Why do they resort to mockery of the Prophet?

[email protected] (Sharafuddin B S)
December 22, 2012

We hear about the blasphemy and mockery of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) at certain intervals. This is not a new phenomenon but happened all the time throughout the ages. Moreover, this kind of mockery is not limited to Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) alone. It also happened to many other revered Prophets who came before him, especially in the history of Jews, who tried to crucify Jesus Christ (pbuh), killed John the Baptist and others.

muhammadOne such effort is done very recently by some very insignificant people in USA, which created huge uproar in many parts of the world. They produced a malicious and blasphemous film ‘Innocence of Muslims’. The mastermind of this renewed blasphemy was an Egypt-born Coptic Christian, who is an illegal immigrant in USA. He along with one hundred Jews, collected some money, produced a very substandard film and posted in YouTube, which is available for free for anyone to propagate anything they want.

The irony is that these kinds of malicious materials are widely tolerated by many modern countries - which claim to be democratic and free countries - under the pretext of freedom of opinion.

Is this Freedom of Opinion?

In fact there is a clear line between freedom of opinion and blasphemy. Freedom of opinion is to express something candid, good, bad or different view point openly. Islam too advocates and respects freedom of opinion. The Quranic verse, “Allah does not like the public mention of evil except by the one who has been oppressed,” (4: 148) hints that if a person is oppressed, he can even pronounce the evil talk in public. This is just an example to see to what extent Islam gives and encourages freedom of opinion.

Meanwhile, if someone approaches you and abuses your father, or any other respectable personality by saying that he was a womanizer, an oppressor, a child molester and makes a fictitious film depicting the same and supplies it to the masses through various media, will you tolerate him for the sake of freedom of opinion?

Surely, this will not remain in the parameter of freedom of opinion; it is called blasphemy and generally not tolerated by anyone in a civilised society. Tolerating blasphemy is not tantamount to respecting freedom of opinion.

There are laws against blasphemy in every country and there are several instances of applying these laws. Even during the cases of blasphemy against Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) in the past, laws of blasphemy were implemented. When controversial writer Salman Rushdie wrote ‘Satanic Verses’, many non-Muslim countries banned it even before Penguin could release this ill-intended book in several countries. India, a country with non-Muslim majority too banned it when it was about to be published in its land. Khushwant Singh, then resident editor of Penguin Publications in India, who is known for his ‘Gossip Sweet and Sour’ columns also had recommended banning this book in India.

It is very important for any country to utilise the available laws against blasphemy and to develop strong laws against blasphemy as it is a very counter-productive to the society and countries. There is no contribution towards knowledge, logic, literature or progressive thinking in this kind of blasphemous works. The sole intention of it is to provoke people and to create chaos in the society.

Why do They Make Mockery?

Question arises why these people often resort to blasphemy of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) in particular? God forbid, every time in this kind of blasphemous works Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is portrayed as a molester, a womaniser, an oppressor, a terrorist and so on. Similar is the case with the infamous Danish cartoons, which had caused global uproar a few years ago.

Probably, a SWOT analysis of the Muslim community to ascertain the reason behind this blasphemy will lead us to some better conclusions.

Strengths of Muslims

Without exaggeration, some of strengths which Muslim community possesses are seldom there in any other communities of the world. One of the strength is that they have the only book of guidance which cannot be distorted. It’s a fact that none of the divine Scriptures which came before Quran is available today in a secured and undistorted form. You will not find any book which is an accurate book of guidance as Quran. It is also protected in the hearts of hundreds of thousands of people around the world, who have committed complete Quran into their memory, as Quran says: “We have certainly sent down the dhikr (Quran) and we will surely guard it” (15: 9).

quranThis is a biggest strength of Muslims because through this they always remain rightly guided. No one can say anything against Quran based on knowledge and logic. Probably this is one of the reasons, trouble mongers resort to the cowardice act of mockery of the Prophet (pbuh), as Quran came through him (pbuh) in the form of revelation.

