no time the film again falls into the same repetitiveness, this time not because of the indiscipline of Vicky but because of the indecisiveness of Rumi. Added to her indecisiveness is the character of Robbie who is aware of Vicky but again like Rumi is quite indecisive. He suffers between wanting to make the marriage work and being a large hearted man who does not want to have any problem if his wife follows her heart. This nature of Robbie punctures the speed of the film and adds an extra layer of boredom to the repetitiveness of the storyline. Robbie’s idea of he being large hearted meets with a serious accident when he overhears a conversation between Rumi and Vicky when the both secretly meet each other despite Rumi’s marriage to Robbie. The audience expect the story to take an unexpected turn from this point but again the film starts going back to the same loop of indecisiveness and stretches the film for an annoying duration of over two and a half hours!

While Vicky Kaushal is quite convincing as the commitment phobic and irresponsible small town boy with aspirations, Abhishek Bachhan is good enough to carry the boring Robbie who seems like an extension of Vanraj from Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam, but thankfully with a touch of playfulness. Taapsee Pannu as Rumi carries great energy and gives film the strength it has. If not for her the film would have not stayed afloat thanks to the heavy weight of the repetitive storyline and predictable screenplay.

 

[Samvartha ‘Sahil’ is a freelance writer based out of Manipal, Karnataka. An alumnus of Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi and the Film and Television Institute of India, Pune, he has earlier worked as an academician at Manipal University and as a journalist with The Hindu.]

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 26,2020

Udupi, Mar 26: As many as 1000 expatriates, who have arrived from foreign countries and have been placed in home quarantine, were warned against violating the guidelines given to them and leaving their houses. 

Deputy Commissioner G Jagadeesha, addressing reporters here on Thursday, said that the district administration and health department officials have sent notices to surrounding houses regarding those quarantined and requested them to bring to the notice of relevant authorities if anyone was found violating the quarantine rules.

'If anyone is found violating the quarantine rules and roaming in public, a complaint can be registered by calling on 9480242600. Strict action will be taken against such violators,' said Mr Jagadeesha.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 23,2020

Bellari, Feb 23: Fringe outfit Sri Ram Sena leader Sanjeev Maradi said on Friday said that organization will reward Rs 10 lakh to the person who will 'eliminate' those who have raised "pro-Pakistan" slogans including Amulya who recently raised "Pakistan Zindabad" slogan at an anti-CAA protest in Bengaluru.

"We request both state and central government not to release them (Pro-Pakistan sloganeers) on bail. If they will be released Sri Ram Sena will eliminate them or will give a reward of Rupees 10 lakh to those who kill them," said Sanjeev Maradi.

"We condemn such slogans. This is like a virus. First, it happened in Jammu and Kashmir, then in JNU, then Mysore and then a student named Amulya raised pro Pakistan slogan in Bengaluru," he added.

A girl named Amulya raised 'Pakistan Zindabad' slogan on Thursday at an anti-CAA protest where AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi was also invited.

Thereafter, a case was registered under Section 124A (Offence of sedition) of the Indian Penal Code against the student.

Meanwhile, Imran Pasha, the organizer of the anti-CAA protest said that Amulya was not invited to the event.

"We were the organizers of the event. At around 6:45 pm on Thursday, when I and Member of Parliament Asaduddin Owaisi were entering the stage area, we did not notice Amulya was present there. I did not invite her," Pasha told media.

Comments

Thouseef Ahmed
 - 
Sunday, 23 Feb 2020

So theese guys have come out in public with supari and police department is on mute mode . 

 

Kannadiga
 - 
Sunday, 23 Feb 2020

Spirit of quarter bottle and plate of Beef Sukha. Subject to HQ feeding these are awake else always with DUFF and Blind eye and now nil knowledge about our Nation. What are the nation organization institution are day by day loosing .

O God Give some education knowledge these sena soldiers to behave like human.

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Media Release
February 14,2020

Veteran journalist P. Sainath has said that the nation is in a crisis. And this crisis is not limited to just the rural area. It has become a national crisis at various areas such as agriculture, education, economy, job creation etc.

He was delivering the endowment lecture on the topic ‘Indian democracy at the post-liberalization and post-truth era’ at Media Manthan 2020 organized by the PG department of journalism and mass communication at St Aloysius College (Autonomous). 

Mr Sainath said that the many policies adopted in the 90s led to India becoming unusually unequal. Referring to the speech Ambedkar had made at the Constituent Assembly while handing over the draft of the Constitution, Mr Sainath said, “Ambedkar had warned about the weakness of Indian democracy that liberty without equality allows the supremacy of a few over the multitude. Liberty, equality and fraternity must be kept together as we cannot have one without the other.” 

Mr Sainath stated that the agrarian crisis was no longer about the loss of productivity, employment or about farmer suicide; it was a societal, civilizational crisis. Commenting on the lopsided policies such as cow-slaughter ban, he explained how cow slaughter ban had adversely affected many industries due to their interdependency. While Muslims who slaughtered cows were rendered helpless, the cattle traders who were mostly OBCs lost their earnings as the cattle prices crashed. An important industry like Kolhapur sandals industry in Maharashtra went bankrupt as a result of the cow slaughter ban in Maharashtra. He said the policymakers had no idea how the rural industries were interconnected. Demonetisation too devastated the rural economy as 98 percent of rural transactions happen through cash. 

Mr Sainath also spoke about the crisis of inequality which affects the Dalits and the Adivasis far more than anyone else as 90 percent of the rural households take home less than Rs 10,000/- per month. “Women are yet another group whose labour is never counted in the gross domestic product. Women and girls globally do unpaid work which amounts to about 12.5 billion working hours per year. Monetarily speaking, this is worth 10.8 trillion dollars,” Mr Sainath added. 

Speaking about the crisis of jobs Mr Sainath said that major companies were laying off employees just to create more profits for the investors and the adoption of artificial intelligence in the industry would further destroy millions of jobs.

Rector of St Aloysius College Institutions Fr Dionysius Vaz SJ, Principal Dr (Fr) Praveen Martis SJ, HOD of Journalism and Mass Communication department Dr (Fr) Melwyn Pinto SJ were present.

‘Veerappan and Vijay Mallya’s business models are interesting!’

Addressing the gathering during his endowment lecture on Friday, Mr Sainath made an interesting comment on the so called ‘revenue model’. “Whenever I visit IIMs and IITs for lectures on my PARI project, the students there ask me what my revenue model for my project is. I tell them that I do not have a revenue model. In fact, journalism does not begin with a revenue model. Gandhiji, Ambedkar, Bhagat Singh were all great journalists. But they did not have a revenue model,” Mr Sainath said.

On a lighter note, he said that the best revenue model that he liked was that of forest brigand Veerappan and liquor baron Vijay Mallya. “Veerappan ruled the forest for forty years and from the top ministers to the villagers he could dictate terms and liver royally. Similarly, Mallya’s revenue model was to steal the banks and run away abroad and live like a king,” Mr Sainath added.

Journalism is not and can never be a business. It is a calling, he opined. While newspaper can be a business, television can be a business, journalism per se cannot be reduced to a business. “Unfortunately today, journalists are recruited on a contract basis and they have no bargaining power; and there are no unions to fight for their cause. Hence, they are at the mercy of the corporate media houses for their survival and are made to write stories that cannot be called journalism,” Mr Sainath said.

Answering a question as to the pressures he faced as a journalist, he said that external pressures from the government or others could be very well handled. It is the internal pressures from once own media house that journalists find it difficult to manage.

 

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.