Prashant Singh Files Fraud Complaint Against Veena Malik

January 2, 2014

Prashant_SinghVeena Malik and controversies just never seem to die down and this time around its all about her relationship with her so called live-in boyfriend Prashant Singh, according to her is GAY.

Pakistani Actress Veena Malik, who shot to fame when she entered Bigg Boss Season 4, was recently in the news as she tied the nuptial knot with a Pakistani Businessman Asad Bashir Khan Khattak on December 25, 2013 in Dubai.

Veena Malik tied the knot at the Emirates court on Christmas day. “It happened very quickly. Our parents were talking from a few months and they wanted us to meet and see if we are compatible. My mother came to Dubai first and met Asad, then my father came to meet him,” Malik revealed to media.

Days after her wedding, everyone thought Veena had settled down with husband Asad Khan, a man called Prashant Singh has turned up and claims to have had a live-in relationship with Veena. He has even filed a police complaint under Section 507 (Criminal Intimidation) of fraud against Veena and said that she has threatened to accuse him of rape and molestation if he revealed their relationship to the media. Veena allegedly even called up his mother and threatened her.

Veena on the other hand has a completely different story to tell. She claims Prashant is simply a staff member who enjoys taking her pictures. When asked about his accusations, Veena said, “I always treated him like a brother. He is one among my very good gay friends.” Now this could be a story that our controversial queen could have cooked up so that she comes out clean infront of her husband Asad. If one remembers she has been lined with Asmit Patel and it was even speculated that both were planning to get married.

What has been told to us is that, Veena allegedly ran away with money after cheating Prashant in Mumbai and hurriedly got married to singer, model and businessman Asad Bashir Khattak in Dubai. Due to her mother’s poor health, the wedding was rushed and soon after the newlyweds threw a private reception.

As per Prashant, the actress cheated him by staying in a live-in relationship for two long years and suddenly getting married to a Dubai-based businessman without even informing him. Prashant claims he had made Veena a partner in his company, Huge H Digital, but was shocked after the wedding news. According to him, Veena committed fraud and took away money they both earned through the entertainment company.

In an interview to Geo News she says; “Prashant is an ex-employee of mine, he used to work for me. Now many such rumours will surface now, people will talk about my past, but by God’s grace we both are happy. At the moment I am extremely happy with my in-laws, my husband is my life, my partner. I don’t want to talk about any rumours.”

On the other hand, heartbroken Prashant Singh finds solace on Twitter and other social networking sites trying to convince everyone that what he is saying is the truth.

At the end of all this drama all we can tell Prashant Singh is to let go and move on because as far as Veena Malik is concerned he could just be one out the many.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
February 29,2020

Ernakulam, Feb 29: A court here on Friday issued a bailable arrest warrant against Malayalam actor Kunchacko Boban for failing to appear before it for witness examination in an assault case filed by an actress.

Ernakulam Additional Sessions Judge Honey M Varghese issued the arrest warrant.

As per the court's direction, Boban can take bail from police station and appear before court on March 4.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 14,2020

Mumbai, Mar 14: Animal Planet has announced a new documentary "The Zoo: COVID-19 And Animals", which seeks to explore the effects of coronavirus on animals.

The special will see Dave Salmoni, Animal Planet’s big cat expert, talking to a number of experts, from the World Health Organization to wildlife biologists, in order to find out how COVID-19 is affecting animals and what pet owners can do to safeguard them.

The issue came to forefront when a four-year-old Malayan tiger tested positive for COVID-19 at Bronx Zoo in New York.

The documentary will feature chief veterinarian of Bronx Zoo, who will give an update on the big cats and their treatment, and also Dr Peter Embarek from WHO's COVID-19 Task Force, who works particularly on all aspects of the virus related to animals.

In a statement, Salmoni said, "When news about Nadia the tiger came out the questions immediately began; what about my pets? How do I keep my animals and family safe? We’re going to answer these questions and more through this documentary."

"We're speaking to a wide range of experts from the World Health Organization, to wildlife biologists, to veterinarians. We are at war with this disease and so we get down to the nitty-gritty, and discuss practical questions about daily lives with our pets," he added.

Sai Abishek, Director – Content, Factual & Lifestyle Entertainment – South Asia, Discovery, said, "We have been the forefront of busting myths around novel coronavirus with international documentaries. With this latest film, we take a hard look at how animals are being treated during such a crisis and the safety measures that can be taken to keep both, the people and their pets healthy."

"The Zoo: COVID-19 And Animals" will premiere on May 17 on Animal Planet, Animal Planet HD and Discovery Plus app.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
January 6,2020

Kochi, Jan 6: A trial court on Monday framed charges against Malayalam film actor Dileep and other accused in the case of alleged abduction and molestation of a south Indian actress in 2017.

The actor and nine other accused were present in the additional special sessions court in Ernakulamwhen the charges were framed against them.

All of them have denied the charges.

On Saturday, the Court had dismissed a plea filed by Dileep, seeking to exclude him from the list of accused.

The Court had admitted the prosecution argument that there is prima facie evidence against him in the crime and dismissed the plea of the actor, who is eighth accused in the case.

The court had also not allowed a plea by the actor to grant him 10 days time to file the appeal in a higher court in the light of the Supreme Court order in November 2019 that the trial should be completed in six months.

The court is hearing the case in-camera.

On December 19, Dileep, along with his lawyers and a technical expert, had examined the contents of the electronic records at the closed room of the court.

Earlier, the Supreme Court had directed that the actor be allowed to inspect the records to enable him to present an effective defence during the trial.

In February 2017, the actress was allegedly abducted and molested by the accused.

Seven people, including the key accused 'Pulsar' Suni were arrested in connection with the actress' abduction case.

There are 10 accused in the case.

The entire act had allegedly taken place in a moving vehicle, which was filmed by the accused to blackmail her.

Dileep was subsequently arrested and arrayed as an accused in connection with offences under provisions of the Indian Penal Code and IT Act.

The top court had directed that the trial in case be concluded expeditiously, preferably within six months from the date of the judgement.

A woman judge is hearing the case.

In February 2019, the High Court, while considering a plea seeking to transfer the case to a Sessions Court headed by a woman judge to conduct the trial, had ordered the CBI special court Judge-III Ernakulam Honey M Varghese to complete the trial expeditiously.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.