Another strength of Muslim community is the ‘Shariah’ - the rules and regulations of Islam developed on the basis of Quran and traditions of Prophet Mohammad (pbuh). Major part of the Quran is all about rules and regulations for human life. It gives broader and illustrative rules and regulations about a believer’s private life, social life, transactions, social fabric, marriages, divorce, and distribution of assets and so on. Moreover, for every small act and every aspect of life there is detailed guidance and illustration in Islam. You will not find this kind of detailed rules and regulations in any religion. Due to this fact, constitutions of a few non-Muslim countries too allow their Muslim population to follow their own personal-laws based on Shariah. Whereas many non-Muslim communities develop their own rules and regulations for marriage, divorce and other civil rights which undergoes amendments and changes whenever they see flaws in it. But in Islam there are set of Quranic rules and regulations which are constant and unchangeable.

Resurgence of Islam

It is an obvious truth that despite the global media’s organised propaganda against Islam, there is a great deal of curiosity and attraction towards Islam across the world. Even though hundreds of anti-Islamic books are hitting the market every day and huge activities are underway to wage propaganda war against Islam throughout the world, today Islam has emerged as the biggest “practiced religion” and “fastest growing faith” in the world.

It is worth mentioning here that there were efforts to abolish the religious identity of Muslims several times in history in many countries. However, it so happened that there was religious awakening and resurgence after sometime. We may see such examples in Russia and its adjacent countries which were once part of USSR, and European countries like Bosnia, Turkey and elsewhere. Today, hundreds of thousands of Muslim gather for Eid Prayers in Moscow, where Muslim identity was once eliminated. Hundreds of thousands of peaceful demonstrators turned up in recent protest in Turkey against blasphemy of the Prophet (pbuh). This was a proof for the allegiance of people towards Islam.

moscow

Today, thousands of Muslims gather for Eid Prayers in Moscow, where Muslim identity was once eliminated.

At the time of Ottoman Empire, Turks had a close connection with Arabic language. However, the successive regime of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, not only banished Arabic language, but also tried to eliminate Islamic identity. In spite of this, people of Modern Turkey are turning towards Islam in great number and showing keen interest in practice of religion.

In fact, global Muslims do not have an organised way of missionary activities to convey the message of Islam compared to missionary activities of Christians and other ideologies. There are a few individual ‘Dayees’ (preachers) performing their mission here and there. However, Islam is considered as the fasted growing religion in most of the non-Muslim majority countries. In the West during the last fifty years, the growth of Muslim population is more than 200%. Disturbed by this development, some of the western countries are thinking of banning minarets of the masjids and prohibiting niqab (veil) and hijab in order to discourage the spread of Islam.

On the other hand a considerable number of great personalities and celebrities from different fields are constantly coming to the fold of Islam. British singer, songwriter and Pop icon Cat Stevens, at the zenith of his stardom became a Muslim and is now known as Yousuf Islam, a popular Muslim activist. British journalist and war-correspondent Yvonne Ridley, best known for her capture by the Taliban in the battlefield of Afghanistan, accepted Islam after reading Quran, and now actively spreading her thoughts about Islam. Canadian scholar of linguistics Dr Thomas Ballantine Irving, not only accepted Islam, but also translated the noble Quran. Eminent French medical scientist Dr. Maurice Bucaille, who is known for his masterpiece “The Bible, The Qur'an and Science”, accepted Islam and proved the divinity of Quran through modern science. These are mere a few well-known names, among hundreds of prominent personalities who came to the fold of Islam in recent years.

yvonne_Ridley

British journalist Yvonne Ridley, best known for her capture by the Taliban in the battlefield of Afghanistan, accepted Islam after reading Quran.

Inspiring Personality

The personality of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) itself is a strength of Muslims. Western scholar Michel H. Hart’s masterpiece ‘The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History’, a book written after extensive unbiased research, declares Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) as the most influential personality in the history. Sir Isaac Newton and Jesus Christ (pbuh) are placed in the second and third position respectively in his book. Newton was born in the 17th century AD while Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was born in the 7th century AD. According to Michal H. Hart, from 7th century to 17th century AD you will not find anyone who is as influential as Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). Interestingly the researcher Michal H. Hart was neither a follower of Prophet (pbuh) nor a Muslim.

The history of Arabia and Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is indeed astonishing. In the 7th century AD there were two super powers - the Roman Empire and the Persian Empire. Between these two mighty empires was the resource-less Arabian Peninsula, where there were only nomads, camels and less-educated people.

