Shah Rukh Khan I-T notice; asked to spell out offshore investments

July 25, 2016

Mumbai, Jul 25: Amid New Delhi's high-pitched hunt for hidden assets of the rich and famous, actor Shah Rukh Khan has received a notice from the income-tax department. About a fortnight ago, the tax office asked Khan to spell out details of his investments in offshore destinations.

srkThe tax office sought details of Khan's investments in destinations such as Bermuda, British Virgin Islands (BVI) and Dubai. While tax authorities are sitting on a mountain of information on offshore investments by a large number of Indians, it is unclear whether the department has any prima facie evidence to believe that Khan's overseas assets reflect his undisclosed wealth.

The notice was sent under Section 131 of the Income-Tax Act, which empowers tax authorities to conduct enquiries, a person aware of the development told ET. The department, it appears, is going beyond the actor's disclosed ownership of shares of companies in tax havens to fish out information such as activities of these outfits, the decision-makers, directors, etc. ET's email to Karuna Badwal, Khan's business manager and co-producer at Red Chillies Entertainment, went unanswered till the time of going to press.

According to industry sources, besides Khan, a few industrialists who have structured investments through Singapore have received similar notices. It happens at a time the government — driven by its promise to unearth black money — is going after many wealthy Indians who did not declare overseas bank accounts and assets such as properties and stocks in the quasiamnesty scheme last year. The notices to celebrities (like Khan) may be aimed at reminding the rich that they should come clean under the ongoing Income Declaration Scheme (IDS), which is being aggressively marketed by the finance ministry as an opportunity to declare undisclosed local assets.

Efforts to make a ID's a success

"The government is making all efforts to make IDS a success. Notices are being issued to assessees to send the message that the government is serious and those who once again refuse to declare concealed income would face the music," said senior chartered accountant Dilip Lakhani.

According to Mitil Chokshi, senior managing partner at audit firm Chokshi & Chokshi LLP, "There's no doubt that those assessees who have been issued notices or subjected to investigation cannot opt for IDS. But such actions — like prosecution initiated against many assessees, charges slapped on many professionals for aiding and abetting, and information obtained from other jurisdictions — would make assessees think twice before evading tax. It would surely go to make many new assessees." Neither Lakhani nor Chokshi is an adviser to Khan.

Many businessmen, top-notch professionals and actors have used the liberalised remittance scheme of the Reserve Bank of India to buy apartments and stocks abroad. Many, in order to escape estate duty, bought into shell companies in Jersey to invest in London's property market. The scheme allows investment in almost all markets barring countries such as Mauritius, Iran and Afghanistan. Some businessmen have used their companies in India to invest abroad as rules allow a local company to invest up to 400% of its net worth in an overseas joint venture or wholly owned subsidiary.

"A lot depends on how investments are structured. A professional in showbiz who parks a slice of his earnings from overseas shows in an offshore account may appear to be violating the law. But if he organises his business smartly — by giving the rights of organising such shows to a firm in BVI or Dubai and hires directors who execute the decisions — he may still be within the tax rules. He is liable to pay tax only if he receives dividend from such overseas companies he has floated," said a person who provides such advice.

A few years ago, taxpayers were told to share information of overseas investments in their tax returns. "But even if one shares such information, the tax department would not know the nature of the company and its structure. Now, they are trying to find out more. But there's very little the department can do if the investments are legal," he said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
June 26,2020

Los Angeles, Jun 26: Warner Bros has moved its Christopher Nolan-directed espionage thriller Tenet from July 31 to August 12.

It's the second delay for the highly-anticipated movie, which was originally scheduled to release on July 17 but was postponed to July 31 due to coronavirus pandemic.

Warner Bros. is committed to bringing Tenet' to audiences in theaters, on the big screen, when exhibitors are ready and public health officials say it's time. In this moment what we need to be is flexible, and we are not treating this as a traditional movie release.

We are choosing to open the movie mid-week to allow audiences to discover the film in their own time, and we plan to play longer, over an extended play period far beyond the norm, to develop a very different yet successful release strategy, a Warner Bros spokesperson said in a statement to Deadline.

