Why do they resort to mockery of the Prophet?

[email protected] (Sharafuddin B S)
December 22, 2012

We hear about the blasphemy and mockery of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) at certain intervals. This is not a new phenomenon but happened all the time throughout the ages. Moreover, this kind of mockery is not limited to Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) alone. It also happened to many other revered Prophets who came before him, especially in the history of Jews, who tried to crucify Jesus Christ (pbuh), killed John the Baptist and others.

muhammadOne such effort is done very recently by some very insignificant people in USA, which created huge uproar in many parts of the world. They produced a malicious and blasphemous film ‘Innocence of Muslims’. The mastermind of this renewed blasphemy was an Egypt-born Coptic Christian, who is an illegal immigrant in USA. He along with one hundred Jews, collected some money, produced a very substandard film and posted in YouTube, which is available for free for anyone to propagate anything they want.

The irony is that these kinds of malicious materials are widely tolerated by many modern countries - which claim to be democratic and free countries - under the pretext of freedom of opinion.

Is this Freedom of Opinion?

In fact there is a clear line between freedom of opinion and blasphemy. Freedom of opinion is to express something candid, good, bad or different view point openly. Islam too advocates and respects freedom of opinion. The Quranic verse, “Allah does not like the public mention of evil except by the one who has been oppressed,” (4: 148) hints that if a person is oppressed, he can even pronounce the evil talk in public. This is just an example to see to what extent Islam gives and encourages freedom of opinion.

Meanwhile, if someone approaches you and abuses your father, or any other respectable personality by saying that he was a womanizer, an oppressor, a child molester and makes a fictitious film depicting the same and supplies it to the masses through various media, will you tolerate him for the sake of freedom of opinion?

Surely, this will not remain in the parameter of freedom of opinion; it is called blasphemy and generally not tolerated by anyone in a civilised society. Tolerating blasphemy is not tantamount to respecting freedom of opinion.

There are laws against blasphemy in every country and there are several instances of applying these laws. Even during the cases of blasphemy against Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) in the past, laws of blasphemy were implemented. When controversial writer Salman Rushdie wrote ‘Satanic Verses’, many non-Muslim countries banned it even before Penguin could release this ill-intended book in several countries. India, a country with non-Muslim majority too banned it when it was about to be published in its land. Khushwant Singh, then resident editor of Penguin Publications in India, who is known for his ‘Gossip Sweet and Sour’ columns also had recommended banning this book in India.

It is very important for any country to utilise the available laws against blasphemy and to develop strong laws against blasphemy as it is a very counter-productive to the society and countries. There is no contribution towards knowledge, logic, literature or progressive thinking in this kind of blasphemous works. The sole intention of it is to provoke people and to create chaos in the society.

Why do They Make Mockery?

Question arises why these people often resort to blasphemy of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) in particular? God forbid, every time in this kind of blasphemous works Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is portrayed as a molester, a womaniser, an oppressor, a terrorist and so on. Similar is the case with the infamous Danish cartoons, which had caused global uproar a few years ago.

Probably, a SWOT analysis of the Muslim community to ascertain the reason behind this blasphemy will lead us to some better conclusions.

Strengths of Muslims

Without exaggeration, some of strengths which Muslim community possesses are seldom there in any other communities of the world. One of the strength is that they have the only book of guidance which cannot be distorted. It’s a fact that none of the divine Scriptures which came before Quran is available today in a secured and undistorted form. You will not find any book which is an accurate book of guidance as Quran. It is also protected in the hearts of hundreds of thousands of people around the world, who have committed complete Quran into their memory, as Quran says: “We have certainly sent down the dhikr (Quran) and we will surely guard it” (15: 9).

quranThis is a biggest strength of Muslims because through this they always remain rightly guided. No one can say anything against Quran based on knowledge and logic. Probably this is one of the reasons, trouble mongers resort to the cowardice act of mockery of the Prophet (pbuh), as Quran came through him (pbuh) in the form of revelation.

