Patriotism is in Indian Muslims’ DNA

P A Hameed Padubidri
February 24, 2019

It's an excellent, but self-motivated, initiative being orchestrated by Muslims and their various organizations throughout India including coastal Karnataka against the deadly Pulwama terror attacks which resulted in the death of over 40 CRPF Jawans. This initiative covers a wide range of protests and condemnations. Those who indulge in such terror activity go against the religion and humanity. Hence, the Muslims’ initiative is highly appreciated.

Many ask as to why there is a need for Muslims to prove their patriotisms particularly during the reign of BJP and not when other parties, especially Congress had ruled the country?  They also articulated whether it is necessary for Muslims to prove their patriotisms in more demonstrative manner?  Why others are not obligated to exhibit it?

Let us analyze their questions in the backdrop of Indian history in general. No doubt, Indian Muslims’ fidelity to their country is embedded in their blood and it was proved in various phases of Indian history. They do not need for any "Certificate of Patriotism" from so called nationalists who were secretly loyal and helpful to the British during freedom struggle. Because of this, one of the accused (who is now being portrayed as freedom fighter by a section of people) in the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi was scot free.

Muslims of this time might have woken up today from their deep slumbers; but intellectual Muslims had woken up long before and strived hard and sacrificed for the cause of the country. Their loyalties to India were sincerely exhibited during the first war of independence which broke out in 1857. Muslims fought in teeth and nail to drive the British out of India. That's the reason, Muslims were the main targets for the British.

They were persecuted and harassed in many ways. They were deprived of their educations and jobs in various sectors of the British government. Even a small position in the government sectors were not provided to Muslims. From Tipu Sultan to Moulana Abul Kalam Azad, the freedom struggle was being continuously carried out till the independence of India in 1947.

Even if the Declaration of Allahabad Order in 1858 by Queen Elizabeth went against Muslims as a result of Muslims' patriotism and their disloyalty against the British, the Muslims had demonstrated their unshaken fidelity towards India. The British found it very difficult to shaken the Muslims and hence the British had tried their maximum level best to keep the Muslims away from the main stream. This is one of the main phases of the Indian history.

The British didn’t stop their devious tricks there itself while continuing it until they shaped up the concept of "Two-Nation Theory" in order to blame on the Muslims.

When the partition theory was proposed by Mohammad Ali Jinnah and other Muslim League leaders of that time, it was totally snubbed and rejected by the Muslims. A wide range of protests were staged by deep patriotic Muslims against this proposal throughout India. Campaigns, protests, slogans, street processions etc were held elsewhere. All India Azad Muslim Conference, against the Partition held in Delhi in April 1940, was one of the milestones in the Indian history that marks staunch opposition to the partition of the Indian Muslims.

Great Muslim personalities like Moulana Azad, Allah Baksh, Dr M A Ansari (ex-VP Hamid Ansari’s father), Asaf Ali, various Muslim organizations like All India Jamiat-e-Ahle Hadeeth, All India Jamiat-E-Ulema, Watan Anjuman, All India Muslim Majlis etc strongly condemned the 2-N’s theory. They had rejected the partition theory and soundly advocated for the composite Indian nationalism that comprises of Muslims, Hindus, Christians, Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists, Dalits and others alike. It is clearly elucidated in the book, MUSLIMS AGAINST PARTITION OF INDIA, authored by Shamsul Islam.

When the two nation theory was presented by then Congress in the table, elite and intellectual Muslims strongly opposed it and remained in India under the leadership of great Muslim leaders and scholars. They showed their resolute patriotism despite they belonged to Congress.

Throughout the historical phases of India, Muslims devoted themselves to India. But, unfortunately, the blame of partition of India was put on the Muslims by both British and RSS. While the Muslims were advocating for the composite Indian nationalism, the RSS which was born in 1925, was advocating the "Nationalism of Hindutva", which always stress for the fractured nationalism and anti-secularism. The assassination of Mahatma Gandhi was the result of such ideology. Nathuram Godse was just a face of such ideology that endangered the integrity and solidarity of India. It is still continuing!

