Spinners rule roost as India nail England

September 24, 2012

spin_rule_the_match

Three days can be too long in cricket and England realised it the hard way.

Only on Friday, England were brimming with pride and confidence after annihilating Afghanistan by 116 runs. On the other hand, India had come in for all-round criticism, and justifiably so, for their scratchy win against their Asian greenhorns.

England appeared ready to teach India a lesson or two in T20 cricket, but it was instead MS Dhoni and company who handed a crushing 90-run defeat to the defending champions in their final Group ‘A’ match here at the packed R Premadasa Stadium on Sunday night.


After posting a competitive 170/4 on the back of knocks from Rohit Sharma (55 n.o., 33b, 5x4, 1x6), Virat Kohli (40, 32b, 6x4) and Gautam Gambhir (45, 38b, 5x4), Indian spinners played havoc with the clueless English batsmen to bowl them out for a paltry 80 in 14.4 overs to qualify for the Super Eight stage as group toppers.

Harbhajan Singh (4-12), returning to the squad after being in the wilderness for over 12 months, bamboozled the Englishmen with his bag of tricks in his parsimonious four overs.

With an equally impressive Piyush Chawla, again playing his first international since the match against the Netherlands in March 2011 in the World Cup, claiming 2-13 with his assortment of googlies and leg-breaks, England looked like the Afghanistan of Friday.

Two slips, a short-leg and a silly point are a rare sight in T20 cricket where captains would prefer to dot the boundary line with fielders. But such was the effect of Indian spinners that Dhoni was forced to pack his close-in cordon in anticipation of wickets that fell like nine-pins.

Redemption

It was a sort of redemption for man of the match Harbhajan, who last played his match against England in the Nottingham Test last year before being ignored for his patchy form. Irfan Pathan (2-17), too, played his hand in India’s victory, dismissing opener Alex Hales and the dangerous Luke Wright cheaply. It was also a vindication of five-bowler strategy adopted by India, who until this match were reluctant to play with a batsman less. India, meanwhile, rested Zaheer Khan and R Ashwin along with Virender Sehwag.

Barring the six-over Power Play period and the final five overs, Indian innings chugged along a trifle slow in the middle overs.


After losing make-shift opener Irfan, who stepped in for Sehwag, early in the innings, Kohli provided the momentum with some crunching drives. With Gambhir picking up the odd boundary, India raced to 52 during field restrictions. It was as good a start as India would have hoped for after being asked to bat first by England who included an extra seamer in Tim Bresnan dropping Samit Patel.

On hindsight England might be regretting their decision to play with just one spinner -- Graeme Swann.

The way Indian spinners left the English batsmen befuddled and the manner in which the England off-spinner kept the Indian batsmen quiet, the left-arm spin of Patel may have come in handy. Swann, introduced immediately after the Power Play, bowled with great control and precision as Kohli and Gambhir failed to force the pace against the wily bowler.

Kohli perished, trying to send Swann out of the park. A tired-looking Gambhir was unable to make much headway though the knock would have done a world of good to his confidence. In an effort to get some quick runs, Gambhir holed out in the deep that heralded the best phase for the Indian innings.

Rohit took an erratic English attack apart as India collected 57 runs in the last five overs. The frenetic pace of run-making also forced the English fielders into silly errors that helped India post a good total which eventually proved quite daunting.

Score Board

INDIA
Gambhir c Kieswetter b Finn 45
(38b, 5x4)
Irfan b Finn 8
(8b, 1x4)
Kohli c Bairstow b Swann 40
(32b, 6x4)
Rohit (not out) 55
(33b, 5x4, 1x6)
Dhoni c Hales b Dernbach 9
(8b, 1x4)
Raina (not out) 1
(1b)
Extras (B-1, LB-3, W-8) 12
Total (for 4 wkts, 20 overs) 170

Fall of wickets: 1-24 (Irfan), 2-81 (Kohli), 3-119 (Gambhir), 4-166 (Dhoni).
Bowling: Finn 4-0-33-2 (w-3), Dernbach 4-0-45-1 (w-3), Broad 4-0-36-0, Bresnan 4-0-35-0 (w-1), Swann 4-0-17-1 (w-1).

