House panel summons defence chiefs

April 10, 2012

New Delhi, April 10: The three defence service chiefs have been summoned by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Defence, which asked them to appear before it and apprise on the level of the armed forces’ preparedness in case of an enemy attack.

The three chiefs may appear before the panel on April 20, though the date may be changed to ensure their presence.

The committee took this unprecedented step after Army Chief Gen V K Singh's letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, depicting the sorry state of affairs in the Army, found its way to the media.

tank

New Delhi, April 10: The House panel on Monday took the decision of calling the chiefs after it heard Defence Secretary Shashi Kant Sharma, who clarified the government's stand on a newspaper report on the movement of two Army units towards the national capital on the same day when Gen Singh moved the Supreme Court challenging the government's stand on his date of birth controversy.

The Army does not need the government's permission to move units, Sharma reportedly informed the committee headed by Congress member Satpal Maharaj. The defence secretary said that the inference drawn in the report – an attempt to stage a coup or muscle flexing by the Army – was completely wrong. Sharma underlined that no standard operating procedures were violated by the Army.

The media report was “misleading” and drew “wrong inferences,” she added. While a some MPs wanted more details, many wanted a closure of the controversy as it dealt with the Army.

Quizzed by the Parliamentarians on the involvement of retired officers in arms deals, Sharma suggested a moratorium of five years for service officers before they were allowed to take up a job in the private sector, BJP MP Uday Singh, who attended the meeting, told Deccan Herald. The MPs wondered why the Defence ministry lowered the cool-off period for service officers from two years previously to one year, which is in vogue at the moment. The Army Chief claimed recently that a retired Lt Gen offered him a bribe of Rs 14 crore to clear a tranche of sub-standard vehicles.

Besides the defence secretary, the House panel also heard Vice-Chief of the Army Lt Gen S K Singh and officials from the Indian Air Force, Defence Research and Development Organisation and Bharat Earth Movers Ltd, to understand the status of preparedness of the armed forces as the committee was discussing the budgetary proposals for defence. Last month the Centre increased the military budget by 17.63 per cent aiming to improve border infrastructure, purchase new equipment and raise new forces. The rise is possibly the highest since Kargil conflicts.

Munition shortage

Deposing before the panel, the Army vice-chief said the force was facing a shortage of certain anti-tank munitions - an issue flagged by the Army chief in his letter. Though there were reports that tank ammunition might be exhausted in 20 days due to poor reserve rather than the buffer period of 40 days, there was no official confirmation on the extent of shortage.

Following the vice-chief's deposition, the committee decided to call all three service chiefs for an ‘interaction’ which may lead to a separate report on defence preparedness, a member said.

This is an extraordinary step as in the recent past, the three service chiefs have appeared before a House panel only once. In January, 2011, the Army and IAF chiefs and the Navy vice-chief appeared before the Public Accounts Committee when it was examining a CAG report on ration supply to soldiers. BEML chief V R S Natarajan informed the panel that the company dealt with the original manufacturer of Tatra trucks and not an agent. All standard processes were followed.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 21,2020

Nagpur, Feb 21: Former Maharashtra chief minister and senior BJP leader Devendra Fadnavis on Friday condemned AIMIM leader Waris Pathan's reported remarks that 15 crore Muslims are more than a match for the country's 100 crore Hindus, and asked the latter not to mistake the majority community's tolerance for weakness.

Pathan has been widely condemned for reportedly stating that "15 crore hain lekin 100 crore pe bhari hain".

He purportedly made these comments while addressing an anti-Citizenship (Amendment) Act rally in Kalaburagi in north Karnataka on February 16. The AIMIM leader has claimed he was quoted out of context.

Speaking to reporters in Nagpur, Fadnavis demanded an apology from Pathan and asked the Uddhav Thackeray government to take action.

"We condemn the statement made by Waris Pathan and demand an apology. In case he does not apologise, the state government must take action against him," he said.

Fadnavis said Pathan should understand that minorities were safe and enjoyed full freedom in India because 100 crore Hindus live in the country.

He said no one would dare utter such a statement in a Muslim-majority nation, adding that the "Hindu community is tolerant but its tolerance should not be mistaken for weakness".

"Pathan should apologise to the nation and the Hindu community," he said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
July 6,2020

New Delhi, Jul 6: The Indian Academy of Sciences, a Bengaluru-based body of scientists, has said the Indian Council for Medical Research's (ICMR) target to launch a coronavirus vaccine by August 15 is "unfeasible" and "unrealistic".

The IASc said while there is an unquestioned urgent need, vaccine development for use in humans requires scientifically executed clinical trials in a phased manner.

While administrative approvals can be expedited, the "scientific processes of experimentation and data collection have a natural time span that cannot be hastened without compromising standards of scientific rigour", the IASc said in a statement.

In its statement, the IASc referred to the ICMR's letter which states that "it is envisaged to launch the vaccine for public health use latest by 15th August 2020 after completion of all clinical trials".

The ICMR and Bharat Biotech India Limited, a private pharmaceutical company, are jointly developing the vaccine against the novel coronavirus -- SARS-CoV-2.

The IASc welcomes the exciting development of a candidate vaccine and wishes that the vaccine is quickly made available for public use, the statement said.

"However, as a body of scientists including many who are engaged in vaccine development IASc strongly believes that the announced timeline is unfeasible. This timeline has raised unrealistic hope and expectations in the minds of our citizens," it said.

Aiming to launch an indigenous COVID-19 vaccine by August 15, the ICMR had written to select medical institutions and hospitals to fast-track clinical trial approvals for the vaccine candidate, COVAXIN.

Experts have also cautioned against rushing the process for developing a COVID-19 vaccine and stressed that it is not in accordance with the globally accepted norms to fast-track vaccine development for diseases of pandemic potential.

The IASc said trials for a vaccine involve evaluation of safety (Phase 1 trial), efficacy and side effects at different dose levels (Phase 2 trial), and confirmation of safety and efficacy in thousands of healthy people (Phase 3 trial) before its release for public use.

Clinical trials for a candidate vaccine require participation of healthy human volunteers. Therefore, many ethical and regulatory approvals need to be obtained prior to the initiation of the trials, it added.

The IASc said the immune responses usually take several weeks to develop and relevant data should not be collected earlier.

"Moreover, data collected in one phase must be adequately analysed before the next phase can be initiated. If the data of any phase are unacceptable then the clinical trial is required to be immediately aborted," it said.

For example, if the data collected from Phase 1 of the clinical trial show that the vaccine is not adequately safe, then Phase 2 cannot be initiated and the candidate vaccine must be discarded.

For these reasons, the Indian Academy of Sciences believes that the announced timeline is "unreasonable and without precedent", the statement said.

"The Academy strongly believes that any hasty solution that may compromise rigorous scientific processes and standards will likely have long-term adverse impacts of unforeseen magnitude on citizens of India," it said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 23,2020

New Delhi, Jun 23: The Delhi High Court Tuesday granted bail to Jamia student Safoora Zargar, who is pregnant and was arrested under anti-terror law UAPA in a case related to communal violence in northeast Delhi during protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act, as Solicitor General Tushar Mehta did not oppose it on humanitarian grounds.

At the outset of the hearing, Mehta, representing Delhi Police, submitted that Zargar can be released on regular bail on humanitarian grounds and the decision has not been taken on merits of the case and should not be made a precedent.

Justice Rajiv Shakdher, who conducted the hearing through video conferencing, released Zargar, who is 23-week pregnant, on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs 10,000 and surety of like amount.

The court said she shall not indulge in any activity for which she has been charged with and shall not hamper the investigation or influence the witnesses.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.