Amit Shah deployed illegal Gujarat Police surveillance on Bangalorean woman for 'saheb': Cop

November 15, 2013
New Delhi, Nov 15: BJP general secretary Amit Shahmade Gujarat Police deploy illegal police surveillance on a young woman because his "saheb" was obsessed about knowing every moment of hers.

amith_shah

The details were made public by investigative websites Cobrapost and Gulail, based on taped phone conversations between IPS officer GL Singhal, Shah and others. The tapes were submitted to CBI by Singhal, who is an accused in the Ishrat Jahan fake encounter case.

According to tapes played out before the media on Friday here, the "illegal spying" operation was initiated sometime in August 2009, when Shah was Gujarat's minister of state for home, and continued for several weeks thereafter. According to these tapes, Gujarat Anti Terrorist Squad (ATS), where Singhal was an SP, illegally listened in on the woman's mobile phones, had policemen deployed at airport, hotel, and even in hospital where her mother was undergoing a surgery.

Besides the woman, a senior Gujarat IAS officer Pradeep Sharma was also put under illegal watch.

"In the latter half of 2009, when I was posted as SP (operations) in the anti-terrorist squad (ATS) at Ahmedabad, Shri Amit Shah had directed me several times to watch the movements of Shri Pradeep Sharma, who was then posted as municipal commissioner, Bhavnagar. He had also asked me to put a watch on a young woman named Madhuri. I had deputed some men of the crime branch (as ATS was short of subordinate staff) to follow her, as directed by Shri Amit Shah," the investigative websites quoted Singhal as having told the CBI on April 17, 2013.

The websites calimed that for over a month the Gujarat Police apparatus "used its sweeping powers to rigorously monitor every private moment, every personal conversation and every daily movement of Madhuri (name given by the websites). Singhal has told the CBI that the surveillance was illegal and was carried out only on the oral instructions of Shah."

According to recordings played before the media on Friday, the woman was tailed as she visited shopping malls, restaurants, ice cream parlours, gyms, cinema halls, hotels and airports. The recordings also show that she was followed even as she visited her ailing mother in a hospital. When she boarded a flight from Ahmedabad, cops were asked to board the same aircraft so that she was not out of sight even for a moment.

According to the recordings, Shah was keen to know about the men who met the woman, and if she was with some man when she checked into a hotel in Ahmedabad. Not just her phone, but also those of her family and friends were tapped by the ATS, the tapes reveal.

Shah kept collecting information almost real time, while also revealing that his "saheb" had other sources for information on the woman.

According to the tapes, Shah also instructed Singhal to put surveillance on IAS officer Pradeep Sharma. Shah was keen to know if Sharma was meeting with the particular woman. The websites claim that unaware of the existence of these tapes Sharma had independently filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court in May 2011 alleging that he was being framed in bogus corruption cases by the Gujarat government, and among the allegations he mentions is about Narendra Modi's association with a young woman.

"It now emerges from Singhal's statements and tapes that the name of the woman mentioned by Sharma in his petition is the same as the name of the woman who was kept under watch by Shah and company," the websites said in a statement.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 2,2020

New Delhi, Mar 2: The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a curative petition filed by convict Pawan Kumar Gupta who was sentenced to death in the 2012 Nirbhaya gang rape and murder case.

A five-judge bench headed by Justice N V Ramana said that no case is made out for re-examining the conviction and the punishment of the convict.

Other members of the bench were justices Arun Mishra, R F Nariman, R Banumathi and Ashok Bhushan.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 15,2020

New Delhi, May 15: The World Bank on Friday approved $1 billion 'Accelerating India's COVID-19 Social Protection Response Program' to support the country's efforts for providing social assistance to the poor and vulnerable households, severely impacted by the pandemic.

This takes the total commitment from the World Bank towards emergency COVID-19 response in India to $2 billion.

A $1 billion support was announced last month to support India's health sector.

The response to the COVID-19 pandemic around the world has required governments around the world to introduce social distancing and lockdowns in unprecedented ways, said Junaid Ahmad, World Bank Country Director in India in a webinar interaction with the media.

These measures, intended to contain the spread of the virus have, however, impacted economies and jobs – especially in the informal sector. India with the world's largest lockdown has not been an exception to this trend, he said.

Of the $1 billion commitment, $550 million will be financed by a credit from the International Development Association (IDA) – the World Bank's concessionary lending arm and $200 million will be a loan from the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), with a final maturity of 18.5 years including a grace period of five years.

The remaining USD 250 million will be made available after June 30, 2020.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
July 22,2020

New Delhi, Jul 22: Congress leader Sachin Pilot has served a legal notice to party MLA Giriraj Malinga, for claiming that the former had offered him money to join the BJP.

"Former Rajasthan Deputy Chief Minister Sachin Pilot has served a legal notice to Congress MLA Giriraj Malinga for his Rs 35 crore bribery allegation," a source close to Pilot said.
P
Earlier, addressing a press conference, Malinga said, "Those MLAs who are stuck either in Haryana or Jaipur, are running after money. To say, they are not, are false claims. Even I was offered the same by Pilot, which I had refused. Came to this party knowing BJP and Congress do not accept money to give tickets."

When asked by the reporters whether he was offered Rs 35 crore, he claimed by saying, "Yes, 35." The MLA claimed he was himself the prove when the reporters asked for the same.

The political situation in Rajasthan is in turmoil after Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot sacked his then-deputy Sachin Pilot and the latter's confidants from his council of ministers. The Congress has also claimed that BJP was trying to buy its party MLAs.

On Monday, the Rajasthan High Court had said that it would hear the petition filed by Pilot and 18 of his loyalist MLAs on July 24, against the disqualification notices issued against them, a lawyer said.

"The arguments in the matter have been concluded. The court has heard the arguments from all the parties. The High Court has slated the matter for orders on July 24," Advocate Prateek Kasliwal told reporters after the hearing. 

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.