Delhi gang rape: High court slams cops for lapses as home secretary lauds them for cracking case

safia@coastaldigest.com (TNN)
December 22, 2012

Delhi

New Delhi, December 22: Even as angry Delhiites continued to take to the streets over the gruesome gang rape of a 23-year-old girl and the high court slammed the cops for lapses that had led to Sunday night's incident, Union home secretary RK Singh lauded the Delhi Police for its "outstanding" job in cracking the case.

Singh's remark appeared completely out of sync with the mood of the city. It came on a day when the high court made its unhappiness known over the police's "evasive" status report in the case and demanded the names of officers on patrol duty on the route taken by the bus in which the gang-rape took place.

The home secretary was replying to a question on whether the police commissioner should resign taking moral responsibility for lapses that led to the rape. He was addressing a joint press conference with police commissioner Neeraj Kumar.

Attempting to restore people's faith in the police, Singh assured Delhiites that no 'goondagardi' (rowdiness), 'dadagiri' (bullying) or misbehaviour with women would be tolerated and a "very strict regime" would be put in place to ensure safety of people in the capital which recorded a 17% rise in rape cases in the past year.

"We will ensure that all necessary action is taken by Delhi Police ... people of Delhi will feel it," Singh said.

'Furnish case details by January 9'

A Delhi high court bench of Chief Justice D Murugesan and Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw on Friday said the police had submitted an incomplete status report. "We are not convinced," an anguished bench said, adding that the questions it had raised two days ago, when it took suo motu cognizance of the case, "had not been addressed.

"None of the details we sought have been mentioned. The bus couldn't be detected for 40 long minutes so we asked who were the policemen on duty on the route who manned the barricades and PCR vans? When we had asked specific questions why the report is evasive?" the bench asked Delhi Police counsel Dayan Krishnan and Delhi government sta8nding counsel Najmi Waziri.

Waziri conceded the status report filed by the cops suffered from absence of details but assured the bench that the "entire bureaucracy is seized of the matter and our primary focus is to investigate the case". "Many things cannot be brought into the public domain at this juncture," Waziri added.

The court then gave the police till January 9 to furnish details it had sought. To make it a water-tight casethat doesn't get botched up, HC also asked Waziri to ensure forensic examination in the crime be "expeditiously conducted by experts" since in many cases delay in DNA and CFSL reports affects the prosecution case.

The court's direction came after it learnt that there was no director at the CFSL. "Evidence is lost. They don't accept any sample as there is shortage of chemicals too. If it is so, then please rectify it immediately," the court directed, saying the Delhi government must look into the lack of infrastructure and other facilities at FSL labs.

During the hearing, Meera Bhatia, a woman lawyer assisting the court, raised apprehensions on the quality of medical care being given to the victim at Safdarjung hospital and urged the court to direct that she be transferred to a super-speciality hospital. But the HC refused, saying, "We have already noted in our previous order that the victim, if it is possible, should be shifted to a super-speciality hospital."

HC had on December 19 taken suo motu cognizance of the gang rape incident and decided to monitor its probe by directing the police to carry a "high standard" investigation and file the chargesheet only after the court's perusal.

Home secretary R K Singh, at his joint press meet with police commissioner Neeraj Kumar, said the police would file the chargesheet "quickly", seek life imprisonment for the accused and request day-to-day hearing of the case. Asked about the growing demand that the accused should be given death penalty, Singh said police were working as per law and according to the law, life imprisonment was the maximum punishment for rape.

On the possibility of including death penalty in the law for rape, he said, "We will have to look into the demand ... but there are many jurists and various human rights groups who are demanding abolition of capital punishment in India, though I personally believe there should be death penalty for such crime".

Singh complimented the Delhi Police for cracking the "blind case" within a very short span of time.


Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 23,2020

New Delhi, Jun 23: With an increase of 14,933 new cases and 312 deaths in the last 24 hours, India's COVID-19 count reached 4,40,215 on Tuesday.

According to the latest update by the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW), 14,011 deaths have been recorded due to the infection so far in the country.

The rise in confirmed cases today is lower than the highest spike of 15 thousand plus cases registered on Sunday.

The count includes 1,78,014 active cases, and 2,48,190 cured/discharged/migrated patients.

Maharashtra with 1,35,796 confirmed cases remains the worst-affected by the infection so far in the country. The state's count includes 61,807 active, 67,706 cured, discharged patients while 6,283 deaths have been reported due to the infection so far.

Meanwhile, the national capital's confirmed coronavirus cases reached 62,655.

2,233 deaths have been reported in Delhi due to the infection so far.

Tamil Nadu has reported 62,087 cases so far with toll increased to 794.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 13,2020

New Delhi, Jan 13: The Supreme Court on Monday commenced hearing on issues related to discrimination against women in various religions and at religious places including Kerala's Sabarimala Temple.

A nine-judge bench headed by Chief Justice S A Bobde said that it was not considering review pleas in the Sabarimala case.

“We are not hearing review pleas of Sabarimala case. We are considering issues referred to by a 5-judge bench earlier,” the bench said.

The apex court had on November 14 asked a larger bench to re-examine various religious issues, including the entry of women into the Sabarimala Temple and mosques and the practice of female genital mutilation in the Dawoodi Bohra community.

While the five-judge bench unanimously agreed to refer religious issues to a larger bench, it gave a 3:2 split decision on petitions seeking a review of the apex court's September 2018 decision allowing women of all ages to enter the Sabarimala shrine in Kerala.

A majority verdict by then Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justices A M Khanwilkar and Indu Malhotra decided to keep pending pleas seeking a review of its decision regarding entry of women into the shrine, and said restrictions on women in religious places was not restricted to Sabarimala alone and was prevalent in other religions as well.

The minority verdict by Justices R F Nariman and D Y Chandrachud gave a dissenting view by dismissing all review pleas and directing compliance of its September 28 decision.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
May 19,2020

New Delhi, May 19: Former Union Minister P Chidambaram said that as the fourth phase of the nationwide lockdown amid the coronavirus scare began from Monday, his thoughts were with the people of Kashmir who were in a "terrible lockdown within a lockdown."

The senior Congress leader said that at least now, the people in the rest of India will understand that he dubbed the "enormity of the injustice" done to those who were detained in Kashmir and those still under detention" immediately before and after the abrogation of Article 370 of the Indian Constitution on August 5, 2019.

Chidambaram said that former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti was the "worst sufferer" of preventive detention and even courts had shirked their constitutional duty with respect to detainees.

"The worst sufferers are Mehbooba Mufti and her senior party colleagues who are still in custody in a locked-down state in a locked-down country. They are deprived of every human right," he said in a statement.

"I cannot believe that for nearly 10 months, the courts will shirk their constitutional duty to protect the human rights of citizens," he added.

The detention on Mehbooba Mufti under the Public Safety Act (PSA) had been extended for three more months on May 5. Booked under the stringent PSA, she was initially kept at the Hari Niwas guesthouse in Srinagar but later shifted to a Tourism Department hut in the Chashma Shahi area.

She was shifted to her Gupkar Road official residence on April 7.

Besides Mehbooba Mufti, two other former Chief Ministers -- Omar Abdullah and his father Farooq Abdullah -- were also detained under the PSA but later released.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.