A tale of two brothers

[email protected] (V Krishnaswamy, Tehelka)
February 18, 2014

two_brothers

His favourite book is The Godfather. His favourite film probably goes by the same name, but we don't know if he watches films at all. Most of his cars have the registration number 9001. He loves his immaculate Savile Row and Armani suits and his scotch in the evening. If there is something he regrets, he once told a TV interviewer in jest, it is his golf handicap that has gone from eight to double digits. He hates losing.

He is the president of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI); the next ICC chairman, set to take over in June 2014; the 'de-facto' owner — he denies it — of the Chennai Super Kings; former president of the All India Chess Federation; and the reigning supremo of the Tamil Nadu Cricket Association and the Tamil Nadu Golf Federation. Meet Narayanswami Srinivasan, a man, who does not know the meaning of giving up.

These days, it is not just cricket that is in trouble. Olympic sports, always a poor country cousin to cricket in India, too, has been in trouble. It was always in a bit of a mess, but the pain has become more acute now. Some years ago, the Indian sports officials decided they could conduct a successful Commonwealth Games. Those Games in 2010 went off well, India won almost a 100 medals, but the mess began thereafter.

Reports of financial wrongdoing, large-scale corruption and much else began emerging. Soon after that, a whole lot of people connected with the Commonwealth Games were made to shift their residences temporarily from their posh homes to Tihar jail. Then in November 2012, within a few months after India won its best-ever haul of six medals, it was suspended by the International Olympic Committee (IOC). Reason: the IOC felt that 'tainted' officials ought to be shown the door, but the Indians disagreed, and the IOC simply banished the Indians and forced onto them the ignominy of walking behind an Olympic flag instead of the Indian tricolour. It hurt when a bunch of Indian youngsters won medals, including gold, at an Asian Youth Games, but were forced to stand behind an Olympic Council of Asia flag.

Last week, India's only five-time Winter Olympian, Shiva Keshavan and his two colleagues Himanshu Thakur and Nadeem Iqbal, too, were not allowed to carry the Indian colours. The whole nation seemed to be up in arms.

Yes, Olympic sports in India needed a saviour.

And in he walked. He was a former president of the Indian Triathlon Federation, who went on to head the Asian Triathlon Federation.

Side by side, from being the Secretary-General of the Squash Rackets Federation of India, he became its president and was then elected president of the Asian Squash Federation in 2005. He was re-elected to this position in 2005 and by 2009 he was the Patron of the Association. In between in 2008, he took over as the president of the World Squash Federation (WSF) from Jahangir Khan. In 2012, he became the World Body's president for a second term. Coming into the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) as an associate vice-president, he was elected a vice-president in 2005 and in 2007, he was appointed as an executive committee member of the Sports Development Authority of Tamil Nadu. A member of the Audit Committee for the Delhi Commonwealth Games 2010, he was also on the executive board for the Games. He sure knew his way up.

As a president of the WSF, he twice, though unsuccessfully, made presentations to the IOC to include his sport in the Olympic programme. It was supposed to be a creditable presentation, but it lost out to wrestling, a sport that has won India medals in the past two Olympic Games.

This past week, he became the new IOA president. Unopposed, just as many of his elections in other sporting bodies, have been. That he was also being called a 'proxy' for the 'tainted' officials is another matter. Outside of the sports arena, he was a respectable industrialist and a former executive director of India Cements and his interests included sugar, shipping, power, and trading and finance. As if that was not enough, he is also the honorary consul for the Government of Latvia with jurisdiction for Tamil Nadu and Kerala. Meet Narayanswamy Ramachandran, the new IOA president and brother of N Srinivasan.

Indian sports can be divided into two categories — cricket and the rest (that means Olympic sports). One brother, 'Srini' held the reins in cricket and 'Rami' was the master of the rest. Under normal circumstances, that would merit a headline by itself: Brothers ruling Indian sport. Alas, not all stories are fairytales. The two brothers are hardly, well… brotherly, or even friends.

A LOT has been said and written about how Srinivasan returned from the United States at the age of 23 to take over his father's business. Then began a series of tales, which saw him take control, and then lose control of the business at India Cements. But the man who never gives up waited for his time.

He cultivated friends in the right places and after 10 years, got his business back. He may attribute it to luck, but luck, if any, was just a footnote. It was a result of his tenacity and ability to bounce back.

His has been a tale of nurturing and leveraging powerful relationships. Murasoli Maran, nephew of DMK supremo M Karunanidhi, was his friend and it was with his help that he wrested back the control of his business. That Maran's son, Kalanidhi, also a media baron, became the owner of Sunrisers Hyderabad, when the team came up for grabs in the last season, would seem a coincidence, but insiders say, Srinivasan's presence helped. Besides, Kalanidhi also owns an airline.

Srinivasan's friends included the late BS Adityan, a former IOA president and a business magnate, who owned a string of newspapers and a TV channel, NDTV-Hindu. Adityan was a director at India Cements till he passed away in 2013.

