South Africa beat India by 10 wickets in second Test and win series 1-0 to hand Kallis perfect farewell gift

December 31, 2013

South_Africa_beat

Durban, Dec 31: They didn’t use any sobriquets. But they made a telling statement by donning jerseys, the back of which read: ‘THE ONLY PLAYER TO SCORE 10,000 RUNS AND TAKE 200 WICKETS IN TEST CRICKET’. Enough said. Then, they gave him a lap of honour — partly on the shoulders of Graeme Smith and Morne Morkel, largely on foot. A jolly good fan even offered him a can of beer.

He took a big gulp. Then, he thanked everyone from his parents to coaches to teammates to girlfriends. Enough done? Nah, he deserved a grander party. Nevertheless, it was the perfect send-off for the perfect team man.

Yes, South Africa galloped to a 10-wicket victory on the final day of the second and deciding Test at Kingsmead. Yes, Dale Steyn was adjudged Man of the Match for his match haul of 9/147. Yes, MS Dhoni and Ravindra Jadeja played awful shots to hasten the completion of the perfect script. Yes, Ajinkya Rahane stood out with an elegant 96 to become India’s find of the tour. Yes, India didn’t register a single win on this tour. Yes, Dhoni and Duncan Fletcher presided over the team’s ninth straight overseas loss.

But the day, much like the Test match, belonged to Jacques Henry Kallis. If not for his fighting 115 in the first innings, India would have left these shores with a commendable 0-0 scoreline against the world’s No. 1 team. But it wasn’t to be. After the humdinger in Johannesburg, where the Proteas came within eight runs of forcing a historic win, came the delight in Durban. Let’s face it: the better team won.

Going into the fifth day, India had three options: bat, bat and bat. But they lasted no more than 50 overs. For the record, the visitors were bowled out for 223 in the second session, thereby setting South Africa a 59-run target. Forty-eight minutes is all it took Graeme Smith and Alviro Petersen to seal the deal.

Earlier, resuming at 68/2, India lost Virat Kohli and Cheteshwar Pujara, two of their most dependable batsmen on this tour, within the space of 15 deliveries. In fact, Kohli was adjudged caught behind off Steyn on the very first ball of the day. If not for India’s hatred for DRS, Kohli would have stayed on and, perhaps, played a match-saving knock. It wasn’t to be. By the way, replays showed that the ball had brushed his sleeve on its way to AB de Villiers.

DRS or no DRS, Pujara was a goner. It was a peach of a delivery from Steyn: fast, furious and full.

It seamed away just a little bit, beat Pujara’s dead bat and that was that. Suddenly, India were 71/4. Rohit Sharma and Ajinkya Rahane did survive the test of fire; in fact, they even added 33 runs. But all this while, Steyn kept telling Sharma some hard truths. “I have more runs than you in this series,” the pacer sledged. He went on, “You have done nothing in your career.” Sharma retorted: “Let’s see how you bowl in India.”

A lapse in concentration saw Sharma lose his wicket to a Vernon Philander delivery that came back in. Plumb. Out. He was gone for 25. His total for the series: 45. Steyn scored 44 in this Test alone.

India could have still saved the game. But MS Dhoni and Ravindra Jadeja threw it away. At 154/7, an innings defeat was a possibility. But Rahane proved he was made of steel. India went into the lunch break at 173/7, only seven ahead.

After the break, Rahane farmed the strike on most occasions. He showed that he has matured as a batsman as he brought forth the quality that had turned VVS Laxman into a legend — ability to bat with the tail-enders. He kept the South African bowlers sweating it out even an hour after lunch.

Rahane also hit some delicious straight drives. A meaty cut off Philander fetched him six, but with Zaheer Khan becoming Peterson’s fourth victim of the innings and Ishant Sharma giving Steyn his 350th Test wicket, Rahane attempted a slog against Philander, he lost his leg stump for 96.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 13,2020

Mar 13: The start of the Indian Premier League (IPL), the world's most lucrative cricket competition, has been postponed from March 29 until April 15 over the coronavirus, the Indian cricket board said Friday.

"The Board of Control for Cricket in India has decided to suspend IPL 2020 till 15th April 2020, as a precautionary measure against the ongoing Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) situation," the BCCI said in a statement.