Another strength of Muslim community is the ‘Shariah’ - the rules and regulations of Islam developed on the basis of Quran and traditions of Prophet Mohammad (pbuh). Major part of the Quran is all about rules and regulations for human life. It gives broader and illustrative rules and regulations about a believer’s private life, social life, transactions, social fabric, marriages, divorce, and distribution of assets and so on. Moreover, for every small act and every aspect of life there is detailed guidance and illustration in Islam. You will not find this kind of detailed rules and regulations in any religion. Due to this fact, constitutions of a few non-Muslim countries too allow their Muslim population to follow their own personal-laws based on Shariah. Whereas many non-Muslim communities develop their own rules and regulations for marriage, divorce and other civil rights which undergoes amendments and changes whenever they see flaws in it. But in Islam there are set of Quranic rules and regulations which are constant and unchangeable.

Resurgence of Islam

It is an obvious truth that despite the global media’s organised propaganda against Islam, there is a great deal of curiosity and attraction towards Islam across the world. Even though hundreds of anti-Islamic books are hitting the market every day and huge activities are underway to wage propaganda war against Islam throughout the world, today Islam has emerged as the biggest “practiced religion” and “fastest growing faith” in the world.

It is worth mentioning here that there were efforts to abolish the religious identity of Muslims several times in history in many countries. However, it so happened that there was religious awakening and resurgence after sometime. We may see such examples in Russia and its adjacent countries which were once part of USSR, and European countries like Bosnia, Turkey and elsewhere. Today, hundreds of thousands of Muslim gather for Eid Prayers in Moscow, where Muslim identity was once eliminated. Hundreds of thousands of peaceful demonstrators turned up in recent protest in Turkey against blasphemy of the Prophet (pbuh). This was a proof for the allegiance of people towards Islam.

moscow

Today, thousands of Muslims gather for Eid Prayers in Moscow, where Muslim identity was once eliminated.

At the time of Ottoman Empire, Turks had a close connection with Arabic language. However, the successive regime of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, not only banished Arabic language, but also tried to eliminate Islamic identity. In spite of this, people of Modern Turkey are turning towards Islam in great number and showing keen interest in practice of religion.

In fact, global Muslims do not have an organised way of missionary activities to convey the message of Islam compared to missionary activities of Christians and other ideologies. There are a few individual ‘Dayees’ (preachers) performing their mission here and there. However, Islam is considered as the fasted growing religion in most of the non-Muslim majority countries. In the West during the last fifty years, the growth of Muslim population is more than 200%. Disturbed by this development, some of the western countries are thinking of banning minarets of the masjids and prohibiting niqab (veil) and hijab in order to discourage the spread of Islam.

On the other hand a considerable number of great personalities and celebrities from different fields are constantly coming to the fold of Islam. British singer, songwriter and Pop icon Cat Stevens, at the zenith of his stardom became a Muslim and is now known as Yousuf Islam, a popular Muslim activist. British journalist and war-correspondent Yvonne Ridley, best known for her capture by the Taliban in the battlefield of Afghanistan, accepted Islam after reading Quran, and now actively spreading her thoughts about Islam. Canadian scholar of linguistics Dr Thomas Ballantine Irving, not only accepted Islam, but also translated the noble Quran. Eminent French medical scientist Dr. Maurice Bucaille, who is known for his masterpiece “The Bible, The Qur'an and Science”, accepted Islam and proved the divinity of Quran through modern science. These are mere a few well-known names, among hundreds of prominent personalities who came to the fold of Islam in recent years.

yvonne_Ridley

British journalist Yvonne Ridley, best known for her capture by the Taliban in the battlefield of Afghanistan, accepted Islam after reading Quran.

Inspiring Personality

The personality of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) itself is a strength of Muslims. Western scholar Michel H. Hart’s masterpiece ‘The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History’, a book written after extensive unbiased research, declares Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) as the most influential personality in the history. Sir Isaac Newton and Jesus Christ (pbuh) are placed in the second and third position respectively in his book. Newton was born in the 17th century AD while Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was born in the 7th century AD. According to Michal H. Hart, from 7th century to 17th century AD you will not find anyone who is as influential as Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). Interestingly the researcher Michal H. Hart was neither a follower of Prophet (pbuh) nor a Muslim.

The history of Arabia and Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is indeed astonishing. In the 7th century AD there were two super powers - the Roman Empire and the Persian Empire. Between these two mighty empires was the resource-less Arabian Peninsula, where there were only nomads, camels and less-educated people.

