Aadhaar rebels find easy ways to avoid PAN linkage

TNN
July 23, 2017

Mumbai, Jul 23: In a quiet display of dissent, numerous taxpayers across the country have opted to file their tax returns manually+ , via snail-mail, rather than get an Aadhaar card. Many others filed their returns online early, prior to June 30, when the Aadhaar linkage+ was not mandatory.adar

"Technically you should be able to file online even if you don't have an Aadhaar card, but the e-filing system does not allow it," said docu filmmaker Rakesh Sharma, who considers the Aadhaar requirement a potential violation of privacy and a possible tool for state surveillance and data mining.

The I-T department's e-filing portal+ does not accept returns without an Aadhaar or an Aadhaar application number.

In some instances, even an application number is being rejected - which according to I-T officials could be owing to an error by the tax filer or a temporary technical glitch.

Thus, those without an Aadhaar or its application number are caught in a catch-22 situation, as taxpayers with an income of above Rs 5 lakh have to mandatorily file their I-T returns online.

A Bengaluru-based consultant said she and her husband, as well as many of their friends, refused to get the Aadhaar card and filed their returns in early June. "Aadhaar started off as something optional and we kept reading about data getting stolen. So a lot of us were concerned about giving our biometrics to the private operators given the potential for identity theft." She is also livid about the relentless text messages she receives from her bank threatening to freeze her accounts if she does not link them to Aadhaar, despite the fact that this has not yet been mandated.

Chennai-based environmentalist Nityanand Jayaraman, who is filing manual returns, said he has a problem with Aadhaar as he simply doesn't trust the government. "I do not like the fact that it is bullying people into taking an Aadhaar for everything. If it wants to link Aadhaar with anything, it has to be with voter ID."
"I am debating whether to snailmail my returns to the Bangalore Central Processing Centre or just wait it out until the constitutional bench of the Supreme Court which is currently hearing the matter, passes its order. If they don't accept my I-T return, then I want a physical confirmation of that," said a Mumbai-based media professional.

Section 139AA of the I-T Act has made it mandatory to quote the Aadhaar number or the application number for I-T returns+ filed on or after July 1, this year. On June 9, the Supreme Court (SC) bench upheld this section. As an interim relief, pending hearing of the privacy issues relating to Aadhaar by a constitutional bench, the SC clarified that for those taxpayers who do not have an Aadhaar, their PAN will not be cancelled for the time being. The tax laws had also provided for cancellation of PAN in the absence of intimation of Aadhaar or its application number.

"The SC's order does not give any leeway to taxpayers for filing of I-T returns without Aadhaar or an enrollment number, post July 1. If they don't have an Aadhaar, taxpayers should at least obtain an Aadhaar enrolment number," a senior I-T official said.

An exemption from quoting Aadhaar has been provided for in limited cases only, such as for non-residents, foreign citizens, or individuals above 80 years of age. The exemption is also available to those residing in Assam, Jammu & Kashmir and Meghalaya.

I-T authorities claim that a manual return for those earning above Rs 5 lakh will be void. "I-T officials are not duty-bound to accept manual returns and are unlikely to accept them," a chartered accountant admitted.

"I am asking my clients to pay any outstanding tax dues and just sit back for the time being. Fortunately, the late filing fee of Rs 10,000 introduced by the budget doesn't apply to FY 2016-17," said another CA.

"Taxpayers could also try approaching the I-T commissioner (or any higher level officer) for acceptance of their manual I-T return. However, there must be a genuine reason for not having enrolled for Aadhaar - for instance Aadhaar application made by an aged citizen (exemption is only for those above 80 years) may not have been accepted as his or her biometrics was not legible," the CA added.

Five Indian sailors stuck in UAE to return home
An advocate offers a ray of hope to those not having an Aadhaar or an application number.

According to him, the limited constitutional validity of section 139AA is subject to the final decision of the constitutional bench of the SC. As of now, no penal action, including cancellation of PAN card can take place till the matter is disposed of by the SC. Thus, no I-T return can be rejected for not quoting Aadhaar. Even if these taxpayers manage to file their return manually, it's unlikely that they will get a refund, if any is due. For this, the I-T return needs to be processed online.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 28,2020

Feb 28: The Supreme Court on Friday granted more time to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to file a counter affidavit on a petition filed by Karnataka BJP leader and mining baron Gali Janardhana Reddy seeking permanent relaxation on his bail condition to allow him to visit Karnataka's Bellari and Kadapa in Andhra Pradesh.

A bench of Justices Arun Mishra and Indira Banerjee listed the matter for further hearing on March 16 after the CBI sought more time to do file the counter affidavit.

Earlier, the apex court had issued a notice to the CBI and sought its response on the plea.

Last year, the Court had allowed Reddy to visit the Ballari district for a period of two weeks to meet his father-in-law, who the petitioner claimed had suffered a stroke and also allowed him to move a bail modification application seeking permanent relaxation of his bail condition.

In January 2015, the Supreme Court had granted bail to Reddy in an illegal mining case involving Obulapuram Mining Company (OMC) on the condition that he will not visit any of the mining zones in Karnataka or Andhra Pradesh.

By the time he was granted bail, Reddy had already spent over three years in prison.

Reddy and his brother-in-law BV Srinivas Reddy, who was the Managing Director of OMC, were arrested by the CBI on September 5, 2011.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 16,2020

Hubballi, Apr 16: Police have seized a vehicle carrying nine members of a family from Dharwad for misusing the travel pass issued by the district administration in Narendra Village and sent them for Quarantine.

Deputy SP Ravi Nayak and his team stopped the vehicle at Narendra village, in the outskirts of the city and found out that they were from Uppina Betagiri village returning from a wedding function using government pass issued for medical reasons.

The police seized the vehicle and sent them to KIMS hospital for a medical check-up. Their swab samples have been collected and sent for testing. The police have asked them to go for a compulsory home quarantine for 14 days.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
July 21,2020

Bengaluru, Jul 21: Leader of Opposition and former Chief Minister of Karnataka Siddaramaiah on Monday attacked the ruling government and said press conference of Health Minister B Siramulu was more like an exercise to hide facts than presenting proof with accurate data.

"Got to know about the press conference addressed by B Siramulu and Dr Ashwathnarayan CN to clear accusations of corruption. It looked more like an exercise to hide facts than presenting proof with accurate data," Siddaramaiah tweeted.

"It is still unclear about the points presented in the press conference. They have not answered any of my questions which were raised earlier. I will respond in detail once I receive the written explanation from the govt. Minister has claimed that both Health & Medical education department together have spent Rs323 Cr. But the data presented by them does not even add up to Rs100 Cr. What happened to the rest of the money?," asked Siddaramaiah.

He said that Centre has procured ventilators at Rs4 lakh per unit under PM Cares. But only in our state, the ventilators are procured at Rs12-Rs18 lakh per unit

"Prime Minister's Office has procured ventilators at Rs4 lakh per unit under PM Cares. But only in our state, the ventilators are procured at Rs12-Rs18 lakh per unit. Why do we see such a huge difference in price? Ministers, in the press conference, have told that quality & technological capabilities are the reasons for huge price difference. Does it mean ventilators under PM Cares lack quality? Why did they not present the technical specifications to justify the same?" he asked.

"Not just about the procurement of medical equipment, I had even asked data about food kits, PDS distribution, beds procured, quarantine centres & isolation wards. Where is the data for that?" he asked in a series of tweets. 

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.