Post-RTI, buzz now is privacy law

October 19, 2012
RTI_Law

New Delhi, October 19: An expert group has suggested a law to protect privacy of citizens, recommending that both government and private sector organisations should be covered by the proposed legislation, being drafted by the Department of Personnel and Training.

Suggesting a “conceptual framework” for the proposed legislation to the Planning Commission on Thursday, the group recommended that right to privacy should be extended to individuals, except in cases of national security, public order and prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of criminal offences.

Disclosure of information shold be made only when it is in public interest. Protection of an individual or rights and freedom of others may also be considered an exception to the application of the proposed right to privacy law, the group headed by former Chief Justice of Delhi High Court A P Shah said.

The ambit of the privacy legislation should extend to data being processed in India, and data that originated in India, even when it is transferred internationally. The violation of the proposed law should constitute an offence and penalty be imposed on the violator, it recommended but did not quantify the amount of penalty.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had recently called for maintaining a “fine balance” between the Right to Information (RTI) Act and the Right to Privacy.

He also said the citizens’ right to know should definitely be circumscribed if disclosure of information encroached upon someone’s personal privacy.

This came in the wake of RTI activist Arvind Kejriwal’s accusations against the dealings of the company owned by Robert Vadra with housing major DLF and Union Ministers including P Chidambaram terming the dealings as “an issue between two private individuals.”

While releasing the report, Justice Shah noted that protection of the right to privacy guaranteed under the Constitution was a major concern with the initiation of programmes like Unique Identification number, NATGRID and DNA profiling, most of which will be implemented through the communication and information technology in the country.

To ensure protection of right to privacy of individuals, the panel outlined nine “national privacy principals” for collection, processing, storage, access retention, destruction and maintaining anonymity of the information collected about an individual.

Under these principals, a data (information) controller will be required to give simple information to all individuals in clear and concise words before collection of any personal information about them. The individuals will also be given choice with regard to providing personal information.

So far telephones were tapped by an executive order. The panel has recommended that under emergency situation, telephone of an individual could be tapped by an executive order just for first 15 days.

The authorities will have to seek a court order for continuing further tapping of telephone of an individual, Justice Shah said.

After personal information has been used in accordance with the identified purpose, it should be destroyed. Data retention mandates by the government should be in compliance with the national privacy principals, the report said.

Justice Shah, however, clarified that recommendations his committee for formulation of the proposed legislation would not come in conflict with the Right to Information Act, saying, “RTI also recognizes right to privacy.” The privacy Act should not circumscribe the Right to Information Act.

Additionally, RTI recipients should not be considered a data controller, the panel categorically said in its report.


Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 19,2020

New Delhi, Apr 19: With 1,334 fresh cases of coronavirus reported in the last 24 hours, the total number of confirmed cases of COVID-19 in India has reached 15,712 including 507 deaths, said Lav Aggarwal, Joint Secretary, Health and Family Welfare, here on Sunday.

As many as 2,231 people have recovered from the disease so far, said Aggarwal during the daily media briefing on the coronavirus. "This equals 14.1 per cent of the total cases," he added.

"A total of 15,712 confirmed cases have been reported in India including 507 deaths and 2,231 people, who were COVID-19 positive, have recovered. Out of the total deaths, 27 deaths have been reported in the last 24 hours," said Aggarwal.

The Joint Secretary said that no new case was reported in Mahe in Puducherry and Karnataka's Kodagu in the last 28 days.

"A total of 54 other districts beside these two in 23 States/Union Territories did not report any cases in the last 14 days," he said.

He informed that there are 755 dedicated COVID-19 hospitals and 1,389 dedicated health care centres in the country, which takes the total dedicated facilities where severe or critical patients can be treated to 2,144.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
June 20,2020

New Delhi, Jun 20: With the highest single-day increase of 14,516 COVID-19 cases reported in the last 24 hours, India's coronavirus count stood at 3,95,048 on Saturday.

The death toll has gone up to 12,948 in the country with 375 persons succumbing to the infection.

According to the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, the total number of cases includes 1,68,269 active cases, 2,13,831 cured/discharged/migrated and 12,948 deaths.

Maharashtra with 1,24,331 cases continues to be the worst-affected state in the country with 55,665 active cases while 62,773 patients have been cured and discharged in the state so far. The death toll due to COVID-19 stands at 5,893 in the state.

The number of confirmed cases in Tamil Nadu also crossed the 50 thousand mark on Saturday and reached 54,449.

The national capital is the third-worst affected by the infection in the country with the count reaching 53,116 today.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 17,2020

New Delhi, Jan 17: Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia does not have any car on his name, according to information shared in the poll affidavit filed by him for Delhi elections.

In the affidavit, it is also shown that while his self-acquired immovable property remained roughly the same as in 2015. His wife's self-acquired immovable property is worth roughly about Rs 65 lakh, as per his latest affidavit.

In the papers submitted during the nomination for 2015 Delhi polls, the senior AAP leader had declared that he owned a Maruti Swift car of make 2013.

However, in his 2020 affidavit, he has mentioned "nil" in the column for motor vehicles and other means of transport.

In the affidavit submitted on Thursday, his moveable assets were declared worth Rs 4,74,888 for 2018-19, as against Rs 4,92,624 for 2013-14.

In 2015, Sisodia had informed in his affidavit that he had bought a property in Vasundhara, Ghaziabad, worth Rs 5.07 lakh in April 2001. The approximate current market value of self-acquired property in 2015 was Rs 12 lakh.

In his current affidavit, the AAP leader has mentioned the same property. However, the approximate current market value of self-acquired property in 2020 has increased to Rs 21 lakh.

In his affidavit for the 2015 polls, Sisodia had also said that his wife had purchased a property in March 2008 costing Rs 8.70 lakh. At that time, the approximate value of her self-acquired property was Rs 20 lakh.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.