The same atmosphere was prevailing when Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was born. His life was full of challenges - born as an orphan, lost two of his care takers grandfather and uncle at an early age. He did not undergo any formal education and remained an illiterate. Until he was 40-year-old, lived like an ordinary man. He did not perform any extraordinary things in the society. However, he commanded great respect in Makah through his character, and was kwon among people as “the truthful” and “the honest”.

the100But things changed after his 40th year, when he became a Prophet: He started conveying an inspiring message and people became his followers in the society. Initially, nomads and uneducated people began to emerge as leaders through this message. Within 50 years, his message spread to a large part of the world. After another 100 years it reached much larger part of the world and within short span of time Islam emerged as a global super power.

History bears testimony that Muslim rulers conquered the mighty Roman and Persian empires. It is an astonishing history and it appears to be a legend. Even today we can see the remains of Roman Empire in Syria’s Palmyra, which was one of the capitals of Roman Empire. Istanbul and Baghdad - two great cities of Islamic civilisation - also were capitals of the same Roman Empire.

The influential personality of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) played a major role in the spread of Islam. We can see the influence of his personality even today. Anyone who studies his history derives lots of influence from it. That is the very reason the enemies of Islam try to target the Prophet (pbuh) and malign his image in every possible way. In Islamic terminology this is called ‘Fitnah’, an act of spreading chaos on the earth. The Fitnah of intentional and organised blasphemy deserve a severe punishment.

According to Quran, “Fitnah (Creating Chaos on the earth) is worse than committing a murder,” (2:191). Because, Fitnah leads to the loss of innocent lives and destruction of prosperities. The result of the latest Fitnah of blashphemy against the Prophet (pbuh) was also the same: A country lost eight jetliners, lost an Ambassador in Libya, many diplomats were killed, a large number of innocent people lost their lives in many courtiers and chaos erupted around the world. A legal action against the person who initiated the mockery in the initial stage, would have been averted all these chaos!

Honour of the Prophet (pbuh) Protected

The honour of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), has been protected through various means. Quran says that Allah Himself will protect the honour of His Prophet. He also protects the honor through Muslim community and through Islamic Sharia.

Allah says in Quran, “I am sufficient for you against the people who do mockery” (15: 95). Through this verse Allah has given a guarantee that He will protect the honor of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). In another verse Allah says “And we have raised high for you (Muhammad) your repute” (94: 4). Before the birth of Prophet (pbuh), “Muhammad” was an unknown name. Today we can see millions of people identify themselves with the name ‘Muhammad’ all over the world. Every time when the mu’addin (prayer caller at masjid) says the adaan (prayer call) in the microphone saying, “I bear witness that Muhammad (pbuh) is the messenger of Allah”, the name of the Prophet (pbuh) raises high in the sky. There is no minute in a day when this announcement is not proclaimed since time varies from country to country.

Quran exhorts the Muslim community that Prophet (pbuh) should be more dearer to them than any other things in their life. “Say: If your fathers, your sons, your brothers, your wives, your relatives, the wealth that you have gained, the commerce in which you fear a decline, and the dwellings in which you delight ... are dearer to you than Allah and His Messenger, and striving hard and fighting in His Cause, then wait until Allah brings about His Decision (torment)” (9: 24). Accordingly for a true Muslim, the most dearest thing in his/her life is love towards Allah, His Prophet (pbuh) and striving in the way of Allah.

Shariah, the rules and regulations of Islam, also protects the honour of Prophet (pbuh). It prescribes capital punishment for blasphemy. This can be seen during the conquest of Makkah, when the Prophet (pbuh) forgave all unbelievers of the conquered land including his blood thirsty enemies. He forgave staunch enemies of Islam like Abu Sufiyan and made a declaration that whoever takes shelter in the house of Abu Sufiyan will be forgiven. Ikrima, another staunch enemy of Islam too approached Prophet (pbuh) seeking asylum. When he was arriving from distance Prophet (pbuh) said: “Ikrima is coming towards us as a believer and migrant, hence do not abuse his father”. In spite of the fact that Ikrima’s father Abu Jahal was the bitterest enemy of Islam, the Prophet (pbuh) did not let anyone abuse him. He forgave every individual and declared: “there will be no revenge on any of you today.” However, he did not forgive four individuals who committed blasphemy and they were executed.

How to React?