Runs during Power Play: 1-6 overs: 52/1.

ENGLAND

Kieswetter c Kohli b Chawla 35
(25b, 4x4, 2x6)
Hales b Irfan 0
(2b)
Wright lbw Irfan 6
(4b, 1x6)
Morgan b Harbhajan 2
(6b)
Bairstow b Chawla 1
(8b)
Buttler b Harbhajan 11
(12b, 1x4)
Bresnan c Gambhir b Harbhajan 1
(8b)
Broad c Gambhir b Dinda 3
(3b)
Swann st Dhoni b Harbhajan 0
(3b)
Finn (not out) 8
(10b, 1x4)
Dernbach (run out) 12
(7b, 2x4)
Extras (W-1) 1
Total (all out, 14.4 overs) 80

Fall of wickets: 1-2 (Hales), 2-18 (Wright), 3-39 (Morgan), 4-42 (Bairstow), 5-51 (Kieswetter), 6-54 (Bresnan), 7-60 (Buttler), 8-60 (Swann), 9-60 (Broad).

Bowling: Irfan 3-0-17-2 (w-1), Balaji 1-0-10-0, Dinda 2-0-26-1, Harbhajan 4-2-12-4, Chawla 4-1-13-2, Yuvraj 0.4-0-2-0.

Runs during Power Play: 1-6 overs: 39/3.



Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 10,2020

New Delhi, May 10: Former Australia captain Ian Chappell has proposed radical changes in the LBW laws, stating that a batsman should be given out leg before as long as the ball is hitting the stumps irrespective of the spot of its landing and impact.

Chappell also said captains should agree on one way of working up the ball which will encourage swing bowling, even as the ICC is considering the use of artificial substances to shine the ball instead of sweat and saliva in post-COVID-19 scenario.

"The new lbw law should simply say: 'Any delivery that strikes the pad without first hitting the bat and, in the umpire's opinion, would go on to hit the stumps is out regardless of whether or not a shot is attempted'," he wrote in a column for ESPNcricinfo.

"Forget where the ball pitches and whether it strikes the pad outside the line or not; if it's going to hit the stumps, it's out."

The 76-year-old said the change in lbw law would attract expected criticism from the batsmen but it would make the game more fair.

"There will be screams of horror - particularly from pampered batsmen - but there are numerous positives this change would bring to the game. Most important is fairness.

"If a bowler is prepared to attack the stumps regularly, the batsman should only be able to protect his wicket with the bat. The pads are there to save the batsman from injury not dismissal.

"It would also force batsmen to seek an attacking method to combat a wristspinner pitching in the rough outside the right-hander's leg stump," said Chappell.

He cited Sachin Tendulkar's example on how he negotiated Shane Warne's round the wicket tactic during the 1997-98 Test series in India.

"Contrast Sachin Tendulkar's aggressive and successful approach to Shane Warne coming round the wicket in Chennai in 1997-98 with a batsman who kicks away deliveries pitching in the rough and turning in toward the stumps. Which would you rather watch?

"The current law encourages "pad play" to balls pitching outside leg while this change would force them to use their bat. The change would reward bowlers who attack the stumps and decrease the need for negative wide deliveries to a packed off-side field," he said.

Chappell said his proposed change to the lbw law would also cut down "frivolous" DRS challenges.

"This change to the lbw law would also simplify umpiring and result in fewer frivolous DRS challenges. Consequently, it would speed up a game that has slowed drastically in recent times.

"It would also make four-day Tests an even more viable proposition as mind-numbing huge first-innings totals would be virtually non-existent."

On the substitute of shining the ball without sweat and saliva, Chappell said international captains should find out a way of working up the ball.

"With ball-tampering always a hot topic, in the past I've suggested that administrators ask international captains to construct a list (i.e. the use of natural substances) detailing the things bowlers feel will help them to swing the ball.

