Tug-of-war for 'Byari' glory: Sara Aboobaker hits out at producer

[email protected] (CD Network)
March 9, 2012
Mangalore, March 9: The controversy surrounding the authorship of the story of 'Byari' has surfaced again with noted Kannada writer Sara Aboobaker reiterating her claim that the National Award winning movie was based on her first book Chandragiri Thiradalli released in mid-80s.

The first-ever Beary film with the same title, shared the Best Feature Film award along with Marathi film Deol when the names were announced on Wednesday in New Delhi.

The film, produced by Mangalore-based producer Altaf Hussain Chokkabettu, was released in June last year with the director himself playing the lead male character.sara

Sara, who had raised her objections during and before the release of the movie, once again reiterated her stand that the movie was based on her successful novel, which narrated the plight of a young Muslim woman who 's life was shattered by the misuse of provisions of Talaq in Islam.

“Altaf Hussain Chokkabettu, the producer of the movie had asked her for the rights of the book. “I had already signed a agreement until 2015 with the National Film Development Corporation that I would not give the story to any visual media,” she told coastaldigest.com

Despite her telling the producer of Byari that he could not use the story, in Kerala, he had declared that his film was based on her book. “He even put up posters in Mangalore saying that the story was mine,” she said. “But when I raised objections he backtracked and, claimed that the story was written by Irfan Chokabettu”.

Sara, has in fact, approached court seeking justice, but had to withdraw since she was 'disillusioned' with the legal system of the country.

“Today lawyers don't take up cases on the basis of who's right or who's wrong. They want to ascertain how influential or financially sound the other party is before taking up one's case. Even otherwise, the judicial process is riddled with inordinate delays. At 75, I was not prepared for the long haul,” says Sara.

“I still have the clippings of his (Altaf) statements published in Malayalam newspapers. I also have a poster of the movie which has my name on it. I had produced them before the court. The court had asked the defendant to produce the book supposedly written by Irfan Chokkabettu,” she said, but insisted she had withdrawn the case since she was not sure of getting justice.

When asked about the marked difference in the climax of her novel and that of the movie, she said: “When you adopt a book to the visual media, you make certain changes. It has happened with all the great works of Kannada literature. It cannot be a mere coincidence that the names of characters of the movie and that of my book are same.”

Sara is also unhappy that fellow-writers did not come out in the open to support her fight against what she called an act of blatant plagiarism. “Of course I am pained by the marked silence of my fellow writers. They should have come out in the open to fight against the injustice. Even in the Karnataka Film Chamber, except Jayamala, no one took up my cause. If this had happened in United States or some other country, people would have reacted strongly,” she says.

When asked how she felt about a debut Beary film getting a top national award, she said: “Awards are not a big thing. The movie was about one of the worst practices in our religion. The portrayal of the evil practice will definitely fetch awards. I won the award for the best story for the same novel when it was made a film in Tamil. So it was quiet expected. And you know how the awards are decided these days. Lot of lobbying and behind-the-scene maneuvering goes into it.”

Reacting to a question if she was feeling betrayed that she had been denied the credit, Mrs. Sara said: “No, not at all. I have already secured awards and accolades for my work. My books have been made the textbook in some universities. I have been bestowed honorary doctorate by three universities in Karnataka. I am saddened by the way he (Altaf) cheated me and went on to claim that he did not even know me.”

altaf

On the other hand producer Altaf Hussain refuted her claim and said the film was based on Quran and not on anyone's book.

“Just because the names of the characters are same, she cannot claim that the movie is based on her book. The movie has been created based on a real-life event. Our movie does not violate the tenets of Islam, while her book questions the Islamic customs,” he argues.

Altaf reiterated that he did not know Sara Aboobaker until the controversy broke out. “I did not know who this woman was. When I set out on the movie-making mission, I would have naturally spoken to writers in the Beary community. There are eminent writers like Boluvaru, Fakir Mohammed Katpad, Baddur who are well-versed in Beary culture and language. Sara Aboobaker does not belong to beary community. She is a Malayali. Their culture and our culture are different. So, I would not have met her even to get her advice,” he says.

Insisting that he had never spoken to the media in Trissur International Film Festival, nor printed any publicity material with her name on it, Altaf says, “the publicity material submitted by her (Sara) to the court is two years old. But we prepared the first poster only after we got the censor certificate from the concerned authorities. The movie was released in Mangalore on June 9. The only press meet we held in connection with the movie was in Mangalore on June 3.”

