Tint ban: M'lore citizens to press SC for a review

June 10, 2012

Tint_Removing_7

Mangalore, June 10: The Supreme Court's ban order on the black sun film on car glasses has raised quite a few eyebrows in the country. Citizens of Mangalore, who have had their share of inconveniences ever since the order was passed, are planning to press for a review with the Apex Court.

“The Court should have given more time and considered public opinion. There are lakhs of cars in the country and it is something that concerns a large number of people”, says Mukesh of Car Décor unit of the city.


An association by name Car Owners and Consumers' Association (COCA) will be formed and the Supreme Court will be approached for a review on the ban. City based advocate P P Hegde will represent the Association, Mr. Mukesh told Coastaldigest.com.

“Almost 90% of the people go for sun films. It is an extra expenditure for them. If that many people are spending extra amount of money, it only means how necessary the sun films are. If the Court has only referred to the black sun films it is rather understandable. But at least some minimum level of tint must be allowed. The ban may be relevant in European countries because the heat that we experience in India is not comparable to those countries. Also, absence of sun films will have an effect on the fuel efficiency of vehicles. Owing to heat that we have in the coastal region, the pressure on the compressor is bigger, which reduces fuel efficiency. That is the reason why vehicles give better mileage at night. Sun films help in cooling A/C cars faster and reduce the pressure on the compressor thereby resulting in better fuel efficiency”, says Mr. Mukesh.

One of the concerns of people associated with the tint ban is security. “I am an amateur photographer and hence carry my camera worth Rs. 2 lakhs in my car. I leave my valuables such as camera lens, laptop etc in my car while I am on the move. It is inevitable at times to park the car at roadside and in the absence of sun films, my valuables in the car would be easily exposed. There is greater chance of theft now and it is a cause of concern for me”, says Shreevats of Derebail.

Some of the other reasons being cited by people in favour of the sun films include safety in case of any cracking of the glass due to stone pelting or accident as glass pieces tend to stick to the sun films reducing chances of human injury, blocking of harmful UV rays that could cause skin allergy, privacy for ladies to breast feed their children while on a journey, protection of interiors of the cars etc.
'Police behaving rudely'

Meanwhile, many citizens have groused that cops have been stopping vehicles at will, behaving rudely with people, asking them to remove the tints immediately.

“The cops stopped me and took off the sun films from my vehicle in a jiffy. I was concerned if they would damage the glass in the process. Nevertheless, how can they take off the tints when the rules have specified a certain level of visibility?” says Adil Ahmed of Pandeshwar.

As per the Rule 100 (2) of the Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989, the windscreen and rear windows should have a visual light transmission (VLT) of not less than 70%. For the side windows, minimum visibility should be 50%.

However, the police defend the move to remove the tints even if the tint visibility is 0%. “The Supreme Court has clearly said that no sun films must be present. The minimum visibility aspect that is being discussed concerns the glass itself and not the sun film. We measure the visibility of the glass using luxometer. If the glasses too do not fulfill the visibility needs, they too are required to be changed. However, when it comes to sun films, there is no question of visibility as the court has ordered its removal”, a traffic police official told Coastaldigest.com.

The Supreme Court has not only ordered implementation of the ban but also authorized the police to take off the sun films, the official said, adding that the department carried out removal operations till June 5 without imposing fines. But now, the fines will be imposed and there are still people who have not responded to the awareness drives. Offenders will be fined Rs. 100, the official said.

However, Coastaldigest.com found a couple of government vehicles operating with the tint on, even after the ban was implemented.

court_1

court_2

The tinted 'Legal Awareness Chariot' being run by the district administration in association with other departments

Car_Tint_1

Car_Tint_2

Government vehicle with tinted glasses being used by Yogish Bhat, Deputy Speaker, Karnataka Legislative Assembly

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
February 7,2020

New Delhi, Feb 7: The Supreme Court on Friday issued a notice to the Central government on a plea challenging the Constitutional validity of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and effective implementation of the Assam Accord.

A bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) SA Bobde also sought Centre's response on the plea filed by Assam Social Justice Forum.

The petition sought appropriate directions for taking effective steps for the implementation of Assam Accord, 1985 in letter and spirit and for conservation and preservation of the of a distinct culture, heritage and traditions of the indigenous people of Assam.

The Assam Accord, 1985, had fixed March 24, 1971, as the cut-off date for deportation of all illegal immigrants irrespective of their religion.

The Bench also sought Centre's response on another fresh batch of pleas challenging CAA and tagged them along with other petitions pending in the matter.

One of the petitions, filed by the Association of Advocates from Maharashtra among others, sought to declare the Citizenship Amendment Act as discriminatory, arbitrary, and illegal and consequently set aside the impugned act as ultra-vires the Constitution of India.

On the other hand, over a hundred petitions have been filed in the apex court, for and against the amended citizenship law, which is facing opposition and protests across the country.

CAA grants citizenship to Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians who fled religious persecution in Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan and took refuge in India on or before December 31, 2014.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 5,2020

Bengaluru, Jun 5: With the easing of COVID-19 lockdown norms under unlock 1.0, the Karnataka government on Thursday permitted state transport buses to operate even during the night curfew hours 9 pm to5 am.

Autos, taxis and cabs have also been given permission to operate during these hours for picking commuting passengers from pickup points or bus stands.

Chief Secretary T M Vijay Bhaskar in an order said, state transport corporations (BMTC, KSRTC, NEKRTC and NWKRTC) buses have been allowed to operate during night curfew hours from 9 pm to 5 am.

On the basis of their bus tickets, passengers would be allowed to commute to bus stand or from there to home, in accordance with the COVID-19 control measures, SOPs and other guidelines, it said.

Further, during the curfew hours autos, taxis and cabs have been given permission to pick commuters from pickup points or bus stands, it added.

Earlier, the government had revised the night curfew time from the previous 7 pm-7 am to 9 pm-5 am, and said the movement of individuals shall remain strictly prohibited between 9 pm and 5 am throughout the state, except for essential activities.

The government has also said that jungle lodges and resorts, also private organisations providing similar facilities, along with activities they provide like safari, trekking among others would be permitted from June 8, in compliance with the guidelines and SOP issued and following the social distancing norms.  

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
March 23,2020

Bengaluru, Mar 23: Deputy Chief Minister Laxman Savadi cautioned private bus transport services operators, taxis and autorickshaws from exploiting commuters in wake of bus and train services being suspended by the government as precautionary measures to prevent the spread of COVID-19.

In a statement released here on Monday, Transport Minister Savadi said it has come to the notice that private buses, taxis and autorickshaws were misusing the opportunity and exploiting commuters. Inter-district bus services have been suspended in the districts wherein lockdown has been announced to protect the health of people and none should violate the decision of the government, he stated.

Transport and Police Department officials have been asked to taken action against those violating norms and exploiting commuters. Service providers for their profit cannot risk with the health of the people and repeated cases if come to the fore, they will not be spared, Savadi cautioned.

Government has taken measures to prevent spread of COVID-19. Private transport service providers and people should join hands and cooperate to contain it, he appealed. 

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.