The Oscar controversy thickens

Agencies
February 26, 2019

Los Angeles, Feb 26: The Oscars celebrated diversity with a string of wins for minority nominees, but the night's message was undermined by a bitter controversy simmering Monday over the best picture winner, civil rights dramedy ‘Green Book.’

The victory for Peter Farrelly's true-life story of a gay black pianist, who strikes up an unlikely friendship with his Italian-American driver in 1960s America lit up social media, sparking a savage backlash over what critics see as its "whitesplaining" racial politics.
 
Veteran African American filmmaker Spike Lee stormed briefly out of the auditorium as the top prize at the 91st Academy Awards was announced on Sunday, later hinting that he thought it was a historically poor choice.

Lee was dumbfounded back in 1990 when ‘Driving Miss Daisy,’ a movie deemed by many to be egregiously tone deaf on race, won best picture while his widely lauded ‘Do the Right Thing’ couldn't even muster a nomination.

Three decades later, Lee was in the running for best film with ‘BlacKkKlansman’ and appeared exasperated to lose to another film about race relations set largely in a car.

"I'm snakebit, every time someone's driving someone, I lose," Lee half-joked backstage, visibly frustrated despite taking home a consolation prize, an Oscar for screenwriting, his first in a competitive category.

An evening overshadowed by a controversy over race had a fitting coda when Lee, after pleading for US voters to "be on the right side of history" when they vote in the 2020 presidential election, took a Twitter beating from Donald Trump.

"Be nice if Spike Lee could read his notes, or better yet not have to use notes at all, when doing his racist hit on your President," Trump tweeted Monday, although he hadn't been named by the director.

The top prize, the third statuette of the night for 'Green Book', came after its star Mahershala Ali, an African American and two years ago the first Muslim to win an acting Oscar, bagged the prize for best supporting actor. The film, an audience favourite that has taken more than USD 140 million in box offices worldwide, it has been embroiled in controversy since its premiere.

The real-life family of Ali's character, the late pianist Don Shirley, denounced the film as a "symphony of lies" while others described it as yet another "white saviour movie." Ali's co-star Viggo Mortensen was hardly a balm to the roiling controversy when, during a Q&A on the film in November, he used the N-word.

On the surface, the academy's selections on Sunday looked about as diverse as could be expected, with superhero blockbuster "Black Panther," a movie with a mainly black cast, scooping three awards.

Three of the four acting prizes went to African Americans and an Egyptian first-generation American, while black women won in costume design and production design for the first time, both for "Black Panther."

Richard Brody argued in The New Yorker, however, that the "repellently obtuse" "Green Book" proved the academy had changed nothing meaningful since being berated over the 2016-17 #OscarsSoWhite controversy.

Peter Bradshaw of The Guardian found that the "well-intentioned white/black balance" came across as glib, while the London-based Independent website bemoaned its "relentless, almost uncanny mediocrity."

As is often the case, there was a backlash to the backlash, from commentators complaining of an industry crippled by its fear of offending audiences and an obsession with the appearance of political correctness rather than genuine reform.

Conservative entertainment blog Hollywood in Toto, which considers Tinseltown's liberals as something of a bete noire, described the bonding theme in "Green Book" as "noble." Toto evoked the allegedly faked recent hate attack on black "Empire" actor Jussie Smollett to argue that the US movie industry is often too quick to see racism where none exists.

"Saying movies like 'Green Book' make white movie goers feel better is insulting," said editor Christian Toto. "Why would you need to be white to enjoy a beautifully told story about moving past one's bigotry?"

The number of minority actors with lead roles in films increased from 13.9 per cent in 2016 to 19.8 per cent in 2017, a far from perfect statistic but a sizeable improvement, nonetheless. "It sounds absurd to suggest people who claim to be against racism, like woke liberals in and out of Hollywood, would be against a film that promotes racial healing," said Toto.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 12,2020

Chennai, Mar 12: Superstar Rajinikanth on Thursday clarified that he never aspired to become the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu and said his plans for politics include different heads for his prospective party and a possible government headed by it.

In his first official press conference since December 31, 2017, when he announced to take the political plunge, the veteran star also said he planned to appoint as CM, an educated youth who was compassionate and had self-respect.

With a two-leadership system for party and the government, the former would act as an "opposition" to highlight issues and would not even hesitate to "remove", apparently the head of the government, if it fails to perform, he said.

His prospective party would focus on including a substantial amount of youngsters in the age group of below 45 years while the rest would comprise retired judges and IAS and IPS officials among others.

"I myself would reach out to them and invite them," to join him, the 69-year-old actor said.

Contrary to expectations, he however, did not make a concrete statement on floating his party but called for an "uprising" by youth, after which he would make his formal political entry.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 30,2020

Mumbai, May 30: Actor Vaani Kapoor on Saturday said she will go on a virtual date with five people as part of an initiative to raise money for daily wage earners, who have been affected due to the nationwide lockdown implemented to rein in coronavirus.

Vaani has teamed up with actor Arjun Kapoor's sister Anshula Kapoor’s online fundraising platform, Fankind, to raise funds for daily wage workers.

Vaani and Fankind have come together to provide five of her fans a chance to go on a virtual date with her - by donating to provide food to daily wage workers.

“As human beings, we will need to come forward and support as many people as possible in need due to the coronavirus pandemic in our country. I’m doing my bit to support the daily wage earners of our country and their families who are in dire situations given the lockdown.

“My activity, in which five lucky winners can have a virtual date with me, will see us collect funds to help feed them and their families across the country," Vaani said in a statement.

Earlier, Arjun too supported the initiative to help daily wage earners.

According to the press release, the funds will go to GiveIndia, a non-profit organisation, which will provide hot cooked meals to wage earners and their families. Each meal costs Rs 30 and will be delivered in various areas of Maharashtra, Bangalore, and Chennai.

A.T.E. Chandra Foundation has also come on board and will be adding 25 percent of the total donation value collected as a matching amount, thereby multiplying the impact, the release said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
January 4,2020

Mumbai, Jan 4: After the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kanpur constituted a panel to decide whether legendary poet Faiz Ahmed Faiz's poem 'Hum Dekhenge' is offensive to Hindu sentiments, filmmaker Shoojit Sircar had a cryptic take on the burning controversy.

"Best time for the rich & small businesses to make money as most of the population are engaged with a revolutionary poet named Faiz," Sircar said in a tweet.

The poem, penned down by the iconic poet in 1979, came into limelight again recently during the protests against CAA and NRC in IIT Kanpur.

Earlier on Thursday, senior lyricist Javed Akhtar rejected the claims about the poem being 'anti-Hindu'.

IIT Kanpur on Thursday had set up a committee to look into the issue.

The move came after a complaint that the students who took out a peaceful march in the campus on December 17 against the Citizenship Amendment Act and in solidarity with Jamia Millia Islamia students, sung it as a mark of protest, which hurt the sentiments of other communities.

The CAA grants citizenship to Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, Parsis, Buddhists and Christians who faced religious persecution in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh and came to India on or before December 31, 2014.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.