Interestingly, Ramachandran too, was once a director in the company. Of course, elder brother Srini was all-powerful. Then suddenly in 2009, Srinivasan bought over Ramachandran's stake in the company and both refused to talk about it, calling it a private transaction. To date, no one is clear, why Ramachandran, 61 then, and three years younger than his elder brother, decided to suddenly leave.

As time went by, Srnivasan grew and grew while Ramachandran stayed in the shadows. Or so it seemed.

Ruthless to those who dared to oppose him and benevolent beyond imagination to those he considered 'loyalists', Srinivasan has as many admirers as detractors. For every official, who he has sidelined or brushed aside in his march to numero uno position in Indian cricket, there is somewhere a cricketer, local or national, he has given a job. He has backed no less than a dozen teams, probably more, at local and national leagues and the list of cricketers he has had on his rolls is like a who's who of Indian cricket — current India and Chennai Super Kings captain MS Dhoni, former India captains S Venkataraghavan and Rahul Dravid and many, many more have played for his teams.

It is said that when it came to giving the former players monies for their contribution to Indian cricket, many other BCCI officials felt it should be done in instalments to ensure the ex-cricketers stayed ingratiated to the Board. Srinivasan rejected the idea and gave the money in one go. The likes of Sunil Gavaskar, Kapil Dev, Ravi Shastri, Dilip Vengsarkar, Syed Kirmani were among those who got Rs 1.5 crore each from the Rs 75 crore or so that was distributed among the 174 cricketers who retired before 2004.

Srinivasan's detractors allege that he has caused losses of hundreds of crores to the BCCI because of various deals — allegations that have not yet been proved. Srinivasan himself is unfazed.

When it comes to the alleged 'conflict of interest' of 'owning' an IPL team and also being the president of the BCCI, Srinivasan claims the team belongs to India Cements, and not him. That he is also the managing director of India Cements is another matter.

Srinivasan's son-in-law, Gurunath Meiyappan, who for the past six seasons was seen hobnobbing with the Chennai Super Kings, was arrested last year and questioned in connection with alleged betting and fixing matches in the IPL. Both charges are yet to be proved in a court of law.

The Justice Mudgal Committee, which was set up by the Supreme Court to look into the IPL scandal, has reported that Meiyappan did indulge in betting, but also said that it is unclear if he was involved in passing information, which could have led to fixing. The report has also claimed that Meiyappan was very much the face of Chennai Super Kings, while Srinivasan and Indian skipper MS Dhoni, who was questioned by the Committee, have claimed that Meiyappan was a mere “enthusiast”. That an enthusiast could sit on the auction table and be with the team on the ground is a little difficult to swallow. And there hangs a tale, whether or not Chennai Super Kings should be banned from the IPL as per the rules of the competition. The Mudgal report has been submitted and the matter will be taken up by the Supreme Court on 7 March.

Ramachandran may be relatively low-profile, but he, too, is no stranger to controversies. Clean Sports India (CSI), a non-profit organisation run by a bunch of sportspersons and officials, claims Ramachandran misled the government to get the Rashtriya Khel Protsahan Puraskar in 2011 by the President. The case will come up for hearing in the Delhi High Court on 21 February.

The CSI also alleges a case of conflict of interest (much like that of his elder brother Srinivasan) against Ramachandran. He is said to have given an undertaking to the WSF (which he currently heads) in 2012 that he had no commercial interest in the game, and projected himself just as a patron of Squash and Racquet Federation of India (SRFI). They claim he was then serving as the president of SRFI, but currently, the president of the SRFI is KS Tripathi.

While Ramachandran's election brought in immediate results and the Indian trio in the Sochi Winter Olympics will be able to walk with the Indian flag at the closing ceremony, Indian cricket and Srinivasan, who only a week earlier was named as the next ICC chairman, are under a cloud.

It is said Srinivasan does little without consulting his astrologer, who goes by the name of Vaastu Venkatesan. Years ago, the religiously inclined Srini ensured the rebuilding of the then dilapidated Ganesh temple outside the Chepauk Stadium (now the MA Chidambaram Stadium) in Chennai, from there the Gods watched his rise in the Tamil Nadu Cricket Association, which he has ruled for years

These days, Vaastu Venkatesan must be a busy man, and Srini needs a bit more than tenacity; he also needs the Lords' blessings more than ever before.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
January 20,2020

Washington D.C., Jan 20: An American bride asked for money from her invitees so that they can be on the 'exclusive guest list'.

Weddings can be surely expensive. But is it feasible for one to charge the guests to make up for the expenses?

According to Fox News, that is exactly what happened in a recent American wedding. A 19-year-old shared on Reddit that her cousin was getting married on Sunday and announced that she would charge 50 dollars to those who wanted to attend her wedding.

"She said that they can Venmo her money so there won't be no [sic] problems and everyone who paid will be added onto the 'exclusive guest list' which basically means you won't have to wait in line while other guests pay," wrote the user named DaintySheep.

While she refused to pay for entry into her cousin's wedding the bride-to-be contacted the elders in the family which ended up in an embarrassing situation.

