In the beginning of January 2020 two very disturbing events were reported from Pakistan. One was the attack on Nankana Sahib, the holy shrine where Sant Guru Nanak was born. While one report said that the place has been desecrated, the other stated that it was a fight between two Muslim groups. Prime Minister of Pakistan Imran Khan condemned the incident and the main accused Imran Chisti was arrested. The matter related to abduction and conversion of a Sikh girl Jagjit Kaur, daughter of Pathi (One who reads Holy Guru Granth Sahib in Gurudwara) of the Gurudwara. In another incident one Sikh youth Ravinder Singh, who was out on shopping for his marriage, was shot dead in Peshawar.
While these condemnable attacks took place on the Sikh minority in Pakistan, BJP was quick enough to jump to state that it is events like this which justify the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). Incidentally CAA is the Act which is discriminatory and relates to citizenship with Religion, which is not as per the norms of Indian constitution. There are constant debates and propaganda that population of Hindus has come down drastically in Pakistan and Bangla Desh. Amit Shah, the Home minister stated that in Pakistan the population of Hindus has come down from 23% at the time of partition to 3.7% at present. And in Bangla Desh it has come down from 22% to present 8%.
While not denying the fact that the religious minorities are getting a rough deal in both these countries, the figures which are presented are totally off the mark. These figures don’t take into consideration the painful migrations, which took place at the time of partition and formation of Bangla Desh later. Pakistan census figures tell a different tale. Their first census was held in 1951. As per this census the overall percentage of Non Muslim in Pakistan (East and West together) was 14.2%, of this in West Pakistan (Now Pakistan) it was 3.44 and in Eat Pakistan it was 23.2. In the census held in Pakistan 1998 it became 3.72%. As far as Bangla Desh is concerned the share of Non Muslims has gone down from 23.2 (1951) to 9.6% in 2011.
The largest minority of Pakistan is Ahmadis, (https://minorityrights.org/country/pakistan/) who are close to 4 Million and are not recognised as Muslims in Pakistan. In Bangla Desh the major migrations of Hindus from Bangla Desh took place in the backdrop of Pakistan army’s atrocities in the then East Pakistan.
As far as UN data on refugees in India it went up by 17% between 2016-2019 and largest numbers were from Tibet and Sri Lanka. (https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/publication…)
The state of minorities is in a way the index of strength of democracy. Most South Asian Countries have not been able to sustain democratic values properly. In Pakistan, the Republic began with Jinnah’s classic speech where secularism was to be central credo of Pakistan. This 11th August speech was in a way what the state policy should be, as per which people of all faiths are free to practice their religion. Soon enough the logic of ‘Two Nation theory” and formation of Pakistan, a separate state for Muslim took over. Army stepped in and dictatorship was to reign there intermittently. Democratic elements were suppressed and the worst came when Zia Ul Haq Islamized the state in collusion with Maulanas. The army was already a strong presence in Pakistan. The popular formulation for Pakistan was that it is ruled by three A’s, Army, America and Allah (Mullah).
Bangla Desh had a different trajectory. Its very formation was a nail in the coffin of ‘two nation theory’; that religion can be the basis of a state. Bangla Desh did begin as a secular republic but communal forces and secular forces kept struggling for their dominance and in 1988 it also became Islamic republic. At another level Myanmar, in the grip of military dictatorship, with democratic elements trying to retain their presence is also seeing a hard battle. Democracy or not, the army and Sanghas (Buddhist Sang has) are strong, in Myanmar as well. The most visible result is persecution of Rohingya Muslims.
Similar phenomenon is dominating in Sri Lanka also where Budhhist Sanghas and army have strong say in the political affairs, irrespective of which Government is ruling. Muslim and Christian minorities are a big victim there, while Tamils (Hindus, Christians etc.) suffered the biggest damage as ethnic and religious minorities. India had the best prospect of democracy, pluralism and secularism flourishing here. The secular constitution, the outcome of India’s freedom struggle, the leadership of Gandhi and Nehru did ensure the rooting of democracy and secularism in a strong way.
India so far had best democratic credentials amongst all the south Asian countries. Despite that though the population of minorities rose mainly due to poverty and illiteracy, their overall marginalisation was order of the day, it went on worsening with the rise of communal forces, with communal forces resorting to identity issues, and indulging in propaganda against minorities.
While other South Asian countries should had followed India to focus more on infrastructure and political culture of liberalism, today India is following the footsteps of Pakistan. The retrograde march of India is most visible in the issues which have dominated the political space during last few years. Issues like Ram Temple, Ghar Wapasi, Love Jihad, Beef-Cow are now finding their peak in CAA.
India’s reversal towards a polity with religion’s identity dominating the political scene was nicely presented by the late Pakistani poetess Fahmida Riaz in her poem, Tum bhi Hum Jaise Nikle (You also turned out to be like us). While trying to resist communal forces has been an arduous task, it is becoming more difficult by the day. This phenomenon has been variously called, Fundamentalism, Communalism or religious nationalism among others. Surely it has nothing to do with the religion as practiced by the great Saint and Sufi traditions of India; it resorts mainly to political mobilization by using religion as a tool.
Comments
Thanks for the good writeup. It if truth be told used to be a entertainment account
it. Look complicated to far brought agreeable from you!
However, how can we be in contact?
Here is my web site - the best vitamin c serum: http://www.alwaysflowers.net/?option=com_k2&view=itemlist&task=user&id=…
I have read some excellent stuff here. Certainly price bookmarking for revisiting.
I surprise how a lot effort you put to create any such wonderful
informative website.
my blog best vitamin c serums: http://tianheqiqiu.com/comment/html/index.php?page=1&id=68442
It's fantastic that you are getting thoughts from this piece of writing as well as from our argument made at this
time.
Look into my web page vitamin c serum reviews (www.mep.aw: http://www.mep.aw/?option=com_k2&view=itemlist&task=user&id=885541)
Shobakka, how is Yeddi why you got married same person twice did you divorced after first marriage,
Uruda Madmaye,
Gattida Thammana avodu
Shimoga ties with Udupi. Vow. Why hiding the good news from the couple.
HAPPY MARRIED LIFE....
Dears,
don't think, if both are single, why not. But why in secret. Who can stop them.
Any way he is now son in law of D. Kannada.
So we have to arrange him a Thammana, chammana,
Government should not waste money by providing Z plus security to Mr. Padmanabah.. there is no benefit for common man even if yeddy get marry or not ? Its their personal life. Wishing good luck for yeddy and shoba.. happy married life..
Wishing you both Happiest Married Life.
Next Karnataka Cabinet, Lungi and Chaddi leading Karnataka Govt
Marriage is not a crime in our Hindustani tradition we have a perfect way of getting marriage system, That's in life one Time only what here Yeddi and Lunggi did Twice could you please clarify Master Viren ???
It is an open secret. I think few people still need confirmation.
Yeddy killed his wife to get marrried with shobha. Yeddy has the support from Swamis, because after getting married he supplies women to swamis.
Yeddy used to find with Nithyananda. If there was no women then they used to fulfill their desires. This is going on in Indian politics.
@Viren Kotian & Nihal
Marrying secretly is not a crime in India. but here suspicion arises over the death of former CM's wife!
After all why cant they stop drama ?
Anyway, happy married life.
Well said Mr Vieren Kotian. Let's take it positively.
Is marrying a crime in India? Well done Yeddy and Shobhakka. You have set an example of simple marriage. Let others follow this couple. Congrats :)
Add new comment