The same atmosphere was prevailing when Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was born. His life was full of challenges - born as an orphan, lost two of his care takers grandfather and uncle at an early age. He did not undergo any formal education and remained an illiterate. Until he was 40-year-old, lived like an ordinary man. He did not perform any extraordinary things in the society. However, he commanded great respect in Makah through his character, and was kwon among people as “the truthful” and “the honest”.

the100But things changed after his 40th year, when he became a Prophet: He started conveying an inspiring message and people became his followers in the society. Initially, nomads and uneducated people began to emerge as leaders through this message. Within 50 years, his message spread to a large part of the world. After another 100 years it reached much larger part of the world and within short span of time Islam emerged as a global super power.

History bears testimony that Muslim rulers conquered the mighty Roman and Persian empires. It is an astonishing history and it appears to be a legend. Even today we can see the remains of Roman Empire in Syria’s Palmyra, which was one of the capitals of Roman Empire. Istanbul and Baghdad - two great cities of Islamic civilisation - also were capitals of the same Roman Empire.

The influential personality of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) played a major role in the spread of Islam. We can see the influence of his personality even today. Anyone who studies his history derives lots of influence from it. That is the very reason the enemies of Islam try to target the Prophet (pbuh) and malign his image in every possible way. In Islamic terminology this is called ‘Fitnah’, an act of spreading chaos on the earth. The Fitnah of intentional and organised blasphemy deserve a severe punishment.

According to Quran, “Fitnah (Creating Chaos on the earth) is worse than committing a murder,” (2:191). Because, Fitnah leads to the loss of innocent lives and destruction of prosperities. The result of the latest Fitnah of blashphemy against the Prophet (pbuh) was also the same: A country lost eight jetliners, lost an Ambassador in Libya, many diplomats were killed, a large number of innocent people lost their lives in many courtiers and chaos erupted around the world. A legal action against the person who initiated the mockery in the initial stage, would have been averted all these chaos!

Honour of the Prophet (pbuh) Protected

The honour of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), has been protected through various means. Quran says that Allah Himself will protect the honour of His Prophet. He also protects the honor through Muslim community and through Islamic Sharia.

Allah says in Quran, “I am sufficient for you against the people who do mockery” (15: 95). Through this verse Allah has given a guarantee that He will protect the honor of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). In another verse Allah says “And we have raised high for you (Muhammad) your repute” (94: 4). Before the birth of Prophet (pbuh), “Muhammad” was an unknown name. Today we can see millions of people identify themselves with the name ‘Muhammad’ all over the world. Every time when the mu’addin (prayer caller at masjid) says the adaan (prayer call) in the microphone saying, “I bear witness that Muhammad (pbuh) is the messenger of Allah”, the name of the Prophet (pbuh) raises high in the sky. There is no minute in a day when this announcement is not proclaimed since time varies from country to country.

Quran exhorts the Muslim community that Prophet (pbuh) should be more dearer to them than any other things in their life. “Say: If your fathers, your sons, your brothers, your wives, your relatives, the wealth that you have gained, the commerce in which you fear a decline, and the dwellings in which you delight ... are dearer to you than Allah and His Messenger, and striving hard and fighting in His Cause, then wait until Allah brings about His Decision (torment)” (9: 24). Accordingly for a true Muslim, the most dearest thing in his/her life is love towards Allah, His Prophet (pbuh) and striving in the way of Allah.

Shariah, the rules and regulations of Islam, also protects the honour of Prophet (pbuh). It prescribes capital punishment for blasphemy. This can be seen during the conquest of Makkah, when the Prophet (pbuh) forgave all unbelievers of the conquered land including his blood thirsty enemies. He forgave staunch enemies of Islam like Abu Sufiyan and made a declaration that whoever takes shelter in the house of Abu Sufiyan will be forgiven. Ikrima, another staunch enemy of Islam too approached Prophet (pbuh) seeking asylum. When he was arriving from distance Prophet (pbuh) said: “Ikrima is coming towards us as a believer and migrant, hence do not abuse his father”. In spite of the fact that Ikrima’s father Abu Jahal was the bitterest enemy of Islam, the Prophet (pbuh) did not let anyone abuse him. He forgave every individual and declared: “there will be no revenge on any of you today.” However, he did not forgive four individuals who committed blasphemy and they were executed.

How to React?

