Made-in-India label poses challenge for companies

[email protected] (Namrata Singh, TNN )
March 16, 2013

Made_in_IndiaMumbai, Mar 16: As Indian companies look to expand their footprint globally, and multinationals eye reverse innovations out of India, a certain provenance paradox appears to be posing a new challenge in this journey.

It's to do with the stereotypes consumers develop about products made in their country of origin. Consumers generally associate certain geographies with the product category. For instance, the best wine comes from France or the best chocolate comes from Switzerland. That in short is the provenance paradox.

Why this is becoming a major marketing and branding challenge for the next decade? Multinationals are increasingly looking at India for reverse innovation, while Indian groups are gunning to establish their presence in developed markets. But emerging markets are said to be developing faster than the stereotypes are eroding.

The concern is whether innovations emerging out of a developing market could get restricted to that zone alone. "Multinationals today are allocating resources to emerging markets to spur innovations out of emerging markets. But emerging market innovations for emerging markets is different while innovations from emerging markets to developed markets is a different ballgame," said Rohit Deshpande, a Sebastin S Kresge professor of marketing at Harvard Business School, who authored a paper on the provenance paradox.

Companies from emerging markets have had a hard time in the past establishing their brands in developed markets. "Typically, brands with labels from emerging markets such as India, Brazil, China have not got the kind of acceptability that brands from the developed markets have. The only brands which have perhaps managed to penetrate the developed markets are from markets like Japan and Korea — Sony, Samsung and LG. Usually, brands were created in emerging markets for emerging markets. Indian companies have realized how hard it is to establish a global brand," said Deshpande.

Multinationals, however, do not believe that the provenance paradox could become a major hurdle in their path of reverse innovation. According to Satyaki Ghosh, director, consumer products, L'Oreal India, the brand image is distinctly French and its brands are known for their quality and, hence, its Indian innovations are also seen in the same light.

"As a brand marketer, one's first loyalty is to the brand DNA and then one tries to get it closer to the local consumer. So, local innovation can still be a 360 degree one, with relevant formula for Indian consumers and the communication can be with Indian insight but the affinity of the brand still remains very French," said Ghosh.

Hindustan Unilever, on the other hand, has only recently started exporting Pureit water purifier, which is an Indian innovation, to Mexico and Brazil. How would the made-in-India tag play out for the brand when it enters a developed market such as Germany? "We do not position our brands from the country or origin. That's quite deliberate because we are a multinational. As far as we are concerned, it is about the product and the benefit it delivers," said Keith Weed, chief marketing and communications officer, Unilever.

Indian groups such as the Tatas have acquired global brands, which obviates the provenance paradox challenge altogether. A Tetley tea or a Jaguar Land Rover would be as well accepted by consumers in developed markets as in

developing markets. But acquisitions merely obscure the problem, they do not dissolve the existence of a provenance paradox.

"There is no magic formula or a shortcut to overcome the provenance paradox. It takes time and persistent effort — the Japanese have showed us that it is possible to overcome this issue; the Koreans are now doing the same. Indian companies can follow the example set by brands from these two countries. It is a question of focus — choosing the right segments to compete in and achieving world-class quality/excellence levels in the products/services being offered — sustained effort and time," said S P Shukla, president, group strategy and chief brand officer, Mahindra Group.

The problem relates to not much efforts put in by Indian companies to promote their corporate brands. "Infosys developed the global delivery model which is today being used by a number of other companies. Similarly, there is reverse innovation on learning. Many students are interested in starting their careers in India. The heroic deeds displayed by the Taj staff on 26/11 revealed the unique talent management processes at Taj which recruits people for their attitude and not for their grades. These are some examples that show that Indian companies need to promote their innovations globally so as to shed the image attached to the 'made in India' tag,'' said Deshpande.

The Mahindra Group attempted it when it provided complete IT support for the 2010 FIFA World cup.