If enemies of Islam utilize media to attack Islam, the best refutation could be through media itself. There are various media through which we may refute in an effective way. Though peaceful and timely demonstrations also sometime convey the message to the masses and governments to take necessary action, killing of the innocent people in the pretext of protest is not permissible in Islam, which strictly prohibits killing of innocent people, destroying public properties or cutting the trees even during wars. Even in their reaction and protest, Muslims should carry a message that through they are upset and angry they prove to be peace-loving people and always protect values promulgated by the final Prophet (pbuh).

protest

Islam strictly prohibits killing of innocent people, destroying public properties or cutting the trees even during wars.

There are two things that Muslims can do in order to respond to the blasphemy. One of them is swift reaction which is spontaneous. The second one is well-thought out pro-action. Muslim community is good at reaction but seldom we see any efforts done by Muslims which can be considered as pro-action.

Reminding Muslims about the proactive approach Qur’an says, “So they who have believed in him (Prophet), honored him, supported him and followed the light which was sent down with him are the victorious’ (7: 157).

Therefore Muslim community should be proactive by taking care of the four important responsibilities that they constantly have towards Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), which is believing in him, respecting him, helping him and following him.

Helping the Prophet (pubh) is nothing but spreading the message which he had conveyed. Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was the last Prophet and after him prophet hood is terminated. But the prophetic mission, which is transferred to his followers, is not terminated. Today every fourth person in the world is a Muslim. Among them some are living peacefully in peaceful countries, where as some are living with difficulties and challenges, deprived of their freedom and rights. It is the responsibility of every individual Muslims particularly those who are living in peaceful societies to convey the message of Islam to maximum people so that the peace reaches the entire world.

Qur’an says, “Their intention is to extinguish Allah's Light (by blowing) with their mouths: But Allah will complete (the revelation of) His Light, even though the Unbelievers may detest (it). It is He Who has sent His Apostle with Guidance and the Religion of Truth, that he may proclaim it over all religion, even though the Pagans may detest (it)” (61: 8,9).

Surly, Islam has all the qualities and requisites to become a predominant faith, if supported by plan and efforts by Muslim community as Quran says, “Man will not get anything other than what he strives for and you will surely see the fruit of your striving” (53: 39,40).

Sharafuddin-Soofi

The writer is a multilingual personality of Mangalore origin currently residing in Kuwait, having several years of experience in journalism, teaching, public speaking and social service.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
July 20,2020

As Covid 19 has created havoc all rounds, the rulers of certain countries are using it to further intensify their set agendas. The democratic freedoms are being curtailed in certain forms, the reaction to which has come in America in the form of a campaign, which is opposing “stifling” cultural climate that is imposing “ideological conformity” and weakening “norms of open debate and toleration of differences”. In India similar intimidations have been intensified. In addition the occasion has been used by the sectarian forces first to link the spread of Corona to Muslim community and now in the name of reducing the burden of curriculum certain chapters on core concepts related to Indian nationalism are being deleted from the text books.

It has been reported that chapters on federalism, citizenship, nationalism, secularism, Human Rights, Legal Aid and Local Self Government and the like are being dropped. Education has been an important area for communal forces and they constantly keep saying that leftists have dominated the curriculum content, it suffers from the impact of Macaulay, Marx and Mohammad and so needs to be Indianized. The first such attempt was done when BJP came to power in 1998 as NDA and had Murli Manohar Joshi as the MHRD minister. He brought the changes which were termed as ‘saffronization of education’. Their focus is more on social science. Some of the highlights of this were introduction of subjects like Astrology and Paurohitya, and chapters defending caste system, nationalism of the type of Hitler was praised.

With defeat of NDA in 2004, the UPA did try to rectify some of these distortions. Again after 2014 the RSS affiliates working in the area of education have been active, interacting with MHRD officials to impress upon them the need to change the curriculum matching with their Hindu nationalist agenda. Its ‘Shiksha Sanskriti Utthan Nyas’ has been asking for removal of English, Urdu words in the texts. It has asked for removal of thoughts of Rabindranath Tagore on Nationalism, extracts of autobiography of M F Husain, references to benevolence of Muslim rulers, references to BJP being Hindu party, apology of Dr. Manmohan Singh for anti Sikh pogrom of 1984, the reference to killings of Gujarat carnage in 2002 among others. This they call as Bhartiykaran of syllabus.