If enemies of Islam utilize media to attack Islam, the best refutation could be through media itself. There are various media through which we may refute in an effective way. Though peaceful and timely demonstrations also sometime convey the message to the masses and governments to take necessary action, killing of the innocent people in the pretext of protest is not permissible in Islam, which strictly prohibits killing of innocent people, destroying public properties or cutting the trees even during wars. Even in their reaction and protest, Muslims should carry a message that through they are upset and angry they prove to be peace-loving people and always protect values promulgated by the final Prophet (pbuh).

protest

Islam strictly prohibits killing of innocent people, destroying public properties or cutting the trees even during wars.

There are two things that Muslims can do in order to respond to the blasphemy. One of them is swift reaction which is spontaneous. The second one is well-thought out pro-action. Muslim community is good at reaction but seldom we see any efforts done by Muslims which can be considered as pro-action.

Reminding Muslims about the proactive approach Qur’an says, “So they who have believed in him (Prophet), honored him, supported him and followed the light which was sent down with him are the victorious’ (7: 157).

Therefore Muslim community should be proactive by taking care of the four important responsibilities that they constantly have towards Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), which is believing in him, respecting him, helping him and following him.

Helping the Prophet (pubh) is nothing but spreading the message which he had conveyed. Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was the last Prophet and after him prophet hood is terminated. But the prophetic mission, which is transferred to his followers, is not terminated. Today every fourth person in the world is a Muslim. Among them some are living peacefully in peaceful countries, where as some are living with difficulties and challenges, deprived of their freedom and rights. It is the responsibility of every individual Muslims particularly those who are living in peaceful societies to convey the message of Islam to maximum people so that the peace reaches the entire world.

Qur’an says, “Their intention is to extinguish Allah's Light (by blowing) with their mouths: But Allah will complete (the revelation of) His Light, even though the Unbelievers may detest (it). It is He Who has sent His Apostle with Guidance and the Religion of Truth, that he may proclaim it over all religion, even though the Pagans may detest (it)” (61: 8,9).

Surly, Islam has all the qualities and requisites to become a predominant faith, if supported by plan and efforts by Muslim community as Quran says, “Man will not get anything other than what he strives for and you will surely see the fruit of your striving” (53: 39,40).

Sharafuddin-Soofi

The writer is a multilingual personality of Mangalore origin currently residing in Kuwait, having several years of experience in journalism, teaching, public speaking and social service.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
March 8,2020

They say ‘history repeats itself first as a tragedy and then as a farce’. In case of India, communal violence not only keeps repeating itself, the pattern of the tragedy keeps changing every next time. Some features of the violence are constant, but they are under the wraps mostly. The same can be said about the Delhi violence (February 2020). The interpretations, the causative factors are very discernible, but those who are generally the perpetrators have a knack of shifting the blame on the victim community or those who stand for the victims.

As the carnage began presumably in the aftermath of statement of Kapil Mishra of BJP, which was given in front of a top police official, in which he threatened to get the roads emptied. The roots of violence were sown earlier. The interpretations given by the Hindu Nationalist camp is that the riot is due to the changing demographic profile of the area with Muslims increasing in number in those areas, and coming up of Shaheen Bagh which was presented was like ‘Mini Pakistan’. As per them the policies of BJP in matters of triple talaq, Article 370 and CAA, NPR, NRC has unnerved the ‘radical’ elements and so this violence.

As such before coming to the observations of the activists and scholars of communal violence in India, we can in brief say that violence, in which nearly 46 people have died, include one from police and another from intelligence. Majority victims are Muslims. The violence started right under the nose of the police and the ruling party. From the videos and other eye accounts, police not only looked the other way around, at places it assisted those attacking the innocent victims and burning and looting selective shops. Home minister, Amit Shah, was nowhere on the scene. For first three days the rioters had free run. After the paramilitary force was brought in; the violence simmered and slowly reduced in intensity. The state AAP Government, which in a way is the byproduct of RSS supported Anna Hazare movement, was busy reading Hanuman Chalisa and praying at Rajghat with eyes closed to the mayhem going in parts of Delhi.

