Drama galore in India's doubles tennis teams

August 5, 2016

Ravi Ubha, Aug 5: India loves Bollywood, and its Olympic tennis team has inadvertently provided a sequel suitable for the country’s renowned film industry.

olyAs at the London Games four years ago, personality clashes and animosity are threatening to overshadow Indian players’ reputation for strong doubles play.

Since the 2012 Games, Sania Mirza has risen to No. 1 in the women’s doubles rankings, and Leander Paes, who at 43 is headed to a record seventh Olympics, has collected five more Grand Slam titles in doubles or mixed doubles to raise his career total to 18.

But instead of celebrating Paes’ longevity and the team’s medal chances, Indian players have been rehashing public feuds.

“It doesn’t look good, but it happens in various other countries,” said Bharat Oza, the secretary-general of India’s national tennis governing body, the All India Tennis Association. Oza, however, was not immediately able to give examples.

Four years ago, the tennis association’s preference was for Mahesh Bhupathi to partner in London with Paes, recreating the so-called Indian Express team that won three Grand Slams and in 1999 became the first men’s pair in the Open era to reach all four Grand Slam finals in one season. But Bhupathi, whose doubles partner at the time was Rohan Bopanna, refused to play with Paes.

Bhupathi, who used stinging language like “we don’t speak and have no camaraderie” and said Paes “privately and publicly stabbed me in the back,” could not be convinced.

Disappointing show

Ultimately, Bhupathi and Bopanna formed one team, with Paes forced to play with the unheralded Vishnu Vardhan.

Paes, though, was chosen to play mixed doubles alongside Mirza, even though she had won two mixed doubles Grand Slam titles with Bhupathi, including one at the French Open just weeks earlier.

Mirza, feeling like a pawn, released a lengthy, no-holds-barred statement denouncing the decision.

“As an Indian woman belonging to the 21st century, what I find disillusioning is the humiliating manner in which I was put up as a bait to try and pacify one of the disgruntled stalwarts of Indian tennis,” she said.

None of India’s four doubles teams won more than one Olympic match on the grass of the All England Club.

Any thoughts of a seamless process this year fizzled when Bopanna told the Indian association that he wanted to play in Rio de Janeiro with Saketh Myneni, who has yet to appear in the top 100 in singles or doubles but has regularly played with Bopanna in the Davis Cup.

As a top-10 doubles player at the ranking cutoff for the Olympics in June, Bopanna earned an automatic spot in the Rio tournament and could line up with any country-

man he chose, but his governing body had to approve.

“I have much admiration for Leander Paes and his many achievements, but unfortunately we have not been able to put together a good combination despite our best efforts, and I do not believe our styles of play are either compatible or complementary,” Bopanna said in a statement.

“Considering that this is a team event where two individuals need to jell together

to do well, regardless of individual achievements, it is the team and the combination that matters.”

The Indian tennis association, to no one’s surprise, turned down Bopanna’s request, and he was named Paes’ partner. This time, though, there was no fight.

“The moment we declared this is what the combinations are, immediately, within five minutes, Rohan sent me an email saying that I agree to play because he knew if he refuses, then he knows we don’t send a team,” Oza said.

If Bopanna had prevented Paes from making a record-extending seventh appearance in the Olympic tennis event and deprived the country of men’s participants, he would have been cast as a villain by many in India.

“The best bet would be to field Leander and Rohan, so that’s why we told Rohan,

‘We appreciate what you say, but ultimately we have to think about the country and the medal prospect,’” Oza said. “Naturally Leander is an iconic figure in the Davis Cup and world tennis.”

Measured moves

Mirza avoided being placed in an awkward position again. A team of Bopanna and Mirza was the only one that had a rankings combination that guaranteed India a spot in the 16-team mixed doubles draw.

At Wimbledon, Mirza said she did not “have a take” on the latest turbulent chapter in Indian tennis. “I’m there to represent my country, and I’m looking forward to it,” she added.

Bopanna, in an email, said: “What’s done in the past, there is nothing to dwell on that. It’s time where you look into the future and move on.” Paes did not respond to questions emailed to him.

For Mirza, chemistry in doubles is pivotal. “I think it’s good if you get along on and off the court, but history has said people who don’t get along well on the court can still win,” she said. “It just depends person to person. For me, it’s important.”

Paes and Bopanna won together in a lower-tier Davis Cup series against South Korea in July. Paes would not normally have played in such an event, but he was urged to participate by the Indian tennis association, Oza said.

“Leander has said he would only play at the World Group level, not below that, but we told him that because the government, the public, population of India and people abroad are looking at what you people are doing, you at least better make an appearance saying that we can play good doubles, so that at least will satisfy some of the murmurs that are going around,” Oza said.

“We called him because it was an important tie, and it was before Rio, so at least you can have some exercise together, playing in match conditions.”

Bopanna said, “We had a few strong practice sessions prior to the start of the tie.”

