Troubled career, Lokayukta probe drove DySP Ganapathi to suicide?

[email protected] (CD Network)
July 9, 2016

Mangaluru, Jul 9: The investigation into the sensational suicide case of Mangaluru DySP M K Ganapathi has revealed that one of the main reasons for his anger towards former home minister K J Gorge was that the latter had turned down request of former to revoke his suspension in 2014.

dyspMr. Ganapathy had a long tenure serving in various capacities in the Bengaluru city police, but it was also marked by controversies with the official accused of being involved in multiple encounters and suspended many times during the last six years.

He had served as an inspector at Yeshwantpur, Rajagopal Nagar and Madiwala police stations and had killed a rowdy sheeter, Prashanth alias Pacchi (20), in September 2010 in an encounter.

With the youth's mother taking up a legal fight saying her son was murdered, Mr. Ganapathy was suspended and a departmental inquiry later exonerated him. He was again suspended in 2014 when he was inspector of Madiwala, when there were allegations that he had misused recovered property.

Due to these multiple inquiries and suspensions, his promotion from inspector of police to deputy superintendent of police was held up for over five years, which had caused him much heartburn, officers close to him in the department said.

One of the two complaints filed against Ganapathi in the Lokayukta by the kin of Prashanth alias Pachi, who was gunned down in Yeshwantpur, was closed recently.

The second complaint was filed by Prashanth's brother Ravindra in 2015. The complaint alleged that Prashanth, who faced over 12 criminal cases, was eliminated in a fake encounter. The complaint had named the then Joint Commissioner of Police (crime) Alok Kumar, Ganapathi and a sub-inspector, who was attached to Yeshwantpur police station in 2010.

Sources in the Lokayukta said Ganapathi had visited the Lokayukta office around 10 days ago.

He was seen enquiring about the pending Inquiry against him in connection with the Yeshwantpur encounter. “He had a lot of inquiries pending against him. He was visibly upset and was complaining about senior officials in the department. We consoled him and advised him to remain calm since he was promoted recently,” an official said.

This complaint was forwarded to the Lokayukta SP and later a police inspector for preliminary inquiry. Sources said the inspector had recommended closure of the inquiry stating that the allegations had no reference to any corrupt practices and hence may be referred to the State Human Rights Commission (SHRC). The complaint, however was not closed and is pending. On Friday, the Lokayukta registrar directed the Lokayukta police to provide the status of the preliminary inquiry.

Meanwhile, sources said Prashanth's relatives had filed a petition with the SHRC and a writ petition before the High Court. A senior police official said Ganapathi was exonerated in the petition filed with the SHRC.

A senior police officer, who knew Ganapathi said, “His colleagues say he was suffering from depression and was under medication. He was also suffering from ailments. All these could have driven him to commit suicide.

“For now, nothing can be said. The CID is conducting the investigation and a clear picture will emerge after they submit a report.”

Fired twice on bed before hanging self

Investigations have also revealed that Ganapathi had fired twice from his service revolver on a bed before hanging himself in the lodge on Thursday.

Both bullets were fired at the bed and the spent bullets were found in the room. The service revolver was found on the floor near his body. CID sleuths, who visited the scene of crime on Friday, have recovered the service revolver and the bullets from the custody of the local police.

Ganapathi had hired an autorickshaw to reach the local channel's office where he gave his interview before taking the extreme step.

As soon as Ganapathi's brother K?M?Thimmaiah, also a DySP, learnt about the interview, he alerted the Madikeri police. They immediately began to search a few hotels and lodges in Madikeri. They reached a hotel near the KSRTC bus stand. When there was no response to their knocking, they peeped through the window and saw Ganapathi hanging.

Police cordoned off the lodge. CID?officials also inspected the room in the evening. In Managluru, staff in the IGP?office said CID officials had locked up Ganapathi's office on Friday morning.

A native of Rangasamudra near Kushalnagar, Ganapathi was a former employee of BEML and joined the police force as a sub-inspector in 1994. He first served at Aldur and Sakarayapatna (both in Chikkamagaluru). His other postings were, Mangaluru, Puttur, Ullal and CID office in?Bengaluru. He was again posted to Ullal, Bantwal, Kadri (in Mangaluru), Lashkar (Mysuru), DIG office (in Bengaluru), Yeshwantpur, Madiwala, IG?office (in Bengaluru), Bengaluru Rural and finally IGP?(Western Range) office in Mangaluru after he was promoted as DySP. He was transferred every two or three years.

Comments

suleman beary
 - 
Saturday, 9 Jul 2016

How many criminal case must be booked for encounter?

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 2,2020

Mangaluru, May 2:  Fishermen in the coastal districts fear that the fishing season ending on May 31 every year might be rescheduled early this year due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

In a statement department of fisheries on sturday said fishing season is closed for 61 days every year before the arrival of the monsoon.

As per the data with the Fisheries Department, this year the number of fishes caught has set a record.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
coastaldigest.com news network
February 14,2020

Bengaluru, Feb 14: In a major embarrassment to the police, the Karnataka High Court has termed as illegal the prohibitory orders imposed under Section 144 of CrPC by the City Police Commissioner in December 2019 in the light of the anti-Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) protests in Bengaluru.

The orders were passed “without application of mind” and without following due procedures, the court noted. Giving reasons for upholding the arguments of the petitioners that there was no application of mind by the Police Commissioner (Bhaskar Rao) before imposing restrictions, a division bench of the High Court said he had not recorded the reasons, except reproducing the contents of letters addressed to him by the Deputy Commissioners of Police (DCPs). 

The state government had contended that prohibitory orders were passed based on reports submitted by the DCPs who expressed apprehension about anti-social elements creating law and order problems and damaging public property by taking advantage of the anti-CAA protests.  

The High Court bench said the Police Commissioner should have conducted inquiry as stated by the Supreme Court to check the reasons cited by the DCPs who submitted identical reports. Except for this, there were no facts laid out by the Police Commissioner, the court said.

“There is complete absence of reasons. If the order indicated that the Police Commissioner was satisfied by the apprehension of DCPs, it would have been another matter,” it said.  

“The apex court has held that it must record the reasons for imposition of restrictions and there has to be a formation of opinion by the district magistrate. Only then can  the extraordinary powers conferred on the district magistrate can be exercised. This procedure was not followed. Hence, exercise of power under Section 144 by the commissioner, as district magistrate, was not at all legal”, the bench said. 

“We hold that the order dated December 18, 2019 is illegal and cannot stand judicial scrutiny in terms of the apex court’s orders in the Ramlila Maidan case and Anuradha Bhasin case,” the HC bench said while upholding the arguments of Prof Ravivarma Kumar, who appeared for some of the petitioners.   

Partly allowing a batch of public interest petitions questioning the imposition of prohibitory orders and cancelling the permission granted for protesters in the city, the bench of Chief Justice Abhay Shreeniwas Oka and Justice Hemant Chandangoudar observed that, unfortunately, in the present case, there was no indication of application of mind in passing prohibitory orders.

The bench said the observation was confined to this order only and it cannot be applicable in general. If there is a similar situation (necessitating imposition of restrictions), the state is not helpless, the court said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 23,2020

Mangaluru, Jan 23: Bajpe Police on Thursday registered yet another case against the prime accused in Mangaluru International Airport case, Aditya Rao.

According to the police, a complaint was received from the officials of Indigo flight that they had to delay their flight scheduled to take off for Hyderabad at 1615 hrs after receiving a hoax call from Aditya, threatening of bomb.

They also asserted that the passengers were de-boarded from the flight and the luggages were brought back to security check again.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.