Communal violence is the sore point of Indian society. It did begin during colonial period due to British policy of ‘Divide and Rule’. At root cause was the communal view of looking at history and pro active British acts to sow the seeds of Hindu-Muslim divide. At other level the administrative and police the British were fairly neutral. On one hand was the national movement, uniting the people and creating and strengthening the fraternal feeling among all Indians. On the other were Muslim Communalists (Muslim League) and Hindu Communalists (Hindu Mahasabha, RSS) who assisted the British goal of ‘divide and rule’ promoting hatred between the communities. After partition the first major change was the change in attitude of police and administration which started tilting against Muslims. Major studies by Dr. Asghar Ali Engineer, Paul Brass and Omar Khalidi demonstrated that anti Muslim bias is discernible in during and after the riots.

Now the partisan role of police has been visible all through. Sri Krishna Commission report brought forth this fact; as did the research of the Ex DIG of UP police Dr. V.N.Rai. Dr. Rai’s studies also concluded that no communal violence can go on beyond 24 hours unless state administration is complicit in the carnage. In one of the violence, investigation of which was done by concerned Citizen’s team (Dhule, 2013) this author observed that police itself went on to undertake the rampage against Muslims and Muslim properties.

General observation about riots is that violence sounds to be spontaneous, as the Home Minister is pointing out, but as such it is well planned act. Again the violence is orchestrated in such a way that it seems Muslims have begun the riots. Who casts the First stone? To this scholars point out that the carnage is so organized that the encircled community is forced to throw the first stone. At places the pretext is made that ‘they’ (minorities) have thrown the first stone.

The pretexts against minorities are propagated, in Gujarat violence Godhra train burning, in Kandhamal the murder of Swami Laxamannand and now Shaheen bagh! The Hindu Muslim violence began as riots. But it is no more a riot, two sides are not involved. It is plain and simple anti Minority violence, in which some from the majority are also the victims.

This violence is possible as the ‘Hate against this minority’ is now more or less structural. The deeper Hate against Muslims and partly against Christians; has been cultivated since long and Hindu nationalist politics, right from its Shakhas to the social media have been put to use for spreading Hatred. The prevalent deeper hate has been supplanted this time by multiple utterances from BJP leaders, Modi (Can be recognized by clothes), Shah (press EVM machine button so hard that current is felt in Shaheen Bagh), Anurag Thakur (Goli (bullet) Maro) Yogi Aditya Nath (If Boli (Words)Do not work Goli will) and Parvesh Varma (They will be out to rape).

The incidental observation of the whole tragedy is the coming to surface of true colors of AAP, which not only kept mum as the carnage was peaking but also went on to praise the role of police in the whole episode. With Delhi carnage “Goli Maro” seems to be becoming the central slogan of Hindu nationalists. Delhi’s this violence has been the first one in which those getting killed are more due to bullets than by swords or knifes! Leader’s slogans do not go in vain! Courts the protectors of our Constitution seem to be of little help as if one of them like Murlidhar Rao gives the verdict to file against hate mongers, he is immediately transferred.

And lastly let’s recall the academic study of Yale University. It concludes; BJP gains in electoral strength after every riot’. In India the grip of communalism is increasing frighteningly. Efforts are needed to combat Hate and Hate mongers.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Wafa Sultana
April 4,2020

Over the last couple of days when the world was occupied with unifying efforts to fight the deadly Covid19 pandemic, sections of Indian media provided viewers a familiar scapegoat – the Indian Muslims – who are often stereotyped as a community being constantly at loggerheads with the citizenry and the State. Biased media channels were quick to resort to blaming the entire Muslim community for the spread of the disease in the country, thanks to an ill-timed Tablighi Jamaat gathering at its international headquarters in Delhi’s Nizamuddin. Unsurprisingly, the opprobrium was also marked by a sudden spike in WhatsApp forwards of videos with people wearing skullcaps licking spoons and performing Sufi breathing rituals, suggesting some sort of wild conspiracy on the part of the community to spread the virus.  Some media channels were quick to formulate, hypothesize and provide loose definitions of a newly discovered form of Jihad i.e. ‘Corona Jihad ’ thereby vilifying the Islamic faith and its followers.

While the investigation on the culpability of the organizers of the Nizamuddin event is still ongoing, there is enough information to suggest that the meeting was held before any lockdown was in force, and the problem began when there was no way of getting people out once the curfew was announced. Be that as it may, there is little doubt that organizing a meet of such a scale when there is a global pandemic smacks of gross misjudgment, and definitely the organizers should be held accountable if laws or public orders were defied. Attendees who attempt to defy quarantine measures must be dealt with strictly. However, what is alarming is that the focus and narrative have now shifted from the unfortunate event at Nizamuddin to the Tablighi Jamaat itself.

