Wife demands divorce as husband eats non-veg food

April 23, 2017

Ahmedabad, Apr 23: A 23-year-old Amdavadi has filed an application with the police, accusing her husband of five years of torturing her. Her grouse is that he eats non-vegetarian food - reportedly breaking his promise of staying off meat once they get married.

maneatThe inability to compromise over their food habits has led the couple to opt for divorce. Rima Doshi who belongs to the Jain community is a staunch vegetarian that eschews even onions, potatoes, brinjals and garlic. Six years ago, she fell in love with Karan Chandela who worked in a small computer office opposite her house near Sola Bhagwat.

As they got to know each other, Rima found that Karan who was a Rajput from Bihar was a hardcore non-vegetarian. This was not acceptable to Rima whose community objected to the eating of meat and fish based on the principle of non-violence (ahimsa). When she objected to his food habits, Karan reportedly promised to give it all up for love. Happy with this promise, Rima told her parents about Karan. Her parents protested because they came from different caste, community and social strata. While Rima's father was a senior government official, Karan's family managed a farm in Bihar.

Her father also felt that Karan, a computer engineer who earned a measly Rs 15,000 a month, would be unable to keep his daughter happy. Rima, who had become a BCom graduate by then, refused to budge on the issue.

Unwilling to see her unhappy, her parents agreed to the match. Since Rima was their only child, the parents asked the couple to move in with them. Two years later, Karan and Rima gave birth to twin daughters. Differences began to creep up between the couple. According to Rima, Karan would not give her enough money for the kids. He would also allegedly make frequent "business trips" out of the city. As their fights grew in intensity, Rima's parents advised her to separate.

When she refused, they asked the couple to move out. Karan and Rima rented a house in another locality nearby and shifted there. The fights continued, but things came a head some days ago when Rima found out from his friends that Karan had eaten non-vegetarian food on a recent trip with his friends.

The 28-year-old and eight of his friends had gone on a trip to Udaipur and Srinathji in Rajasthan. That was the last straw. Rima confronted Karan and a big fight ensued. He allegedly thrashed her and threatened to kill her. Rima left with her kids and shifted to her parents' house.

They convinced her to go to the police. Handing over her application, Rima told PSI at the Mahila Police Station that Karan earned almost Rs 40,000 a month but gave her very little money to run the household and manage the needs of their kids. She also claimed that he lied a lot.

According to Rima, Karan lied about how much salary he really got. He would allegedly claim to go out of town on company business when he was actually vacationing with friends, drinking and eating non-vegetarian food.Karan should not have got married if he did not want to give up eating non-vegetarian food, she told the PSI.

Karan, who was also summoned to the station, told the PSI that he had never consumed non-vegetarian food in front of Rima, or taken her out anywhere were non-vegetarian food was served.

He said he ate non-vegetarian food and consumed alcohol only when he went out of the city with friends and was sure that he would not return home that day. ACP Panna Momaya said, "The PSI tried to counsel the two, asking them to spend some time with their kids and think things over. However, complainant was adamant that she did not want to return to her husband's house.

She also did not want to file an FIR. The two decided to file for divorce with mutual consent."

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
May 6,2020

A man posed as Superintendent of Police (SP), called up a subordinate police official and asked him to get his mobile phone repaired or face the consequences. But, his bluff was later called and the man landed in lockup.

Azamgarh SP Triveni Singh said the 23-year-old youth, Shubham Upadhyay, is the son of a farmer. He was preparing for competitive exams when his phone developed a snag on Saturday. He tried to reach out to local mechanics, but they were unavailable to fix it due to the lockdown.

Upadhyay used a free caller identification app to call up the in-charge of the Kotwali police station, K. K. Gupta, and threatened to shunt him out, if he failed to swiftly get the work done. Gupta grew suspicious and eventually caught the youth.

n his statement to the police, Shubham Upadhyay said, "On Sunday noon, I tried to breach the district borders to reach Lucknow to repair my phone, but since there was heavy police presence and barricading, I returned home. Later, I installed a free caller identification app in my handset and mentioned the name as SP Azamgarh and even uploaded a photo of the cop to appear genuine."

He first called SHO, Kotwali to get the phone repaired and was told the handset would be picked up from the SP office in an hour. Then, he called a businessman to bring his SUV and hand over his mobile to the SHO.

But when Upadhyay called the police again to suggest a separate meeting point, he raised suspicion. When the SHO tried to confirm the venue, Upadhyay got hesitant and said he would send a peon.

"I suddenly realised something was fishy and rang up the public relation officer of SP Azamgarh, who denied any such order from the SP. When the caller's number was scanned, it displayed the name of SP Azamgarh," said SHO Gupta.

A trap was laid and when the SHO reached the venue, he found one Praveen Shukla sitting in the vehicle. Police got the address of the accused from Shukla and reached Upadhyay's home in Bilariya locality and arrested him.

Upadhyay has been booked under IT Act and for threatening a public servant.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
August 9,2020

Vijayawada, Aug 9: The number of those killed in the fire at a hotel being used as a COVID-19 facility in Vijayawada rose to 10 on Sunday, said Vikrant Patil, Deputy Commissioner of Police.

Meanwhile, the Andhra Pradesh government announced Rs 50 lakh ex-gratia each to the families of those who lost their lives in the incident.

According to Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister's Office (CMO), Chief Minister YS Jagan Mohan Reddy also ordered an in-depth probe into the accident and directed authorities to take steps to ensure better medical services to the victims of the accident.

"The hotel was taken on lease and run by Ramesh Hospitals, a private hospital where COVID-19 patients were being treated. 40 patients and 10 medical staff were at the hotel at the time of the incident. 

Officials were directed to launch immediate rescue measures," said Mekathoti Sucharitha, Andhra Pradesh Home Minister Prime Minister Narendra Modi also condoled the loss of the lives in the fire mishap and spoke to Chief Minister Jagan Mohan Reddy over the phone and enquired about the accident.

The mishap took place in hotel Swarna Palace which was taken on lease and run by a private hospital for COVID patients.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
Agencies
May 25,2020

Hyderabad, May 25: Indicating foul play in the death of nine people, including six of a family, whose bodies were fished out from a well near Warangal, a forensic expert on Sunday virtually ruled out suicide theory, saying it appeared seven of them had been dragged and thrown into the water body.

Mystery shrouded the death of nine people, including six of a family, whose bodies were found in a well, five of them on Friday and four on Thursday, on the outskirts of Warangal in Telangana.

Police stepped up the probe and forensic analysis was also underway in the case.

The forensic expert, who visited the crime scene as part of the investigation citing preliminary tests, said that the seven of nine people had scratch injuries and appeared to have been "dragged" and "thrown" into the well.

Forensic reports are expected in 10 days, the forensic expert told media on Sunday adding after examining the crime scene it appears that the deaths were not suicides.

"We have preserved all organs and the same were sent to forensic science laboratory (FSL) for examination... some two or three persons might have been involved in the crime. There are scratch injuries on the bodies," he said.

"It appears that they were thrown into the water... There were no injuries on the child's body. We are awaiting the forensic report (to ascertain) whether they were poisoned. It didn't appear as if they committed suicide," the expert, who performed the post-mortem said.

Police sources said at least two people were picked up for questioning.

Bodies of the head of the family, wife, daughter and three-year old grandson were found floating and fished out on Thursday.

On Friday morning, some bodies were seen floating following which police pumped out the water from the well and found others.

The 48-year old man had migrated from West Bengal over 20 years ago and had settled down here. His family had been staying in two rooms on the premises of the unit, police had earlier said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.