It is worthwhile to note that Muslims not just woke up to prove patriotism only during BJP rule; they did it long before in various phases of Indian history. It's undeniable and indisputable truth lying in the history.

It's the more need of the hour than ever to thwart the stereotypes that were webbed around the Muslims in the contemporary India with all possible means and join more fully with socio-secular minded non-Muslims, who uphold the harmonious fabrics of our Indian constitution to defeat the divisive ideology & to live in co-existence and peace.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed within this article are the personal opinions of the author. The facts and opinions appearing in the article do not reflect the views of coastaldigest.com and coastaldigest.com does not assume any responsibility or liability for the same.

Comments

mansoor Ahamed
 - 
Wednesday, 27 Feb 2019

very true history written by P.A Hameed Sahab about patriotism.Muslim sacrifices for the indian freedom struggle, which are purposely kept in darkness.

 

 

Here he brought into light facts about indian muslim history for our knowledge! There are tons of like this; and teach our children about the truth!

 

 

Please read about the muslims' sacrifices for the cause of india and freedom strugle, it must be known by every indian. it also needs a timely awarnesses.

 

Really, it's worth reading.

 

Mohammad Mansoor
 - 
Monday, 25 Feb 2019

Masha Allah. Very good article. Jazakum Allahu Khairan Advocate sahab

Abdul rahman Puttur
 - 
Monday, 25 Feb 2019

Very thought-provocative  and detailed spotlight on the muslims' sincere and unwavering sacrifice for this country. Really a wonderful piece of work thoughtfuly and studiously written by P.A.Hameed Sahab.

 

Thank you so much, sir.

 

Navaz
 - 
Monday, 25 Feb 2019

Very Good article with eye opening real fact which RSS and its right (wrong) wing groups trying to delete these facts from history , which they cannot

 

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
February 4,2020

As democracy is seeping in slowly all over the world, there is an organization which is monitoring the degree of democracy in the individual countries, The Economist Intelligence Unit. As such in each country there are diverse factors which on one hand work to deepen it, while others weaken it. Overall there is a march from theoretical democracy to substantive one. The substantive democracy will herald not just the formal equality, freedom and community feeling in the country but will be founded on the substantive quality of these values. In India while the introduction of modern education, transport, communication laid the backdrop of beginning of the process, the direction towards deepening of the process begins with Mahatma Gandhi when he led the non-cooperation movement in 1920, in which average people participated. The movement of freedom for India went on to become the ‘greatest ever mass movement’ in the World.

The approval and standards for democracy were enshrined in Indian Constitution, which begins ‘We the people of India’, and was adopted on 26th January 1950. With this Constitution and the policies adopted by Nehru the process of democratization started seeping further, the dreaded Emergency in 1975, which was lifted later restored democratic freedoms in some degree. This process of democratisation is facing an opposition since the decade of 1990s after the launch of Ram Temple agitation, and has seen the further erosion with BJP led Government coming to power in 2014. The state has been proactively attacking civil liberties, pluralism and participative political culture with democracy becoming flawed in a serious way. And this is what got reflected in the slipping of India by ten places, to 51st, in 2019. On the index of democracy India slipped down from the score of 7.23 to 6.90. The impact of sectarian BJP politics is writ on the state of the nation, country.

Ironically this lowering of score has come at a time when the popular protests, the deepening of democracy has been given a boost and is picking up with the Shaheen Bagh protests. The protest which began in Shaheen Bagh, Delhi in the backdrop of this Government getting the Citizenship amendment Bill getting converted into an act and mercilessly attacking the students of Jamia Milia Islamia, Aligarh Muslim University along with high handed approach in Jamia Nagar and neighbouring areas.  From 15th December 2019, the laudable protest is on.