The studio has also delayed the US re-release of Nolan's sci-fi blockbuster Inception, in honour of the film's 10th anniversary, to July 31.

Tenet features John David Washington, Robert Pattinson, Elizabeth Debicki, Kenneth Branagh, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Michael Caine, Clemence Poesy, Dimple Kapadia and Himesh Patel.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
January 9,2020

Mumbai, Jan 9: A day after Deepika Padukone visited the JNU campus to express solidarity with students who had been attacked, her film "Chhapaak" made another splash on Wednesday over the name of its antagonist.

While Deepika was the focus of many a discussion on social media and beyond for showing up at a public meeting in the university, the film, based on the life of acid attack survivor Laxmi Agarwal, was also making news for quite another reason.

In what could well be a storm in a 'Twitter cup', "Nadeem Khan" and "Rajesh" began trending on the microblogging site after a magazine article claimed the name of the antagonist had been changed. By 4 pm, 'Nadeem Khan' clocked close to 60,000 tweets and 'Rajesh' close behind with 50,000.

In 2005, Laxmi was disfigured for life when a man called Nadeem Khan and three others allegedly hurled acid at her in Delhi's upscale Khan Market.

In the film based on her life, the narrative remains the same but the names have been changed. So, Laxmi is 'Malti' Agarwal and Nadeem becomes 'Babboo' aka 'Bashir Khan'.

On Wednesday, Swarajya magazine wrote an article headlined, "The Ways Of Bollywood: In Deepika Padukone-Starer Chhapaak, Acid Attacker Naeem Khan Becomes ‘Rajesh'." "As part of a backlash against Padukone's JNU 'meet and greet', social media users researched the names of the characters involved in the movie Chhapaak and conspicuously found the name of main perpetrator Naeem Khan absent," the article alleged.

But in the Meghna Gulzar directed film, there is no mention of any Nadeem or Naeem Khan. Moreover, Rajesh is the name of Malti's boyfriend.

Minister of State for Environment, Forest and Climate Change Babul Supriyo jumped into the controversy, saying it was another example of "absolute hypocrisy".

"...When you say all characters are fictitious and don't have any resemblance with living beings and all of that, this is absolute hypocrisy. When you change the name which also changes the religion, it has been done very deliberately," Supriyo told a TV channel when asked to comment on the controversy.

South Delhi BJP MP Ramesh Biduri also called for a boycott of the movie.

With Deepika grabbing attention by going to JNU, many appreciated her 'silent solidarity' but others criticised her for "supporting the Leftists" and said it was a promotional stunt ahead of the release.

"#BoycottChhapaak" was trending on Twitter as was "#ISupportDeepika".

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
June 6,2020

Hollywood star Angelina Jolie feels discrimination and impunity cannot be justified in any way, and says she hopes people in the US can come together to "address the deep structural wrongs in our society".

The Oscar-winning star, who turned 45 on Thursday, also donated $200,000 to the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, reports people.com.

"Rights don't belong to any one group to give to another. Discrimination and impunity cannot be tolerated, explained away or justified. I hope we can come together as Americans to address the deep structural wrongs in our society," Jolie said.

"I stand with the NAACP Legal Defense Fund in their fight for racial equality, social justice, and their call for urgent legislative reform," she added.

Meanwhile, the actress celebrated her birthday amid lockdown with her six children -- Maddox, 18, Pax, 16, Zahara, 15, Shiloh, 14, and 11-year-old twins Knox and Vivienne.

The actress and activist has been active since the COVID-19 pandemic spread around the world and has donated to different organisations.

Jolie previously donated $1 million to No Kid Hungry, the organisation working to feed children during the COVID-19 pandemic.

"I knew that there were problems in America, that there was poverty, but I could not believe when I realised how many school children in America were dependent on a meal to not go hungry. I was so disgusted that we have gotten to this point as a country and that we would let the most vulnerable be in such a state. I can't imagine what it feels like for those parents," she said while opening up about her reason to get associated with the organisation.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.