For those not familiar with the Tablighi Jamaat, the organization was founded in 1926 in Mewat by scholar Maulana Mohammad Ilyas. The Jamaat’s main objective was to get Muslim youth to learn and practice pristine Islam shorn of external influences. This is achieved through individuals dedicating time for moral and spiritual upliftment secluded from the rest of the world for a brief period of time. There is no formal membership process. More senior and experienced participants typically travel from one mosque to other delivering talks on religious topics, inviting local youth to attend and then volunteer for a spiritual retreat for a fixed number of days to a mosque in a nearby town or village to present the message to their co-religionists. Contrary to ongoing Islamophobic rhetoric, the movement does not actively proselytize. The focus is rather on getting Muslims to learn the teachings and practices of Islam.  This grassroots India-based movement has now grown to almost all countries with substantial Muslim populations. Its annual meets, or ‘ijtemas’ are among the largest Islamic congregations in the world after the annual Haj. One of the reasons for its popularity and wide network in the subcontinent and wordwide is the fact that it has eschewed the need for scholarly intervention, focusing on peer learning of fundamental beliefs and practice rather than high-falutin ideological debates. The Tablighi Jamaat also distinguishes itself from other Islamic movements through its strictly apolitical nature, with a focus on individual self-improvement rather than political mobilization. Hardships and difficulty in the world are expected to be face through ‘sabr’ (patience) and ‘dua’ (supplication),  than through quest for political power or influence. In terms of ideology, it is very much based on mainstream Sunni Islamic principles derived from the Deobandi school.

So, why is all this background important in the current context? While biased media entities have expectedly brought out their Islamophobic paraphernalia out for full display, more neutral commentators have tried to paint the Tablighi Jamaat as a fringe group and have tried to distance it from 'mainstream Muslims'. While the intent is no doubt innocent, this is a trap we must not fall into. This narrative, unfortunately, is also gaining ground due to apathy some Muslims have for the group, accusing it of being “disconnected from the realities of the world”. Unlike other Muslim organizations and movements, the Tablighi Jamat, by virtue of its political indifference, does not boast of high-profile advocates and savvy spokespersons who can defend it in mainstream or social media.  The use of adjectives such as 'outdated' and 'orthodox' by liberal columnists to describe the Jamaat feeds into the malignant attempt to change the narrative from the control of the spread of the pandemic due to the Nizamuddin gathering to 'raison d'etre' of the organization itself.

A large mainstream religious group like the Tablighi Jamaat with nearly a hundred-year history, normally considered to be peaceful, apolitical and minding its own business is now suddenly being villainized owing to unfortunate circumstances. Biased media reactions filled with disgust and hate seem to feed the Indian public conscience with a danngerous misconception - to be a nominal Muslim is okay but being a practicing one is not.  For those committed to the truth and fighting the spread of Islamophobia, the temptation to throw the entire Tablighi Jamaat under the bus must be resisted.

The writer is a lawyer and research scholar at Qatar University. Her research interests include Islamic law and politics.

Comments

zahoorahmed
 - 
Saturday, 4 Apr 2020

great article! provides a great perspective on tableeg jamat

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Ram Puniyani
January 9,2020

‘Go to Pakistan’ has probably been most often used phrase used against Muslims in India. Recently in yet another such incident the SP of Meerut, UP has been in the news and a video is circulating where he, Akhilesh Narayan Singh, is allegedly using the jibe ‘Go to Pakistan’. In the video he is seen shouting at protestors at Lisari Gate area in Meerut, “The ones (protestors) wearing those black or yellow armbands, tell them to go to Pakistan”. His seniors stood by him calling it ‘natural reaction to shouting of pro Pakistan slogans. Many BJP leaders like Uma Bhararti also defended the officer. Breaking ranks with fellow politicians, Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi of BJP, criticised the said officer and asked for suitable action against him. Interestingly this is same Naqvi, who earlier when the beef related arguments were going on; had stated that those who want to eat beef can go to Pakistan.

