Zardari visit thaws India-Pak freeze

April 10, 2012

zardari_copy_copy_copy

New Delhi, April 10: Pakistan president Asif Ali Zardari’s visit to India on Sunday seems to have begun paying peace dividends with the Supreme Court granting bail to a 80-year-old Pakistan scientist convicted of murder, and both sides beginning work on a hassle-free visa regime for businessmen of both countries.

On Sunday, during the visit of Zardari for lunch with prime minister Manmohan Singh and a pilgrimage to Ajmer, Pakistan had requested India to consider the case of Mohammed Khalil Chishti, the Pakistani microbiologist who was sentenced to life term in 1992 for a murder he committed in India.

Taking a sympathetic view, A Bench of Justice P Sathasivam and Justice J Chelameswar provided relief to the microbiologist but told him to stay back in Ajmer in Rajasthan till further directions. The court told Chisti’s counsel to file separate applications for allowing the scientist to live in Delhi and to go back to Karachi.

In a departure from the usual, the Bench hoped that the bonhomie created between the two countries during Sunday’s visit of Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari to Ajmer would continue in future as well. “Let us hope what has happened yesterday (Sunday) will continue,” the Bench said.

‘Good things happening’

“What we have read from today’s (Monday) newspapers is that good things are happening,” the Bench added. The court considered on humanitarian ground the plea made by senior advocate U U Lalit, appearing for Chishti, who has been suffering from several ailments.

In yet another fallout of the visit, Pakistan High Commissioner Sahid Malik said on Monday that his country and India were working towards a liberalised visa regime for businessmen that may see the two countries issuing one-year, multi-entry and non-reporting visas to businessmen of either country.

The proposal was discussed at Sunday’s meeting between Zardari and Manmohan Singh, and both leaders desired to improve relations between the neighbouring nations, Malik told an interactive session organised by industry chamber Assocham.

“Taking note of his present age and also considering the fact that he was in Ajmer for the last 20 years and… without expressing anything on the merits of the case, we are satisfied that the appellant has made out a case for enlarging him on bail.

Accordingly, the appellant is ordered to be released on bail in Sessions Case No. 157 of 2001 to the satisfaction of the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, (Fast Track) No.1, Ajmer,” the Bench said.

The apex court, however, left the issue of conditions for Chishti’s release to the trial court in Ajmer.

During the hearing, counsel appearing for the Rajasthan government opposed the arguments for Chishti’s bail, contending that the appellant being a Pakistani national, it was not desirable to release him on bail.

Chishti had come to Ajmer from Karachi to see his ailing mother in 1992.

During his stay, he got involved in a fight with neighbours over property, leading to the shooting down of a man named Idris Chishti.

The Ajmer-born scientist had remained in confinement after his arrest in the case. The trial court had, on January 31, 2011, held him guilty and awarded life term.

During Zardari’s visit, Pakistan’s Interior Minister Rehman Malik raised the case of scientist with his Indian counterpart P Chidambaram, who was understood to have told him that the matter was in court.

Immediately after the bail order, Chishti’s nephew Salman hailed the SC’s decision and hoped that he would soon be sent back to Karachi to join his family and grandchildren.

Step forward

* Jailed Pakistani scientist Mohammed Khalil Chishti granted bail

* Conditions for his release left to the trial court in Ajmer

* He will fly to Karachi to join family

* Pakistan, India working on liberalised visa regime for businessmen

*One-year, multi-entry and non-reporting visas might be issued

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
July 21,2020

New Delhi, Jul 21: The Enforcement Directorate is understood to have initiated a process to freeze over 60 bank accounts in the country on the request of the Brazilian government in connection with a money laundering case in that country, offiicials said on Monday.

They said the agency has undertaken the action under the provision of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in pursuance of a mutual agreement between the two nations to combat financial crimes.

The over 60 bank accounts are held by some individuals and businessmen based in the country, they said.

The probe, they said, is linked to some high profile people of Brazil.

The suspected accounts sought to be frozen by the Enforcement Directorate (ED), on behalf of the Brazilian government, are stated to be of banks in Delhi and Mumbai, they added.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
January 22,2020

Aligarh, Jan 22: An FIR has been lodged against social activist and Magsaysay Award winner Sandeep Pandey for his remarks on Savarkar.

Speaking to media, CO Civil Lines, Anil Samania said, "A complaint is lodged by Rajiv Kumar Ashish, national vice-president of All India Hindu Mahasabha against Magsaysay Award winner Sandeep Pandey in connection with indecent remarks on Veer Savarkar. An FIR is lodged based on this complaint under sections 153 and 505 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)."

"An investigation is underway. Pandey came to the Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) where he made a speech in which he made the alleged indecent remarks," he added.

Comments

Keshu
 - 
Thursday, 23 Jan 2020

Veer Savarkar? LOL

come on CD...he is british boot licker

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 12,2020

An Indian national was killed and four others injured in alleged firing by Nepal police personnel along the India-Nepal border in Bihar's Sitamarhi district today.

Sources said the firing took place after a clash between the Indians and personnel of Nepal police at the Lalbandi-Janki Nagar border in Pipra Parsain panchayat under Sonebarsha police station of the district.

Jitendra Kumar, the additional director general of police (headquarters), confirmed the death and injuries. The place of firing falls under Nepal jurisdiction.

Locals said Vikesh Kumar Rai, 25, died on the spot and Umesh Ram and Uday Thakur received bullet injuries when they were working in an agricultural field. Another person, Lagan Rai, is said to have been detained by the Nepali police.

Injured persons were rushed to Sitamarhi Sadar Hospital for better treatment.

Vikesh Kumar Rai’s father, Nageshwar Rai, said that his agriculture land falls under Narayanpur in Nepal where his son was working.

On May 17, Nepal police had fired blank rounds to disperse dozens of Indians trying to cross the border. It was not clear if they were also farmers.

The district magistrate and the superintendent of police of Sitamarhi have rushed to the spot.

Nepal shares a 1,850-kilometre (1,150-mile) open border with India and people travel across it for work and to visit family. It had closed its international borders on March 22 amid the coronavirus pandemic.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.