Modi and his then colleagues gets clean chit in 2002 Gujarat carnage

News Network
December 11, 2019

Ahmedabad, Dec 11: The Gujarat government on Wednesday submitted the final part of Nanavati Commission's report on Gujarat carnage after the Godhra incident in 2002, giving "clean chit to the then chief minister Narendra Modi and all his then colleagues and entire state machinery." 

Minister of State for Home Pradipsinh Jadeja said, "The commission has found that there was no larger conspiracy behind the riots as was alleged by several NGOs and Congress leaders back then. It was only with an intention of maligning the image of now Prime Minister Narendra Modi that these people came up with allegation of a larger conspiracy." 

The report tabled in the Assembly states, "On overall consideration of the entire material, the Commission finds that the communal riots which followed the Godhra incident were really by way of aftermath of that incident. It was because of the Godhra incident that large sections of the Hindu community became very angry and ultimately indulged in violent attacks on Muslims and their properties."

"There is no evidence to show that the attacks were either inspired or instigated or abated by any Minister of the state or by any religious or political party or organisation as such. The only thing that can be said with some certainty on the basis of evidence which has come before the Commission, is that local members of VHP, Balrang (sick) Dal took part in incidents which happened in their localities. In some incidents in three or four districts including Ahmedabad, some local BJP workers also appear to have taken part," the commission noted.

The report has termed former IPS officer R B Sreekumar, who had testified against Modi and others before the commission as "disgruntled officer." The report also discredits evidence of former IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt, who for the first time had testified in 2010 that he had attended the controversial meeting on February 27, 2002, in Gandhinagar where Modi had allegedly told officers to "let Hindus vent their anger." This meeting was held hours after coach S-6 of Sabarmati Express train was set on fire at Godhra railway station that killed 58 kar sevaks on the spot and led to widespread riots in the state. The report also doesn't believe in the testimony of retired IPS officer Rahul Sharma.

The commission's report also clears Modi's role in handing over the dead bodies to VHP leader Jaydip Patel. There were allegations that dead bodies of victims were paraded in several parts including in Ahmedabad leading to communal hatred. The report states, "The evidence also discloses to send those dead bodies to Ahmedabad was taken for the reason that curfew was already imposed in Godhra town by the time such decision was taken and it was felt that would be very difficult for the relatives of those dead persons to come to Godhra and collected dead bodies of their relatives. The commission doesn't find any substance in the allegation that the chief minister had arranged the same with an evil intention." 

The report contains nine volumes that have over 2,500 pages. On the question of then chief minister not opposing the bandh call given by VHP on February 28, 2002, that allowed the rioters to target Muslims, the report states, "The evidence discloses that the 'Bandh' call was given by BJP on its own and the Chief Minister and other Ministers came to know about it later. The Bandh was not supported by the Government or the Chief Minister or any of his Ministers. State transport buses were seen plying on the roads on 28.02.2002 and they were attacked by the mobs, which had gathered on the roads."

The report also has a statement of Modi that was recorded before the commission. It quotes Modi as saying, "I didn't receive any telephone call from Ehsan Jafri, Ex-Member of Parliament either on 28.02.2002 at 1 am or any other point of time." It is to be noted that Jafri's wife Zakia had alleged that her husband called multiple times for help while a mob was swelling outside the Gulberg Society. Jafri and 68 others were burnt alive on that day in Ahmedabad at their residence at Gulberg Society.

Earlier in 2008, the commission had submitted its first report based on its probe on the burning of the Sabarmati Express train at Godhra railway station. In this report also, the commission gave clean chit to then chief minister Modi while holding that there was no evidence to show that he or his ministers or police officers had any role. Part-two of the report is based on the subsequent riots.  

On March 6, 2002, the state government had appointed the one-member commission of retired high court justice K G Shah. Following litigation in the Supreme Court, another member retired justice G T Nanavati was added in the commission. In 2008, justice Shah passed away. The commission took a record 12 years to submit its report to the state government.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 14,2020

Kalaburagi, Mar 14: Utter negligence of Kalaburagi health department officials was one of the main reasons for the death of his father, alleged family member of Kalaburagi man and India's first COVID-19 victim here on Friday.

The victim's son said 'if officials of Kalaburagi health department had advised us to admit his father in isolated ward, which was opened in Gulbarga Institute of Medical science (GIMS), my father's survival time may have been extended,' he said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
June 17,2020

Riyadh, Jun 17: Saudi Arabia is expected to scale back or call off this year's hajj pilgrimage for the first time in its modern history, observers say, a perilous decision as coronavirus cases spike.

Muslim nations are pressing Riyadh to give its much-delayed decision on whether the annual ritual will go ahead as scheduled in late July.

