Old rivals, new game: Flipkart Azim Premji vs Amazon Narayana Murthy

August 14, 2014

azim-premji-and-narayana-murthy

Bangalore, Aug 14: India's tech titans and fierce cross-town rivals, Wipro's Azim Premji and Infosys' N R Narayana Murthy, are squaring off in the burgeoning $3-billion e-commerce market space too. Premji has gone with the domestic players; he has investments in Myntra (recently acquired by Flipkart) and Snapdeal while Murthy has placed his bets on global e-tailing giant Amazon.

India's rapidly growing e-commerce market is turning out to be a two-horse race between Amazon and Flipkart.

Earlier this year, the Wipro chairman through his investment arm, Premji Invest, and a clutch of other investors, pumped in about $50 million in fashion e-tailer Myntra. Snapdeal, another e-commerce player, got $100 million in funding from five investors including Premji Invest.

More recently, Amazon and Murthy's family office, Catamaran Ventures, floated a JV to help small and medium businesses join the online bandwagon.

Catamaran holds a majority 51% in the JV—Taurus Business and Trade Services.

"Myntra and Snapdeal needed money and expertise from successful Indian entrepreneurs. From an investment perspective, Premji's investments are a more classic VC style investment that fosters local entrepreneurship with a very high risk-reward ratio," said Praveen Chakravarty, a successful angel investor and co-founder of Mumbai Angels. However, he has a counter view on the Amazon transaction. "It seems to me as a low-risk, financial return-focused yield investment that has risen out of an opportunity driven by regulations in India."

(Premji has gone with the domestic players; he has investments in Myntra and Snapdeal while Murthy has placed his bets on global e-tailing giant Amazon.)

Sources privy to developments in Amazon said that the US e-tailing behemoth was scouting for a big brand that could invest Rs 100 crore in cash with a guaranteed return on investment of around 20% at the time of exit. TOI could not ascertain the nature of the Amazon-Catamaran tie-up, as both parties have not disclosed the financials of the deal.

"Amazon doesn't need money nor does it need hand-holding and guidance," said a senior executive of a Bangalore-based VC fund-house, who requested anonymity as the subject was sensitive in his opinion.

Deepak Srinath, director—digital practice at Bangalore-based Allegro Capital Advisors, said comparisons between Premji and Murthy's venture is not like-to-like. "Having said that, it's easier to be a financial investor. But in the case of Catamaran, they are setting up full-scale operations and would be managing business operations. It's not easy to stick your neck out in this fashion which is a high-risk game in itself."

Aashish Bhinde of Avendus Capital said both Murthy and Premji have carved their own paths to align with players in the country's e-commerce play. When asked if Murthy's embraced a safe game plan with assured returns, while Premji's is a higher risk affair, Bhinde said he doesn't agree with those characterizations. "I believe they both are bullish about the sector but have different investment strategies. While one is taking a portfolio investment approach, the other has made a more strategic move," he added.

With Flipkart raising $1 billion in fresh funds and Amazon pouring $2 billion into the India market, many existing players could fall off the investors' radar paving the way for a two- or a three-way race between Amazon, Flipkart and Snapdeal in India. So far, Flipkart has raised close to about $1.7 billion from a clutch of investors as it fights Amazon and Snapdeal in a fast-growing e-commerce market. India has 243 million internet users, and this number continues to grow rapidly due to increased smartphone penetration.

Higher disposable incomes and internet connectivity are pushing the Indian middle class to shop online. The two IT czars are fighting it out in an e-commerce market that's expected to touch $32 billion by the end of this decade.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
July 25,2020

New Delhi, Jul 25: India reported a spike of 48,916 coronavirus cases on Saturday, according to the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.

The total COVID-19 positive cases stand at 13,36,861 including 4,56,071 active cases, 8,49,431 cured/discharged/migrated. With 757 deaths in the last 24 hours, the cumulative toll reached 31,358.

Maharashtra has reported 3,57,117 coronavirus cases, the highest among states and Union Territories in the country.

A total of 1,99,749 cases have been reported from Tamil Nadu till now, while Delhi has recorded a total of 1,28,389 coronavirus cases.

According to the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), 4,20,898 samples were tested for coronavirus on Friday and overall 1,58,49,068 samples have been tested so far.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 28,2020

Kochi, Apr 28: The Central government on Tuesday told Kerala High Court that the Kerala government will have to take up with other states the matter pertaining to bringing back COVID-19 affected Malayali nurses.

A Division Bench of Justice PV Asha and Justice V Shircy asked the Kerala government to examine if there is any solution that may be considered and orally noted the suggestion that perhaps a video-conference may be conducted between the states on the matter.

The matter was posted for further hearing on April 30.

Counsel for the Central government said that the "Centre has issued guidelines for the protection of health workers. But in this specific case, state governments have assured that nurses are being given proper treatment."
"The plea is on apprehensions that they are not being treated well in the other states.

Centre could help if there is any necessary requirement thereafter," the Centre's counsel said.

Advocate Abraham Vakkanal, appearing for the state government, said that state chief secretary has written to Union cabinet secretary to relax travel restrictions amid COVID-19 lockdown to bring back the nurses.

Vakkanal said that the state has sought permission and is waiting for approval and will take further actions if permission is received on the matter.

Advocate Anupama Subramaniam, appearing for the petitioner, said that 68 Malayali nurses in other states have reached out to inform that they are not being given treatment and that facilities for food and shelter are also not readily available for them.

Kerala High Court had earlier asked the Centre and the state government to file their reply on the plea.

The court was hearing a petition seeking to bring COVID-19 affected Malayali nurses back to Kerala from other States considering their "poor health and working conditions".

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 18,2020

New Delhi, Jun 18: The Delhi High Court Thursday asked the Delhi Police to file status report on a plea by Jamia Coordination Committee member Safoora Zargar, who was arrested under the anti-terror law --UAPA -- seeking bail in a case related to communal violence in northeast Delhi during protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act in February.

Zargar, M Phil student of Jamia Millia Islamia University, is more than four months pregnant.

Justice Rajiv Shakdher issued notice to the police and asked it to file a status report on the bail plea.

The high court listed the matter for further hearing on June 22.

Zargar, who was arrested by the Special Cell of Delhi Police on April 10, has challenged the June 4 order of the trial court denying her bail in the case.

The trial court, in its order, had said “when you choose to play with embers, you cannot blame the wind to have carried the spark a bit too far and spread the fire.”

It had said that during the course of investigation a larger conspiracy was discernible and if there was prima evidence of conspiracy, acts and statements made by any one of the conspirators, it is admissible against all.

The court had said that even if there was no direct act of violence attributable to the accused (Zargar), she cannot shy away from her liability under the provisions of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).

However, the trial court had asked the concerned jail superintendent to provide adequate medical aid and the assistance to Zargar.

The police had earlier claimed that Zargar allegedly blocked a road near Jaffrabad metro station during the anti-CAA protests and instigated people that led to the riots in the area.

It further claimed that she was allegedly part of the “premediated conspiracy” to incite communal riots in northeast Delhi in February.

Communal clashes had broken out in northeast Delhi on February 24 after violence between citizenship law supporters and protesters spiralled out of control leaving at least 53 people dead and scores injured.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.