Ansari emerges front-runner in Prez poll stakes

May 4, 2012

ansari

New Delhi, May 4: The consultation process over candidates for the presidential election made some headway on Thursday.

The Congress is understood to have informed its UPA partners that Vice-President Hamid Ansari was its preferred choice for the coveted post, followed by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee.

Senior party sources indicated that Congress would support the candidature of Ansari and added: “We feel we will not encounter any problem (with allies) with this choice. However, if there is any, then we are sure, there will be no such issues regarding Mukherjee.”

On a day when UPA’s unpredictable friend, Mamata Banerjee took the centre stage, meeting Sonia Gandhi and Samajwadi Party leader Mulayam Singh, the race to find the next incumbent of the Rashtrapati Bhavan got an unexpected twist, with a Congress spokesperson indicating that Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee was not in the race.

Responding to questions from media, spokesperson Renuka Chowdhry quipped: “It will never be easy to leave Pranab da. He is such a valued person for us in the party. His contribution to the party cannot be even measured. For him, it will not seem to be fair...but he has such an active political mind. He is too involved and knows politics so well.”

The Congress, however, scrambled to clarify within hours. Party spokesman Rashid Alvi asserted: “The consultation process is on. No names have been finalised. Renuka Chowhury’s remarks show the importance of Pranabda. It does not mean he is ruled out for anything. It shows his importance for the party, Parliament and the country.”

Mamata seemed to have seized the initiative from Chaudhury’s statement as she said: “I think their party has already announced today that he is not (the candidate)," when asked by journalists whether Mukherjee was acceptable as a presidential candidate. She added: “I cannot say anything. Congress party has already announced their opinion... He belongs to the Congress party. Congress party will decide.”

The remarks of Chaudhury and Mamata created an impression during the day that incumbent vice president Hamid Ansari was ahead in the presidential poll race. Many wondered if Congress itself was not interested in fielding one of its seniormost leaders. However, some senior Congress leaders dismissed the suggestion.

Congress sources asserted that Mukherjee, UPA trouble shooter, was very much in the race and pointed out that Janata Dal (United) was likely to support the finance minister rather than a candidate picked up by the BJP-led NDA. “More allies from NDA supporting our candidate cannot be ruled out”, they added.

Sonia Gandhi, who held a meeting with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh with Mukherjee present, told reporters that there was time before a candidate was selected. Queried over "confusion" on names for presidential nominees, she said: “there is no confusion. Be patient, still there is time.”

Mamata, who met Gandhi for the first time after her election as CM a year ago, declined to speak to media after the meeting. It was, however, learnt that she pledged her support to the UPA candidate but felt that it would be better if the candidate was elected unanimously with support from across the political spectrum.

The West Bengal CM, who also met Samajwadi Party president Mulayam Singh Yadav, told reporters: “I would prefer a consensus. If this does not evolve, then of course there will be a contest. All options are open”. Asked if she would prefer Mukherjee, she quipped: “Congress has to take a decision first. He is after all a Congress leader. I can't interfere in any other party's internal affairs”. Mulayam said he was for a political person as president.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 24,2020

New Delhi, Jun 24: With the highest single-day spike of 15,968 cases and 465 deaths in the last 24 hours, India's COVID-19 count reached 4,56,183 on Wednesday.

According to the latest update by the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW), 14,476 deaths have been recorded due to the infection so far in the country.

The count includes 1,83,022 active cases, and 2,58,685 cured/discharged/migrated patients.

Maharashtra with 1,39,010 confirmed cases remains the worst-affected by the infection so far in the country. The state's count includes 62,848 active, 69,631 cured, discharged patients while 6,531 deaths have been reported due to the infection so far.

Meanwhile, the national capital's confirmed coronavirus cases reached 66,602.

2,301 deaths have been reported in Delhi due to the infection so far.

Tamil Nadu has reported 64,603 cases so far with the death toll reaching 833.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 19,2020

New Delhi, Jun 19: RJD and AAP were not invited to the all-party meeting called by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday to discuss the situation at the India-China border after 20 Indian soldiers were killed in a "violent face-off," leaving the parties fuming.

Top RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav criticised the government for not inviting the party to the meeting, asking on Twitter late Thursday night, "Just wish to know the criteria for inviting political parties for tomorrow's (Friday's) all-party meet on Galwan Valley. I mean the grounds of inclusion/exclusion. Because our party hasn't received any message so far."

AAP's Rajya Sabha leader Sanjay Singh joined the chorus, "there is a strange ego-driven government at the centre. AAP has a government in Delhi and is the main opposition in Punjab. We have four MPs. But on a vital subject, AAP's views are not needed? The country is waiting for what the Prime Minister will say at the meeting."

Sources said the government has set a criteria to invite only parties with five or more MPs in Parliament for the digital meet, where the Prime Minister will brief the top leaders of parties and hear their views on the way ahead. There are at least 27 parties in the Parliament, which have less than five members, while 17 have more than five members or more than five MPs.

Interestingly, RJD has five MPs in Rajya Sabha and its senior MP Manoj K Jha shared the Rajya Sabha website link on Twitter, which showed the party has five MPs. "We have not been invited and the government's bogus argument has been exposed," Jha said.

CPI leaders said General Secretary D Raja received a call from Defence Minister Rajnath Singh inviting him to the meeting and with a message that the Prime Minister's Office would coordinate but there was no follow-up after that.

"Exclusion of AAP and RJD in the all-party meet on a National debate does not augment well. AAP is ruling Delhi and has its CM. Why should people of Delhi be kept out in such an important debate on National integrity and Sovereignty?" former NCP MP Majeed Memon tweeted.

During the all-party meeting on COVID-19 too, the government had not called all parties with representation in Parliament to the all-party meeting in April and had set five MPs as a benchmark to be invited.

Raja had then written a letter to Modi demanding that the government should not get into "technicalities" and discuss the issue with all parties in Parliament.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 24,2020

Kochi, Mar 24: Long queues were witnessed in front of state beverages corporation outlets across Kerala on Tuesday despite the statewide lockdown to prevent the spread of the coronavirus.

As tipplers thronged the outlets unmindful of the curfew, officials asked them to ensure that they kept a one metre distance between them as part of preventive steps to check the COVID-19 transmission.

Official sources said precautionary measures have been taken at the beverages outlets to prevent the virus spread.

Only those wearing masks were allowed to stand in queues, the sources said.

Police were deployed to ensure that the people standing in queues keep a one metre distance between them, they added.

The opposition Congress slammed the CPI(M)-led LDF government for not taking steps to restrict crowds in front of the Kerala State Beverages Corporation (Bevco) outlets, apprehending that such a situation would pave way for spreading the virus.

Ernakulam district congress committee general secretary Sherin Varghese claimed if the government had implemented a 2017 Kerala high court order directing the beverages corporation to take remedial steps to end long queues in front of the outlets, such a situation would not have arisen.

"Had the beverages corporation complied with the court order, safety and security of persons standing in queues could have been ensured.

Now there is no protective measure to prevent the possible transmission of the coronavirus from a carrier to another person," he told PTI.

Meanwhile, the state government has directed that adequate distance be kept between people standing in queues.

Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan on Monday justified the decision to keep the liquor shops open citing the "peculiar" situation prevailing in the state.

Kerala is in a total lockdown since Monday midnight till March 31 to check the virus spread.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.