India’s diplomatic politician and former PM IK Gujral passes away

November 30, 2012

Gujral_InderNew Delhi, November 30: Former Prime Minister Inder Kumar Gujral today passed away after suffering from a infection for which he was hospitalised. He was 93.

 

He may not have ever been a popular leader, often preferring a quiet corner in the rough tumble of Indian politics, but it was Gujral’s diplomacy and ability to keep friends across political borders  that helped him stay afloat in various posts and elevated him to the Prime Minister of the nation.

 

Born on 4 December, 1919 in Jhelum , Pakistan to parents who were part of the freedom struggle, it was hardly a surprise that Gujral took to politics early in life. He had a rich education, and with teachers like the poet Faiz among his teachers, Gujral was inculcated with a love for Urdu language and poetry that lasted his lifetime.

 

Not surprisingly he took to student politics, and initially was a member of the communist party. Gujral also was president of the Lahore Students Union, and like his parents, went to jail during the freedom struggle when he backed the Quit India movement.

Like many families his also moved to Delhi during Partition. After a stint in the New Delhi Municipal Corporation as Vice Chairman, he caught the eye of Indira Gandhi and became a minister of state and held various portfolios between 1967 and 1976. He held positions like Communications and Parliamentary Affairs, Information and Broadcasting, Housing and Planning.

 

During the Emergency, the usually diplomatic Gujral had a run in with Sanjay Gandhi over the coverage of the Emergency by newspapers at the time, a move that cost him his post of the Information and Broadcasting ministry. However, he stayed on in the Congress, not leaving despite the slight.

 

In the 1980s, he chose to leave the Congress for the Janata Dal and in 1989 even won from the Jalandhar parliamentary seat to the Lok Sabha, and became the Minister of External Affairs in VP Singh’s government.

 

During his tenure he was sent to deal with the kidnappers of Rubaiya Sayeed, the daughter of the Union Home Affairs Mufti Mohammed Sayeed , which led to the release of five terror suspects for her safe return. He even had to represent India when Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990 and his meeting with Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein raised a few eyebrows.

 

When the United Front, a coalition of many regional parties including the Janata Dal, won the 1996 elections to come to power, Gujral found himself in familiar territory when he was made by the External Affairs Minister by HD Deve Gowda. However, a fall out between the Congress, which was supporting the government from outside at the time, resulted in Gujral becoming the 12th Prime Minister of India.

 

Not a man to leap into controversies and normally adept at dodging them by not doing anything, Gujral in his year long tenure managed to embroil his government in a few before he had to step down.

 

Janata Dal president and then Bihar Chief Minister Lalu Prasad Yadav faced allegations of siphoning off crores in the Fodder scam. Gujral and his government did nothing barring transfer the CBI director who had discovered the scam.

 

When MLAs in the Uttar Pradesh chose to throw mikes during a no-confidence vote against the BJP government in October 1997, Gujral’s government recommended President’s rule in the state, a recommendation that was instantly returned by the then president KR Narayanan and struck down by the state’s high court.

 

Gujral’s forte remained foreign affairs throughout his tenure and he even came up with the ‘Gujral Doctrine‘ on how India should deal with her neighbours,that reaped dividends for India.

 

And then in 1997 the axe fell when the United Front government refused to kick out the DMK from the alliance after the Jain Commission, which probed the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, found that the party had backed the now destroyed Sri Lankan insurgency group LTTE that had killed him. The Congress demanded the report be tabled and the DMK be shown the door, Gujral and the United Front refused and the rug was pulled out from under them by Congress president Sitaram Kesri.

 

After his tenure as Prime Minister, Gujral remained in politics but stayed on the sidelines, occasionally criticising the BJP government and opposing President’s rule in Bihar. He was even offered a Congress ticket by the party, but he preferred to stay on in the Janata Dal, choosing the propriety of not switching parties given he had served as a prime minister in the past.

 

However, he never stopped backing better relations between India and Pakistan . He backed it while he was Prime Minister and even when the BJP, who he never cared much for, made overtures to improve relations. An eloquent speaker and a man of words, Gujral recited poems to Pakistani diplomats he ran into and writing couplets in his spare time.

 

He gradually faded away from public life, preferring to be involved in other causes and shunning the public eye.

 


Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 15,2020

Thiruvananthapuram: Kerala activist Rehana Fathima has been asked to take compulsory retirement from BSNL after she was embroiled in Sabarimala row.

Stating that her attempt to enter the shrine of celibate god in 2018 had spoiled the reputation of the company among customers, the BSNL, in its order asked her to take compulsory retirement, further claiming that her acts were “subversive of discipline and amount to misconduct”.

She was suspended from service following her arrest in November 2018 over Facebook posts.

Fathima, who is a technician with the state-run communications company, said she will explore legal remedies against the order sent by her employer.

The Fathima hit headlines when she attempted to enter the Sabarimala shrine, which has traditionally been closed to women in the age group of 10-50 years.

She did after the Supreme Court order allowing entry of women in the age group of 10-50.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
June 4,2020

New Delhi, Jun 4: CSIR Director-General Shekhar Mande said on Thursday that the World Health Organisation's (WHO) decision to halt hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) drug trial was taken in haste and the global body should have actually analysed the data before making the decision.

"I firmly believe that WHO decision was taken in haste it was a kind of knee jerk reaction they should have actually analyse the data on their own before temporarily suspend the trials that is my personal opinion," Mande said.

India's nodal government agency ICMR (Indian Council of Medical Research) overseeing the country's response to the coronavirus pandemic last month wrote to the WHO citing differences in dosage standards between Indian and international trials that could explain the efficacy issues of HCQ in treating COVID-19 patients.

In addition, Dr Sheela Godbole, National Coordinator of the WHO-India Solidarity Trial and Head of the Division of Epidemiology, ICMR-National AIDS Research Institute also wrote a letter via an email to Dr Soumya Swaminathan, Chief Scientist at World Health Organisation.

In a letter, Dr Godbole stated: "There was no reason to suspend the trial for safety concern," attributing it to the current RECOVERY data which differs significantly from the non-randomised assessment by Mehra et al, a scientific paper.

Referring to the letter, the CSIR head said, "We don't know what actually happened behind the scenes but the hypothesis is that because of the paper published in Lancet. It is a very well known journal and if Lancet has done due vigilance in publishing the paper. 

Therefore, the WHO thought the paper's findings are right that's why WHO hold based on what is published on Lancet. The WHO shouldn't have accepted it immediately this should have taken their own due vigilance to find out that study is right or not."

DG CSIR said because there is a global outcry it must have put pressure on both Lancet as well as WHO and both of them now retracted from their original position. "WHO has started a trial again and Lancet has put an expression of concern on their website both of these are very welcome development for science," he said.

"So I am pretty sure that Lancet would have published the reports only after seeing somewhere the drug failed to work," Mande said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 30,2020

New Delhi, May 30: An Air India flight from Delhi to Moscow on Saturday had to return midway after the airline's ground team found out that one of the pilots had tested positive for novel coronavirus, officials said.

"When the A320 plane, which did not have any passengers as it was heading to Moscow to bring back stranded Indians under Vande Bharat Mission, had reached Uzbekistan's airspace, our team on ground realised that one of the pilots had tested COVID-positive," senior Air India officials said.

"The flight was immediately asked to return. It came back to Delhi at around 12.30 pm on Saturday," the officials said. The crew has been quarantined. Another plane would be sent to Moscow to bring back the stranded Indians, according to the officials.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.