As RSS is a multithreaded hydra one of its pracharak Dinanath Batra has set up ‘Shiksha Bachao Abhiyan Samiti’ which has been pressurizing various publishers to drop the books which are not conforming to their ideology. One recalls their pressuring withdrawal of Wendy Doniger’s ‘The Hindus’, as it does present the ancient India through the concerns of dalits and women. Mr. Batra has already come out with a set of nine books for school curriculum, giving the RSS view of the past and RSS understanding of social sciences. These have already been translated into Gujarati and thousands of the sets of these books are being used in Gujarat Schools.

The present step of deleting parts of curriculum which gives the basics of Indian Nationalism, secularism and human rights is a further step in the same direction. These are the topics which have made the Hindu nationalists uncomfortable during last few years. They have been defaming secularism. They removed it from the preamble of Indian constitution, when they put out an ad on the eve of Republic day in 2015. From last few decades since the Ram Temple movement was brought up, simultaneously the secular ethos of India’s freedom movement and secular values of Indian constitution have been constantly criticized. Many an RSS ideologues and BJP leaders have been asking for change of Indian Constitution for this very reason.

Secularism is part of the concept of Indian nationalism. In the name of religious nationalism, sectarian divisive nationalism they have been attacking various student leaders in particular. When we study Nationalism, the very genesis of Indian nationalism tells us the plurality of our freedom movement with its anti colonial roots. The struggle was for Indian nationalism and so the Muslims and Hindu communalists kept aloof from this great struggle against colonial masters, it was this struggle which built the Indian nation with all its diversity.

Similarly as we have equal rights as citizens the chapters on citizenship are being dropped. Federalism has been the core part of India’s administrative and political structure. As the dictatorial tendencies are becoming stronger, federalism is bound to suffer and that explains the dropping of this subject. Democracy is decentralization of power. Power reaching the lowermost part of the system, the villages and average citizens. This got reflected in Local self Government. The power is distributed among villages, cities, state and center. By removing chapters on federalism and local self government, the indications of the ideology of ruling party are on display.

While we are not dealing with all the portents of the planned omissions, one more aspect that related to dropping of chapter on Human rights needs our attention. The concept of Human rights and dignity are interlinked. This concept of Human rights also has international ramifications. India is signatory to many an UN covenants related to Human rights. The indications are clear that now rights will be for the few elite and ‘duties’ for the large deprived sections will be put on the forefront.

In a way this incidental ‘Corona gifted opportunity’ to the ruling Government is being fully used to enhance the agenda of ruling party in the arena of Educational Curriculum. The part of curriculum with which the ruling party is uncomfortable is being removed. This act of omission does supplement their other acts of commission in changing the shape of educational curriculum, which are reflected in RSS affiliates’ suggestions to MHRD regarding Bhartiyakaran of contents of syllabus. As per this the things like regarding the great epics like Ramayana and Mahabharata as History, the things like India having all the stem cell technology, plastic surgery, aviation science etc. will have a place in the changes planned by communal forces!

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
March 14,2020

In the wake of Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) UN High Commissioner, Michele Bachelet, has filed an intervention in the Supreme Court petition challenging the constitutionality of the Citizenship Amendment Act, as she is critical of CAA. Responding to her, India’s Foreign Minister S. Jai Shanker strongly rebutted her criticism, saying that the body (UNHCR) has been wrong and is blind to the problem of cross border terrorism. The issue on hand is the possibility of scores of people, mainly Muslims, being declared as stateless. The problem at hand is the massive exercise of going through the responses/documents from over 120 crore of Indian population and screening documents, which as seen in Assam, yield result which are far from truthful or necessary.

The issue of CAA has been extensively debated and despite heavy critique of the same by large number of groups and despite the biggest mass opposition ever to any move in Independent India, the Government is determined on going ahead with an exercise which is reminiscent of the dreaded regimes which are sectarian and heartless to its citizens, which have indulged in extinction of large mass of people on grounds of citizenship, race etc. The Foreign minister’s assertion is that it is a matter internal to India, where India’s sovereignty is all that matters! As far as sovereignty is concerned we should be clear that in current times any sovereign power has to consider the need to uphold the citizenship as per the principle of non-discrimination which is stipulated in Art.26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political (ICCPR) rights.