Interestingly this is probably the first time that any BJP leader has opposed the use of this jibe against the Indian Muslims. True to the dominance of trolls who support divisive politics, Naqvi has been trolled on the issue. As such vibe ‘Go to Pakistan’ has been a strong tool in the hands of aggressive elements to demonise Muslims in general and to humiliate those with Muslim names. One recalls that when due to the rising intolerance in the society many eminent writers, film makers were returning their awards, Aamir Khan said that his wife Kiran Rao is worried about their son. Immediately BJP worthies like Giriraj Singh pounced on him that he can go to Pakistan.

The strategy of BJP combine has been on one hand to use this ‘go to Pakistan’ to humiliate Muslims on the other from last few years another Pakistan dimension has been added. Those who are critical of the policies of BJP-RSS have on one hand been called as anti National and on the other it is being said that ‘they are speaking the language of Pakistan’.

Use of Pakistan to label the Muslims and dissidents here in India has been a very shrewd tool in the hands of communal forces. One remembers that the ‘cricket nationalism’ was also the one to use it. In case of India-Pakistan cricket match, the national hysteria, which it created, was also aiming at Indian Muslims. What was propagated was that Indian Muslims cheer for Pakistan victory and they root for Pakistan. There was an unfortunate grain of truth in this as a section of disgruntled, alienated Muslim did that. That was not the total picture, as most Indian Muslims were cheering for Indian victory. Many a Muslim cricketers contributed massively to Indian cricket victories. The cricket legends like Nawab Mansoor Ali Khan Pataudi, Irfan Pathan, and Mohammad Azaruddin are just the few among the long list of those who brought glories for India in the field of cricket.

Even in matters of defence there are legions of Muslims who contributed to Indian efforts in the war against Pakistan all through. Abdul Hamid’s role in 1965 India Pak war and the role of Muslim soldiers in Kargil war will be part of Indian military history. There have been generals in army who contributed in many ways for the role which military has been playing in service of the nation. General Zamiruddin Shah, when asked to handle Gujarat carnage, does recount how despite the lack of support from local administration for some time, eventually the military was able to quell the violence in some ways.

During freedom movement Muslims were as much part of the struggle against British rule as any other community. While the perception has been created that Muslims were demanding Pakistan, the truth is somewhere else. It was only the elite section of Muslims who supported the politics of Muslim League and later the same Muslim League could mobilize some other section and unleash the violence like ‘Direct Action’ in Kolkata, which in a way precipitated the actual process of partition, which was the goal of British and aim of Muslim League apart from this being the outcome of ‘Two Nation theory’.

Not much is popularized about the role of great number of Muslims who were part of National movement, who steadfastly opposed the idea and politics which led to the sad partition of the subcontinent. Few excellent accounts of the role of Muslims in freedom movement like Syed Nasir Ahmad, Ubaidur Rahman, Satish Ganjoo and Shamsul Islam are few of these not too well know books which give the outline of the great Muslim freedom fighters like Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, Ansari Brothers, Ashfaqulla Khan.

Immediately after partition tragedy the communal propaganda did the overdrive to blame the whole partition process on Muslim separatism, this totally undermined the fact that how poor Muslims had taken out massive marches to oppose the Lahore Resolution of separate Pakistan moved by Mohammad Ali Jinnah. The whole Muslim community started being seen as the homogenous, ‘The other’ and other misconceptions started against the community, the one’s relating them to atrocities of Muslim kings started being made as the part of popular folklore, leading the Hate against them. This Hate in turn laid the foundation of violence and eventual ghettoisation of this community.

The interactive-syncretism prevalent in India well presented by Gandhi-Nehru was pushed to the margins as those believing in pluralism did not actively engage with the issue. The economic marginalization of this community, coupled with the increasing insecurity in turn led to some of them to identify with Pakistan, and this small section was again presented as the representative of the whole Muslim community.

Today the battle of perception is heavily tilted against the Muslim community. It is a bit of a surprise as Naqvi is differing from his other fellow colleagues to say that the action should be taken against the erring police officer. The hope is that all round efforts are stepped up to combat the perception constructed against this religious minority in India. 

Comments

Prakash SS
 - 
Thursday, 9 Jan 2020

it is very much understandable if Pakistan is bad country our PM Namo would never visited without any invitation, that time Pakistan was good he prised their Mutton biriyani and Karak chai in pakistan. we feel something is wrong with our PM and his chelas. 

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.