Stereotypes regarding the country of origin, said Wilfried Aulbur, managing partner, Roland Berger Strategy Consultants, can be surmounted by having adequate products. Experts believe the challenge for Indian companies is to go by past learnings and flip the coin in their favour.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 12,2020

New Delhi, May 12: With 3,604 more COVID-19 cases reported in the last 24 hours, India's tally of coronavirus cases reached 70,756, said the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare on Tuesday. 87 deaths were reported during the period.

As per the tally, 46,008 patients are active coronavirus cases while 22,454 patients have been cured/discharged and one patient has migrated.

With 87 deaths due to COVID-19 reported in the last 24 hours, the number of deaths has risen to 2,293.

As per the ministry, Maharashtra has the most number of coronavirus cases with 23,401 cases with 4,786 patients being cured/discharged while 868 deaths have been reported in the state.

Gujarat is second on the list with 8,541 cases that include 2,780 patients recovering from the disease and 513 fatalities.

Tamil Nadu's tally reached 8,002 cases, including 2,051 recoveries and 53 deaths.

While Delhi's tally stands at 7,233 cases with 2,129 patients recovered and 73 deaths.

Meanwhile; Mizoram (one case reported--now recovered), Goa (seven cases reported and all seven recovered), Manipur (Two cases reported and both patients recovered) and Arunachal Pradesh (one case reported--now recovered) have reported no new cases in the last 24 hours.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Bloomberg
July 27,2020

New Delhi, Jul 27: India’s coronavirus epidemic is now growing at the fastest in the world, increasing 20% over the last week to more than 14 lakh confirmed cases, according to Bloomberg’s Coronavirus Tracker.

Infections in the South Asian nation of 130 crore people have reached 14.3 lakh, including 32,771 deaths, India’s health ministry said, with daily cases close to a record 50,000 on Monday. India is only trailing the US and Brazil now in the number of confirmed infections, but its growth in new cases is the fastest.

Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka are among the states where the maximum number of daily cares are being reported. The world’s second-most populous country has been ramping up testing, with 515,472 samples taken on Sunday, according to the Indian Council of Medical Research.

Still, India and Brazil have some of the world’s lowest testing rates, with 11.8 tests and 11.93 tests per 1,000 people respectively, compared to the US with 152.98 tests per 1,000 and Russia with 184.34, according to Our World in Data, a project based at the University of Oxford in the UK.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
August 6,2020

New Delhi Aug 6: In a new twist in the Vijay Mallya case, a certain document connected with the case in the Supreme Court has gone missing from the apex court files. 

A bench comprising Justices U.U. Lalit and Ashok Bhushan adjourned the hearing to August 20.

It was hearing the review plea filed by Mallya against a July 14, 2017 judgment wherein he was found guilty of contempt for not paying Rs 9,000 crore dues to banks despite repeated directions, although he had transferred $40 million to his children.

The bench was looking for a reply on an intervention application, which it seemed has gone missing from the case papers.Parties involved in the case sought more time to file fresh copies.

On June 19, the Supreme Court sought explanation from its registry regarding Mallya's appeal against the May 2017 conviction in the contempt case for not repaying Rs 9,000 crore dues to banks not listed for the last 3 years.

A bench comprising Justices Lalit and Bhushan had asked the Registry to furnish all the details including names of the officials who had dealt with the file concerning the Review Petition for last three years.

The bench said according to the record, placed before it, the review petition was not listed before the court for last three years. "Before we deal with the submissions raised in the Review Petition, we direct the Registry to explain why the Review Petition was not listed before the concerned Court for last three years," said the bench.In May 2017, the apex court held him guilty of contempt of court for transferring $40 million to his children, and ordered him to appear on July 10 to argue on the quantum of punishment.

The bench said let the explanation be furnished within two weeks. "The Review Petition shall, thereafter, be considered on merits," it added.In 2017, the apex court passed the order on a contempt petition against Mallya by a consortium of banks led by the SBI. 

The banks claimed Mallya transferred $40 million from Daigeo to his children's accounts, and did not use this money to clear his debt. Banks cited this as violation of judicial orders.

stm88 info live rtp slot

slot auto scatter hitam

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.