But as the kingdom negotiates a call fraught with political and economic risks in a tinderbox region, time is running out to organise logistics for one of the world's largest mass gatherings.

A full-scale hajj, which last year drew about 2.5 million pilgrims, appears increasingly unlikely after authorities advised Muslims in late March to defer preparations due to the fast-spreading disease.

"It's a toss-up between holding a nominal hajj and scrapping it entirely," a South Asian official in contact with Saudi hajj authorities said.

A Saudi official said: "The decision will soon be made and announced."

Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim nation, withdrew from the pilgrimage this month after pressing Riyadh for clarity, with a minister calling it a "very bitter and difficult decision".

Malaysia, Senegal and Singapore followed suit with similar announcements.

Many other countries with Muslim populations -- from Egypt and Morocco to Turkey, Lebanon and Bulgaria -- have said they are still awaiting Riyadh's decision.

In countries like France, faith leaders have urged Muslims to "postpone" their pilgrimage plans until next year due to the prevailing risks.

The hajj, a must for able-bodied Muslims at least once in their lifetime, represents a major potential source of contagion as it packs millions of pilgrims into congested religious sites.

But any decision to limit or cancel the event risks annoying Muslim hardliners for whom religion trumps health concerns.

It could also trigger renewed scrutiny of the Saudi custodianship of Islam's holiest sites -- the kingdom's most powerful source of political legitimacy.

A series of deadly disasters over the years, including a 2015 stampede that killed up to 2,300 worshippers, has prompted criticism of the kingdom's management of the hajj.

"Saudi Arabia is caught between the devil and the deep blue sea," Umar Karim, a visiting fellow at the Royal United Services Institute in London, told AFP.

"The delay in announcing its decision shows it understands the political consequences of cancelling the hajj or reducing its scale."

"Buying time"

The kingdom is "buying time" as it treads cautiously, the South Asian official said.

"At the last minute if Saudi says 'we are ready to do a full hajj', (logistically) many countries will not be in a position" to participate, he said.

Amid an ongoing suspension of international flights, a reduced hajj with only local residents is a likely scenario, the official added.

A decision to cancel the hajj would be a first since the kingdom was founded in 1932.

Saudi Arabia managed to hold the pilgrimage during previous outbreaks of Ebola and MERS.

But it is struggling to contain the virus amid a serious spike in daily cases and deaths since authorities began easing a nationwide lockdown in late May.

In Saudi hospitals, sources say intensive care beds are fast filling up and a growing number of health workers are contracting the virus as the total number of cases has topped 130,000. Deaths surpassed 1,000 on Monday.

To counter the spike, authorities this month tightened lockdown restrictions in the city of Jeddah, gateway to the pilgrimage city of Mecca.

"Heartbroken"

"The hajj is the most important spiritual journey in the life of any Muslim, but if Saudi Arabia proceeds in this scenario it will not only exert pressure on its own health system," said Yasmine Farouk from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

"It could also be widely held responsible for fanning the pandemic."

A cancelled or watered-down hajj would represent a major loss of revenue for the kingdom, which is already reeling from the twin shocks of the virus-induced slowdown and a plunge in oil prices.

The smaller year-round umrah pilgrimage was already suspended in March.

Together, they add $12 billion to the Saudi economy every year, according to government figures.

A negative decision would likely disappoint millions of Muslim pilgrims around the world who often invest their life savings and endure long waiting lists to make the trip.

"I can't help but be heartbroken -- I've been waiting for years," Indonesian civil servant Ria Taurisnawati, 37, told AFP as she sobbed.

"All my preparations were done, the clothes were ready and I got the necessary vaccination. But God has another plan."

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 16,2020

Kalaburagi, May 16: Former Karnataka Minister Dr Sharanprakash Patil, who was booked for violating COVID-19 imposed lockdown guidelines said on Friday that it was "politically motivated".

"It's politically motivated, the officer who filed the case was forced by MLA or some other people. As elected representatives, we're going in the constituencies, listening to people as they're apprehensive about the return of migrants. We had not conducted any meeting. Wherever we have gone we have followed social distancing," Patil said.

Patil said, "When I had gone there people came to discuss about a local problem and I was talking to an official concerned. In the meantime, some officer gave a complaint that we have violated the lockdown or something."

"They are trying to curb the voice of opposition because there are a lot of lacunae. We hear complaints about quarantine centres that there is no proper facility for food, or stay, or bathrooms," the Congress leader said.

The FIR was registered on Thursday against 23 persons, including the former MLA and 21 local Congress leaders, under Section 188 (disobedience to order duly promulgated by a public servant) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Congress leader Patil and his followers had conducted a meeting at a convention hall in Sulpeth town on May 13, following which sectoral magistrate Muneer Ahmed lodged a complaint.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.