The two-month Twenty20 competition is estimated to generate more than $11 billion for the Indian economy and involves cricket's top international stars.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
August 4,2020

New Delhi, Aug 4: Former India women's team captain Anjum Chopra firmly believes that the BCCI has a plan for women's cricket but she wants the Board to communicate its ideas more specifically.

Speaking to news agency, Chopra, who is now a successful broadcaster, said the BCCI is thinking in earnest about the progress of women's cricket.

"It's not that the BCCI is not thinking about women's cricket. I only think they need to be more specific in communication about women's cricket," Chopra said.

"I firmly believe that they must be thinking about women's cricket but the communication all this while has been very specific to men's cricket."

The latest trigger for criticism of BCCI was India's withdrawal from a tour of England in September owing to logistical issues arising out of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Chopra concedes it was "not nice" but Indian players' participation in the women's IPL, in November, will still be useful preparation for next year's ODI World Cup.

"It is heartening to see women's cricket making headlines. They should have been a part of that England tour and it did not feel nice initially but the women's IPL, irrespective of the format, will be helpful for World Cup preparations. Any form of cricket is good preparation," Chopra said.

"Missing out on a tournament is not nice, but logistically there may have been issues. And you can't send an under-prepared team."

"If you see in isolation we may have missed out on an opportunity to play in England. The more the girls play the better it is, before playing a tournament of the stature of World Cup. The assurance from the president is a very good thing."

Chopra welcomed the Sourav Ganguly-led BCCI's decision to hold the women's event in the UAE alongside the IPL, which will run from September 19 to November 10. The women's IPL will coincide with the business end of the men's league.

"I am definitely happy, it's always nice to be part of any cricket anywhere across the world.

"They should have been nearing the final stages of the preparation for the World Cup by now, but because of the pandemic things did not go as planned," she added.

Chopra had a successful international career spanning over 17 years, during which she represented India in a record six World Cups and became the first woman cricketer to appear in 100 One-day Internationals.

She also felt that the pandemic would not have much impact on the women's game that has gained momentum in recent times.

"...Cricket was on pause button...Once cricket resumes and players are back on the park, everything is going to get picked up. It might take some time to get started as everything starts from zero...

"The awareness the women's game has created, I hope it stays. They will just restart, not start after the pandemic."

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 12,2020

New Delhi, May 12: Chennai Super Kings have rejected the idea of an IPL with only Indian players in the near future, differing with Rajasthan Royals, the franchise which is keen on the option given the circumstances caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

The IPL, which is indefinitely postponed, can be held in the September-October window if the scheduled T20 World Cup in Australia doesn't take place.

"CSK is not keen to do an IPL with only Indian players. That way it would be playing another Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy (domestic T20 competition). The franchise has not been in touch with the BCCI of late as the situation is worsening," a CSK source said on conditions of anonymity.

"Let's hope we can have the IPL later this year," he added.

CSK are three-time IPL champions, making them the second most successful team in the event's history after Mumbai Indians, who have won the tournament four times.

The BCCI is also very keen to stage the IPL and if it doesn't happen, the world's richest board would be in financial trouble like Cricket Australia.

"The board will take a revenue hit of Rs 4000 crore if it doesn't happen. The board will be in a big problem," BCCI treasurer Arun Dhumal said earlier this week.

With COVID-19 cases continuing to rise in India, the board and IPL team officials see little point in discussing when the event can be held.

"There has been no discussion with the BCCI ever since it postponed the IPL. There is no point in discussing also as things are unlikely to be okay anytime soon," the CSK source said.

"We expect the BCCI to take the best possible decision when the time comes," he added.

For the IPL to happen with foreign players, travel restrictions, which are currently in place, will have to be eased.

There is an option of conducting the IPL outside India and Sri Lanka Cricket has even offered to host the biggest T20 league in the world.

M S Dhoni was expected to make a much-awaited comeback with the IPL but that too has been postponed indefinitely.

Teammates like Suresh Raina and Piyush Chawla have already spoken about how eager Dhoni was to return.

According to them, Dhoni had the determination of a youngster before the league was suspended due to the lockdown imposed to contain the pandemic.

"Dhoni is his own man but I see him playing the IPL for at least two three years. When it comes to playing for India, only he knows best," the source added.

Last month, Rajasthan Royals executive chairman Ranjit Barthakur had said the franchise was open to a shortened IPL with only Indian players.

"Earlier we could not think of an Indians-only IPL but now there is enough quality to choose from. It is better to have an Indians-only IPL than not have it at all," he had told news agency.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.