'Dead' man in India must prove he is alive

July 14, 2012
uttar_delcr

New Delhi, July 14: It may sound bizarre, but reflects a sorry state of affairs that can happen only in India! Some “living” people want justice, as they have been declared “dead” on paper — certified by government documents.

Santosh Singh is a “living” example who told Gulf News, “It took minutes for the government department in the state of Uttar Pradesh to issue a fake ‘death certificate’ at the behest of my relatives who usurped my property. But no amount of requests to the-powers-that-be has helped get me back the status of being ‘alive’. Imagine, while I am living, I have to prove that I am alive!”

Resident of Chhitauni in Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, Singh says, “I left my hometown and went to Mumbai, Maharashtra, in 2000 after meeting Bollywood actor Nana Patekar, who was shooting for his film Aanch in our village. He had offered me a job as cook.”

Singh’s problems started when he fell in love and married a Maharashtrian girl from a dalit (lower caste) family.

“My parents had passed away and my sisters were by then married. When I went back to my village, I had to face angry relatives, who threatened to teach me a lesson for marrying a dalit girl. They said I had brought shame upon the thakur (upper caste) family we belong to.

“The villagers declared me an outcast and my relatives reported me ‘missing’. Soon after, my cousins, who are politically well connected, prepared fake documents and declared me ‘dead’. They have since grabbed my land and property.”

Singh’s battle in the court to get back his identity and land bore no result, as the date of hearing kept being postponed for many years. “I had no money left to pay the lawyer and he ditched me,” he says dejectedly.

Left with no choice, a few months back, Singh took his fight to Jantar Mantar in Delhi. He sits with a placard that reads, Mein zinda hoon (I am alive). Passers-by look at him quizzically. While some sympathise with him, others are unable to fathom his dilemma.

Remonstrating just a couple of kilometres away from where the high-and-mighty political leaders reside, he laments, “Except assurances, I have received nothing. Even the police sided with my cousins and beat me up mercilessly, due to which my left ear drum is permanently damaged.”

Fed up of the struggle and finding that all channels have till now led to a dead end, Singh sobs bitterly and requests, “Please help me. Kindly publish my mobile number: 00971-8587870812 for any kind of assistance to reach me.

“My wife and five-year-old son are staying with my in-laws in Mumbai and want me to go back to them. But my only wish is to reclaim my ancestral property, which I wish to sell and start life afresh.”

Meanwhile, Singh is not an isolated case of people declared “dead” by greedy relatives to grab land in villages all over the country. The situation has become such that an association has been formed to fight for the rights of the “living dead”.

Called Mritak Sangh (Association of the Dead), it was launched by a farmer Lal Bihari in Uttar Pradesh. He was in the process of applying for a loan when the bank representative told him that his papers had been rejected. Government records showed he was no longer among the living. And there was even a death certificate bearing his name.

Bihari learnt that it was not a case of any administrative blunder, but his unscrupulous relative had bribed an official to provide a false death certificate. During his fight for justice Bihari realised there were several hundred others suffering the same predicament.

The association formed by Bihari has decided to walk the streets of Azamgarh in Uttar Pradesh on July 30, to put pressure on the government to look into their misery.

But Singh claims, “No association, NGO or rights activists have come to anyone’s help till now.”


Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
January 11,2020

Those owning a single house in joint names would continue to file their income tax returns (ITRs) in much simpler ITR-1 (Sahaj) and ITR-4 forms (Sugam) for assessment year 2020-21 with the government issuing a clarification in this regard.

The clarification has come days after the government modified the eligibility for filing the returns in ITR-1 and ITR-4, stating that those owning a property jointly, spending Rs 2 lakh on foreign travel and paying electricity bill of Rs 1 lakh in a year would not be able to file returns in the simpler forms.

They would have to file their returns with much more detailed information in other specified forms.

Following the changes in the eligibility for filing returns in the two forms, concerns were raised over it with taxpayers claiming that it will cause huge hardship for them.

"The matter has been examined and it has been decided to allow a person, who jointly owns a single house property, to file his/her return of income in ITR-1 or ITR-4 Form, as may be applicable, if he/she meets the other conditions," a Finance Ministry statement said.

"It has also been decided to allow a person, who is required to file return due to fulfilment of one or more conditions specified in the seventh proviso to section 139(1) of the Act, to file his/her return in ITR-1 Form," it added.

Tax practitioners welcomed the government’s move of going back to the previous position.

"This is a welcome clarification allowing middle class taxpayers owning a single house property to file simpler ITR forms, 1 and 4, and not the detailed ITR forms even if they own house property in joint names," said Shailesh Kumar, Director, Nangia Andersen Consulting.

It may be noted that taxpayers holding multiple house properties would have to file more detailed return forms.

In the major changes notified earlier this month by the Income-Tax department, individual taxpayers were disallowed to file return either in ITR-1 or ITR 4 if he or she was a joint-owner in house property.

In another change, those who deposited more than Rs 1 crore in bank account or spent Rs 2 lakh on foreign travel or paid Rs 1 lakh on electricity bill in a financial year were also barred from using the easy-to-fill return forms.

"By today's clarification, the government has maintained status quo. Now, the taxpayers can continue filing their returns in the same fashion in which they did last year," said Naveen Wadhwa, Deputy General Manager (DGM), Taxmann.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 14,2020

London, May 14: Fugitive liquor baron Vijay Mallya on Thursday urged the Central government to accept his offer to repay 100 per cent of his loan dues and close the case against him.

While congratulating the Centre for introducing Rs 20 lakh crore relief package to boost the economy amid the coronavirus lockdown, Mallya, lamented that his repeated attempts to pay back his dues have been ignored by the Indian government.

"Congratulations to the Government for a Covid 19 relief package. They can print as much currency as they want BUT should a small contributor like me who offers 100% payback of State-owned Bank loans be constantly ignored? Please take my money unconditionally and close," he tweeted.

Earlier this month, Mallya had sought permission to appeal against a ruling ordering his extradition to India in Britain's highest court the UK Supreme Court.

The application comes two weeks after the High Court in London - the UK's second-highest court - dismissed Mallya's appeal against a lower court ruling that he be sent to India to face charges of defrauding a consortium of Indian banks of more than Rs 9,000 crores relating to the collapse of Kingfisher Airlines in 2012.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 13,2020

Visakhapatnam, Jun 13: A four-month-old baby who was on ventilator treatment for 18 days for COVID-19 was on Friday evening discharged from hospital after testing negative.

"A tribal woman of East Godavari named Laxmi was infected with COVID-19 in May, later the doctors confirmed that her four-month-old baby was also infected," said District Collector, Vinay Chand.

"The baby was shifted to Visakhapatnam VIMS hospital on May 25. She was treated for 18 days on a ventilator. Doctors again conducted baby's COVID-19 test recently, following which the reports came negative. After a health check-up, VIMS doctors discharged the baby on Friday evening," he added.

Meanwhile, 14 new COVID-19 positive cases have been reported in Visakhapatnam district on Friday, taking the total number of cases to 252 including one fatality due to the virus.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.