It is interesting to note that the lead in this protest has been taken by the Muslim women, from the Burqa-Hijab clad to ‘not looking Muslim’ women and was joined by students and youth from all the communities, and later by the people from all the communities. Interestingly this time around this Muslim women initiated protest has contrast from all the protests which earlier had begun by Muslims. The protests opposing Shah Bano Judgment, the protests opposing entry of women in Haji Ali, the protests opposing the Government move to abolish triple Talaq. So far the maulanas from top were initiating the protests, with beard and skull cap dominating the marches and protests. The protests were by and large for protecting Sharia, Islam and were restricted to Muslim community participating.

This time around while Narendra Modi pronounced that ‘protesters can be identified by their clothes’, those who can be identified by their external appearance are greatly outnumbered by all those identified or not identified by their appearance.

The protests are not to save Islam or any other religion but to protect Indian Constitution. The slogans are structured around ‘Defence of democracy and Indian Constitution’. The theme slogans are not Allahu Akbar’ or Nara-E-Tadbeer’ but around preamble of Indian Constitution. The lead songs have come to be Faiz Ahmad Faiz’s ‘Hum Dekhenge’, a protest against Zia Ul Haq’s attempts to crush democracy in the name of religion. Another leading protest song is from Varun Grover, ‘Tanashah Aayenge…Hum Kagaz nahin Dikhayenge’, a call to civil disobedience against the CAA-NRC exercise and characterising the dictatorial nature of the current ruling regime.

While BJP was telling us that primary problem of Muslim women is Triple talaq, the Muslim women led movements has articulated that primary problem is the very threat to Muslim community. All other communities, cutting across religious lines, those below poverty line, those landless and shelter less people also see that if the citizenship of Muslims can be threatened because of lack of some papers, they will be not far behind in the victimization process being unleashed by this Government.

While CAA-NRC has acted as the precipitating factor, the policies of Modi regime, starting from failure to fulfil the tall promises of bringing back black money, the cruel impact of demonetisation, the rising process of commodities, the rising unemployment, the divisive policies of the ruling dispensation are the base on which these protest movements are standing. The spread of the protest movement, spontaneous but having similar message is remarkable. Shaheen Bagh is no more just a physical space; it’s a symbol of resistance against the divisive policies, against the policies which are increasing the sufferings of poor workers, the farmers and the average sections of society.

What is clear is that as identity issues, emotive issues like Ram Temple, Cow Beef, Love Jihad and Ghar Wapasi aimed to divide the society, Shaheen Bagh is uniting the society like never before. The democratisation process which faced erosion is getting a boost through people coming together around the Preamble of Indian Constitution, singing of Jan Gan Man, waving of tricolour and upholding the national icons like Gandhi, Bhagat Singh, Ambedkar and Maulana Azad. One can feel the sentiments which built India; one can see the courage of people to protect what India’s freedom movement and Indian Constitution gave them.

Surely the communal forces are spreading canards and falsehood against the protests. As such these protests which is a solid foundation of our democracy. The spontaneity of the movement is a strength which needs to be channelized to uphold Indian Constitution and democratic ethos of our beloved country.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
January 26,2020

During last couple of decades we have been witnessing the coming up of various statues in different parts of the country. There is diverse political logic and different set of political tendencies for erecting these statues. When Mayawati was UP CM, she got multiple of her own statues made, in addition to many statues of major dalit icons, irrespective of the criticism against that act. As per her strategy it was a symbol of identity of dalit assertion. The biggest statue to come up was that of Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel, a lifelong Congressman, whom RSS combine is trying to appropriate. This statue of Unity was ‘Made in China’. The clever trick was that the same forces were behind this statue, which was banned by Patel in the aftermath of Gandhi murder. Interestingly while currently BJP is blaming Congress for Partition of India, ironically it was Sardar Patel who was in the committee which gave final stamp of approval for the partition of India.

There is also a talk in UP, where the Ram temple campaign yielded rich electoral dividends for BJP, to have tallest statue of Lord Ram in Ayodhya. In a state where children are dying in hospitals due to lack of Oxygen cylinders, a huge budgetary allocation will be required for such project. While on statues one should also remember that in Maharashtra a tall statue of Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj is underway in Arabian Sea, near Mumbai. Only few voices of protest against it came up, e.g. that of renowned journalist, now, MP, Kumar Ketkar, whose house was vandalised for his opposing the move on the grounds that same massive amount can be utilized for welfare-development activities in the state.

