When case no.TP/1086/12-13 Eh was called at the office of the commissioner of the Mangalore city corporation on the 24th of March there was no response from either of the parties! That was because the complainant Sri Vinayak P.Baliga was absent as he had been sent out of the world- he had been brutally murdered in front of his house allegedly by hired killers on the 21st of March at around 6 am. The respondents were Dakshina Kannada Dravida Brahmins association, Sharada School and Tulunadu Trust who also did not choose to turn up. The allegations were that they have put up buildings on TS no.340 without proper license and have started using them without occupancy certificate by the corporation authorities. It was also alleged that the buildings are not being used for the purpose for which they were constructed and there were also violations and deviations from the plans which had been approved by the corporation. He had also stated that the narrow road was blocked due to parking of the vehicles waiting to pick up children from the school and problems were being caused in the residential locality due to these commercial activities.
To support his contention he had also submitted a communication from the commissioner of Mangalore city corporation no.e428:cr72:12-13 which had categorically stated that the buildings under survey no TS 340(part) under RS no.501, Kodiyalbail village had been granted permission to build as follows:
cellar- nil
ground floor-323.52 sq meters
1st floor 323.52 sq meters
2nd floor 323.52 sq meters
total 970.56 sq meters.
But on spot inspection it was found that the built up was as follows:
Cellar ---------323.52
Ground floor- 342.92
1st floor ---do---
2nd floor ---do---
3rd floor ---do---
4th floor ----do—(with acc sheet roof)
Total-----2015.04 sq meters.
So, it was not a minor violation but a build up space of more than twice the licensed area! The commissioner had also issued notice under section 308(1) of the Karnataka Municipal corporations act and had warned that unless the deviations were rectified within seven days of the date of the notice(which was dated 19-11-2012) it would be demolished at the cost of owners and the amount collected from them. They had also asked the respodents to submit the plans of the newly constructed building within seven days of the date of the notice! The fact is that it is 2016 and the building still exists and going strong! The road is still narrow and gets blocked. The residents till suffer and the Mangalore City corporation is in deep slumber. Perhaps that is a sign of ‘smartness’ for a city which aims to get the smart city tag!
With the complaint having become infructuous the violators can be happy for some more time! But, a group of citizens are planning to re submit the complaint or get impleaded into the case. But as a senior lawyer remarked such complaints are not civil cases and do not become extinct if the complainant is eliminated. We are waiting to see what action the commissioner will take on the issue which still exists. We are waiting for the demolition to start!
caption:
the photos show the narrow approach roads to the institutions.
another photo shows the old ailing parents of Vinayak Baliga.
The photos of the institutions occupying the buildings scheduled to be demolished.
The hearing that never took place!
When case no.TP/1086/12-13 Eh was called at the office of the commissioner of the Mangalore city corporation on the 24th of March there was no response from either of the parties! That was because the complainant Sri Vinayak P.Baliga was absent as he had been sent out of the world- he had been brutally murdered in front of his house allegedly by hired killers on the 21st of March at around 6 am. The respondents were Dakshina Kannada Dravida Brahmins association, Sharada School and Tulunadu Trust who also did not choose to turn up. The allegations were that they have put up buildings on TS no.340 without proper license and have started using them without occupancy certificate by the corporation authorities. It was also alleged that the buildings are not being used for the purpose for which they were constructed and there were also violations and deviations from the plans which had been approved by the corporation. He had also stated that the narrow road was blocked due to parking of the vehicles waiting to pick up children from the school and problems were being caused in the residential locality due to these commercial activities.
To support his contention he had also submitted a communication from the commissioner of Mangalore city corporation no.e428:cr72:12-13 which had categorically stated that the buildings under survey no TS 340(part) under RS no.501, Kodiyalbail village had been granted permission to build as follows:
cellar- nil
ground floor-323.52 sq meters
1st floor 323.52 sq meters
2nd floor 323.52 sq meters
total 970.56 sq meters.
But on spot inspection it was found that the built up was as follows:
Cellar ---------323.52
Ground floor- 342.92
1st floor ---do---
2nd floor ---do---
3rd floor ---do---
4th floor ----do—(with acc sheet roof)
Total-----2015.04 sq meters.
So, it was not a minor violation but a build up space of more than twice the licensed area! The commissioner had also issued notice under section 308(1) of the Karnataka Municipal corporations act and had warned that unless the deviations were rectified within seven days of the date of the notice(which was dated 19-11-2012) it would be demolished at the cost of owners and the amount collected from them. They had also asked the respodents to submit the plans of the newly constructed building within seven days of the date of the notice! The fact is that it is 2016 and the building still exists and going strong! The road is still narrow and gets blocked. The residents till suffer and the Mangalore City corporation is in deep slumber. Perhaps that is a sign of ‘smartness’ for a city which aims to get the smart city tag!
With the complaint having become infructuous the violators can be happy for some more time! But, a group of citizens are planning to re submit the complaint or get impleaded into the case. But as a senior lawyer remarked such complaints are not civil cases and do not become extinct if the complainant is eliminated. We are waiting to see what action the commissioner will take on the issue which still exists. We are waiting for the demolition to start!
caption:
the photos show the narrow approach roads to the institutions.
another photo shows the old ailing parents of Vinayak Baliga.
The photos of the institutions occupying the buildings scheduled to be demolished.