Can such policies, which affect large number of people and are likely to affect their citizenship be purely regarded as ‘internal’? With the World turning into a global village, some global norms have been formulated during last few decades. The norms relate to Human rights and migrations have been codified. India is also signatory to many such covenants in including ICCPR, which deals with the norms for dealing with refugees from other countries. One is not talking of Chicago speech of Swami Vivekanand, which said that India’s greatness has been in giving shelter to people from different parts of the World; one is also not talking of the Tattariaya Upanishad’s ‘Atithi Devovhav’ or ‘Vasudhaiva Kutumbkam’ from Mahaupanishad today.

What are being talked about are the values and opinions of organizations which want to ensure to preserve of Human rights of all people Worldwide. In this matter India is calling United Nations body as ‘foreign party’; having no locus standi in the case as it pertains to India’s sovereignty. The truth is that since various countries are signatories to UN covenants, UN bodies have been monitoring the moves of different states and intervening at legal level as Amicus (Friend of the Court) to the courts in different countries and different global bodies. Just to mention some of these, UN and High Commissioner for Human Rights has often submitted amicus briefs in different judicial platforms. Some examples are their intervention in US Supreme Court, European Court of Human Rights, International Criminal Court, and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. These are meant to help the Courts in areas where UN bodies have expertise.

 Expertise on this has been jointly formulated by various nations. These interventions also remind the nations as to what global norms have been evolved and what are the obligations of individual states to the values which have evolved over a period of time. Arvind Narrain draws our attention to the fact that, “commission has intervened in the European Court of Human Rights in cases involving Spain and Italy to underscore the principle of non-refoulement, which bars compulsory expulsion of illegal migrants… Similarly, the UN has intervened in the International Criminal Court in a case against the Central African Republic to explicate on the international jurisprudence on rape as a war crime.”

From time to time organizations like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have been monitoring the status of Human rights of different countries. This puts those countries in uncomfortable situation and is not welcome by those establishments. How should this contradiction between ‘internal matter’, ‘sovereignty’ and the norms for Human rights be resolved? This is a tough question at the time when the freedom indices and democratic ethos are sliding downwards all over the world. In India too has slid down on the scale of these norms.

In India we can look at the intervention of UN body from the angle of equality and non discrimination. Democratic spirit should encourage us to have a rethink on the matters which have been decided by the state. In the face of the greatest mass movement of Shaheen bagh, the state does need to look inwards and give a thought to international morality, the spirit of global family to state the least.

The popular perception is that when Christians were being persecuted in Kandhmal the global Christian community’s voice was not strong enough. Currently in the face of Delhi carnage many a Muslim majority countries have spoken. While Mr. Modi claims that his good relations with Muslim countries are a matter of heartburn to the parties like Congress, he needs to relook at his self gloating. Currently Iran, Malaysia, Indonesia and many Muslim majority countries have spoken against what Modi regime is unleashing in India. Bangladesh, our neighbor, has also seen various protests against the plight of Muslims in India. More than the ‘internal matter’ etc. what needs to be thought out is the moral aspect of the whole issue. We pride ourselves in treading the path of morality. What does that say in present context when while large section of local media is servile to the state, section of global media has strongly brought forward what is happening to minorities in India.   

The hope is that Indian Government wakes up to its International obligations, to the worsening of India’s image in the World due to CAA and the horrific violence witnessed in Delhi.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
February 13,2020

Forthcoming Census and RSS campaign

Currently massive protests are going on against NPR, NCR and CAA. At the same time we are going to begin the process of decadal census in 2021. Already RSS is active in promoting NPR, NCR and CAA. At the same time RSS wants that Adivasis should register themselves as Hindus rather than ticking the column of ‘Others’. As per their spokesperson in the 2011 census many Adivasis groups ticked that column because of which the population of Hindus came down to by 0.7 percent point to come down to 79.8 %. This has sent signals to this Hindu nationalist organization and is planning to ensures that Adivasis tick the column of Hindus in this census.