When asked if Irfan Chokkabettu's work has been published in the print media, he said: “Irfan is a talented writer. He has got a number of stories with him which are not published anywhere.”

Reacting sharply to Sara's criticism of plagiarism, Altaf said: “It is foolish to say that she withdrew her case because lawyers cheated her. The advancing age is clearily showing in her statements. Now that the film has won national award, she has started to blackmail us once again. But this will not succeed.”




Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 10,2020

Bengaluru, Jan 10: The Special Investigation Team (SIT), probing the murder case of journalist-activist Gauri, arrested absconding suspect Rushikesh Devdikar alias Murali (44) from Dhanbad district in Jharkhand on Thursday evening and is bringing him to the city.

Rushikesh is the 18th suspect arrested in the case, Chief Investigating Officer M N Anucheth said. The investigation has revealed that he was primarily involved in the conspiracy to murder Gauri.

Rushikesh, who was hiding in a house in Katras, Dhanbad, will be produced before the local Judicial Magistrate in Dhanbad on Friday, said Anucheth, adding that the SIT had searched his house for clues. "We will obtain a transit warrant from the court and then bring him to Bengaluru," the officer said.

Originally from Aurangabad in Maharashtra, Rushikesh's family still lives there.

Gauri Lankesh was shot dead near her residence at around 8.20 pm on September 5, 2017, by two bike-borne men.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
January 1,2020

Kanpur, Jan 1: In a seemingly bizarre development, the IIT in Kanpur has set up a panel to decide whether the poem "Hum dekhenge lazim hai ki hum bhi dekhenge", penned by Faiz Ahmad Faiz, is anti-Hindu.

The panel has been set up in response to complaints filed by a faculty member who claimed that the students, during a protest, sang this poem which was anti-Hindu.

The poem reads thus -- "Lazim hai ke hum bhi dekhenge. Jab arz-e-Khuda ke kaabe se. Sab bhut uthwaye jayenge, Hum ahl-e-safa mardood-e-harm. Masnad pe bithaye jayenge. Sab taaj uchale jaenge. Sab takht giraye jayenge. Bas naam rahega Allah ka. Hum dekhenge."

It was the last line that has turned into a bone of contention. Translated into English, it means, 'When thrones will vanish, only Allah's name will remain' -- implying the misleading translation by the professor.

The poem had been written by Faiz in reference to military dictator Zia-ul-Haq in 1979 and was against the military rule in Pakistan. Faiz had left leanings and was an atheist. He was known for his revolutionary writings that kept him in jail for several years.

It may be recalled that the IIT-Kanpur students had taken out a peaceful march on the campus on December 17 in support of the students of Jamia Millia Islamia and during the march, the students sang the Faiz poem.

According to IIT Deputy director Manindra Agarwal: "In the video, the students are seen reciting the Faiz poem which can also be perceived as being anti-Hindu.

The IIT faculty member, in his complaint, has alleged that the students made anti-India and communal statements during their demonstration in solidarity with the Jamia students.

The complaint was based on two lines of the poem, which have obviously been misinterpreted -- "When all idols will be removed, only Allah's name will remain."

The faculty member has stated that "organisers and masterminds must be identified and expelled immediately."

Fifteen other students have also signed the complaint filed by the professor against the protesting students.

Meanwhile, IIT students have said that the faculty member who lodged the complaint has been banned on a social networking site for posting communal content.

In an article published on the IIT-Kanpur student media portal, the students clarified what exactly happened on the day of protest and how their chant was given a 'communal and misleading' turn. They stated that they had recited a few lines of the Faiz poem in reference to the police crackdown on the Jamia students.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
coastaldigest.com news network
May 20,2020

Mangaluru/Udupi, May 20: The twin districts of coastal Karnataka today reported seven new coronavirus cases. Six cases were reported from Udupi district and one from Dakshina Kannada.

All the six new coronavirus patients in Udupi have been admitted to Dr TMA Pai Covid hospital.

With the new case, 22 confirmed cases of coronavirus have been reported so far in the district, including a one death. Three have recovered, and 18 are active.

55th case in Mangaluru

The new coronavirus patient in Dakshina Kannada is a 40-year-old woman from Neermarga near Mangaluru.

With this, the total number of cases in Dakshina Kannada has risen to 55 out of which 33 are currently active.

The woman had travelled from Rajajinagar in Bengaluru along with her son to Mangaluru on May 10.

Sources said that she was residing in two houses at Kudupu and Kuttikala.

She was suffering from Asthma and respiratory problems. She was admitted to Wenlock COVID hospital on May 17.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.