On the back of this comes a comparatively low budget 114 feet tall statue of Jesus Christ in Karnataka, in Kappala hills Harobele village, where Christian pilgrims have been thronging from last several centuries. The land for this has been donated by Congress leader Shivaprasad and his brother, a Congress MP. It is planned to be carved out from a single rock. The plan of this statue is being opposed by those who have been behind most of the statue projects so far. Hindu Jagran Vedike, VHP, RSS are up in arms saying that they will not let this come up. There are various arguments cited for this opposition. It is being said that this was a place of worship of Lord Munnieshwara (a form of Lord Shiva).

More than this it is being argued that Shivakumar is trying to please his Italian boss in the party. Also that this will bring back the period of slavery of foreign rule, the colonial rule of British. As such this opposition is more in tune with the ideology of RSS combine, which has been for a statue here and a statue there. Their politics regards Christianity as a ‘foreign religion’! It is true that in Citizenship Amendment Act, they have not excluded Christianity while other religion, which they regard as ‘Foreign’ i.e. Islam. Here they are using a different logic, that the countries from where persecuted minorities are coming, are Muslim countries, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangla Desh.

In India the major targeting by RSS combine has been against Muslims, but Christians are also not spared. Starting in the decade of 1980, an intense propaganda has been going on that Christian Missionaries are converting. As RSS affiliate Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram became active in Adivasi areas, the likes of Swami Aseemanand, Swami Laxmanand and followers of Aasaram bapu spread out in Tribal areas. They started their programs to popularise Shabri and Hanuman, with congregations like Shabri Kumbh being regularly organized in these areas. The aim was to Hinduize the people in those areas.

The first major anti Christian violence came up in the ghastly form of burning alive of Pastor Graham Steward Stains along with his two minor sons Timothy and Philip. RSS affiliate Bajrang Dal's Dara Siingh aka Rajendra Pal was behind this and he is serving the life term for that. At the same time Wadhva Commission was appointed to investigate this crime which shook the country and President K.R. Narayan termed it as the one belonging to the inventory of the black deeds of human history.

The Wadhva commission report pointed out that there was no statistical significant change in the region where the pastor was working. Similarly the national figures tell us that the Christian population, if at all, has marginally declined in last five decades as per the census figures. They stand like this, percentage of Christians in population, 1971-2.60, 1981- 2.44, 1991-2.34, 2001-2.30 and 2011-2.30. There are arguments that some people are converting to Christianity but are not revealing their religion. This may be true in case of miniscule percentage of dalits, who may not reveal there conversion, as they stand to loose reservation provisions if they convert.

The anti Christian violence is scattered and is below the radar most of the places. There was massive valence in Kandhamal, Orissa, when on the pretext that Christians have murdered Swami Laxmananand, a massive violence was unleashed in 2008. On regular basis prayer meetings of Christians are attacked on the pretext that these are attempts at conversion. While there is a huge demand for the schools and colleges run by Christian groups, in Adivasis areas and remote areas the work of Swamis is on.

Now the trend is to dump Christian traditions. Since Ramnath Kovind became President, the usual practice of Carol Singers visiting Rashtrapati Bhavan has been stopped. In the army retreat so far ‘Abide with me’ by Scottish poet, Henri Francis Lyte, a Christian song, a favourite of Gandhi, has been dropped. The Christian minorities have perceived the threat in various forms. Currently they are as much part of the protests against CAA, NPR and NRIC as any other community.

While statues and identity issues cannot have primacy over the social development issues, it cannot be selective. To oppose Jesus Christ statue while spending fortunes for other statues is a part of the agenda of RSS combine, which is unfolding itself in various forms. opposition to Jesus Christ statue being yet another step in the direction.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.