As such RSS has a very clever attitude in defining the term Hindu. The first formulation was by Savakakar who said that all those who regard the land east of Indus as their Holy land and Father land are Hindus. This left out Muslims and Christians, and brought all others in the ambit of Hindu fold. From the decade of 1980s due to electoral compulsions they have been trying to articulate that all those who are living in India are Hindus. Murli Manohar Joshi stated that Muslims are Ahmadiya Hindus and Christians are Christi Hindus. Recently there was a controversy when they restated that Sikhs are not a separate religion but are a sect of Hinduism. Many Sikh organizations stood up to say that Sikhism is a religion by itself and recalled the book of Kahan Singh Nabha, “Hum Hindu Nahin”

As far as Adivasis are concerned in contrast to what is being planned by Hindu nationalist RSS, many Adivasis groups have been meeting from last couple of years to demand just the contrary. As per them there should be a column where they can tick their identity of Adivasis.  There are active campaigns among Adivasis groups to uphold their Adivasi identity in Census. As per them in the first census which was conducted in Independent India, the column, Aborigines, was there, which was later removed forcing them to club themselves with other religions.

After 1951 in addition to Hindu, Muslim, Sikh, Christian, Jain and Buddha, the column ‘others’ was also there which was removed in 2011. Even during British period if you look at the censuses of the British era (from 1871 to 1931); there was provision for tribes to choose Aborigine as an option. There are nearly 83 religious practices being followed by Adivasis. Few major of these are Sarna, Gondi, Punem, Adi, and Koya. What they share in common is that they are animists, worship nature and spirit of ancestors; do not have priestly class or Holy Scriptures and Gods and Goddesses characteristic of the broad Hindu pantheon.

RSS as per its political agenda of Hindu Nation regards them as Vanvasi. They pontificate that they have been part of Hindu society who were driven away to forests to escape the forcible conversion being done by the Muslim invaders. This concoction is contrary to the interpretations based on the studies from population genetics. The Hindu nationalist argues that Aryans have been the original inhabitants of the country from where they spread to other parts of the World. The book by Tony Joseph, ‘Early Indians’ tells us that away from the race theory, we are all mixed up. The first inhabitants in our land were the ones who emigrated from South Asia over Sixty thousand years ago.

The Indo-Aryans came here nearly three thousand years ago and they pushed the aborigines to the forests and hills and that’s what constitutes the Adivasi community of India.

Hindu Nationalists like all the nationalists who construct their nationalism around their religion claim to be the most original inhabitants of the land, and their interpretations of past are molded according to that. RSS right from beginning has not been using the word Adivasi, it calls them Vanvasi. As per its agenda it wants them to be part of Hindu fold, despite Adivasis themselves saying that they are not Hindus, they have beliefs and practices which are far away from Hinduism in whatever form.

To enhance its political reach from the decades of 1980s in particular its work in Adivasis areas has been intensified. While ‘Vanvasis Kalyan Ashram’, part of RSS Combine which was formed much earlier, it was in the decades of 1980s that their work was jacked up by sending more Pracharaks in Adivasi areas. We see that in Gujarat, Dangs and nearby area, Swami Aseemanand, in MP, centered around Jhabua-the followers of Asaram Bapu and in Orissa Swami Laxmananad stationed them. They saw Christian missionaries working in the field of education and health as an obstacle to Hinduization of Adivasis. Their propaganda against Christian missionaries led to the ghastly murder of Pastor Graham Stains. It was this propaganda which led to anti Christian violence in various forms, the most horrific being the Kandhamal violence of 2008.

In order to culturally co-opt them into the fold of Hinduism they began series of religious congregations, Kumbhs. Shabri Kumbh in Dangs and many other Adivasis predominant areas created an atmosphere of fear, Adivasis were asked to be part of it, saffron flags were distributed and they were made to put it in their houses. Two religious icons were popularized in these areas, one was Shabri and other was Hanuman. To cap it all, Ekal Vidyalayas, started spreading RSS’s interpretation of history in these areas. The other angle of the whole thing is that Adivasis are living in the areas rich in minerals, which the BJP supporter Corporate World wants to take over.

World over aborigines have similar pattern. They are animists and what they practice is a culture as such. Many have converted to other religions out of their choice for sure, but finally in these matters what is important is the self perception. Hemant Soren the Chief Minister of Jharkhand pointed out that “Adivasis are not Hindus. ”Keeping that in mind; the column of Aborigines needs to find its place in our census forms.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.