"She wanted to get the money she spent on her special day back. I told her I wouldn't be able to come because this was outrageous and that I wish her well on her special day. She contacted my aunt and my aunt called me cheap and rude. My parents offered to pay for my entry, but I refused," continued the disheartened girl.

While in almost every nook and cranny of the world gifting the bride-groom with money is a tradition, asking for money from friends and family to replenish the money spent on a wedding is can be said to be a rare scenario.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
July 3,2020

Mumbai, Jul 3: In yet another move to keep Chinese technologies companies at bay, the Centre has cancelled the 4G upgradation tender for BSNL as it has decided to come up with fresh specifications for the upgrade process, sources said.

The Department of Telecommunications (DoT) is likely to issue a fresh tender in the next two weeks.

People in the know said that the fresh tender may not allow Chinese companies to participate and that the new tenders that will be floated in the next two weeks will emphasise on Make in India.

As the border tussle with China escalated last month and around 20 soldiers lost their lives, the government had last month asked both BSNL and MTNL not to use equipment of Chinese makers in their upgrading process to 4G facilities.

Huawei and ZTE are the major Chinese telecom equipment makers working with Indian telecom companies and they would be the hardest hit by the decision.

The impact may be felt in terms of the much-awaited 5G trials in the country. After much deliberation, the Centre last December decided to allow Huawei to take part in the 5G trials.

The cancellation of tender for BSNL's 4G upgradation comes after the Centre on Monday banned 59 Chinese apps including TikTok, WeChat and UC Browser.

A statement by the Ministry of Electronics and IT said that the decision was taken since "there is credible information that these apps are engaged in activities which are prejudicial to sovereignty and integrity of India, defence of India, security of state and public order".

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
May 17,2020

As millions of people get hooked to online dating platforms, their proliferation has led to online romance scams becoming a modern form of fraud that have spread in several societies along with the development of social media like Facebook Dating, warn researchers.

For example, extra-marital dating app Gleeden has crossed 10 lakh users in India in COVID-19 times while dating apps like Tinder and Bumble have gained immense popularity.

According to researchers from University of Siena and Scotte University Hospital led by Dr Andrea Pozza, via a fictitious Internet profile, the scammer develops a romantic relationship with the victim for 6-8 months, building a deep emotional bond to extort economic resources in a manipulative dynamic.

"There are two notable features: on the one hand, the double trauma of losing money and a relationship, on the other, the victim's shame upon discovery of the scam, an aspect that might lead to underestimation of the number of cases," the authors wrote in a paper published in the journal Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health.

Around 1,400 dating sites/chats have been created over the last decade in North America alone. In the UK, 23 per cent of Internet users have met someone online with whom they had a romantic relationship for a certain period and even 6 per cent of married couples met through the web.

"The online dating industry has given rise to new forms of pathologies and crime, said the authors.

The results showed that 63 per cent of social media users and 3 per cent of the general population reported having been a victim at least once.

Women, middle-aged people, and individuals with higher tendencies to anxiety, romantic idealization of affective relations, impulsiveness and susceptibility to relational addiction are at higher risk of being victims of the scam.

Online romance scams are, in other words, relationships constructed through websites for the purpose of deceiving unsuspecting victims in order to extort money from them.

The scammer always acts empathetically and attempts to create the impression in the victim that the two are perfectly synced in their shared view of life.

"The declarations of the scammer become increasingly affectionate and according to some authors, a declaration of love is made within two weeks from initial contact," the study elaborated.

After this hookup phase, the scammer starts talking about the possibility of actually meeting up, which will be postponed several times due to apparently urgent problems or desperate situations such as accidents, deaths, surgeries or sudden hospitalizations for which the unwitting victim will be manipulated into sending money to cover the momentary emergency.

Using the strategy of "testing-the-water", the scammer asks the victim for small gifts, usually to ensure the continuance of the relationship, such as a webcam, which, if successful, leads to increasingly expensive gifts up to large sums of money.

When the money arrives from the victim, the scammer proposes a new encounter.

The request for money can also be made to cover the travel costs involved in the illusory meeting. In this phase, the victim may start having second thoughts or showing doubt about the intentions of the partner and gradually decide to break off the relationship.

"In other cases, the fraudulent relationship continues or even reinforces itself as the victim, under the influence of ambivalent emotions of ardor and fear of abandonment and deception, denies or rationalizes doubts to manage their feelings," said the study.

In some cases, the scammer may ask the victim to send intimate body photos that will be used as a sort of implicit blackmail to further bind the victim to the scammer.

Once the scam is discovered, the emotional reaction of the victim may go through various phases: feelings of shock, anger or shame, the perception of having been emotionally violated (a kind of emotional rape), loss of trust in people, a sensation of disgust towards oneself or the perpetrator of the crime and a feeling of mourning.

"Understanding the psychological characteristics of victims and scammers will allow at-risk personality profiles to be identified and prevention strategies to be developed," the authors suggested.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.