"From this list, the administrators should deem one method to be legal with all others being punishable as illegal," the cricketer-turned-commentator added.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 22,2020

New Delhi, Jun 22: Claiming to be saddled with faulty equipment from China, the Indian Weightlifting Federation (IWLF) on Monday called for a boycott of sports apparatus made in that country after the violent face-off in eastern Ladakh killed 20 Army personnel last week.

The IWLF ordered four weightlifting sets, comprising barbells and weight plates, from Chinese company 'ZKC' last year. The body said that the equipment turned out to be faulty and the weightlifters are no longer using them.

"We should boycott all Chinese equipment. The Indian Weightlifting Federation has taken the decision that it will not use any equipment made in China," IWLF secretary general Sahdev Yadav said.

The IWLF, in a letter, has informed the Sports Authority of India (SAI) about its decision to stop using any equipment made in China.

"In a letter to SAI we have written that IWLF won't be using the Chinese equipment," he said.

"In future also we will not use made in china sets. We will use sets made by Indian origin companies or any other company but not from China," Yadav added.

National coach Vijay Sharma revealed that the plates were found to be sub-standard when the lifters started training again earlier this month following the easing of the COVID-19 lockdown restrictions.

"The sets were spoilt. We can't use them now," Sharma said.

"All the weightlifters in the camp are against China. They have stopped using Chinese apps like Tik Tok. Even while ordering things online, they check where the product has been manufactured," he added.

Asked why the sets were even ordered, Sharma said they had no option as the equipment from China is to be used in the Tokyo Olympics and lifters needed to be familiar with it.

"We had ordered four sets from China for Olympic training a year ago. Now, since we have resumed training post the lockdown we haven't used them. All the lifters are against the use of Chinese equipment," he said.

He said equipment was ordered from China for the first time.

"We don't order equipment from China as the quality is very bad. This was the first time we got it."

The weightlifters are currently training with equipment made in Sweden.

"Post the lockdown we started training on sets from Swedish company 'ELICKO'. SAI has issued 10 sets for us. The main training takes place with those. Maximum international competitions have sets from ELICKO," Sharma said.

Yadav also said that there are ready alternatives to Chinese equipment.

"We have a lot of alternatives. We already have good Indian sets and we also have equipment from Sweden. We will use that, why should we use Chinese?" Yadav said.

Calls to boycott China-made goods erupted across India after the Galwan valley clash last Monday. It was the most violent face-off between the troops from the two countries in more than four decades.

The Indian Olympic Association (IOA) has said it is open to boycotting Chinese products in the wake of the incident.

The BCCI will also review IPL's sponsorship deals, including the title deal with Chinese mobile manufacturing company Vivo later this week.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
January 26,2020

Mumbai, Jan 26: Boxing great Mary Kom has been selected for the Padma Vibhushan, the country's second highest civilian award. Olympic silver medallist and reigning badminton World Champion PV Sindhu has been named for Padma Bhushan as the names of Padma awardees were disclosed on Saturday on the eve of the 71st Republic Day.

Rated as one of the most successful amateur boxers of all time, Mary Kom won bronze at the 2012 London Olympics and has won gold at the boxing World Championships for a record six times. She has won a total of eight medals at the World Championships, the most recent of which came in October 2019 in Ulan Ude, Russia. The 36-year-old is now looking to qualify for the 2020 Tokyo Olympics.

Sindhu became the only Indian woman to win an Olympic silver when she reached the final of the women's singles event at the 2016 Olympics in Rio de Janeiro, Brazi. In August last year, the 24-year-old became the first Indian to win gold at the badminton World Championships.

She has also won two silver and two bronze medals at the World's in the past, thus making her only the second woman after Chinese two-time Olympic gold medallist Zhang Ning to win five medals in the competition.

Indian women's hockey captain Rani Rampal, who has been the face of women's hockey in the country and played a pivotal role in the team qualifying for the 2020 Tokyo Olympics, is among those who have been nominated for the Padma Shri award.

Women's football stalwart Oinam Bembem Devi, former cricketer Zaheer Khan, shooter Jitu Rai, former hockey captain and coach M.P. Ganesh and archer Tarundeep Rai are the other sportspersons to be selected for the Padma Shri award.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.