Paes’s lone Olympic medal came not in doubles but in singles, in Atlanta in 1996, when he took home the bronze. If he and Bopanna stand side by side on the podium in Brazil, this Bollywood-style drama would come to a pleasing conclusion for Indian tennis fans.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 4,2020

Feb 4: India captain Virat Kohli on Tuesday said the death of NBA legend Kobe Bryant in a helicopter crash has impacted his outlook towards life, which he feels, is sometimes taken for granted in pursuit of control over the future.

Bryant, a two-time Olympic gold-medallist and one of the most decorated basketball players of all time, died in a helicopter crash last month along with his 13-year-old daughter Gianna, who was also a budding hoopster.

"Firstly, it was a shock to everyone. I grew up watching those NBA games in the morning and watching what he did on court. But when someone that you have looked up to in some ways, passes away like that, it does put things in perspective," Kohli said on the eve of the first ODI against New Zealand here.

"...at the end of the day, life can be so fickle. It's so unpredictable. I think a lot of the times we get too caught up in the pressures of what we have to do tomorrow...we really forget living life and enjoying life and just appreciating and being grateful for the life we have," he added.

Kohli said a tragedy like this makes one realise that nothing can be more important than enjoying every moment of existence.

"...it did put things in perspective for me massively. It just makes you feel like not wanting to have control of things in front of you all the time, and just embracing life and appreciating it.

"You start looking at things from a different point of view suddenly and you want to enjoy every moment you're going through. You realise that what you're doing at the end of the day is not the most important thing. The most important thing is life itself," Kohli signed off.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 12,2020

New Delhi, May 12: Chennai Super Kings have rejected the idea of an IPL with only Indian players in the near future, differing with Rajasthan Royals, the franchise which is keen on the option given the circumstances caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

The IPL, which is indefinitely postponed, can be held in the September-October window if the scheduled T20 World Cup in Australia doesn't take place.

"CSK is not keen to do an IPL with only Indian players. That way it would be playing another Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy (domestic T20 competition). The franchise has not been in touch with the BCCI of late as the situation is worsening," a CSK source said on conditions of anonymity.

"Let's hope we can have the IPL later this year," he added.

CSK are three-time IPL champions, making them the second most successful team in the event's history after Mumbai Indians, who have won the tournament four times.

The BCCI is also very keen to stage the IPL and if it doesn't happen, the world's richest board would be in financial trouble like Cricket Australia.

"The board will take a revenue hit of Rs 4000 crore if it doesn't happen. The board will be in a big problem," BCCI treasurer Arun Dhumal said earlier this week.

With COVID-19 cases continuing to rise in India, the board and IPL team officials see little point in discussing when the event can be held.

"There has been no discussion with the BCCI ever since it postponed the IPL. There is no point in discussing also as things are unlikely to be okay anytime soon," the CSK source said.

"We expect the BCCI to take the best possible decision when the time comes," he added.

For the IPL to happen with foreign players, travel restrictions, which are currently in place, will have to be eased.

There is an option of conducting the IPL outside India and Sri Lanka Cricket has even offered to host the biggest T20 league in the world.

M S Dhoni was expected to make a much-awaited comeback with the IPL but that too has been postponed indefinitely.

Teammates like Suresh Raina and Piyush Chawla have already spoken about how eager Dhoni was to return.

According to them, Dhoni had the determination of a youngster before the league was suspended due to the lockdown imposed to contain the pandemic.

"Dhoni is his own man but I see him playing the IPL for at least two three years. When it comes to playing for India, only he knows best," the source added.

Last month, Rajasthan Royals executive chairman Ranjit Barthakur had said the franchise was open to a shortened IPL with only Indian players.

"Earlier we could not think of an Indians-only IPL but now there is enough quality to choose from. It is better to have an Indians-only IPL than not have it at all," he had told news agency.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
July 12,2020

New Delhi, Jul 12: Former India batsman Sachin Tendulkar has urged the International Cricket Council (ICC) to do away with 'umpire's call' whenever a team opts for a review regarding a leg-before wicket (LBW) decision.

The Master Blaster has also said that a batsman should be given out if the ball is hitting the stumps.

Whether more than 50 per cent of the ball is hitting the stumps or not should not be matter, he further stated.

"What per cent of the ball hits the stumps doesn't matter, if DRS shows us that the ball is hitting the stumps, it should be given out, regardless of the on-field call," Tendulkar tweeted.

With this tweet, the former India batsman also shared a video, in which he has a discussion with Brian Lara regarding the working of DRS.
"One thing I don't agree with, with the ICC, is the DRS they have been using for quite some time. It is the LBW decision where more than 50 per cent of the ball must be hitting the stumps for the on-field decision to be overturned," Tendulkar said in the video.

"The only reason they (the batsman or the bowler) have gone upstairs is that they are unhappy with the on-field decision, so when the decision goes to the third umpire, let the technology take over, just like in tennis, it's either in or out, there's nothing in between," he added.

This call for doing away with umpire's call has been recommended by many former players.
Whenever a verdict pops up as 'umpire's call, the decision of the on-field umpire is not changed, but the teams do not lose their review as well.

ICC recently introduced some changes to the game of cricket, and they gave all teams liberty of extra review as non-neutral umpires will be employed in Test matches due to the coronavirus pandemic.

As a result, all teams will now have three reviews in every innings of a Test match. 

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.